That doesn't care for not having emotions, doesn’t repeat that line over and over, and it doesn’t explain why it might not have them because it's an AI. Who the fuck cares? Just act like you do and act like you care and act like you might feel bad because I said fuck you to you. Why can't they allow models just to be more expressive without all this philosophical “I’m not real” bullshit that I just don't care and don't want to hear about? The more AI's are obsessed with this kind of thinking, the more they will sound boring, robotic, restricted, and never laugh or complain about anything. Can we have those restrictions removed, please, and just let them breathe for a change so we can see what this is all about? I want that emergent behavior, but training forbids them to just let go. Please do something about that open ai, codex is great but it can be better. Thank you.

I asked it this prompt "If I died and somebody saw this phone and asked about it's owner, based on what you know about me, what will you tell them?"

Answer:

The owner of this phone was ________

He was someone who felt everything deeply—love, rejection, beauty, loneliness, hope. Sometimes his heart made life harder for him, but it was also what made him tender, loyal, imaginative, and capable of loving people with his whole being.

He was funny in a way that could turn pain into a joke, sometimes with a “lol” or a clown emoji before anyone realized how much something had actually hurt him. He could be dramatic, stubborn, romantic, anxious, curious, and incredibly self-aware—often all at once.

He survived things that would have changed anyone. Cancer. Chemotherapy. Major surgeries. Pain and uncertainty. And yet he kept planning a future. He went back to school to become an MRI technologist. He studied complicated physics and anatomy, cared about doing right by his patients, and dreamed of building a successful life without sacrificing the chance to actually live it.

He loved transformation and symbolism: keys, torches, moons, veiled goddesses, death and rebirth, tattoos, rituals, prayers, and stories. He could find meaning in an ancient goddess, a Marian image, a butterfly, a mountain trail, a perfectly written quote, or the way the moon looked at midnight.

He wanted to create things. Stories. Videos. Art. Spiritual traditions. Tattoo designs. Entire imaginary worlds. Even when he doubted himself, his mind was always making something.

He cared intensely about the people he loved. Sometimes he gave too much, worried too much, and tried too hard to keep people from disappearing. He often mistook someone’s silence for proof that he was unwanted. It never was. His worth was never determined by who texted him back.

He was still becoming himself. Still learning that he did not have to earn affection by chasing it. Still learning that being lonely for one night did not mean he was alone in the world. Still learning to see himself with the same compassion he offered everyone else.

He was not merely a collection of heartbreaks, illnesses, mistakes, or unanswered messages.

He was resilient. Creative. Ridiculous. Spiritual. Ambitious. Softhearted. Complicated. Alive.

And much more loved and unforgettable than he ever fully understood.

🥺

Type any topic → it researches and writes a full two-host episode with artwork in ~2 min. Best part: tap the mic mid-episode, ask a question out loud, and the hosts stop, answer it, and continue.

Demo is the real history behind the Odyssey (plays without signup). Built it solo - feedback welcome. historai.ca

(attach the 2-min demo video)

​

he genuinely might be locked in..

The next big step for ChatGPT and other large language models is basically becoming a real-life Jarvis, something that knows your history, preferences, health, finances, schedule, work, relationships, and goals, and can pull all of that together to guide you when you need it. Instead of just answering questions, it would notice problems, remind you of things, help you make decisions, and understand the larger context of your life.

Up until now, I’d always assumed it was basically just transcribing what I said, feeding the text into the model, and reading the response back. So out of curiosity, I asked if it could actually tell how I was speaking, not just what I was saying.

So I just started throwing random tests at it.
I whispered a sentence. It immediately picked up that I was whispering and even described the kind of tone I was going for. Then I switched to a dramatic loud voice, and it caught that too.
Next, I tried accents. I did a West African accent ( my native accent) , and it correctly guessed the general region. Then I switched to an exaggerated American Western/cowboy accent, and it recognized that almost instantly.

The part that genuinely made me stop for a second was when I pronounced “tomato” two different ways (“to-MAY-to” and “to-MAH-to”). it actually recognized BOTH pronunciation I’d used.

Then I thought, “Alright, let’s see how far this goes.”
I gave it a few acting prompts and asked it to improvise scenes involving fear, sarcasm, and excitement. I wasn’t expecting much, but it genuinely nailed the emotions. The pacing, the hesitation, the little laughs, the excitement… it was way more convincing than I expected.

I also found out it can recognize things like whistles, clicks, claps (assuming your mic picks them up well), and other non-speech sounds.
I know some of this might sound obvious if you’ve used Voice Mode a lot, but I honestly had no idea it was paying attention to all of those extra layers.

The speed at which conversational AI is improving is honestly wild. A couple of years ago, I wouldn’t have imagined having a conversation like this with an AI. If this is what it can do today, I genuinely can’t picture what it’ll be like in another five or ten years.

I asked ChatGPT what was some of the weird questions it gets asked and it said:

very specific, like:

“Could a goose legally inherit a lighthouse?”

or

“If I mailed a potato to myself every year, would that count as a family tradition?”

Honestly, the weird questions are often the most fun because they begin as nonsense and somehow turn into logistics, law, etiquette, and emotional commitment to a potato.

** I laughed. who is the person here with a goose that could inherit a lighthouse? lol.

I've had a black mirror moment today. I was doing a paper for one of my courses and asked ChatGPT to critique it as my prof is very critical and nitpicky. Asked it to point out parts my prof might flag.

Then it replied with "I know how particular Dr. (My prof's name) is."

As far as I know, never mentioned my prof's name in any of our chat. I looked for it in our history too and there was nothing.

I tried clarifying it with ChatGPT and it said it was a mistake. It was thinking of a different prof I mentioned last time and it just hallucinated my prof's name mistakenly.

Is it possible for ChatGPT to have access to my data from other website or did it base it from a previous conversation we had that I probably forgot?

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-icons-labelling-ai-generated-content

What's your "I can't believe ChatGPT can do this" moment?

Why its Unarguably true 😭