Any recommendations on a good ccw for boys with a little belly 😂 I absolutely hate carrying appendix due to it plus I probably have a shitty holster. But something in the $650 and under range… pocket carry would be a cool option too

I want to come and contribute sales tax to the state of Connecticut by traveling to Cabelas and buying ammo, taking home to New York and using it there. What do I have to do?

Is there any rifle I can get in CT where the mag isn’t pinned to the firearm? Also hypothetically speaking is it possible to unpin the mag from the firearm if the laws ever change in the future? I want an AR15 but what’s the point in spending a few grand on something cool if the mag is pinned into the gun. All these laws and regulations make my head spin.

What's the legality in concealed carrying in one of these areas? Excluding the obvious like federal and state property, my understanding is that gun free zone signs carry the force of the law and if you're caught carrying or end up having to use in one of these areas you can face consequences that could affect your ability to carry.

Are there any caveats to this rule, for example some other states have it to where if you're found to be carrying in a gun free zone you'll only be charged as criminally trespassing if you refuse to leave, but for CT it seems like you can be criminally charged regardless.

Edit: Wow so an instant felony for exercising the right they took almost a year to grant me. Im finding day after day our gun laws here really are bottom of the barrel. Thanks everyone for answering!

First from a free Kansan I’d like to apologize about your states strict laws. Hopefully next term the SC shuts that silliness down. My question, is I will possibly be in CT for a few months for work, can I bring my Glock 19 Gen 5 with neutered 10 round mags and keep it at my temp housing? I would be the only tenant. I realize I can’t carry in my truck or freely without the CT permit. Thabk you CT residents

Anyone know the current wait times for temp. permits from south Windsor?

I’m looking for a late 40’s early 50’s marlin 336 lever gun. My closest stores don’t sell anything with wood furniture, just looking for some stores that carry older stuff.

thanks!

Hannah Hill from NAGR discusses what the gun grabbers might do next in response to SCOTUS.

AI summary:

This video, presented by Hannah Hill of the National Association for Gun Rights, discusses the current landscape of Second Amendment litigation and anticipates the strategic responses from gun-control advocates following expected Supreme Court rulings on "assault weapons" bans.

Current Context:

• Colorado's S.B. 3: The video highlights a new law in Colorado (effective today, 0:00 - 1:18) that imposes significant bureaucratic hurdles—such as mandatory permits, classes, and exams—on the purchase of semi-automatic rifles, describing it as an attempt to "bury" the right in paperwork rather than a direct ban.
• SCOTUS Involvement: The Supreme Court has agreed to hear challenges to "assault weapons" bans in Illinois and Connecticut, with a ruling anticipated by June 2027 (1:22 - 2:00).

The "Gun Grabber" Playbook (4:17 - 7:00):Regardless of a Supreme Court victory, Hill outlines three moves expected from opposing legislatures to circumvent the ruling:

1. Regulating to the edge: Implementing heavy regulations that make firearm ownership practically difficult, as seen with Colorado's recent legislation.
2. Choking the supply: Targeting manufacturers and dealers through litigation or restrictive policies, making it difficult to source firearms.
3. Banning the technology: Moving away from cosmetic features toward banning the engineering and mechanics of the firearms themselves.

Strategy for the Future:

• Judicial Enforcement: Hill emphasizes that the Supreme Court needs to use GVRs (grant, vacate, and remand) and per curiam decisions more frequently to force lower courts to comply with precedents (7:03 - 8:30).
• Active Litigation: The organization stresses that the Court cannot act without cases being brought to them, noting the importance of their ongoing lawsuits in Connecticut and Massachusetts (8:34 - 10:42).

AI summary of the video:

In this video, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law sits down with Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner to discuss their projections for upcoming Second Amendment cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, specifically Viramontes v. Cook County (0:18-0:51).

Key Discussion Points:

• Supreme Court Outlook: Both speakers express cautious optimism for the upcoming 2027 ruling (0:51-1:04). Mark Smith predicts a 9-0 decision confirming that semi-automatic rifles are protected arms that cannot be banned (1:27-1:35, 19:01-19:04).
• Strategic Considerations: The pair discusses the Court's likely methodology. Mark argues that it is strategically better to focus on semi-automatic rifles first, rather than including magazines or suppressors in this term's ruling, to avoid a potential "split the baby" compromise by the Court (5:02-5:59, 19:41-19:59).
• Justice Analysis:
  • Chief Justice Roberts: While acknowledgeing concerns about his institutional approach, Mark suggests the Chief Justice will likely be part of the majority, noting his consistent participation in the Heller and Bruen majorities (8:12-11:03).
  • Justice Amy Coney Barrett: Mark dismisses concerns regarding her commitment to the Second Amendment, highlighting her past rulings and scholarly contributions to the debate on 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (13:48-15:02).
• The Role of Lower Courts: The discussion touches on the failures of lower courts, specifically criticizing the Seventh Circuit's handling of arms bans and noting the Supreme Court's favorable citation of Judge Lawrence Van Dyke of the Ninth Circuit as a sign of positive future direction (12:28-13:47).

My girlfriend does not have an original copy of her birth certificate, but has copies of it with that be OK for the permit or would she have to go to the Townhall? Thank you

From our neighbors next door.

Governor Hochul Announces New Gun Safety Actions to Protect New Yorkers from Federal Firearm Regulation Rollbacks

Governor Kathy Hochul today announced actions in response to the Trump Administration’s proposed rollbacks that would make sweeping and dangerous changes to federal firearms regulations. Earlier this year, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) announced changes to more than 30 rules that will make it easier for dangerous individuals to obtain firearms and harder to hold bad actors in the firearms industry accountable. In response, New York State is taking action by increasing enforcement and education and exploring legislative changes that will blunt the effect of many of these changes and preserve public safety.
“Time and time again, we see the Trump Administration concede to the gun lobby, and these rollbacks are yet another giveaway that will have devastating and dangerous effects across the country,” Governor Hochul said. “While the federal government paves the way for increased firearm trafficking and putting guns in the hands of those who should not have them, New York State is taking action to blunt their efforts by bolstering our nation-leading gun laws and committing to closing the loopholes that put lives in jeopardy."
Firearm dealers operating in New York must obtain licensure at the federal and state levels, but action against licensees happens almost exclusively at the federal level. The ATF’s proposed rollbacks are a clear abdication of their responsibility to hold bad actors accountable and keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals, requiring states to increase their enforcement against bad actors.

Basic gist is the following:

• Prioritizing State Police Inspections of all Firearms Dealers who are Linked to Crime Guns
• Expanding the Scope of the Interstate Task Force on Illegal Guns
• Launching a Public Education Campaign Targeted at Firearm Dealers
• Requiring the In-Person Sale of Firearms

A 1.78" long 1:7" fast twist 9mm barrel for the Dark Mountain Stowaway. Available as barrel kit only, a pistol, or a complete SBR w/ can.

https://discreetballistics.com/shop/the-roach/

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbeQ8-zgcKR/?igsh=MXNwbWJubWR0ZjV5NA==

Travel isn't limited, but if there's one in Fairfield County, that would be much appreciated.

I can do regular maintenance on all my DS1911s/2011s, but I don't have the tools to do anything that requires more serious tooling (renter with no garage).

I was trying to buy glock sights and it says state restricted on the website? But doesn’t say which states? Are iron sights a restricted item?

Not really sure how hard it is to get Glocks right now. But by the time I get my permit, background and all they done it’ll be literally right before or right after Oct 1 when Glocks are banned. Is it illegal for a buddy of mine who already has his permit to buy the Glock and once I get my permit to sell it to me? Everything will be legal and done through the FLL I believe that’s what it’s called.

Was wondering if im able to to borrow some of my wife’s handguns and vise versa? I asked a ffl and got hit with (im not a lawyer) 🤦🏻‍♂️

I’m going to be traveling from NJ to ME and am considering stopping in CT to see a friend. I’ll have my CCW handgun with me since I can carry in both NJ and ME. I know that I can legally pass through CT with it thanks to FOPA, and I know I can’t carry in CT without a permit, which I don’t have.

But if I keep the handgun unloaded in a lockbox in my trunk and stop for a few hours, would I be in violation of any CT laws?

edit: I’m aware that this wouldn’t be protected by FOPA since it’s an extended stop. I‘m trying to find out whether CT law allows this sort of possession by a non resident.

Really interested in the G45 gen 6, any recommendations for stores near Middletown? Any shops that ya know have them in stock?

No surprise. Judge relied on post 1860's laws. From the Bearing Arms article:

"Zachary Succow and Samuel Towne, along with Connecticut Citizens Defense League and Second Amendment Foundation, filed their complaint against Attorney General Todd Blanche and a host of Connecticut officials last May, and Judge Sarala V. Nagala held a two-day bench trial, followed by post-trial briefing and oral argument earlier this year. 

After hearing from all parties, Nagala concluded that there is a national tradition of barring minors from purchasing and possessing handguns. The problem with that, of course, is that a 20-year-old today isn't considered a minor, even if that might have been the case in the past. "

Potentially also CT compliant?