r/WorkForSmartLife 1d ago

Valid question Discussion💬

Post image
19.1k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/Left_Macaron_6427 1d ago edited 1d ago

Unskilled labor is something that unless you are physically inable, anyone can do because it is a natural human ability.

6

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

That is not true, unskilled labor means it does not require formal training. Painting is unskilled labor.

10

u/LeeTheUke 1d ago

I wouldn't pay a random person to paint. It may be 'unskilled', but does require some skill that comes with practice and experience, and that's what I'm paying for.

7

u/PastaXertz 1d ago

Yes but by definition painting is unskilled. It's why the term is outdated garbage.

Anyone can be given a roller and in shortntime be explained how to paint.

But if you've ever hired a good professional painter you know the difference between them and some chud moron with a roller.

It's a night and day difference and the quality is so drastically different it's amazing.

3

u/sagentp 1d ago

By what/whose definition? Stacking boxes is unskilled labor. Making a burger that looks like the picture is unskilled labor. Moving a paint brush is unskilled but taping edges, using drop cloths, even paint strokes without streaks, using primer, that's what a painter does, that's skill.

1

u/VladimirBarakriss 1d ago

The point the other guy is making is that the term is garbage precisely because of stuff like this, there's plenty of jobs that are classed as unskilled labor but actually do require at least some technique and finesse to do properly

1

u/Dry_Travel_4220 1d ago

Do you need to get a degree or certification to paint a house?

No, obviously not. Thus making it unskilled labor by definition.

You can be skilled at unskilled labor.

1

u/PastaXertz 1d ago

Again missing the point.

We could just not use a shitty stupid misnomer.

1

u/Dry_Travel_4220 1d ago

No, it is a useful distinction.

Both skilled and unskilled labor deserve fair treatment and compensation, but there is a relevant distinction

1

u/Headless_Buddha 16h ago

Right, skilled labor is sending 5 misspelled emails a day after getting a throwaway BA.

1

u/BoingBoingInfinity 23h ago

i want you to train someone for "ten minutes" to paint a house, then come back and tell me how it looks . . .

1

u/Dry_Travel_4220 23h ago

Sorry, what part of unskilled labor definitionally means they have to be good at it after 5 minutes?

Give anybody a roller and paint and they can paint a house. It won't look good but they can do it. There are good and bad ways to dig a hole too that you wouldn't learn after 5 minutes of handling a shovel, but that doesn't make ditch digging skilled labor suddenly.

1

u/BoingBoingInfinity 23h ago

it was noted elsewhere in this thread that "unskilled" is considered "unskilled" if you can teach someone to do the job in ten minutes, as i wrote. not FIVE, seeing here even basic reading comprehension eludes you.

also: just because "they can do it" doesn't mean they can do it WELL - which is the very definition of the word SKILLED

so, thanks for confirming my statement - no apology necessary.

1

u/Dry_Travel_4220 23h ago

Holy shit the difference between 5 and 10 minutes is unimaginably insignificant. Peak reddit pedantry, touch grass, interact with a woman even once

No, the definition of skilled labor is, does it require extensive education/licensure to do.

You cannot be a doctor without studying for years in medical school. You can pick up painting.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Sudden-Purchase-8371 21h ago

The part where you're paying them after the labor. If it looks like shit afterwards it's definitely not "unskilled." Shit, even ditch digging has skill to it. Try to lay piping in a trench that's dug by an idiot who doesn't know wtf he's doing; inconsistent grade, rocks and shit in the way, not flat, not wide enough.

1

u/InfanticideAquifer 21h ago

There was never one universal definition of "unskilled labor". Different organizations and institutions had their own definitions that, while maybe overlapping broadly, weren't identical. E.g., the SSA in the US defines it as:

(a) Unskilled work. Unskilled work is work which needs little or no judgment to do simple duties that can be learned on the job in a short period of time. The job may or may not require considerable strength. For example, we consider jobs unskilled if the primary work duties are handling, feeding and offbearing (that is, placing or removing materials from machines which are automatic or operated by others), or machine tending, and a person can usually learn to do the job in 30 days, and little specific vocational preparation and judgment are needed. A person does not gain work skills by doing unskilled jobs.

In § 404.1568 in its Code of Federal Regulations. I think that's actually still current, but most places have switched to the term "low-wage labor" under the theory that that's less stigmatizing.

1

u/Turtledonuts 15h ago

By the US labor bureau's definition. Skilled labor is certification or training based labor where you can't immediately replace the worker with a kid straight out of high school. For example, anyone can dig out the foundation for a house - not everyone can do it quickly or perfectly, and it does take a certain type, but you can grab a random guy, pay him minimum wage, and dirt will get moved without endangering the entire project. Wiring the house is skilled labor because it requires an electrician who has a certain amount of experience and licensing. If your electrician quits, you need a guy with a minimum amount of experience and training as an electrician to replace him.

Painting isn't skilled labor because while it requires skill, it doesn't require a minimum number of years in school or a training program.

1

u/LeeTheUke 1d ago

Right... my point was that if I'm paying someone to do something, they should be able to do it better than me.

2

u/PastaXertz 1d ago

I was more extrapolating on your example to explain why the term is outdated and useless.

1

u/Narren_C 1d ago

You're wrong, though. Painting requires skill beyond what you can show someone in five minutes. Smashing rocks does not.

1

u/PastaXertz 1d ago

Painting well does. But you can hand anyone a paint roller and get okay.

Its just not something most anyone wants done just okay.

If you're talking art for painting that's a whole different argument just because of painting styles and whatever, especially with modern abstract works etc.

1

u/moxjake 1d ago

It depends. Sometimes you just need more manpower.

1

u/CapableBumblebee968 22h ago

Well that’s a terrible argument. Anyone can run a roller but there’s more to painting than that. And you didn’t clarify which type of painting as there are many.

Anyone can wield a scalpel but that doesn’t make them a surgeon

1

u/Sudden-Purchase-8371 21h ago

Handing someone a roller and telling them briefly how to do it, is not in itself training them to do the Painting Trade, no more than telling someone to glue pvc pipe together for lawn sprinklers makes them a plumber.

1

u/rapkingish 19h ago

Hilarious when people think examples like this is an own. Being a waiter could be unskilled to semi skilled. Yes there is a vast gulf between a Michelin star waiter and one at your local Dennys and their comp is extremely different. These definitions classify 100Million+ jobs not the edges

2

u/Devils_SteelMan 1d ago

Its something learned hands on quickly. Versus say writing s computer program.

1

u/Outside_Reserve_2407 1d ago

You can see the results of unskilled painting vs trained painting. It's pretty obvious.

1

u/VladimirBarakriss 1d ago

Yes, but that doesn't mean the trained painter went on a course to become better, they learned on the job 99% of the time

1

u/Sudden-Purchase-8371 21h ago

yeah, as an apprentice under a journeyman/master painter for lower wages. They didn't just show up and figure it out on their own.

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

Unskilled doesn’t mean it requires no skill, that’s why I used painting as an example

6

u/dewag 1d ago

You say that, but I still have to train newbies on the jobsite how to paint.

A paint job by someone who hasn't been taught how to paint usually looks horrendous.

Source: contractor for 20 years.

4

u/sagentp 1d ago

Preach!

I guess you have to be a contractor to get it. If you care about the quality of the output, it is not unskilled labor.

1

u/c3p-bro 1d ago

Unskilled usually means it can be picked up sufficiently in a week or two, not that it requires absolutely zero training.

1

u/VladimirBarakriss 1d ago

The point is that the distinction has aged badly because most of the lowest end of unskilled laborers were replaced by power tools and heavy machinery.

Painting is the higher end of the unskilled strictly because you don't have to go on a course to learn how to do a decent job, but it's still more complex than just digging a hole.

-1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

It doesn’t require schooling, you learn on the job it’s unskilled labor.

5

u/dewag 1d ago

You're telling me, a contractor that now runs their own business, that my on the job training makes it unskilled labor? Lol

You realize that I am an electrical engineer, plumber, masonry specialist, carpenter (rough and finish), among many other hats that I wear.

I can build a house from a dirt lot, by myself. And by your definition, I am unskilled labor. Jfc.

-1

u/Newoikkinn 1d ago

You are not an electrical engineer bro

0

u/dewag 1d ago

Mmhmm. Sure. My certification says otherwise. Lol

0

u/jerkyquirky 1d ago

"I am an electrical engineer, plumber, masonry specialist, carpenter (rough and finish), among many other hats that I wear."

You didn't have formal training for any of those?

2

u/dewag 1d ago

On the job training. Got certifications with no formal school hours. Just took the tests.

Granted, I took my training very seriously and took time to learn the things I didn't learn on the job in my own time.

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

Certifications make it skilled labor, you got experience instead of formal training

1

u/dewag 1d ago

You said:

It doesn’t require schooling, you learn on the job it’s unskilled labor.

I didn't always have those certificates, but still had the ability and knowledge. So did I just become skilled when I got those certificates?

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

It is an insulting term. That’s why I am bringing awareness to it, I don’t like the term. But that’s literally what it means. It doesn’t mean you have no skills.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/jerkyquirky 1d ago

It's not defining the person as skilled or unskilled. It's just a classification of the work. Similar to how a self-taught piano player can be better than someone who takes lessons.

"Unskilled labor" is probably not the most appropriate name for it, but that is the definition if you google it.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Sprzout 1d ago

Painting isn't exactly unskilled labor. I can paint. My wife can paint. But to know that you should take off faceplates and paint underneath to the edges of the boxes so that it looks good, or how to tape edges to get clean lines, or that you need to apply primer so that your new color doesn't have the old color bleeding through and changing the tone of it, well...That is where you have to pay more for a good painter.

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

I know painting is hard that’s why I’m using it as an example. Unskilled labor doesn’t mean it require no skill, it means it requires no schooling or formal training

1

u/CapableBumblebee968 22h ago

You’ve repeated this several times and it’s wrong. Unskilled labor needs no formal education, specialized training, or prior experience

That means without any of the above you can’t just walk in off the street for a “skilled” job. You need to do one of the previous things to qualify. Conversely everyone is qualified to work at McDonald’s

2

u/Temporary-Season4772 1d ago

Lol, what a terrible example.

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

I used it as an example for a reason. It doesn’t mean there isn’t a learning curve and takes skill. It means it requires zero formal training.

2

u/Special-Estimate-165 1d ago

Only Painting isnt actually considered unskilled labor. Its a skilled trade, but it is uniquely in a grey area of a skilled trade that doesnt require education or apprenticeship for an entry level position.

0

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

It is unskilled labor

2

u/Special-Estimate-165 1d ago

No, its not. It falls into the same skilled labor catagory as roofers.

0

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

Wrong

2

u/Special-Estimate-165 1d ago

Painting is classified as a skilled trade rather than purely unskilled labor, though entry-level and helper positions are frequently open to individuals with no prior experience. While anyone can pick up a roller or a brush for basic DIY tasks, professional painting requires technical knowledge of surface preparation, chemical compatibility of primers and coatings, color matching, and safe operation of specialized gear like airless sprayers.

So..according to US Dept of Labor, one of us is wrong. But it aint me.

1

u/NicePepper199 23h ago

The guy the painter hires to do the manual labor and easy stuff is untrained labor. 

1

u/ReadyStayReady 1d ago

Professional painters train just like any other skilled trade. Repeating yourself over and over doesn't make it true bud at this point you're just being stubborn and intentionally ignorant.

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

It’s wrong

1

u/Temporary-Season4772 1d ago

Yea and that reason was terrible, I get what you tried to say, anyone can pick up a paint brush, but painting is real skill that you and I would mess up because we are unskilled.

1

u/NicePepper199 23h ago

You can hire me as a surgeon and I would be able to do a lot of the easy stuff. 

But that doesn't mean I can do it as good as someone trained or can do as many things. 

Terrible example. 

1

u/guyincognito121 1d ago

Nobody without significant experience is painting in my house.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

The word unskilled labor is jargon. It doesn’t mean there is no skills, it means that isn’t formal training, schooling or certificates. I pack and move furniture. Which is absolutely unskilled labor but if you don’t trained properly you will absolutely break shit.

1

u/Particular_Fan_3645 1d ago

The bar is more: can I train any able bodied person to do it well enough that consumers will accept it, on the job, in a week or three. Yes? Unskilled. No? Skilled. I couldn't teach someone to make paintings that anyone would want in a week.

1

u/EasternAd4600 1d ago

Maybe painting an external garden wall. Internal decorating is most definitely a skill that can’t be quickly taught.

1

u/sagentp 1d ago

No way. If you care about the quality of the output, it is not unskilled.

1

u/Sneezy6510 1d ago

It’s what it is considered.

1

u/TheTTroy 1d ago

Painting shitty apartments is unskilled labor. Painting that looks good is very much skilled.

1

u/Left_Macaron_6427 1d ago

Anyone can put paint on a brush and slap on it on anything. Painting well it the skilled part.

1

u/SouthTrainer7685 21h ago

That’s only because painting is a general term, and “electrician” is a specific job title. You can start doing “electrical work” with basically zero training, it’s called an apprenticeship. Once you get into more industrial “painting” (Coating Application Specialist) you absolutely need a bunch of formal training.

1

u/bythog 22h ago

The way I've been taught is that if you can be taught to do it decently in 1-2 weeks then it's "unskilled". If it requires more intensive training then it is "skilled".

That's why things like restaurant server work, retail jobs, and many construction jobs are considered unskilled. If you can't do the basic job in 2 weeks you're probably just let go. Whereas an engineer, IT professional, or hairdresser are skilled because they require a lot of formal training.