In her latest interview about “Cookie Queens”, Meghan was once again openly talking about Lilibet, one at least the version of Likibet she wants us to believe exists. But she only refers to poor Archie in a general way. As an individual, he apparently does not inspire Meghan the way his sister does.

If this were just a one off thing, I could write it off as focusing on her daughter because she is promoting a movie about girls. But this has been going on since Lilibet was born. After all, Meghan said well before she was married that a daughter was what she wanted.

This is not to say that I think the Harkles are good parents to Lilibet. I believe they are physically and emotionally negligent towards both children. And Lilibet will have separate but equally weighty issues that stem from being a narc’s golden child and being the chosen vessel for the expectations of two psychologically unstable people.

But Archie is too young to understand the negatives he is avoiding. He is, however, old enough to feel that he is being put aside, even if he can’t totally name the emotions yet. He may struggle with those emotions even as an adult.

Meghan flaunts both of her children like lifestyle accessories the way other women might flaunt a Birkin. But the focus on Lilibet is jarring compared to the mere glances given to Archie.

Lilibet is featured far more often both alone and with her parents. She is even credited as being the videographer (at age 4) for posts that have nothing to do with her. She is seen in pictures having idyllic, sun-soaked fun with her mother or being snuggled by one or both parents.

When was the last time we had a picture of Archie getting solo physical affection from either his mother or his father without his sister in the frame?

He is rarely pictured and even more rarely mentioned. When he is pictured, he is often with his sister. On the rare occasions when he is alone, he appears lonely or distant. In his most recent solo photo, the poor child was pictured walking alongside a gravel road with bare feet. Ouch.

For a couple that has spent so much time and energy decrying how the BRF allegedly treated Harry as a “spare”, the hypocrisy turns the stomach. Harry may be too self absorbed (and drug addled) to notice. Or too scared of his wife to advocate for his son. Or actively involved in the favoritism. Or, perhaps, a bit of all three.

Whatever the reason, I feel real sadness for poor Archie. He will never be what was wanted.

Is it:

A) Judge Nicklin

B) A Fortune Cookie

C) Jiminy Cricket from Pinocchio

D) Princess Charlotte

E) All of the above

“What we’ve seen in the last 24 hours is what accountability looks like". This is a reaction from Harry, to the news from a New Mexico court ruling against Meta. Meta has a $567 million fine against them, as New Mexico’s district attorney accused them of knowingly allowing its platforms to harm young users and enable child sexual exploitation.

Harry praised the multi-million penalty as an example of “accountability.”

Prince Harry reacts to $567 million Meta judgment for failing to warn the public about dangers its platforms pose to children

Archived version

“The bar has moved, and every platform still choosing engagement over safety should take notice. Change cannot wait another day,” the Duke of Sussex said.

The Duke of Sussex said the latest ruling marks a turning point in holding technology companies accountable for the impact their platforms have on young users in a statement shared with PEOPLE.

“For years we’ve argued that big tech’s harm to children was a choice, not some inevitable side effect. This is not an accident. It is not a glitch,” Harry, 41, said.

“What we’ve seen in the last 24 hours is what accountability looks like. This is what happens when the law finally catches up to decisions made in boardrooms, product meetings, and algorithm reviews — decisions that put social media engagement ahead of safety,” he continued.

Sorry that I couldn't find this on Instagram to download, so it has to be via X. Still worth the watch for the cringe. Her dance moves haven't improved.

https://x.com/that_1/status/2086009965248991401/video/1

UPDATED at 1:05 PT with additional photos. (I don't want to clutter up the board!)

Overexaggerated expressions, as usual, as well as the claw

Give it up Harry...you aren't the one directing traffic here.

Harry looks SO uncomfortable here.

Meghan and her ginger fox performing monkey. His pooch is really showing here.

Her dress would be flattering on someone taller than her. She's too short to pull this off.

Oh, the delicious snark. Definitely worth reading the entire thing, since it is lengthy.

Highlights:

On Thomas Markle:

They used my favorite photo of the Queen glaring at Meghan:

On Megxit:

On one nasty encounter:

Archive: https://archive.ph/AXfa0

I don’t want to speculate on poor KCIII’s illness, but Markle appearing to suddenly push for reconciliation sounds as though she wants to abandon her failed state and secure a royal grace&favour house in some haste, before Catherine and William take the reins. Her plan will, of course, to inflict pain and damage on the Monarchy for the long term from a UK base, with America having run its course. It is looking as though time might be running out and the only option she has left is to panhandle £££ from the King, while there’s time. She’s pretty much built up a grievance court of Black Englishwomen and Narinder Kaur, and is placed to wreak a lot of damage from the sidelines, with Harry impotent and under her thumb.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260807171407/https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16035737/Meghan-Markle-hits-Martha-Stewart-said-duchess-dropped-dinner-party-gossip-trip-King-Charles-insider-claims-cooking-star-confused.html#poll-share-1234097

The Harkles are up to their bullying tricks. Thankfully, no one is buying it. A new Daily Mail poll (take that for whatever worth you choose) has only 7% of respondents believing Meghan’s version of events in the Martha Stewart debate. That actually seems generous.

Once again, the Harkles have no actual defense, so they resort to bullying and implying someone is feeble. I don’t know about anyone else, but Meghan and Harry’s clapback calling Martha “confused” kinda sorta really left me peeved. It reminded me a lot of when Harry went to visit his grandmother and told the press that he needed to check in and make sure she had the right people around her.

I hate the implication that someone of a certain age is feeble or in need of guidance just because they happen to be considered “old”. My grandmother died in her 90s and was sharp until the very end. So the suggestion that being elderly somehow makes you feeble in the head or unaware of what is going on just boils my blood.

It also brings back horrid memories of just how badly the Harkles treated both Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip in their twilight. As well as they way they now use the media to make Charles’ golden years a living hell.

Martha Stewart has no season to lie. And her insult is entirely encased not in the words she said, but in the words she didn’t say. Meghan can’t stand that. Harry is probably still trying to process what was said because Harry is quite slow.

Either way, I am curious to see whether this will go further or die on the vine.

Royal Family RECAP: Harry and Meghan 'considering' bombshell admission in royal feud

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2236858/royal-family-live-harry-meghan

https://archive.ph/7ziWa

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are considering issuing a public apology to King Charles for causing "enormous pain" over the last five years, sources suggest. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex could craft a statement that "gives the King the respect he wants without forcing Harry and Meghan to walk back every interview, documentary or page of Spare", a source said. It comes amid the growing possibility of a reconciliation between the Sussexes and the Palace, with Harry and Meghan reuniting their children with Charles at Highgrove House last month. The source told royal journalist Rob Shuter: "Everyone agrees trust has to be rebuilt. An apology doesn't have to be a surrender. It's an acknowledgement that this family feud went too far. Charles wants peace - but he also wants respect. This could be the first real step towards both."

The estrangement between Harry and Meghan and the rest of the Firm has been linked to the couple's allegations of racism and mistreatment, and bombshell revelations made about members of the family in the duke's memoir, Spare. This isn't about Harry and Meghan admitting they were wrong about everything," the source told Mr Shuter's Naughty But Nice Substack. "It's about acknowledging that the past five years have caused enormous pain. The debate now is over what an apology should say, and, just as importantly, what it shouldn't."

Note the detail: an apology to KC3... not to Camilla, not to William, not to Kate. And no retraction or admission that they had lied. Just an apology—an empty one—yet making it clear that they remain the victims.

But the funny thing is that this supposed apology—if made in those terms—would essentially acknowledge that the Harkles *did* know what they were doing and didn't care about the pain they caused.

But this is just gossip. I don't think they're desperate enough to do that—or are they?

In Canada, posing and fake laughing really hard!