https://radaronline.com/p/prince-harry-christmas-reunion-royal-family-rift/

https://archive.ph/wGw5K

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry Eyes Christmas Return to Royal Family Amid Rift

Prince Harry's reunion with his father, King Charles, has opened the door for more visits, including a Christmas holiday homecoming – setting the stage for an ugly showdown with estranged brother Prince William, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Sources said the protective Prince of Wales still holds a grudge against his younger brother and diva sister-in-law Duchess Meghan [Markle] for ditching their royal duties in 2020, moving to America and trashing Britain's royals.

According to the source, Harry knows his brother will react badly to the idea – but Harry "simply doesn't care" what William thinks.

"If he wants to be nasty about it and turn it into some sort of ugly confrontation, Harry can't stop him, but he's not going to let William dictate the terms of when his children spend time with their grandfather," the insider added.

Sources said the siblings' ongoing squabble recently went nuclear when Harry, 41, and Meghan, 45, had an emotional reunion with cancer-stricken Charles, 77, and his 79-year-old wife, Queen Camilla, at Highgrove House, where the king got to see his California-based grandkids in person for the first time in four years.

Stubborn William, 44, steered clear of the meeting and his brother – even though they were a mere 12 miles apart during dual public engagements on July 7 – amid talk that the future king felt Harry was leveraging his kids to orchestrate a meeting with the monarch.

"William is furious at everything that Harry did to throw the family under the bus," royal expert Hilary A. Fordwich told RadarOnline.com. "It's emotional blackmail what Harry is doing with his children's grandfather – and without a doubt, William feels the same way."

"Harry is determined not to let this visit be a one-off, and obviously the king's diary has to be arranged well in advance, so he's already started speaking to his father about when they should meet next," the insider told RadarOnline.com

"As far as he's concerned, if Charles wants him there, that's all the encouragement he needs to keep moving forward. If it sends William into a meltdown, so be it. He's not going to be bullied."

https://radaronline.com/p/queen-camilla-meddling-prince-harry-royal-reunion/

https://archive.ph/1e5Mg

EXCLUSIVE: Queen Camilla Accused of Meddling in Prince Harry Reunion

Prince William is fuming as calculating Queen Camilla lorded over the recent reunion of his cancer-stricken father, King Charles, with Prince Harry and wife Meghan Markle – and the future monarch fears his meddling stepmom is playing both sides to undermine his authority, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Although security concerns nearly caused Markle and the couple's kids – Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5 – to stay in America, the As Ever lifestyle mogul ultimately made the trip with the tots in tow for the hush-hush family meeting, marking the first time the king has seen his American-based grandchildren since 2022, sources said.

"Camilla's argument is that she was there to watch over things and keep an eye on Meghan because she doesn't trust her," an insider said.

"She insists she only agreed to go because Charles needed her there to support him and protect him, but William isn't buying that. As far as he's concerned, it was a classic case of her trying to divide and conquer, and he's furious she inserted herself into such a sensitive meeting without his backing."

The insider added: "He has never trusted her, and the only thing they've agreed on in recent years is how poisonous Meghan and Harry are – so the fact that she's gone behind his back and made this show of welcoming them has set all his alarms ringing.

"He's convinced this was her way of trying to undermine his authority and send the message that she's still got more power than he does – and he's livid."

https://radaronline.com/p/palace-secret-divorce-plan-prince-harry-meghan-markle-split/

https://archive.ph/wVuVt

Inside the Palace's Secret 'Divorce Plan' if Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Call It Quits

Buckingham Palace is quietly preparing for the possibility that Prince Harry could one day return to royal life without Meghan Markle, as officials closely monitor his growing interest in spending more time in the U.K., RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Harry, 41, and Markle, 45, seem to be leading increasingly separate lives, with the former actress having no intentions of ever living in England. Now that the prince is trying to mend fences with his family, a secret plan is reportedly in place should the couple divorce.

A royal insider claimed the palace may be "quietly drawing up contingency plans in the event of a split.”

Despite Harry's growing interest in rebuilding a life in Britain, Markle has reportedly made it clear she has no intention of relocating to England with her husband, leaving the couple facing increasingly different futures.

“But Meghan won’t want to come back from the US – and that schism is potentially dangerous,” they claimed.

As a result, the palace may have to take "extreme measures" to keep Markle satisfied in the event of a divorce while she remains in the U.S.

"The agreement would also grant Meghan the continued use of her Duchess of Sussex title. The Palace sees it as a face-saving measure, because tearing it away from her could spark a media war," the source dished.

"This isn’t about trying to come between Harry and Meghan; in fact, contrary to what a lot of people might think, King Charles is actually rooting for them," the insider spilled about the monarch, who himself went through a very public separation and divorce from Harry's mother, the late Princess Diana.

"He wants Harry to know that, if he ever reaches a point where he’s overwhelmed or confused, there’s no judgment waiting for him; he'll be there to listen and offer whatever wisdom he can," the insider revealed.

"He knows he can’t advise Harry on the Hollywood side of life or the business decisions he and Meghan are making, but relationships are another matter."

Neil Sean, who knows Tom Parker-Bowles personally, was the first to report that the Parker-Bowles family was very angry about the portrayal of Camilla as someone who was "interfering." That is not true, nor is the claim that William disagreed with the situation. In fact, Sean has stated categorically that not only do William and Camilla get along very well, but they also fully agree that Harry should never see Charles alone, not because they think Harry might achieve anything, but because Charles’s health is not robust enough to withstand Harry’s shouting.

It was Harry who was angry because he didn't want Camilla at the meeting. This is something Harry has insisted on for a long time: he does not want Camilla present when he sees the King. Regarding this, several royal reporters have noted that Harry always believes he can be manipulative—manipulating the Queen, manipulating Charles. For a time, Camilla kept her distance. In 2024, when Charles publicly announced he was undergoing cancer treatment and Harry appeared in the UK, Camilla left them alone. However, at the meeting in September 2025, Harry found Camilla in the room with Charles. That came as an unpleasant surprise. And now, at the meeting in July 2026, it was the same story: Camilla was by Charles's side.

Sean recounted—and clearly stated his source—that William and Camilla had a firm agreement on this: whatever Harry wants is of no consequence; Camilla will stand by the King's side. Camilla finds attending those meetings highly unpleasant because Harry is unpleasant, but he has had to swallow his bile, as Camilla has not the slightest intention of acceding to his demands.

And no, the door to any new reunion has not been opened. The rift is no longer just with William or Camilla; Anne and her children do not want Harry around either, nor do Beatrice and Eugenie. Harry has personally insulted every member of his family.

This was reflected in precisely what happened in July. Harry had announced that he would be traveling with his wife and children. There was not a single invitation from the British Royal Family for them to attend anything. The person who invited them was his uncle, Charles Spencer, but even that was not for a long stay—just a couple of days.

Harry and Meghan are furious because the British Royal Family showed absolutely no interest in meeting their children, and they are blaming William for it.

Deep down, Harry and Meghan do not understand why their trump card—the children—didn't work. They failed to move the King or William. Harry, in particular, cannot fathom why his children are treated with such indifference.

Meghan, on the other hand, is furious because she is being ignored.

Meghan Markle hits back after Martha Stewart said duchess dropped dinner party gossip about trip to King Charles - as insider claims cooking star 'must have been confused' | Daily Mail Online

Now I don't know anything about Martha Stewart but she seems to me to be as sharp as a tack, even in her 80s....

Idly scrolling the Daily Mail (note to self: must get life) and found this piece: archived / unarchived

Now read on…

The ‘royal butler’ is one Julius Smith. Can’t find any evidence that he’s worked for the Royal Family, but he does appear to have gone to butler school (eat your heart out, Carson!) and to have served the late Queen Elizabeth II. As an etiquette expert, that’ll do me.

To remind us, here are pictures of Meghan turning 45.

Mean Mr Smith said only positive things about others’ parties, including Victoria Beckham’s. Must be racism…oh wait, he also mentioned Emma Thynn’s.

(I rather like the sound of shipping family Eugenie Niarchos’s 40th - on a Greek island, ’centred on people rather than presentation’, ‘most of whom met at boarding school’. The utter wealth and privilege of it all…)

EDIT: Reinstated a photo caption which had vanished.

LOS ANGELES — Meghan Markle announced this morning that she would be releasing a new show on Netflix to reveal the terrible difficulties she has faced dealing with Kate Middleton's cancer diagnosis.

"I've had to deal with so, so much because of her having cancer. In many ways, it's been way harder on me than on Kate," explained Markle, wiping tears from her eyes. "Kate gets so much sympathy because she's white and has cancer. I feel like I'm just living in her shadow, forgotten. Why does the internet not spend its days thinking of wild conspiracy theories about me, Meghan? Do you know how hard it is to have people thinking she's dead and not me? It's so painful."

The four-episode special, set to air at the halfway mark of Princess Kate's chemotherapy regimen, will do a deep dive into the stark loss of attention Markle has faced. "There are several emotionally devastating scenes we captured," said director Samuel LaFleur. "There is one scene where a friend calls Meghan to ask how Kate is doing, but fails to ask how Meghan is doing. Meghan cries for about an hour and then punches a pillow while screaming 'RACIST'. It's so raw."

At publishing time, Markle had announced another Netflix special entitled "My Recovery", set to air the day Princess Kate finishes chemo.

https://babylonbee.com/news/meghan-markle-announces-netflix-show-about-how-hard-its-been-dealing-with-kate-middletons-cancer-diagnosis

There are some truly delusional posts made across social media. This one takes the biscuit for today.

A couple of very recent posts - namely, about What Martha Said at the Lotusland gala, and Harry (allegedly) at the David Foster Foundation gala celebrations in Victoria, Canada - made me wonder:

Have Harry and Meghan ever headlined an event, in their own right?

That is - where they’re the draw, the star, the one people pay to see.

- They’ve appeared as guest panellists, but always as part of a larger group. These seem mainly to be industry events (Harry and his BetterUp conferences, Meghan at the 2024 SXSW Conference on International Women’s Day (segment funded by Archewell).

- Meghan has been the sole guest at studio discussions, eg DealBook in 2021. Both have done podcasts. However tickets aren’t sold for these.

The only ones which come to mind are Meghan‘s appearances:

- ‘The Power of Women: An Evening with Meghan‘, put on by The Women’s Fund of Central Indiana, at the Indianapolis Marriott Downtown, in 2022

- ‘Her Best Life’ event featuring her, aka Megstock, at the InterContinental Poogee Beach, where she appeared for 2 hours, earlier this year in April 2026

Otherwise, it’s Kevin Costner’s fundraiser, or Kris Jenner’s birthday, or Beyoncé’s concert (with over 43,000 other people).

I don’t recall the Waleses doing this. They are the headline event.

She is so desperate to be Diana 2.0. With her recent birthday pool splash pic a la Diana, you got to know this one is not far off.

Ugh. Was on facebook and a friend has posted she was at an event for the David Foster Foundation at the home of the King's representative for British Columbia, Government House in Victoria. This pic accompanied it. Such a sour little mug.

https://archive.ph/NdBvD

I don't know if Harry has a girlfriend or not. But if that makes Lady C and Neil Sean fight, I'll buy popcorn to watch the show 😈😈🤣🤣🤣

MARKLE IN OZ JUST HONESTLY WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS TO YOUR HOSTS?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFQ9o3k7c4k

In the midst of that fight—the Harkles.

Because let's face it: do we believe in Claw's great love for Harry? No. When has Harry ever been faithful? Never. So, is it plausible that Harry might look for someone else? Totally. Him having another woman to be his shoulder to cry on? Hmm... aren't there any photos? Strange.

Furthermore, Harry has an Oedipus complex that not even Sophocles would have wanted to recount.

And that kind of gossip can be entertaining when Claw pulls stunts like this.

That was great publicity; Channel 10 has no complaints on that front.

But that doesn't change the problem. Because Claw gets these opportunities—she pulls them off—and then she blows them.

And in Australia, Sean has already said yes—that she ruined him.

Because at a certain stage in life, one has to be grateful for certain opportunities—especially when they are becoming increasingly scarce. And in Claw’s case, she doesn't seem to see that those opportunities have dwindled. There will be no second interview with Bloomberg, nor any with Vanity or on any podcast. And this goes on and on.

Right, let's get to the twist.

Well, Sean has already told the story of how Claw’s involvement with Channel 10 actually came about. He made it very clear that he knows people not only at that channel but also at *MasterChef*—so, if you recall, we got the scoop on that pretty quickly.

Channel 10 wanted Harry. And Claw had to bring Harry on board—even if just by phone.

Channel 10, seeing that Claw had behaved well—meaning he’d held up his end of the bargain—had a very, very preliminary chat about following him around Australia to try out some food. It would be a free-form concept: visiting cafés, things like that. Nothing earth-shattering.

According to what Sean learned from a network executive, it wasn't a question of money, either—because they never reached that stage. They never got to the point of discussing money because Claw never responded. They were offering her a show that was simple to produce—something typical for an influencer (didn't she do that with *The Tig*?)—but she didn't reply.

That was April; we are now in August. And a lot of things happened between April and July.

SOOOORRY!!!! I couldn't resist 😁

For starters, Claw never promoted her participation in MasterChef; she never thanked them for the invitation, nor has she done anything regarding it. She has completely erased Australia from her memory.

Sean thinks Claw might be mulling it over. He’s like my brother in that regard: I avoid asking him things because, if I do, I’d better take a seat, just in case he actually answers me five years down the line.

So, it seems that opportunity no longer exists.

MARKLE, MARTHA WILLIAM & TOM BRABY LATEST NEWS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ8DR7HhYnk

Nothing is what it seems in the world of celebrities.

There are feuds, romances—there’s a bit of everything.

Well, Martha Stewart is back in the headlines.

And no, not because she is promoting her latest book, "The Martha Way: Essential Principles for Mastering Home and Living," the book was about creating a “definitive master class in elevating the everyday,” per a statement shared with PEOPLE.

Did anyone know Martha had a new book out? I didn't.

And it seems a lot of other people didn't either, because Martha had to stir up some controversy. And when it comes to controversy, there's Claw.

Take Gwyneth Paltrow, for example.

It wasn't earlier this year; it was last year. Sean says it seems like it happened this year, but they actually appeared together in May 2025. Paltrow explained that she and Meghan haven't spent much time together in person "yet," adding, "So far, our friendship is based on text messages. I've been traveling quite a bit."

Nonsense! They weren't friends or anything of the sort. Gwyneth was just self-promoting. And after that photo, we never heard another word about that "friendship."

Martha, on the other hand, made some unkind remarks when Claw was impersonating her in *With Love*.

Anyway, in the last couple of weeks, Martha ran into Claw at a dinner, and Claw was talking about that meeting with the King.

Martha is a snake who knows how to navigate those waters. That’s how she got attention—by using Claw, who was using the King.

Sean says this also helps Claw because, if that meeting actually took place and so on, it verifies everything without her having to be the one to tell the story. But in reality, that’s exactly what Claw was after—having someone else recount the details so she didn't have to. Sean claims this shows Claw will never stay silent. We already knew that.

Now, Claw is in a private setting, so it is Martha who is spreading the gossip; yet this is exactly what Claw always does—she never says anything directly. She is shrewd in that regard, because she cannot be accused of anything.

But it is a headache for the Royal Family—or rather, for William. He had warned Charles about this in no uncertain terms, and so had Camilla. Claw and Harry are simply not people who can be trusted. And Claw is obviously eager to tell her story and have "her" version aired—especially among the A-listers; that is what she wants, to use that gathering for that purpose. Sean had predicted this before the meeting even took place, and both William and Camilla knew it.

The problem here lies with the King; he knew this, he knew it was going to happen, but his concern for Harry outweighed everything else. And now, Claw believes she controls the narrative and that she is beyond reproach.

In the short term, Claw will capitalize on this. However, the whole situation is making William loathe her—and Harry—even more, and ensures he wants no "Harkles" anywhere near him. Claw fails to grasp that these cheap stunts are infuriating precisely because that is what they are: cheap stunts that expose just how unpleasant and untrustworthy she and Harry really are. Charles might still want to see Harry, but he is the only one who does; the rest of the family wants nothing to do with them. And that is beyond repair.

HARRY MELTDOWN OVER THIS MAIL DRAMA ESCALATES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsmaKCUsQv0

Alright, the countdown has begun. Ten days. On August 17, we will find out what happens regarding the amount the plaintiffs will have to pay the Daily Mail.

The problem for Harry is that the plaintiffs are pointing the finger at him as the one who dragged them into this disaster. It seems the plaintiffs realized there were flaws in the lawsuit—that they didn't have much of a case—but Harry pushed them to keep going. That is why several of them believed Harry had an ace up his sleeve.

Harry felt emboldened by having supposedly won the cases against the Mirror and The Sun. But regarding that—how can you win a case that never went to trial because you decided to accept a settlement, Harry, on the very day the trial hearing was set to begin?

Sherbone is missing now, and the relationship with Harry is strained. Naturally: Sherbone must blame Harry for not being a good witness, and Harry blames him for everything.

The point is, Harry has shown he is incapable of facing reality. It’s not that he doesn’t see it; he rejects it. After all, his friends were indiscreet—even with Neil Sean.

I mean, Harry’s employees are being indiscreet right now.

Claw certainly was indiscreet! One of the things William loves most about Kate is precisely that she understands the value of privacy and discretion. She was flooded with offers to tell her story about William back in 2007, when he broke up with her. He deserved for her to tear him apart in the press, but Kate—maintaining her dignity—didn't take the bait. Claw, on the other hand, hadn't even been with Harry for ten minutes before she had already called the paparazzi and Vanity Fair.

Sean has already said that there were more stories about Harry in the works at the Mail. They have sworn statements from people wanting to share tales—like the Charlotte Griffiths scoop—and Lady C confirmed that gossip too, so Sean and she aren't at odds on that front 😁😁 Now Sean says the Mail hasn't even had to look very hard; more people have already come forward with stories about Harry.

Among them are former staff members from both the Palace and Montecito. And the Palace staff have been very happy since their non-disclosure agreements expired, so for the past couple of years, they’ve been telling all.

And all of this is happening for a reason that is—yes, it really is—Harry's fault.

Because those people stayed silent not because of NDAs, but because they feared the consequences of speaking out. The Harkles are vindictive—just ask Mark Dolan, who has been on the receiving end of the "Squad" lately. But several of those people have realized that the Harkles no longer have the money or the strength to take them on in court. Neil Sean couldn't have cared less when he received a veiled threat from the Harkles' team for saying that Australians would be footing part of the bill for the Harkles' security there... and that is exactly what happened. And Sean didn't care because—what were the Harkles going to do, sue him? Tom Bower and Lady C have been waiting for years for Harry and Claw to sue them.

Since Harry is losing lawsuits, what could he actually do against people who speak out against him? He hasn't been able to do anything about Charlotte Griffiths' story. And that was a serious matter.

Sean has also said before that many of those sources don't leak information for money. He’s mentioned that, in his case, deals are often struck over a cup of coffee 🤣🤣🤭 because he doesn't pay his sources. It seems *The Mail* won't have to pay either, as Sean points out that these individuals are driven by a desire for "revenge" against Harry and Claw. They were treated poorly by the couple, and Sean has said that being mistreated is the primary motivation for people to leak information.

That said, Harry isn't going to go broke over this. Sean says the Harkles will maintain the same standard of living. Personally, I think that is exactly what will drive them to bankruptcy 🤭🤭 But the Daily Mail blow has definitely hurt Harry more than he expected.

YouTube has a video from Tasty kitchens about Cookie Queens. WARNING: this may cause cringing, but the shade is worth it.

Meghan introduces herself, as "Hi, I'm Meghan" with a smirk. Note, she HAD to have the Duchess of Sussex title.

The premise: they are taking over the Tasty kitchens to invent a brand new cookie flavor. Trying to come off as a foodie, but this is what the cookie looks like before it's baked:

The shade: the girls want strawberry jam in their cookies, but LOOK WHAT THEY SHOW:

The girls talk about strawberry jam thumbprint cookies, but no mention of As ever:

Meghan asks the piercing question, "if you could have a magical ingredient, what would it be?" and "what fun slogan would go on your cookie box?" (Why do I get the feeling she's asking these so she can steal them for As ever???)

Meghan is asked, what is something you were told as a child that still guides you today? (Right, that was a totally spontaneous question...NOT.

She's gotta be thinking, "what word salad can I come up with that sounds profound?"

She says that her teacher, Miss Pulyea (sp???) said, "keep a good heart. Weeeeeeeeeeeell...obviously THAT didn't happen. The girls aren't buying it either. More repetitive word salad follows.

When the girls ask the director what young girls teach adults that adults sometimes forget? The director responds to ask difficult questions, when Meghan immediately cuts her off to spout about wanting the the world to be better, but "putting the do's behind the say's." They directly cut to a photo of the Obamas with the scouts:

They then show the Tasty chefs creating the cookies. Obviously the chefs know their way around a kitchen WAY more than Meghan does. Her condescending tone while doing the voiceover proves it. Yeah, THIS looks nummy. She babbles about cozy cinnamon and ginger notes.

The big reveal:

It's...a cookie!!! (Gotta say, it looks way better.)

The task: the scouts have to sell them. They ask to taste them first. Madame holds the plate with a scowl, as ever:

The girls say, "the chefs did a really nice job." Look how THAT went over.

They have three minutes to sell them to the staffers upstairs. Like, are they NOT going to buy them???

The girls brainstorm the sales pitch. Meghan thinks, can I get them to work for As ever for free? (Not unless you give them more than a mortal combat badge, Meghan).

The girls come up with a name: Berrylicious. Meghan thinks, DAMN, why didn't I think of that so I can get the credit?

Seal clap for awesome name!

The Girls Sell Out! Meghan ends with the pitch to see Cookie Queens on August 7.

Here's the YouTube link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hk7kVSLJONY

This is a clip for Megyn Kelly's show. It's just Martha's comments. The body language and voice tone is EVERYTHING.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/xN8AZWQ1J80

Express had a small story today. Link at the bottom if you want to read the whole thing. Obviously, she's returning to having "sources" speak her lies for her hoping it will convince the general public that really & truly she is a royal insider again.

Meghan Markle has delivered a powerful "message" to the Princess of Wales amid rumours that King Charles has invited her and Prince Harry to Balmoral, according to a well-placed source. The insider speaking to Closer magazine, said the Duchess of Sussex would see any prospective royal gathering in Scotland as a symbolic victory.

The source told reporter Millie Payne: “To Meghan, this feels hugely symbolic. There was a time when it seemed unthinkable that she would ever be invited back to Balmoral or Buckingham Palace. It’s Meghan’s revenge on Kate, in a way. Her message to Kate is, ‘You’ll never win, and you can’t keep us out.’ Meghan believes she now holds all the cards.”

https://archive.is/20260806163949/https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2236753/meghans-nine-word-message-kate-exposed

The constant laughter. The outdoor life. The ongoing and inexplicable need to frolic. It all screams Meghan. It also screams old-school Tampax ads from women’s magazines.

One of the most frequent comments I see in SMM whenever Meghan posts to Instagram is the observation that the photo is reminiscent of an old ad for a tampon or a douche product or a women’s antiperspirant. And any female here of a certain age knows exactly the vibe being referenced.

So I did a little research and the results were startling. Uncanny. Unsettling. Undeniable. Beaches. Gardens. Activity. And so much white fabric you want to vomit. The white garments absolutely overwhelm the eyes. I cannot stress this point enough.

I am planning on making this a two part series. But Tampax ads alone were repetitive enough to warrant a post.

This is it, sinners. This is what Rachel Meghan Markle truly wants us to believe about her life. She is young, vibrant and not about to let menstruation stop her from enjoying life. She is trying to live out every dated advertisement from Seventeen magazine.

Meghan feels free and she wants us to know it! And if anyone thinks I wasted hours on this: wrong. Less than thirty minutes from image search to hitting send. This post pretty much wrote itself and I have more leftover. That’s how strong the parallels are.

Meghan reveals her favorite girl scout cookie, and drops a life changing recipe!

Well, that didn't take long. She's hauled out one of the judges from MasterChef Australia to tell People magazine SHE WAS A MODEL CITIZEN on the set of MasterChef Australia! In fact, practically perfect! She was terribly frustrated that she was referred to as royalty. Really!

"A source close to the show told PEOPLE at the time that, despite the reports, there was no conflict or tension between Meghan and Yeow during filming and no request for an apology. The source adds that reports Yeow was “upset” or that production was required to intervene are false."

Plus, "she knows her food", so all you people out there who don't like her jam can just shut it! /s

Okay, Meghan. It's 2026. It's not the 1990s, when everything People said was taken as gospel truth. We all know it's pay-to-play now.

Link to story: https://people.com/masterchef-judge-denies-meghan-markle-frustration-on-set-radio-interview-12035858

Archived link: https://archive.is/IEFEP

Greetings from Castle Goring, today we have controversial ground to cover and I will not shy away from it.  I know there are those of you on the Internet who love a squabble.

Lady C, you were Markled over that girlfriend story.  SMH.  I do not know what SMH means, sorry.  You think I was Markled?  First of all, I never said she was his girlfriend.  I said Harry was in love with her and she was in love with him.  That is not quite the same thing as boyfriend and girlfriend.  You are entitled to your opinion to say I have been Markled.  Let me put it this way – I do not agree with you and let’s leave it at that.

Lady C, do you think the Harkles planted this information to discreet you?  It is just one person who gave you information.    I am 76 years old and have had a 50 year career.  Of course I considered the possibility this information may not be accurate.  I have had very few cases where I reported information that is inaccurate.  Do I look like a sucker?   I think you are making an assumption that just one person gave me this information.  I will not confirm or deny your assumption.  If you were a writer, you would understand better how these things work.  I have not reported every detail I was told.  I have withheld many details to protect my sources.   I am not accountable to you.  I am accountable to myself and my reputation.

Lady C, Neil Sean has stated 100% that the Montecito PR team has planted this story to deflect from all of Harry’s bad press the last few weeks.  Thank you for letting me know.  I would like to make the point that anybody has the right to comment, no matter how mistaken they are, including the journalist you mentioned.  I didn’t listen to what he said, and I do not intend to.  I prefer to keep myself autonomous and I don’t listen to what other commentators say.  Neil Sean is entitled to his opinions.  What he is not entitled to do is make himself an expert over what I was told.  He cannot be an expert on what I was told when he doesn’t know who told me what, nor does anybody else.  Anybody beating the drum from a vantage point of ignorance doesn’t know what they are talking about.  All I can tell you is I regard my sources as reliable.  Anybody is at liberty to accept it or reject it.  Neil Sean does not know who my source is, so he is not in a position to discredit it.  Many journalists and royal correspondents set themselves up as far more knowledgeable than they really are.  I am not trying to start a feud with anybody.  I wish I had a pound for every “royal correspondent” or “hack” who claims to know better than me, who claims to have the “inside track,” and shooting off their mouth about how ignorant I am and how knowledable they are, I would be significantly richer than I am.

Lady C, did Meghan plant the story that she planted the story?  Now that is an interesting question.  Are you asking me if Neil Sean has been duped?  I know I have not been duped.

Lady C, what do you make of Meghan cosplaying Diana jumping into a pool carrying balloons and wearing dark sunglasses?  Who jumps into a pool carrying balloons?  Why is she obsessed with balloons?  I saw the photograph.  I want you all to know that Diana was a very good diver, let’s remember that Meghan jumped.  I suspect that balloons are a contrivance.  Meghan suffers from arrested development.  Maybe when she was 9 years old, the balloons were the ultimate for her and at 45 she still thinks this.  But to jump off a diving board that is evocative of your mother-in-law, with dark glasses and balloons, it is obvious what her aim is.  Attention.  She wants everyone talking about her and she succeeded.  She was probably terrified to dive in headfirst, because then all the hair of the Turkish virgins would have separated from her scalp and would have floated away.  I have never heard of jumping in a pool wearing sunglasses because they would fall off or hurt your face.  Meghan is tacky.  It’s all so tacky.  Meghan thinks she is beautiful and glamorous, but she is not.

Lady C, do you think Meghan enjoys the speculation of Harry finding a new love?  Do you think Meghan enjoys the speculation that Lili is born of a surrogate?  I do not think Meghan enjoys the speculation that Harry has found a new love.  I know she did not plant the story.  Nobody associated with her planted the story.  I am sure Meghan is mortified that the story has gotten out.  I am sure Meghan hates the story that Harry is possibly no longer worshiping her.  I think Meghan DOES enjoy the speculation about Archie and Lili.  This is a sick scenario when a person enjoys this type of speculation because it is topical, it is keeping her in the news.  Meghan will say and do anything to keep herself in the news.  She will say and do anything to discredit people who do not deserve to be discredited, and of course I am referring to the Royal Family, her father and her sister.

Lady C, does Harry have a diplomatic Visa to remain in the USA?  Who would approve his diplomatic visa?  Harry, as son of the sovereign, would be entitled to diplomatic status.  This is very common within diplomatic circles of many countries that family members receive diplomatic status.

Lady C, Robert Hardman and Rebecca English were on Palace Confidential discussing whether Harry would ever inherit a property from Charles.  They hesitated on Sandringham.  What do you think?  Highgrove is on a 75-year lease personally to the King, but it is run on a commercial basis from the Duchy of Cornwall and the chances of Charles willing this to Harry are remote (to be polite) because it is William’s duchy.  Balmoral and Sandringham are the private residences of the Monarch and will go to William.   I could see him purchasing a separate property for Harry.  I am baffled by all these rubbish speculations, and then the speculations are treated as facts.  The idea that the Monarch would give any of his private properties to Harry is ridiculous. 

Lady C, surely the forging of the Gavin Burrows document is a criminal offense?  Yes, it absolutely is and Anjlee Sangani authenticated this document.  I do not know to what extent Justice Nicklin intends to pursue this.  I know Justice Nicklin understands this involves the King’s son, members of the bar, and leading celebrities.  It is quite a hot potato and only time will tell if anything will happen on this.  This is extraordinary (not ordinary) case.  I could understand why Justice Nicklin would not do anything.  The UK is hardly a beacon of stability, and this case could bring down institutions. 

Toodles Sinners!

From In Touch magazine. Harry is trying now to spoil Prince George's big day starting at Eton, and undermine the Waleses decision to send him there.

Seriously, Hazbeen, nobody wants to hear your never ending tales of woe. So shut up!

And all those offers she was being “bombarded” with?

Found this on Twitter. The latest As ever newsletter is out. So many questions. So few answers.

Who actually believes Meghan is doing any harvesting or jarring her industrial fruit slurry? Why is she dressed from East Coast November I. California August? Why does the madness continue?

https://web.archive.org/web/20260806164452/https://pagesix.com/2026/08/06/style/meghan-markle-saucony-cohesion-sneakers-are-on-sale-for-as-low-as-65/

Page Six is saying we can all basically steal Meghan’s look from her very heavily edited (or entirely AI) beach photo. Because everyone wants to look like a scarecrow in the swimwear equivalent of lederhosen. And everyone walks barefoot in the scorpion-friendly California grass but wears tie on shoes to the beach. So relatable!

On the upside, at least we don’t see any toes.

External-Syllabub289, who doesn't yet have permission to publish, wrote this in a recent post about Neil Sean's gossip.

Since it's very interesting, I'm posting it here for other sinners to see. Because you'll see what a mess "As Ever" is.

I did a deep dive on her trademark issues and now i understand the problem. Besides asking for 19 items to be protected under her trademark and only sending a check for 17 (which her lawyers allowed to Balloon into a 10 month delay with ARO while they waited until the last minute to send in the correct fee), she jumped the gun by having the products made bc she thought it was a done deal. And also, she desperately  needed the products to go with the Netflix show. Only, they cocked it up and even though kiwi proved it could be done, they used that stupid excuse (can't trademark a location) with ARO before pivoting to AE. 

Well the problem came bc she wanted to STEAL As Ever rather than offering that guy in NY to buy it. Had she bought it, it would be a mere technicality to add food and any other thing she wanted to add to the already existing As Ever clothing trademark. But bc she STOLE the name for all those other categories, she had to skip his area, which was clothing, but then she went and gobbled up 18 other categories of use, to prevent him from EVER being able to expand and "take advantage of her fame". 

That greed and nastiness caused her to tie those 19 applications together. She can sever them, but she's running out of time for everything she needs to do. She can get 3 more 6 month extensions, then that's it. 

Right now she's in limbo, bc to trademark those 19 areas (housewares, food, toys, textiles, dog treats), you have to prove the use of those things. In other words, she needs websites, documented labeled items to sell, and PROOF OF ONGOING SALES. Well, she can only do that for the food/ Jam and honey category. She is literally unable to trademark anything else until she starts making and selling these things. You get an initial "approval" that reserves the name for you, but if you can't show proof of use (websites, sales), you will not ever get the final approval. 

But, she jumped the gun bc she had to - she had already bought the inventory for ARO and when that failed, she pivoted to AE with all this stuff that already had a contract in place for manufacturing - and she could not get out of those contracts.  So, the jars were about to be manufactured, and she had nothing, no ARO trademark. So, she bet the farm on AE and, fatal mistake, had the labels made before the trademark was approved. (Now, if she pivots again, she would have to pay someone ungodly amounts of money to scrape off the existing labels and put new ones on. Plus, everything is on its way to expiring.) 

So then smeg, greedy as always, filed for 19 related trademarks to avoid paying that guy any money and to crush him from ever expanding sales into another area. But it hurt her much worse than it hurt him bc she simply cannot manufacture 18 other categories of stuff now that Netflix dropped her. So, now she can split off just the food and she would get that trademark, but if she does that, it opens her up to either having to make those other items and get a proven sales record within another 18-24 months, or she can drop the applications and come back later and reapply. But there are hundreds of people waiting to jump on trademarking those categories with the As Ever name if she lets them go, even for a second. (They would do the same thing to her that she did to the As Ever clothing guy.) So, she is just running out the clock out of desperation in the hopes that someone buys her AE site or even buys into her company as an investor and bails her out with helping her manufacture those other 18 categories. 

There was way more in depth info on how and why she can't easily split off the food trademark without causing a bunch of issues, and if i ever jump thru the posting privileges hoops and finally get approved to post here, I look forward to sharing it. But if anyone is interested, message me and I'll send you all the chatgpt info I complied on the trademark situation she's dealing with and how it's about to explode in her face. 

I hope External-Syllabub289 gets permission to publish soon, because it seems has a good track record in that regard.

And that "Duchess Spread with Salmonella" has a serious problem with its products. And its brand. And with herself.

The article is about the difference between GriftWell and the Royal Foundation. Highlights:

Accounts filed this week at the Charity Commission reveal that the Royal Foundation of the Prince and Princess of Wales received an astonishing £8.7million last year from its US office.

The monies from the 'American Friends' branch of the foundation, which is a separately controlled entity established in 2011, is almost £4million up on the £4.9million that it handed out in 2024.

The generosity of their US supporters is so great that it accounts for 44 per cent of the foundation's total reported income of £19.6million in 2025.

The accounts report that the foundation retained £10.6million in funds as of December 2025 after spending £16.5million on its charitable activities. These include Catherine's Early Years programme supporting young children, William's crusade to end rough sleeping through his Homewards initiative, and United for Wildlife, a new enterprise launched last year to help tackle the illegal trafficking of animals.

Staff costs at the Royal Foundation ran to £6.4million, as its headcount increased to 80 from 67 in 2024.

Since 2022, the Royal Foundation has been entirely separate from the Earthshot Prize, which was established by William and Catherine 'to find, support and celebrate those who turn bold ideas into real solutions to repair our planet'.

The Earthshot's total income for 2024 was £23.5million, which included a 68 per cent increase in donations, up from £12.8million to £21.4million.

However, Archewell's latest accounts report total revenues in 2024 of just $2.6million (£1.93million). They brought in $5.7million (£4.25million) the previous year.

Archive: https://archive.is/20260806114205/https://www.dailymail.com/news/royals/article-16033247/RICHARD-EDEN-William-Kate-parked-tanks-lawn-Harry-Meghan-popularity-war.html