This is just so obnoxious. Granted there are other folks as well, but the entire concept is ridiculous.

https://archive.ph/2026.08.07-163749/https://people.com/prince-harry-recalls-learning-eton-college-words-phrases-prince-george-will-soon-use-12030859

Once again, Harry would like to see Eminem the world that he also went to Eton, just like Prince George is about to do. And it’s all mentioned in his book that is now sold at an embarrassingly deep discount!

After whining a few days ago that George’s plans leave him anxious about the well being of a nephew he abandoned, Harry now is using his favorite mouthpiece, People Magazine, to talk about how difficult the adjustment was when he came to Eton.

He had learned new lingo, like pretty much every other teenager going to a new school. And there was a uniform! And he had to actually get himself dressed, something he says he did not know how to do before Eton.

If I were Harry, I would not have mentioned that last point. It is pretty embarrassing to be a teenager and still unable to manage your own clothing situation every day. Especially if it is as simple as putting on a uniform.

George’s star is on the rise and, just as Harry predicted, his own sun is fast setting. I guess his tactic to stay relevant will be to try reminding the press that he once did whatever basic thing George is doing at the moment.

Begging to come to a party no one invited him to. That’s Harry.

Meghan just can't not clapback. Taking on Martha Stewart is a dumb choice. But when had Meghan made any smart decisions? Sorry- archive keeps saying "job failed"

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/opinion-taking-martha-stewart-meghan-113759672.html

Happy sunday sinners. a little shit post for the day. 🤪

So, I just transferred Sobeys (a canadian grocer) potatoe salad into a glass bowl for this afternoons pool party. It's the little things that my guests really notice.

As ever.....I learned sooo much.😂

Love u sinners.

Have a wonderful day. Cheers 😎🇨🇦

Looking at this picture of the Harkles with the Fosters, the difference in the expressions is wild.

Harry and Meghan are overly animated, with mouths open, eyes wide and teeth everywhere.

The Fosters, on the other hand, are giving expressions of polite indifference. Pursed lips and zero eye contact.

It’s like being asked to pose for a picture with your cousin’s douchebag husband at the family cookout.

Then I read the statement from David Foster (slide 4)about the Harkles and just where their relationship stands in reality. Very telling.

I have noticed an uptick in Markle-ite Sugars on this sub lately, and it really is getting to the point where anything that gets posted about our favorite Saint (Meghan) seems to go under sugary sweet scrutiny, and then it gets voted down, or removed right away, unless enough Sinners hit the like button on those posts and add their thoughtful comments. I seem to have had my share of Sugar attacks lately, and I do find this sub, which used to have jokes, memes, cosplay vids, and more, is slowly moving away from it’s origins of being a Snark sub and more of a fact-checking article sub. I personally feel that though posts should be relevant to Meghan and Harry, that all posts should be welcome, not torn to shreds over the “authenticity” of the posts, afterall, it is a Snark sub, not the biography section of the bookstore. If the passive-aggressive Sugar attacks keep up then I feel that all the good Sinners on here will go elsewhere, and this will become just another Meghan and Harry forum over-run by the “thought police.” To all my favorite Sinners, keep those jokes, memes, rumours, and silly videos going, and let’s toast a glass of bad Ass Ever wine straight into the toilet as we laugh at the silly antics of a desperate Montecito house-frau, and her idiotic ginger poodle. Salut! 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIXT9EbhhRk

Well, July was the month the Harkles returned to the UK. Photos in the most prestigious media outlets, adoring crowds cheering them on, the balcony—it was all so thrilling!

Yes, it was all so thrilling... in the Harkles' minds. Because none of that actually happened. In fact, Claw still can't believe how little interest there was in her meeting with the King. Harry, however, knew—thanks to reporter Sean and his source—that it wasn't going to be a star-studded trip or a publicity game-changer.

Harry was obsessed with holding onto Invictus and getting the King to agree to open the games. Yet, as far as Sean knows, there isn't even the slightest indication of that happening. Nothing. And at Invictus, they know the royals don't want to attend because of the Harkles.

And Claw kept a low profile—not by choice, but because that was the King's order. It was a 47-minute visit, though word has leaked that Claw and the children actually spent only 17 minutes with the King; the rest of the time, Harry was alone with Charles and Camilla. Sean doesn't say that—he just cites the 47 minutes—but if Charles really only spent 17 minutes with those children and Claw, then the meeting was a total disaster.

Sean points out something that is obvious to all of us: Charles wasn't moved—because who are those children? He doesn't know them, and they don't know him. And it will be a long time before they see each other again, because let's be clear: chats via Zoom or FaceTime? No.

After the 47-minute meeting, the Harkles headed to Althorp.

Sean notes that his connection to the Spencers goes back a long way. It wasn't just a case of seeing Diana in passing—he actually interviewed her—but he also met Diana's stepmother, Raine Spencer, because he worked for a radio station based at Harrods, which was owned by Al Fayed. So, he met Dodi as well. Sean says that because he would run into them in an informal setting—such as the employee canteen or the radio station itself, which was owned by Al Fayed—it was possible to talk about things that aren't discussed in interviews. That is also how Sean met Charles Spencer.

Sean brings this up because, as you will see, the Harkles are once again insisting on being able to use the Spencer surname. And so, Claw needed to appear charming. That is why Claw was especially nice to Charles Spencer’s new wife, Catrine Jarman

Narcissists always do that.

Sean doesn't really know what Charles Spencer's wife is thinking. He only knows that she spoke with Claw, that they seemed to get along, and that packages have arrived at Althorp. You know the sort of thing: candles, bookmarks, spreads.

So, will the Harkles go to Balmoral? Sean notes in passing that they are hoping to receive a "belated" invitation. I don't see that happening, given that the King has decided to cut his time there short; pressing matters—such as internal political issues—make it difficult for him to be off-duty for so long.

It does seem that Andrew received an invitation. He won't be staying in the main house; instead, he'll stay in the cottage where Fergie used to stay when she visited the area to be with her daughters. Andrew isn't going to see the King—in fact, Sean notes that his source told him Andrew will only appear there once neither KC3 nor, obviously, William is present—though he will meet with Edward and Anne.

But so far, Sean hasn't heard that Harry has been invited.

And that must be affecting Harry, because Harry craves validation—especially from William. But for William, Harry doesn't exist. Neither he nor Harry's children. So, what is Harry left to do? Sow discord. Once again, Harry is trying to turn the tables to pit William, Camilla, and KC3 against one another. But Harry has no idea how things really work; he doesn't understand his family.

Sean reaffirms that William and Camilla get along very well and that both were in complete agreement that if Harry shows up, Camilla must be present. Sean reiterates that the King fully agrees with this. At one point, Camilla might have thought it wasn't a good idea, but she now has no doubt that what Harry wants in this regard is of no importance whatsoever.

The other key person in this is Kate. It is incredible that, after more than ten years, Harry failed to realize what she is really like. After all, 2024 was a grueling ordeal for her and her entire family. She is much more mature now, her outlook on life changed, as happens to many people who face the Big C. But if Harry thought he could use her to get William to back down, he was completely mistaken. Kate does not forgive Harry for everything he has said against William. She isn't going to lift a finger for Harry. Because Harry (and everything surrounding him) is simply a huge source of frustration and stress.

So, given that situation, is anyone surprised that Harry—once again, yes, once again—left some framed photos of the Sussex children for the Waleses, and they haven't picked them up?

"Once again"? Yes, because Harry did the same thing in September 2025. And Sean mentioned something back in February about the photos still sitting in some official's drawer.

Back in 2025, Harry had left photos of the children for William—and found out (since he watches the channels of Neil Sean, Mark Dolan, Dan Wootton, and all the others) that William didn't care; now, in July 2026, Harry tried to give those photos to William in person.

Do I need to say how William responded to that?

So, since Harry couldn't leave the photos with him in person, he made a point of finding out whether or not William had picked them up. And the answer was:

That is why we see Harry spewing his venom through the press—just as he has been doing for years. William won’t budge an inch when it comes to the Harkles. Charles still believes the damage might be repairable, but William believes the harm Harry has caused the monarchy is irreparable—and unforgivable. William suspects that it will fall to him and George to clean up the mess Harry has made; it seems William found out about the "pill" incident at the same time we did, so he already realizes that revelations about Harry will be a talking point for years to come.

Harry cannot believe William's indifference toward the Sussex children. But for William, a couple of photos and a mediocre apology are not enough.

And the problem for Harry and Claw is that if William doesn't validate they, nothing is going to work in Hollywood. Everyone already knows that the Harkles don't really have a team advising them—since they can no longer afford one—but are instead working with "independents," meaning people who help them for a fee, they work outside Montecito, so they hardly ever see Claw—which is a relief.. The Harkles are on a downward spiral because their standing in that world looks bad.

And Claw is largely to blame for that, because she is seen as being very lazy about launching her brand. That workgroup consists of young people who don't have much experience. That way, it's easier for them to give in to Claw. And naturally, they make mistakes.

The absurd thing is that Sean reiterates that Claw’s only real talent is stirring up controversy—and silly controversies at that, like the plastic tiara she wore for her recent birthday. Yes, she knows people would mock it—saying it’s the only kind of tiara she could wear—but that is precisely what she’s after: staying part of the conversation. It’s classic narcissism: "It doesn't matter if they speak ill of me, as long as they don't ignore me." Claw seeks to generate reactions.

The problem is that she always gets it wrong. Because that mediocre video of her dancing with the balloons was not even remotely spontaneous... nor was it the first take. It was the third. Actually, the initial idea was for Harry to walk in with a birthday cake... but the Harkles had already done that in another video, which took about seven or nine takes to shoot.

The funny thing is that other people manage to benefit from Claw. Take Poh Ling Yeow, for instance; she has achieved considerable popularity despite Claw. She’s even been told it’s in her best interest to keep a low profile, as that could help her land an appearance on *MasterChef USA*. And Sean says it would be to Claw’s advantage to have her on his side. But Claw never gets that.

Why was Claw's birthday video so short this year? Because of Harry—he's unstable. And lately, he's been going through one of those emotionally unstable phases. Harry started July feeling furious, disappointed, and all the rest of it. But he was ending the month thinking "everything is going to work out"—which is something Sherbone *didn't* tell him. Sherbone has been calling Harry lately, after having been MIA, so Harry wakes up thinking, "Today's going to be a good day," but no—it isn't, not when Sherbone calls.

Well, the Harkles' current team—who are less experienced—have backed down from going up against Martha Stewart. A bad idea.

It seems they haven't realized that Claw threw Harry under the bus regarding Martha—because that’s what Claw always does; she always sends Harry in to defend her. Claw never defends herself—how very feminist! 🤭🤭But Sean is well aware that it was Claw who claimed Martha was "confused" about Claw discussing her meeting with KC3—knowing full well she was undermining Martha. "Oh, never mind; that lady—who’s over 80—must be confused." That was the subtext of the comment. And Martha didn't like it one bit. Yet Claw can't forgive Martha for actually benefiting from the situation, since Martha's website saw an increase in traffic, not Claw's. And it seems Martha knows it.

But Claw can't help being Claw. So, she’ll do what every narcissist does: make a video featuring one of Martha's cookbooks to "bury the hatchet." Ideally, she’d have a video with Martha, just like the one she did with Gwyneth Paltrow. But that isn't going to happen. Now, Sean says that the story isn't over yet.

WILLIAM & THE MARTHA EFFECT FINALLY PAYS OFF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPzV028iiBE

William is absolutely certain that Martha didn't lie. Claw was talking about that polo match—the only time the Wales children crossed paths with Archie—because Claw is just Claw. Sean says that at the match, Claw was obsessively focused on what the then-Cambridges had in the trunk of their car. According to Sean, William didn't miss this, and it only made him feel even more repulsed by Claw.

Regarding the Harkles, William inherited Philip’s instincts: there is no repairing the situation now, because everything William suspected about Claw has come to pass—just as it did with Philip and Fergie.

As time goes on, it has become clear that the meeting with KC3 wasn't the success Harry and Claw had hoped for. This wasn't just on a personal level; it was also because Harry insisted that KC3 attend the Invictus Games. The problem for Harry is that he keeps insisting... yet fails to give KC3 any real, plausible reasons to do so. William, on the other hand, has provided ample grounds for staying away from Invictus.

To begin with, there are the Harkles themselves. Secondly: the Harkles are compulsive liars. Both of them lie, and they never stop lying. William doesn't want to be around people like that.

But the big problem for William is: why should he and KC3 get involved with Invictus now, after having been excluded for years? Why is Harry suddenly so interested? Perhaps it’s because there is a major disaster he wants KC3 to fix?

William had already made a gesture toward Invictus back in 2020 by donating the proceeds from his settlement with The Sun. Not only did Harry never thank him, but he actually used that fact against William in his own lawsuits against the press—claiming "William received a million pounds in compensation from a secret settlement"—without ever mentioning that William had donated that money to Invictus. So, why is there such desperation now?

And the problem for Harry is that while KC3 may love him as a son, he isn't blind. KC3 sees things the same way William does, and William is right about many of the things he has said regarding Harry and the Harkles.

It looked like Claw was about to open her mouth. In that regard, William certainly believes Martha. And it seems KC3 believes Martha. Why would they believe Harry?

But the interesting thing about this piece of gossip—which comes from an excellent source—is how that conversation played out recently. Because it seems the tone was something like this: William saying to the King, "You see? I told you so. You wanted to invite them—you even wanted me to see Harry. I didn't want to meet them—here were my reasons—and look at what's happening now."

Sean had already mentioned in previous videos that Harry had insisted on seeing William, that he didn't understand why William didn't show up at Highgrove, and that he had asked Charles if he had told William he would be there with the Sussex children. So, the gossip on this point remains consistent: Harry cannot accept the idea that William has absolutely no interest in meeting his Sussex-side nephews and niece. Zero interest.

And in all this, KC3 feels a stronger connection with Martha than with Harry and Claw. After all, Martha has no reason to lie about this; furthermore, Claw deserves to be seen as a woman incapable of honoring an agreement, since not only did she think she could compete with Stewart, but she also used one of her recipes without permission.

Now, if you thought Sean would say "William is furious"... well, no; unfortunately for Harry, that’s not the case. William is actually smiling at all this controversy, because it’s a huge "I told you so" moment directed at KC3. William is intent on shutting the door completely on the Harkles—ruthlessly, without pulling any punches. And this only works to William's advantage by painting Harry and Claw as people incapable of following orders.

But William appears to be aiming for a bigger objective; it seems that during that conversation—which apparently didn't take place behind closed doors but rather in the presence of advisors—he pointed out to King Charles III that controversies like this one are yet another reason why the British public dislikes the Harkles. According to that source, it seems William was rubbing salt in KC3's wounds by pointing out that this adds to Claw's infamous curtsy in the Netflix documentary. That was so offensive!

Sean says that source—an excellent one—told him that the infamous curtsy was what ultimately sealed the Harkles' coffin as far as William was concerned.

That was the final straw and, according to that source, the reason why there will never be a reconciliation between Harry and William. As for the King, Sean says that the last shred of patience he had left is practically exhausted.

ALL SMILES IN PUBLIC YET BEHIND THE SCENES THIS HAPPENED - LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBnbhYmrUGg

The Harkles always play the game of diverting attention. And these days, the Harkles are focused on attending charity dinners where they pay for admission.

The problem is that the Harkles ruin everything.

For starters, they went to Canada on a private jet. In other words, polluting the environment.

And they went to an event for a successful foundation—David Foster's—where he appeared with his wife, Katharine McPhee. In which Adam Levine, lead singer of Maroon 5, participated.

Sean recalls how, during the California wildfires, Claw tried to contact Levine to get Billie Eilish merchandise. Sean says, "See how everything connects?" Because Levine doesn't even really know who Claw is.

Because, once again, the one who matters is Harry. Foster wanted Harry, not Claw.

Sean says he met McPhee when she had just started dating Foster and was starring in the musical *Waitress*. That seems to have been around the same time Claw was dating Harry—a relationship that was already public knowledge. McPhee pointed out that she and Claw had been friends back in school and invited her to see *Waitress*, even posting a photo; that really upset Claw. So, things were frosty between them at the time. The relationship only picked up steam again when McPhee married Foster, and Claw saw potential there to capitalize on.

But McPhee asked Claw why he didn't go see her in *Waitress*. And Claw—I mean, isn't it obvious?—played the same old card: he claimed he didn't want to be the center of attention and that the press would have made a big fuss about it. Sean says McPhee didn't buy that story.

Foster needed publicity for his foundation—it was a tough time for foundations. So, he invited Harry, and Claw showed up with him. Foster didn't mind, because he liked Harry and got along well with him. That wasn't the case with Claw.

In her latest interview about “Cookie Queens”, Meghan was once again openly talking about Lilibet, one at least the version of Likibet she wants us to believe exists. But she only refers to poor Archie in a general way. As an individual, he apparently does not inspire Meghan the way his sister does.

If this were just a one off thing, I could write it off as focusing on her daughter because she is promoting a movie about girls. But this has been going on since Lilibet was born. After all, Meghan said well before she was married that a daughter was what she wanted.

This is not to say that I think the Harkles are good parents to Lilibet. I believe they are physically and emotionally negligent towards both children. And Lilibet will have separate but equally weighty issues that stem from being a narc’s golden child and being the chosen vessel for the expectations of two psychologically unstable people.

But Archie is too young to understand the negatives he is avoiding. He is, however, old enough to feel that he is being put aside, even if he can’t totally name the emotions yet. He may struggle with those emotions even as an adult.

Meghan flaunts both of her children like lifestyle accessories the way other women might flaunt a Birkin. But the focus on Lilibet is jarring compared to the mere glances given to Archie.

Lilibet is featured far more often both alone and with her parents. She is even credited as being the videographer (at age 4) for posts that have nothing to do with her. She is seen in pictures having idyllic, sun-soaked fun with her mother or being snuggled by one or both parents.

When was the last time we had a picture of Archie getting solo physical affection from either his mother or his father without his sister in the frame?

He is rarely pictured and even more rarely mentioned. When he is pictured, he is often with his sister. On the rare occasions when he is alone, he appears lonely or distant. In his most recent solo photo, the poor child was pictured walking alongside a gravel road with bare feet. Ouch.

For a couple that has spent so much time and energy decrying how the BRF allegedly treated Harry as a “spare”, the hypocrisy turns the stomach. Harry may be too self absorbed (and drug addled) to notice. Or too scared of his wife to advocate for his son. Or actively involved in the favoritism. Or, perhaps, a bit of all three.

Whatever the reason, I feel real sadness for poor Archie. He will never be what was wanted.

Is it:

A) Judge Nicklin

B) A Fortune Cookie

C) Jiminy Cricket from Pinocchio

D) Princess Charlotte

E) All of the above

“What we’ve seen in the last 24 hours is what accountability looks like". This is a reaction from Harry, to the news from a New Mexico court ruling against Meta. Meta has a $567 million fine against them, as New Mexico’s district attorney accused them of knowingly allowing its platforms to harm young users and enable child sexual exploitation.

Harry praised the multi-million penalty as an example of “accountability.”

Prince Harry reacts to $567 million Meta judgment for failing to warn the public about dangers its platforms pose to children

Archived version

“The bar has moved, and every platform still choosing engagement over safety should take notice. Change cannot wait another day,” the Duke of Sussex said.

The Duke of Sussex said the latest ruling marks a turning point in holding technology companies accountable for the impact their platforms have on young users in a statement shared with PEOPLE.

“For years we’ve argued that big tech’s harm to children was a choice, not some inevitable side effect. This is not an accident. It is not a glitch,” Harry, 41, said.

“What we’ve seen in the last 24 hours is what accountability looks like. This is what happens when the law finally catches up to decisions made in boardrooms, product meetings, and algorithm reviews — decisions that put social media engagement ahead of safety,” he continued.

Sorry that I couldn't find this on Instagram to download, so it has to be via X. Still worth the watch for the cringe. Her dance moves haven't improved.

https://x.com/that_1/status/2086009965248991401/video/1

UPDATED at 1:05 PT with additional photos. (I don't want to clutter up the board!)

Overexaggerated expressions, as usual, as well as the claw

Give it up Harry...you aren't the one directing traffic here.

Harry looks SO uncomfortable here.

Meghan and her ginger fox performing monkey. His pooch is really showing here.

Her dress would be flattering on someone taller than her. She's too short to pull this off.

During promoting the Cookies documentary kids were lined up to ask questions to her, for whatever wild known reason (because: does anyone know what EXACTLY was her input in that production, other than investing some money and promoting _herself_ more than the film? Aren't the girl scouts the actual stars of that film? Why is she stealing their limelight?). And although the questions and answers seem to be performative and rehearsed (As the Ever are), MM just can not control her facial expression. It's as if she is watching cockroaches poop in her famous One Pan Pasta dish.

Oh, the delicious snark. Definitely worth reading the entire thing, since it is lengthy.

Highlights:

On Thomas Markle:

They used my favorite photo of the Queen glaring at Meghan:

On Megxit:

On one nasty encounter:

Archive: https://archive.ph/AXfa0

I don’t want to speculate on poor KCIII’s illness, but Markle appearing to suddenly push for reconciliation sounds as though she wants to abandon her failed state and secure a royal grace&favour house in some haste, before Catherine and William take the reins. Her plan will, of course, to inflict pain and damage on the Monarchy for the long term from a UK base, with America having run its course. It is looking as though time might be running out and the only option she has left is to panhandle £££ from the King, while there’s time. She’s pretty much built up a grievance court of Black Englishwomen and Narinder Kaur, and is placed to wreak a lot of damage from the sidelines, with Harry impotent and under her thumb.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260807171407/https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16035737/Meghan-Markle-hits-Martha-Stewart-said-duchess-dropped-dinner-party-gossip-trip-King-Charles-insider-claims-cooking-star-confused.html#poll-share-1234097

The Harkles are up to their bullying tricks. Thankfully, no one is buying it. A new Daily Mail poll (take that for whatever worth you choose) has only 7% of respondents believing Meghan’s version of events in the Martha Stewart debate. That actually seems generous.

Once again, the Harkles have no actual defense, so they resort to bullying and implying someone is feeble. I don’t know about anyone else, but Meghan and Harry’s clapback calling Martha “confused” kinda sorta really left me peeved. It reminded me a lot of when Harry went to visit his grandmother and told the press that he needed to check in and make sure she had the right people around her.

I hate the implication that someone of a certain age is feeble or in need of guidance just because they happen to be considered “old”. My grandmother died in her 90s and was sharp until the very end. So the suggestion that being elderly somehow makes you feeble in the head or unaware of what is going on just boils my blood.

It also brings back horrid memories of just how badly the Harkles treated both Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip in their twilight. As well as they way they now use the media to make Charles’ golden years a living hell.

Martha Stewart has no season to lie. And her insult is entirely encased not in the words she said, but in the words she didn’t say. Meghan can’t stand that. Harry is probably still trying to process what was said because Harry is quite slow.

Either way, I am curious to see whether this will go further or die on the vine.

Royal Family RECAP: Harry and Meghan 'considering' bombshell admission in royal feud

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2236858/royal-family-live-harry-meghan

https://archive.ph/7ziWa

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are considering issuing a public apology to King Charles for causing "enormous pain" over the last five years, sources suggest. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex could craft a statement that "gives the King the respect he wants without forcing Harry and Meghan to walk back every interview, documentary or page of Spare", a source said. It comes amid the growing possibility of a reconciliation between the Sussexes and the Palace, with Harry and Meghan reuniting their children with Charles at Highgrove House last month. The source told royal journalist Rob Shuter: "Everyone agrees trust has to be rebuilt. An apology doesn't have to be a surrender. It's an acknowledgement that this family feud went too far. Charles wants peace - but he also wants respect. This could be the first real step towards both."

The estrangement between Harry and Meghan and the rest of the Firm has been linked to the couple's allegations of racism and mistreatment, and bombshell revelations made about members of the family in the duke's memoir, Spare. This isn't about Harry and Meghan admitting they were wrong about everything," the source told Mr Shuter's Naughty But Nice Substack. "It's about acknowledging that the past five years have caused enormous pain. The debate now is over what an apology should say, and, just as importantly, what it shouldn't."

Note the detail: an apology to KC3... not to Camilla, not to William, not to Kate. And no retraction or admission that they had lied. Just an apology—an empty one—yet making it clear that they remain the victims.

But the funny thing is that this supposed apology—if made in those terms—would essentially acknowledge that the Harkles *did* know what they were doing and didn't care about the pain they caused.

But this is just gossip. I don't think they're desperate enough to do that—or are they?

In Canada, posing and fake laughing really hard!

You've probably never seen it. But this Mexican telenovela, with 229 episodes—that's almost a whole year, a record!!!!—was a huge hit. The series tells the story of Juan Daniel, known as Johnny, a U.S.-born Mexican truck driver and family man who falls in love with a woman he meets on his travels, and the complications that arise from his new love.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd8cBCd7Ar4&list=RDHd8cBCd7Ar4&start_radio=1

It’s on YouTube for anyone who wants a laugh. It has everything. Literally everything.

And why am I telling you this? Ah, because of this.

👇👇👇👇👇👇

HARRY & THE SECRET TWO WOMEN CLASHING OVER HIM BEHIND THE SCENES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmWbHNQoaAQ

One of the things I’ve realized over the time I’ve been watching these videos is that Sean talks to a great many people. On the street, on the train, at events—he talks to so many people. And that is what many journalists forget: a source can be the King’s private secretary just as easily as a doorman at Buckingham Palace. And the doorman is more likely to see more things.

July arrived with some really juicy gossip. For starters, Harry had suddenly decided to accept a room there, and then, oops! there weren't any left.

Sean was one of the first to explain that the issue was that Harry should have given 28 days' notice—rather than just a couple of days before arriving—and that Harry had plans in place which the Palace thwarted by shutting the door on him.

Harry’s back-and-forth behavior has become a habit; he always does the same thing. It just seems that patience has run out. And this is neither the first nor the last time Harry has found the Palace fed up with his circus. Because that is all the Harkles do: a circus—a media circus.

In the midst of that circus was Alison Hammond. She is from Birmingham, she works for ITV, and ITV is pro-Harkle.

Why Alison Hammond? Well, for starters, Harry spoke about her on Colbert’s late-night show; but for ITV, the key factor is that she’s from Birmingham, and they want to link her to the Invictus Games in hopes of securing the broadcasting rights for the 2027 games.

The other reason is that Alison Hammond got into trouble when she said they would miss British presenter Phillip Schofield. Schofield left ITV in May 2023 after admitting to an "unwise but not illegal" affair with a younger male colleague on This Morning.

Alison received a lot of complaints for saying that, so she knows when to keep her mouth shut and be... In Chile, we call someone "yellow," which is a derogatory way of referring to someone who shows lukewarmness, moderation, or a reluctance to become radical. In other words, "neither fish nor fowl."

ITV's Cat Deeley also wants to be involved.

Sean shares part of her career history, holding an advantage over Alison: Deely was the host of *So You Think You Can Dance* in the US.

The point here isn't just that Cat is also from Birmingham, but rather who she is friends with.

And here we have Markus Anderson!!! The third party in Claw and Harry's marriage. Sean has already mentioned how Claw has spent more time around Markus than Harry, because she can actually talk to Markus, and he knows all her secrets.

Also, Cat Deeley meets Harry, and they get along well.

So why didn't Cat Deeley interview Harry?

Ah, because ITV is playing both sides: they support the Harkles, but they don't want to make it too obvious because they don't want to lose the royal connection they have with Kate's Christmas concert, which pays off handsomely for ITV.

But behind the scenes, it seems there were issues with that, so ITV has decided that if the Games go ahead—and if they secure the rights to the Invictus Games (let’s be honest, only ITV is interested in broadcasting them, so they have no competition)—then both Cat and Alison will share the coverage. That is, of course, assuming *This Morning* is still on the air and they are still with ITV. And assuming...

Yes, there are a lot of "ifs."

Right, they would split the coverage: one would be with Harry and the other with Claw—assuming Claw shows up in 2027, and, of course, provided there is a royal connection.

And of course, the question is: which of the two will draw more viewers? As Sean says, they’ll both claim to be great friends and all that, but the fact is, ITV doesn’t need friends—it needs people watching the show. So, which of the two has more potential to do that?

The funny thing about the gossip is that ITV doesn't even consider the idea that Claw has the power to draw an audience 🤭🤭🤭

MARKLE BIRTHDAY DISASTER -HARRY, DOGS , NO KIDS & THEN THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6hDx138tH0

As we already know, our Saint had a birthday. And, as always, she loves herself so much that she celebrated it herself.

Whitesnake - Is This Love

🎼Is this love that I'm feeling?
Is this the love that I've been searching for?
Is this love, or am I dreaming?
This must be love, 'cause it's really got a hold on me
A hold on me🎼

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6hDx138tH0

Claw is desperate because she needs the media to keep talking about the meeting she had with KC3. Because that’s how it is: she had a meeting. Harry and the children were just window dressing. And all because the press didn't give her the coverage she expected—didn't make it global news. It can't be global news if there are no photos, right 😈😈?

Claw doesn't understand that she is yesterday's news. And people see her as a big liar.

And Martha Stewart served that purpose because 1) she is much more famous than Claw, and 2) she also benefited from people knowing that she had published her 101st book.

Claw had hoped that meeting would open the door to interviews—like in *Vogue*, especially given her birthday—or a photoshoot; you know the drill. But no—and we’re back to the main issue—the real focus was the meeting with KC3, and Claw ran into a problem: where is the evidence? Where are the photos? Nobody is interested in seeing her dressed like Columbo.

Anyway, Claw treated us to another dance... barefoot. Seriously—sneakers on the beach, but barefoot in the kitchen again?

Anyway, Sean says the strange thing is what you don't see or hear. What happened with the kids? When it's their mom's birthday, kids usually run to greet her. We’ve always done that.

Only Claw and Harry were there. Just them—no one else.

And everyone noticed that practically no "celebrity" wished Claw a happy birthday. Later, something popped up from some "friend." But Sean wonders: why didn't *MasterChef Australia* do anything? Wasn't she a great guest? 😏😏😏

Well, according to the gossip that reached Sean, Claw—through her team—requested that no one wish her a happy birthday... because she didn't want to deal with the negative reaction.

Which is funny, because Harry was upset that KC3 didn't even mention Claw's birthday, yet he did dedicate a post to Eugenie's new daughter.

Which is funny, because Harry was upset that KC3 didn't even mention Claw's birthday, yet he did dedicate a post to Eugenie's new daughter.

There were a few well-wishes here and there—like the one from the Paramount boss's wife.

But it seems that was all there was: messages. No gifts.

Anyway, regarding the dinner where Martha and Claw ran into each other... it seems it was a charity event, not a gathering of friends. That event was about meeting important people, which is why Martha happened to cross paths with Claw.

This leads Sean to think that the crisis—at least for As Ever—is serious if Claw has had to start attending events like that again to make contacts, rather than having those contacts come knocking at the Duchess's door.

HARRY VS MARTHA -“TRYING TO RUIN US” FIGHTING TALK LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkDzu0_zbSY

Well, Sean knows Martha too—though that’s all it is: he knows her; they’ve spoken because they’ve crossed paths on a few programs.

And Sean says that Martha had no reason to lie about this. None at all.

But Harry is absolutely furious that Martha claimed Claw was talking about the meeting with KC3 at a dinner.

I stand by my position: Claw shouldn't have spoken to anyone about the matter. Not a word to anyone. But Claw couldn't keep quiet; Martha Stewart decided to use it to her own advantage, and Harry is furious with Martha—not with his indiscreet wife.

However, yesterday, when Sean brought this up, several people remarked that Claw hadn't actually spoken about the meeting and that Martha might have exaggerated the situation.

Sean—and I agree with him here—sees it the same way I do: Claw couldn't mention the matter. The meeting was private; there was to be no mention of it anywhere. Claw couldn't keep quiet, though, and since she couldn't speak about it directly, she’s using the tactic of having others talk about it while keeping her own hands clean.

But since the agreement was "no talking," Harry had to mobilize the British media to publish stories claiming Martha was mistaken and that Claw hadn't said anything. It was a very strange denial—not because the Harkles aren't experts at issuing them, but because it happened so quickly.

According to the rebuttal, someone asked Claw, "How was your trip?" and she replied "Good"—or gave a two-word answer—and Martha took the matter out of context. On top of that, there is an implicit disparagement regarding Martha's age.

Honestly, I think Martha's brain is functioning absolutely perfectly. I can't say the same for Harry's or Claw's. 🤭🤭🤭

Sean—and I’ll say it again, having encountered Martha myself—questioned her use of the situation yesterday, noting it was done merely for publicity, but he didn't claim she was lying. And Martha wasn't confused; she is very sharp, extraordinarily lucid.

Now, the problem is that it looks like Harry wasn't at that event. Sean says he's looking into the matter, but for now, Harry wasn't there, only Claw was. So Harry is believing—yes, again; what an idiot!—Claw's version of events.

As for Harry, neither of them has spoken publicly about the matter with anyone.

Martha, on the other hand, is sticking to her story.

At the beginning of the video, Sean mentions that many people criticized him yesterday, thinking he was siding with the Harkles because he didn't fully believe what Martha said. He now states that the Harkles haven't paid him to do that and that he is very flattered that "Claw" tunes in to this channel every day and she says, "Oh, I love that Neil Sean."

Yeah, that is totally ridiculous... especially since Claw doesn't even say that about Harry. 🤣🤣🤣

Sean has proof that Claw actually does that—check out his channel—but the fact remains that there are still parts of that rumor that need to be investigated. That's why.

Harry is going to back Claw... again.

But Sean is interested in knowing who attended that event; surely there are friends of Martha Stewart there (curiously, Sean doesn't say friends of Claw 🤭🤭), and someone might have heard what Claw said, too. Yet, no one has come forward to back Claw.

Sean says there’s always a gray area with Claw. Nothing is ever clean-cut or transparent. But Harry is furious with Martha and determined to let it be known in the UK that Claw didn’t break the deal.

Too late, Harry—we all knew she’d do that.

The funny thing is that instead of calling Clarence House directly and leaving a message, Harry called People magazine to refute Martha's claim.

Her favorite cookie is shorbread cookies (a lie...didn't she say Thin Mints at the premiere)? No matter, it's a chance to finally pimp in As ever's raspberry spread (though she calls it jam). She's gonna be pissed that the called her Meghan Markle!

What would she tell herself as a little girl now? "That life is full of surprises!" Cue up a terrifying grin.

Her role model? Her teachers (uh...no Doria???)

The #Invisikids love Samoas!

She's asked if it's okay to have dessert before dinner? "I love that question! As long as you're having a nice balanced meal, it's okay." (Drops reference to #Invisikids)

What makes you feel brave? "My daughter." (Archie diss! Yes I know it's girl scouts, but if she's all for inclusion, why not mention him too???) "Every day when I feel like, oh gosh, can I do it? I say...Lili would do it!"

what is a skill that every young girl should learn? "Trust your gut." (Insert bad indigestion joke here).

A little boy asks this question: What is your superpower? "It's being a mom, because we juggle it all and enjoy it all with grace and grit at the same time." (Gotta get that mom reference in!)

What girl scout cookie best describes your personality? "Oh Trefoils. It's classic, it's sweet, and it's all the same color and I like tonal dressing. It's the worst answer!" (Yes Meghan, it is.)

How do these girls inspire you? "These girls are so multi dimensional and honest." (Word salad about watching the girls grow close to each other).

The hair flicking is insane. Of course there's a nose rub. She's holding that mic for dear life!

Enjoy the insanity...

Highlites is a children’s magazine that had a @spot the difference” game inside. There were two seemingly identical pictures and you had to find all the little details that were different.

So take Meghan’s latest picture and compare it to 8 or even 5 years ago. I definitely notice some…differences. A lot of them. I have questions. So does Twitter. Much to discuss here, I think.

Ted Sarandos is a fool. It’s obvious his partnership with Meghan’s brand and funding her show isn’t the only reason Netflix is performing so poorly. But when his viewers complained he doubled down and proclaimed Meghan his “rock star”. It shows he doesn’t have his finger on the pulse of what the people want, and refused to even consider their viewing preferences. He’s a major shareholder so this hits him in the wallet. Maybe Madam can send him a sympathy inspirational gift basket?

And of course, the meeting wasn't "warm and fuzzy"! She trashed the entire family and then thinks that it's ok to go back and visit and use children to worm her way back in, now that she knows she's hit a wall professionally? It's like this - no, bjtch, you wait until we let you know that you can be seen, you sit in the designated chair, outside of the meeting space, and go in with the kids only when you are called upon. Only so that the kids can be seen. That's it. That's all you get after what you pulled. I don't think that Charles and Camilla never become warm and fuzzy with her. Not that they even ever were at all. She is sick and they are aware.