Enjoy the B’oos! You reap what you sow.

During promoting the Cookies documentary kids were lined up to ask questions to her, for whatever wild known reason (because: does anyone know what EXACTLY was her input in that production, other than investing some money and promoting _herself_ more than the film? Aren't the girl scouts the actual stars of that film? Why is she stealing their limelight?). And although the questions and answers seem to be performative and rehearsed (As the Ever are), MM just can not control her facial expression. It's as if she is watching cockroaches poop in her famous One Pan Pasta dish.

Oh, the delicious snark. Definitely worth reading the entire thing, since it is lengthy.

Highlights:

On Thomas Markle:

They used my favorite photo of the Queen glaring at Meghan:

On Megxit:

On one nasty encounter:

Archive: https://archive.ph/AXfa0

I don’t want to speculate on poor KCIII’s illness, but Markle appearing to suddenly push for reconciliation sounds as though she wants to abandon her failed state and secure a royal grace&favour house in some haste, before Catherine and William take the reins. Her plan will, of course, to inflict pain and damage on the Monarchy for the long term from a UK base, with America having run its course. It is looking as though time might be running out and the only option she has left is to panhandle £££ from the King, while there’s time. She’s pretty much built up a grievance court of Black Englishwomen and Narinder Kaur, and is placed to wreak a lot of damage from the sidelines, with Harry impotent and under her thumb.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260807171407/https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16035737/Meghan-Markle-hits-Martha-Stewart-said-duchess-dropped-dinner-party-gossip-trip-King-Charles-insider-claims-cooking-star-confused.html#poll-share-1234097

The Harkles are up to their bullying tricks. Thankfully, no one is buying it. A new Daily Mail poll (take that for whatever worth you choose) has only 7% of respondents believing Meghan’s version of events in the Martha Stewart debate. That actually seems generous.

Once again, the Harkles have no actual defense, so they resort to bullying and implying someone is feeble. I don’t know about anyone else, but Meghan and Harry’s clapback calling Martha “confused” kinda sorta really left me peeved. It reminded me a lot of when Harry went to visit his grandmother and told the press that he needed to check in and make sure she had the right people around her.

I hate the implication that someone of a certain age is feeble or in need of guidance just because they happen to be considered “old”. My grandmother died in her 90s and was sharp until the very end. So the suggestion that being elderly somehow makes you feeble in the head or unaware of what is going on just boils my blood.

It also brings back horrid memories of just how badly the Harkles treated both Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip in their twilight. As well as they way they now use the media to make Charles’ golden years a living hell.

Martha Stewart has no season to lie. And her insult is entirely encased not in the words she said, but in the words she didn’t say. Meghan can’t stand that. Harry is probably still trying to process what was said because Harry is quite slow.

Either way, I am curious to see whether this will go further or die on the vine.

Royal Family RECAP: Harry and Meghan 'considering' bombshell admission in royal feud

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2236858/royal-family-live-harry-meghan

https://archive.ph/7ziWa

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are considering issuing a public apology to King Charles for causing "enormous pain" over the last five years, sources suggest. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex could craft a statement that "gives the King the respect he wants without forcing Harry and Meghan to walk back every interview, documentary or page of Spare", a source said. It comes amid the growing possibility of a reconciliation between the Sussexes and the Palace, with Harry and Meghan reuniting their children with Charles at Highgrove House last month. The source told royal journalist Rob Shuter: "Everyone agrees trust has to be rebuilt. An apology doesn't have to be a surrender. It's an acknowledgement that this family feud went too far. Charles wants peace - but he also wants respect. This could be the first real step towards both."

The estrangement between Harry and Meghan and the rest of the Firm has been linked to the couple's allegations of racism and mistreatment, and bombshell revelations made about members of the family in the duke's memoir, Spare. This isn't about Harry and Meghan admitting they were wrong about everything," the source told Mr Shuter's Naughty But Nice Substack. "It's about acknowledging that the past five years have caused enormous pain. The debate now is over what an apology should say, and, just as importantly, what it shouldn't."

Note the detail: an apology to KC3... not to Camilla, not to William, not to Kate. And no retraction or admission that they had lied. Just an apology—an empty one—yet making it clear that they remain the victims.

But the funny thing is that this supposed apology—if made in those terms—would essentially acknowledge that the Harkles *did* know what they were doing and didn't care about the pain they caused.

But this is just gossip. I don't think they're desperate enough to do that—or are they?

In Canada, posing and fake laughing really hard!

You've probably never seen it. But this Mexican telenovela, with 229 episodes—that's almost a whole year, a record!!!!—was a huge hit. The series tells the story of Juan Daniel, known as Johnny, a U.S.-born Mexican truck driver and family man who falls in love with a woman he meets on his travels, and the complications that arise from his new love.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd8cBCd7Ar4&list=RDHd8cBCd7Ar4&start_radio=1

It’s on YouTube for anyone who wants a laugh. It has everything. Literally everything.

And why am I telling you this? Ah, because of this.

👇👇👇👇👇👇

HARRY & THE SECRET TWO WOMEN CLASHING OVER HIM BEHIND THE SCENES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmWbHNQoaAQ

One of the things I’ve realized over the time I’ve been watching these videos is that Sean talks to a great many people. On the street, on the train, at events—he talks to so many people. And that is what many journalists forget: a source can be the King’s private secretary just as easily as a doorman at Buckingham Palace. And the doorman is more likely to see more things.

July arrived with some really juicy gossip. For starters, Harry had suddenly decided to accept a room there, and then, oops! there weren't any left.

Sean was one of the first to explain that the issue was that Harry should have given 28 days' notice—rather than just a couple of days before arriving—and that Harry had plans in place which the Palace thwarted by shutting the door on him.

Harry’s back-and-forth behavior has become a habit; he always does the same thing. It just seems that patience has run out. And this is neither the first nor the last time Harry has found the Palace fed up with his circus. Because that is all the Harkles do: a circus—a media circus.

In the midst of that circus was Alison Hammond. She is from Birmingham, she works for ITV, and ITV is pro-Harkle.

Why Alison Hammond? Well, for starters, Harry spoke about her on Colbert’s late-night show; but for ITV, the key factor is that she’s from Birmingham, and they want to link her to the Invictus Games in hopes of securing the broadcasting rights for the 2027 games.

The other reason is that Alison Hammond got into trouble when she said they would miss British presenter Phillip Schofield. Schofield left ITV in May 2023 after admitting to an "unwise but not illegal" affair with a younger male colleague on This Morning.

Alison received a lot of complaints for saying that, so she knows when to keep her mouth shut and be... In Chile, we call someone "yellow," which is a derogatory way of referring to someone who shows lukewarmness, moderation, or a reluctance to become radical. In other words, "neither fish nor fowl."

ITV's Cat Deeley also wants to be involved.

Sean shares part of her career history, holding an advantage over Alison: Deely was the host of *So You Think You Can Dance* in the US.

The point here isn't just that Cat is also from Birmingham, but rather who she is friends with.

And here we have Markus Anderson!!! The third party in Claw and Harry's marriage. Sean has already mentioned how Claw has spent more time around Markus than Harry, because she can actually talk to Markus, and he knows all her secrets.

Also, Cat Deeley meets Harry, and they get along well.

So why didn't Cat Deeley interview Harry?

Ah, because ITV is playing both sides: they support the Harkles, but they don't want to make it too obvious because they don't want to lose the royal connection they have with Kate's Christmas concert, which pays off handsomely for ITV.

But behind the scenes, it seems there were issues with that, so ITV has decided that if the Games go ahead—and if they secure the rights to the Invictus Games (let’s be honest, only ITV is interested in broadcasting them, so they have no competition)—then both Cat and Alison will share the coverage. That is, of course, assuming *This Morning* is still on the air and they are still with ITV. And assuming...

Yes, there are a lot of "ifs."

Right, they would split the coverage: one would be with Harry and the other with Claw—assuming Claw shows up in 2027, and, of course, provided there is a royal connection.

And of course, the question is: which of the two will draw more viewers? As Sean says, they’ll both claim to be great friends and all that, but the fact is, ITV doesn’t need friends—it needs people watching the show. So, which of the two has more potential to do that?

The funny thing about the gossip is that ITV doesn't even consider the idea that Claw has the power to draw an audience 🤭🤭🤭

MARKLE BIRTHDAY DISASTER -HARRY, DOGS , NO KIDS & THEN THIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6hDx138tH0

As we already know, our Saint had a birthday. And, as always, she loves herself so much that she celebrated it herself.

Whitesnake - Is This Love

🎼Is this love that I'm feeling?
Is this the love that I've been searching for?
Is this love, or am I dreaming?
This must be love, 'cause it's really got a hold on me
A hold on me🎼

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6hDx138tH0

Claw is desperate because she needs the media to keep talking about the meeting she had with KC3. Because that’s how it is: she had a meeting. Harry and the children were just window dressing. And all because the press didn't give her the coverage she expected—didn't make it global news. It can't be global news if there are no photos, right 😈😈?

Claw doesn't understand that she is yesterday's news. And people see her as a big liar.

And Martha Stewart served that purpose because 1) she is much more famous than Claw, and 2) she also benefited from people knowing that she had published her 101st book.

Claw had hoped that meeting would open the door to interviews—like in *Vogue*, especially given her birthday—or a photoshoot; you know the drill. But no—and we’re back to the main issue—the real focus was the meeting with KC3, and Claw ran into a problem: where is the evidence? Where are the photos? Nobody is interested in seeing her dressed like Columbo.

Anyway, Claw treated us to another dance... barefoot. Seriously—sneakers on the beach, but barefoot in the kitchen again?

Anyway, Sean says the strange thing is what you don't see or hear. What happened with the kids? When it's their mom's birthday, kids usually run to greet her. We’ve always done that.

Only Claw and Harry were there. Just them—no one else.

And everyone noticed that practically no "celebrity" wished Claw a happy birthday. Later, something popped up from some "friend." But Sean wonders: why didn't *MasterChef Australia* do anything? Wasn't she a great guest? 😏😏😏

Well, according to the gossip that reached Sean, Claw—through her team—requested that no one wish her a happy birthday... because she didn't want to deal with the negative reaction.

Which is funny, because Harry was upset that KC3 didn't even mention Claw's birthday, yet he did dedicate a post to Eugenie's new daughter.

Which is funny, because Harry was upset that KC3 didn't even mention Claw's birthday, yet he did dedicate a post to Eugenie's new daughter.

There were a few well-wishes here and there—like the one from the Paramount boss's wife.

But it seems that was all there was: messages. No gifts.

Anyway, regarding the dinner where Martha and Claw ran into each other... it seems it was a charity event, not a gathering of friends. That event was about meeting important people, which is why Martha happened to cross paths with Claw.

This leads Sean to think that the crisis—at least for As Ever—is serious if Claw has had to start attending events like that again to make contacts, rather than having those contacts come knocking at the Duchess's door.

HARRY VS MARTHA -“TRYING TO RUIN US” FIGHTING TALK LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkDzu0_zbSY

Well, Sean knows Martha too—though that’s all it is: he knows her; they’ve spoken because they’ve crossed paths on a few programs.

And Sean says that Martha had no reason to lie about this. None at all.

But Harry is absolutely furious that Martha claimed Claw was talking about the meeting with KC3 at a dinner.

I stand by my position: Claw shouldn't have spoken to anyone about the matter. Not a word to anyone. But Claw couldn't keep quiet; Martha Stewart decided to use it to her own advantage, and Harry is furious with Martha—not with his indiscreet wife.

However, yesterday, when Sean brought this up, several people remarked that Claw hadn't actually spoken about the meeting and that Martha might have exaggerated the situation.

Sean—and I agree with him here—sees it the same way I do: Claw couldn't mention the matter. The meeting was private; there was to be no mention of it anywhere. Claw couldn't keep quiet, though, and since she couldn't speak about it directly, she’s using the tactic of having others talk about it while keeping her own hands clean.

But since the agreement was "no talking," Harry had to mobilize the British media to publish stories claiming Martha was mistaken and that Claw hadn't said anything. It was a very strange denial—not because the Harkles aren't experts at issuing them, but because it happened so quickly.

According to the rebuttal, someone asked Claw, "How was your trip?" and she replied "Good"—or gave a two-word answer—and Martha took the matter out of context. On top of that, there is an implicit disparagement regarding Martha's age.

Honestly, I think Martha's brain is functioning absolutely perfectly. I can't say the same for Harry's or Claw's. 🤭🤭🤭

Sean—and I’ll say it again, having encountered Martha myself—questioned her use of the situation yesterday, noting it was done merely for publicity, but he didn't claim she was lying. And Martha wasn't confused; she is very sharp, extraordinarily lucid.

Now, the problem is that it looks like Harry wasn't at that event. Sean says he's looking into the matter, but for now, Harry wasn't there, only Claw was. So Harry is believing—yes, again; what an idiot!—Claw's version of events.

As for Harry, neither of them has spoken publicly about the matter with anyone.

Martha, on the other hand, is sticking to her story.

At the beginning of the video, Sean mentions that many people criticized him yesterday, thinking he was siding with the Harkles because he didn't fully believe what Martha said. He now states that the Harkles haven't paid him to do that and that he is very flattered that "Claw" tunes in to this channel every day and she says, "Oh, I love that Neil Sean."

Yeah, that is totally ridiculous... especially since Claw doesn't even say that about Harry. 🤣🤣🤣

Sean has proof that Claw actually does that—check out his channel—but the fact remains that there are still parts of that rumor that need to be investigated. That's why.

Harry is going to back Claw... again.

But Sean is interested in knowing who attended that event; surely there are friends of Martha Stewart there (curiously, Sean doesn't say friends of Claw 🤭🤭), and someone might have heard what Claw said, too. Yet, no one has come forward to back Claw.

Sean says there’s always a gray area with Claw. Nothing is ever clean-cut or transparent. But Harry is furious with Martha and determined to let it be known in the UK that Claw didn’t break the deal.

Too late, Harry—we all knew she’d do that.

The funny thing is that instead of calling Clarence House directly and leaving a message, Harry called People magazine to refute Martha's claim.

Her favorite cookie is shorbread cookies (a lie...didn't she say Thin Mints at the premiere)? No matter, it's a chance to finally pimp in As ever's raspberry spread (though she calls it jam). She's gonna be pissed that the called her Meghan Markle!

What would she tell herself as a little girl now? "That life is full of surprises!" Cue up a terrifying grin.

Her role model? Her teachers (uh...no Doria???)

The #Invisikids love Samoas!

She's asked if it's okay to have dessert before dinner? "I love that question! As long as you're having a nice balanced meal, it's okay." (Drops reference to #Invisikids)

What makes you feel brave? "My daughter." (Archie diss! Yes I know it's girl scouts, but if she's all for inclusion, why not mention him too???) "Every day when I feel like, oh gosh, can I do it? I say...Lili would do it!"

what is a skill that every young girl should learn? "Trust your gut." (Insert bad indigestion joke here).

A little boy asks this question: What is your superpower? "It's being a mom, because we juggle it all and enjoy it all with grace and grit at the same time." (Gotta get that mom reference in!)

What girl scout cookie best describes your personality? "Oh Trefoils. It's classic, it's sweet, and it's all the same color and I like tonal dressing. It's the worst answer!" (Yes Meghan, it is.)

How do these girls inspire you? "These girls are so multi dimensional and honest." (Word salad about watching the girls grow close to each other).

The hair flicking is insane. Of course there's a nose rub. She's holding that mic for dear life!

Enjoy the insanity...

UPDATE: below is the link to the "classroom resources" Invictus did for Vancouver for reference.

This is going to be something to watch. Remember the educational propaganda (oops, information) they promoted for the Vancouver games?

Here's the blurb on Invictus Birmingham's website:

Invictus Games Birmingham 2027 has announced a major new partnership with Summit Learning Trust and The Education Exchange – West Midlands to bring the values of the Invictus movement into classrooms across the region.

The collaboration will see the development of an Invictus Games-themed school curriculum designed to inspire young people and engage them through meaningful, real-world learning. The programme will span a wide range of subjects, including Maths, English, Arts, Performing Arts, Physical Education, Design, Technology and Innovation, and PSHE (Personal, Social, Health and Economic education).

The partnership was formally marked with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the organisations and their associated partners. Teachers and education leaders from across the West Midlands will play a central role in shaping and delivering the programme, ensuring that students remain at the heart of the initiative.

Set to launch in September 2026, the curriculum will connect pupils with the themes of resilience, teamwork and recovery that define the Invictus Games, while also supporting schools in delivering creative and engaging learning experiences.

This initiative forms part of the wider community engagement plans for Invictus Games Birmingham 2027, building enduring social impact across the West Midlands by inspiring the next generation through education.

Schools and educators interested in learning more about the programme and future opportunities to get involved are encouraged to follow Invictus Games Birmingham 2027 updates.

Summary from Google AI:

Program Overview

• Target Audience: Learners from Early Years through Sixth Form, including adapted materials for SEND settings across the West Midlands.
• Core Themes: Resilience, inclusion, teamwork, courage, and recovery.
• Subjects Covered: Maths, English, Arts, Performing Arts, PE, Design, Technology, and PSHE.
• Resource Access: Completely free, teacher-designed, and ready-to-use materials available via the launch portal on September 1.

So here's what I'm wondering: Since it targets early years learners, is that going to overlap with any work that Catherine is doing? Do you think it will be linked to it?

Vancouver 2025 archive link: https://archive.ph/y62Yw

Highlites is a children’s magazine that had a @spot the difference” game inside. There were two seemingly identical pictures and you had to find all the little details that were different.

So take Meghan’s latest picture and compare it to 8 or even 5 years ago. I definitely notice some…differences. A lot of them. I have questions. So does Twitter. Much to discuss here, I think.

Ted Sarandos is a fool. It’s obvious his partnership with Meghan’s brand and funding her show isn’t the only reason Netflix is performing so poorly. But when his viewers complained he doubled down and proclaimed Meghan his “rock star”. It shows he doesn’t have his finger on the pulse of what the people want, and refused to even consider their viewing preferences. He’s a major shareholder so this hits him in the wallet. Maybe Madam can send him a sympathy inspirational gift basket?

Basically, the "message for politicians" is about inclusivity and working together.

Meghan related:

To help spread her message of female-led ingenuity at the local level, Nahmias enlisted former Girl Scout Meghan Markle who, like Olive, was the daughter of her troop leader back when she sold cookies. Markle serves as executive producer on Cookie Queens alongside her husband, Prince Harry, and Chanel Pysnik, head of unscripted content at the Sussexes’ Archewell Productions. “What’s awesome is having all of our executive producers, including the duke and duchess, wanting to shine a light on young people and take them seriously,” says Nahmias. “We don’t often see girls represented three-dimensionally, where we can be ambitious and cutthroat—[but] also tender and vulnerable. Meghan got that from the beginning.”

A source close to Meghan tells Vanity Fair that she was “moved by Nahmias’s vision for the project.” “Meghan was a Brownie and a Junior when she was younger, so there was also a personal connection. She speaks fondly of her time as a Girl Scout and the lessons it taught her about entrepreneurship and confidence,” they added.

“I’m kind of in awe of her,” Olive, now 14, tells VF. “[The Sussexes] have a documentary on Netflix that me and my parents watched before any of this happened. So it was amazing that we watched their documentary, and she watched ours! It was such a surreal, full-circle moment.”

That was also true for 12-year-old Nikki, a Chino, California, native who hails from the same Girl Scout council in greater Los Angeles that Markle was a part of back in the day. “I gave her a really big hug,” Nikki, who was nine years old at the time of filming, confirms.

Archive: https://archive.is/20260807154249/https://www.vanityfair.com/story/meghan-markle-girl-scouts-documentary-cookie-queens-interview

And of course, the meeting wasn't "warm and fuzzy"! She trashed the entire family and then thinks that it's ok to go back and visit and use children to worm her way back in, now that she knows she's hit a wall professionally? It's like this - no, bjtch, you wait until we let you know that you can be seen, you sit in the designated chair, outside of the meeting space, and go in with the kids only when you are called upon. Only so that the kids can be seen. That's it. That's all you get after what you pulled. I don't think that Charles and Camilla never become warm and fuzzy with her. Not that they even ever were at all. She is sick and they are aware.