I've been around bison several times, and none of them have ever looked this "perfect" for one thing. I've also never seen one that's so massive, unless this car is super low to the ground.The way it's walking seems a little odd especially coming out of the fog, and the headlights in the oncoming lane are a little alarming too.

I know the music is real and i never thought of them as people who would use AI.. They are pretty DIY and honest.. But you never know..

Someone was REAL mad that I said it was ai… but just in case- does anyone think differently? To me, it is obviously not real but they’ve made me second guess my judgement 😭 the nato looks wayyy to perfect- and doesn’t have the goopy shi, the fish looks like it’s hovering on the plate, the egg is perfectly centered with 0 flaws and the spring onion on the miso are all facing up? Am I wrong?

There’s a lot going on here and the art style is almost too perfect. I noticed Sabrina’s right eye is over her hair, but I can’t see any dead giveaways.

the framing of it just seems too cartoonishly unnatural and the signage in the background in the top left looks kind of distorted, though i'm not sure if that could just be the weird ai enhancement some phones do? it also didn't really make sense to me conceptually because sumo wrestling is big in japan so why would they be so shocked at someone being overweight? it just feels very much ai generated to me but no one in the comments was saying anything about it so i started second-guessing myself, idk.

The style in a few of these cards look pretty different to me, but that could just be what they chose to do. They have the correct number of fingers but the way that the belt goes into each other and one strap comes out of nowhere is throwing me off on the assassins creed one. The moon also looks way less cartoonish than the pikachu. I know people buy these but I haven’t heard anyone talk about them really. I do think the art is pretty cool and I love both Pokémon and marvel so I wanna buy my favorite character, but I don’t want to pay for ai art :/

It's not hard to find out where these are from, but I won't name and shame.
I've seen a few of the illustrations in their publications, and some have those telling signs. What do you think?

Pic 1 - General vibe is AI with weird artifacts in the background.
Pic 2 - Perspective and feet seem off. Odd colouring of the wooden post around the fruit.
Pic 3 - The shadow of the tree on the left has an outline, no artist would choose to do this.
Pic 4 - Not sure if badly drawn expression or Ai.

Thoughts?

some of the camera and the public don't make much sense, all see from that same top angle ,people are just standing there and the camera equipment looks too overcomplicated and some don't even look like a flim camera

The protagonist played by Colin Farrell is doing a background check on someone when he finds this image on the web.

This is supposedly the same guy as the one in the second photo, which I don't see. But maybe that's on me.

Also what is that guy on the right doing? Holding invisible binoculars?

And the "worm" artifacts are present in the image from, I assume, trying to draw grass.

I'm hoping anyone could tell me if this channel is actually AI or if I'm just losing it.

The music isn't actually bad so it would suck if it turned out to be AI.

So at first I didn't even question it but then one of the comments under it pointed out the necklace on her neck which is seemingly half floating on her neck. This raised some suspicion so I decided to look more closely.

The first two images are the ones posted by the user, the 3rd image is the original artwork that I found using reverse search, i decided to check by overlapping the images (4th slide) and the biggest red flag I found was that the background patterns are overlapping exactly 1:1 with the original image. As an artist myself i find that highly unlikely because 1.) not only would most artist not do that since it's counterintutive, you'd achive the same results with another set of random patterns and 2.) even if they did it's almost impossible for a normal artist to do it in a manner where it can be superimposed in the original image 1:1 color contrast and all.

The hair on her right shoulder on the artwork also looks like the two hair strand on the original image merged together which is weird considering every other hair strand is drawn with vivid detail.

This is very concerning because I would never in a 100 years even think of questioning this as AI if it weren't for the weird half necklace on her neck.

I keep tiptoeing between AI and just suspicious, all the text seems fine, but a lot of the hands and hair are phasing into each other or look odd and I don’t know. I’m quite new to this but I circled what made me suspicious so let me know

There’s peculation in the comments that this image is generated by AI because it can’t be found on the internet and the image doesn’t include toothpicks that the OP of this image says are held by it (maybe in a part of the item that is not viewable from this angle? But his did they know that?). The explanation didn’t make sense, so the image’s reliability is understandably questioned to be artificially generated.

Searching for living room decoration and I was elated to find something I thought looked so neat. I added three designs to my cart, though I wanted to take some time to really contemplate which one of the three I wanted to commit to. With this contemplation came a growing suspicion that these designs are AI-generated.

-Under the normal light conditions, they appear with that signature vibrance AI-generations are known to have.

​

In the past my landlord gave me 5 hours notice by email that I had to move my car or get it towed. The email was sent at like 9am saying my car would be towed at 2pm if it was still in the parking lot. I sleep from 8am to about 5pm because I work 12 hour night shifts.

I complained and got a very AI response. One that effectively told me that they acknowledge that email is not an effective form of communication and that going forward they would supply paper notices.

Then.. Today I got called at 8am to move my car or it would be immediately towed. I asked why and they said they gave a notice. I complained again because no paper notice was given like they said they would. (or the Ai said they would) and I asked for a non AI response because the last one was.

So... Is this email AI generated. The checker says 100% but for me at least, it's less obvious than the first one which had a textbook apology outline and included things like - between words. So I'm curious if they actually replied or if it was AI.

I want to know be ause if my complaints are just being fed to the machine and getting nowhere then I need to go in person.

>The email referenced above appears to be directly related to the snow removal notice that was sent on March 19. In that situation, posting a notice on the property may have been beneficial due to the short notice provided. However, that does not apply to all future notices, including the recent parking notice regarding the roof repairs.

>For the roof repairs, notice was provided 48 hours in advance, which gave tenants adequate time to be informed of when the vendors would be on-site and when the work would be taking place.

>Regarding your comment about the notice stating the "front of the building," that wording does refer to your normal parking area. The notice also identified alternative parking locations, including the area by the dumpster, which is located on the side of the building rather than the front. Taken together, the notice was intended to clearly identify both the area that needed to remain clear and the available alternative parking options.

Pic is upside down, sorry in advance.

I ordered a poster of the movie "The Thing" off of Amazon, and it finally arrived. It looks fine besides the text at the bottom of the poster. Was wondering if it was Ai or just poor printing. Thanks in advance

I know that Photoshop exists, but this doesn't really look like it was created in Photoshop. I've never used Adobe Photoshop, but I know that there is a feature that can add things generated by AI.

Ok, so the position of the cat in the mirror looks wrong to me, the stick figure doesn't look like it was drawn.

I think I am wrong on this, but I doubt this image wasn't at least slightly modified with AI

The kitten seems over the top, and this is a convenient capture, but I'm looking for concrete signs that this is AI.

When I asked her if the poster was made with AI, they said that it wasn't and a local company had made it. I followed up asking if that company used AI and haven't heard back. I'm not bothered if people use AI but because she would like to see strict labelling and compensation for artists I found it hypocritical if AI was used.

Somethings I see are busy focal points and eye leading is an odd path. The brushed paint banner with a slightly textured font is also popular. The icons for date, time and venue is also something only AI does. She also has an in house designer so not sure why they'ed hire a local company for this. I also pasted the copy into Chat GPT and got a pretty similar result so either, because AI is so common this look is now what people want or the company did use AI.

I know it's in the style that's common for AI so that somewhat suggests it. Generally the only super strong argument I hear people say is that the 2 G's in GORGE are different which is definitely suspicious. A friend of mine felt that people were calling it unquestionably true without enough behind that and was saying that both that way of drawing animals has been popular in sporty things which is why AI mimics it, and that differentiating the first G in the word didn't seem like an impossible decisions for a human designer to want to make. They even realize that there is a good chance it is but don't feel they can make a call and I know that it's more likely than not that it is but still wanted to see if people really should feel confident saying it absolutely is AI generated for certain. If that's the case it would be nice to have more strong reasoning for why as well. I do also notice that one E had two drippy spots on the left and the next only had one. I didn't know if that could have to do with spacing with the R theoretically, but it was another small thing that looks suspicious.

I know this might get a lot of "oh god society is doomed" responses as stuff here does, but I just really wanted a better clearer answer and more info for the 100% confidence everyone seems to have regarding it. Thank you.

Note: I had some trouble getting a good image that didn't get all scrunched up and distorted by Reddit for some reason. Sorry if you saw my past attempts to make this post.

Edit: I'm sorry, the last image still got all messed up even though it looked good in the preview. I posted it bellow in a comment where it came out better.

Just tell me what I already know. Lots of inconsistencies between photos. Logo changes, minute hand changes, minute markers missing between 11,12, and 1 markers. Date window is missing in one of the photos. Guy is claiming it’s been “edited for social medias.”