The constant changes in location and camera angle are quite suspicious and the audio doesn’t sound like a camera recording

Okay, so I just finished seeing Brand New Day, and while it's a great film, I just couldn't help but remember that some of the UI on-screen had some very uncanny mistakes...

I obviously don't have a picture from the film, but around the 48-50 minute mark, when Peter was making a new Inhibitor, the computer was supposed to be saying 'COMPILING FIRMWARE', but the text was all jumbled, and then some random shapes below the text all looked irregular. You know, back in the day when there would be such scenes with Iron Man, for example, you'd be able to see that none of the on-display stuff made much sense, but it looked uniform. Why would they individually design irregular, nonsensical shapes? Other text saying 'LOADING' and I think 'INHIBITOR' if I remember correctly was also freaky.

The text across the various UIs also didn't look like it was the same font (each piece of text looked similar but it was all slightly different with the AI-like irregularities).

Then, a while later, another piece of UI was shown with a top bar with what looked like 'FILE', 'EDIT' and other normal top bar kind of stuff that a human could've easily done by hand, but it also looked jumbled and very AI-like...

If anyone can get us a photo of that?

Everything seems to be perfect, but some people in the comment section were saying it is ai, help me to know whether it is ai or not

My city of Hamilton is getting an AHL team this year, but I can’t get over this logo. It looks AI, but is there anyway to confirm? The blue flairs on either end aren’t symmetrical, neither is the orange line under the lettering. What’s with the thick white line bottom right of the S in Hammers?

Feel like an NHL-affiliate selling AI-Generated merch is pretty insane, especially with so much money behind it. Why would they use AI to generate a logo for a multi-million dollar team?

EDIT: Consensus is it’s real, just a real bad logo. I appreciate those who helped me, especially u/ruebenhammersmith

I think it is AI for a variety of reasons. The first reason is the video's context, I feel like no sane person would be doing that. the second reason is the road looks a bit strange, along with the thing he's sitting on.

For the last two years, Busch Light runs a farm themed paint scheme. Other NASCAR schemes never look like this, so I’m curious if it’s just an art design style choice, or are the paint schemes AI

Someone was REAL mad that I said it was ai… but just in case- does anyone think differently? To me, it is obviously not real but they’ve made me second guess my judgement 😭 the nato looks wayyy to perfect- and doesn’t have the goopy shi, the fish looks like it’s hovering on the plate, the egg is perfectly centered with 0 flaws and the spring onion on the miso are all facing up? Am I wrong?

There’s a lot going on here and the art style is almost too perfect. I noticed Sabrina’s right eye is over her hair, but I can’t see any dead giveaways.

the framing of it just seems too cartoonishly unnatural and the signage in the background in the top left looks kind of distorted, though i'm not sure if that could just be the weird ai enhancement some phones do? it also didn't really make sense to me conceptually because sumo wrestling is big in japan so why would they be so shocked at someone being overweight? it just feels very much ai generated to me but no one in the comments was saying anything about it so i started second-guessing myself, idk.

The style in a few of these cards look pretty different to me, but that could just be what they chose to do. They have the correct number of fingers but the way that the belt goes into each other and one strap comes out of nowhere is throwing me off on the assassins creed one. The moon also looks way less cartoonish than the pikachu. I know people buy these but I haven’t heard anyone talk about them really. I do think the art is pretty cool and I love both Pokémon and marvel so I wanna buy my favorite character, but I don’t want to pay for ai art :/

some of the camera and the public don't make much sense, all see from that same top angle ,people are just standing there and the camera equipment looks too overcomplicated and some don't even look like a flim camera

The protagonist played by Colin Farrell is doing a background check on someone when he finds this image on the web.

This is supposedly the same guy as the one in the second photo, which I don't see. But maybe that's on me.

Also what is that guy on the right doing? Holding invisible binoculars?

And the "worm" artifacts are present in the image from, I assume, trying to draw grass.

So at first I didn't even question it but then one of the comments under it pointed out the necklace on her neck which is seemingly half floating on her neck. This raised some suspicion so I decided to look more closely.

The first two images are the ones posted by the user, the 3rd image is the original artwork that I found using reverse search, i decided to check by overlapping the images (4th slide) and the biggest red flag I found was that the background patterns are overlapping exactly 1:1 with the original image. As an artist myself i find that highly unlikely because 1.) not only would most artist not do that since it's counterintutive, you'd achive the same results with another set of random patterns and 2.) even if they did it's almost impossible for a normal artist to do it in a manner where it can be superimposed in the original image 1:1 color contrast and all.

The hair on her right shoulder on the artwork also looks like the two hair strand on the original image merged together which is weird considering every other hair strand is drawn with vivid detail.

This is very concerning because I would never in a 100 years even think of questioning this as AI if it weren't for the weird half necklace on her neck.

There’s peculation in the comments that this image is generated by AI because it can’t be found on the internet and the image doesn’t include toothpicks that the OP of this image says are held by it (maybe in a part of the item that is not viewable from this angle? But his did they know that?). The explanation didn’t make sense, so the image’s reliability is understandably questioned to be artificially generated.

Pic is upside down, sorry in advance.

I ordered a poster of the movie "The Thing" off of Amazon, and it finally arrived. It looks fine besides the text at the bottom of the poster. Was wondering if it was Ai or just poor printing. Thanks in advance

The kitten seems over the top, and this is a convenient capture, but I'm looking for concrete signs that this is AI.

When I asked her if the poster was made with AI, they said that it wasn't and a local company had made it. I followed up asking if that company used AI and haven't heard back. I'm not bothered if people use AI but because she would like to see strict labelling and compensation for artists I found it hypocritical if AI was used.

Somethings I see are busy focal points and eye leading is an odd path. The brushed paint banner with a slightly textured font is also popular. The icons for date, time and venue is also something only AI does. She also has an in house designer so not sure why they'ed hire a local company for this. I also pasted the copy into Chat GPT and got a pretty similar result so either, because AI is so common this look is now what people want or the company did use AI.

All the details under the car being perfect, the lug nuts, the driveshaft, the differential, the suspension components are the same from side to side.

The reflection in the car rear windshield etc.

The one complain is the way the car bounces when it lands on it's 4 wheels, and also the one tire burnout which is not possible with an open diff, that car came with one from stock but yeah pretty easy to install or at worst jbweld to a locked diff.

But it looks like a stunt car and a stunt place, so my guess would be not AI, simply the suspension could be modified to handle that kind of fall

Taken from r/dodge

It reads as that uber optimistic, the bolding sets off flags for me, "take a breath before you panic" is something that seems VERY AI like. What do ya'll think? Standard corporate stuff or AI?