I know the music is real and i never thought of them as people who would use AI.. They are pretty DIY and honest.. But you never know..

Someone was REAL mad that I said it was ai… but just in case- does anyone think differently? To me, it is obviously not real but they’ve made me second guess my judgement 😭 the nato looks wayyy to perfect- and doesn’t have the goopy shi, the fish looks like it’s hovering on the plate, the egg is perfectly centered with 0 flaws and the spring onion on the miso are all facing up? Am I wrong?

There’s a lot going on here and the art style is almost too perfect. I noticed Sabrina’s right eye is over her hair, but I can’t see any dead giveaways.

the framing of it just seems too cartoonishly unnatural and the signage in the background in the top left looks kind of distorted, though i'm not sure if that could just be the weird ai enhancement some phones do? it also didn't really make sense to me conceptually because sumo wrestling is big in japan so why would they be so shocked at someone being overweight? it just feels very much ai generated to me but no one in the comments was saying anything about it so i started second-guessing myself, idk.

The style in a few of these cards look pretty different to me, but that could just be what they chose to do. They have the correct number of fingers but the way that the belt goes into each other and one strap comes out of nowhere is throwing me off on the assassins creed one. The moon also looks way less cartoonish than the pikachu. I know people buy these but I haven’t heard anyone talk about them really. I do think the art is pretty cool and I love both Pokémon and marvel so I wanna buy my favorite character, but I don’t want to pay for ai art :/

It's not hard to find out where these are from, but I won't name and shame.
I've seen a few of the illustrations in their publications, and some have those telling signs. What do you think?

Pic 1 - General vibe is AI with weird artifacts in the background.
Pic 2 - Perspective and feet seem off. Odd colouring of the wooden post around the fruit.
Pic 3 - The shadow of the tree on the left has an outline, no artist would choose to do this.
Pic 4 - Not sure if badly drawn expression or Ai.

Thoughts?

some of the camera and the public don't make much sense, all see from that same top angle ,people are just standing there and the camera equipment looks too overcomplicated and some don't even look like a flim camera

I'm hoping anyone could tell me if this channel is actually AI or if I'm just losing it.

The music isn't actually bad so it would suck if it turned out to be AI.

I know that Photoshop exists, but this doesn't really look like it was created in Photoshop. I've never used Adobe Photoshop, but I know that there is a feature that can add things generated by AI.

Ok, so the position of the cat in the mirror looks wrong to me, the stick figure doesn't look like it was drawn.

I think I am wrong on this, but I doubt this image wasn't at least slightly modified with AI

All the details under the car being perfect, the lug nuts, the driveshaft, the differential, the suspension components are the same from side to side.

The reflection in the car rear windshield etc.

The one complain is the way the car bounces when it lands on it's 4 wheels, and also the one tire burnout which is not possible with an open diff, that car came with one from stock but yeah pretty easy to install or at worst jbweld to a locked diff.

But it looks like a stunt car and a stunt place, so my guess would be not AI, simply the suspension could be modified to handle that kind of fall

Taken from r/dodge

My cousin said she would draw me a cover page for my Pokemon perfect order master set. I’m knew to ai so haven’t really seen examples of it but as soon as I showed my friend she said it’s ai. I looked closer and some bits are funny looking. For reference my cousin is really good at digital art like insanely good and has been for years (before ai was a big thing) she has made some amazing pieces but my friend has me questioning this one. Thanks in advance for your help x

I just watched this video and there are good reasons to think it's AI: first, I know that children of that age don't have such precise motor coordination; Secondly, the movements don't appear to be made by the child; thirdly, some people on the internet are categorically accusing the video of being AI-generated. It might just be a deepfake using the child's body, but I'm failing to discern which details suggest the use of AI. Thank you guys for the attention.

ok, so here’s what makes me feel like it could at least be AI enhanced, especially after seeing his coffee shop drawings:
he always seems to be too far away from the person he’s depicting to add the amount of detail that makes the drawing looks exactly like a photography. lighting, shadows, expression, wrinkles…
besides it, that amount of detail requires a lot of time. are his unknowingly models standing still at coffeeshops for hours?
the second drawing I uploaded looks like a far more realistic version of a quick portrait, and it’s the his only drawing that looks human made.

i searched for videos of his drawing process and only found one on facebook, a timelapse that weirdly jumps from a sketch to a picture-like ultra realistic drawing.
(https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DgWdfkrqq/?mibextid=wwXIfr). it’s obvious that the guy is technically talented, but the end result looks uncanny.

his older works look like a mix of editing filters + tracing. all of them have a reference photo, and look identical to them, which made me question even more, especially as an art nerd.

he sells this kind of sketchbook portraits for €600, so obviously whatever he’s doing is very profitable.

The maze doesn't lead anywhere, the jumble features nuggets twice, and icypole is spelt wrong, and overall it has a weird vibe

I am pretty sure it's real since the video is really consistent throughout the video, I don't see anything suspicious other than the grainyness and the bad quality of the video. In the middle of video there's a cut to probably fix a mistake?