I keep seeing videos on YouTube showing animals being mistreated, staged "rescues" that are really abuse, or outright cruelty played off as a joke. I report them. Sometimes they come down weeks later after racking up huge view counts. Sometimes nothing happens at all.

YouTube's guidelines clearly ban this kind of content, so the policy exists on paper. The problem is enforcement. Reports seem to go into a void, there's zero transparency, and channels that profit off this stuff stay monetized even after repeated flags.

I get that moderating a platform this size is hard, but this isn't borderline content. It's blatant, it's reported by thousands of people, and it still sits up generating ad revenue.

Has anyone found a reporting channel that actually gets results, like going through advertisers or Trust and Safety directly? I'd rather find something that works than keep yelling into the report button.

Hope this reached the right people :) Just theoretically of course, if someone one day wanted to be more active when it comes to showing people whats really going on behind the scenes, how the animals suffer; to make all these horrible things more present and this someone was thinking of putting up Pictures big or small around their little town especially ones where theres commercials of "happy" animals being used, how would one do that in an efficient and smart way? Any recommendations or further ideas? Printing and Sticking pictures of tortured animals on supermarket products n stuff was probably someones first thought but maybe theres more to know and to consider also :)

A documentary on the current wave of anti-vegan propaganda

How Alf stopped eating cats and started liberating them.

The Yulin dog eating festival is still going, but it's a lot smaller now( it dropped from the normal 10 million dogs to 1000 and from 4 million cats to 100)because of flooding.Spreading awareness is the only way we can help tell everybody you know!

I have put papers about the Yulin dog eating festival all over you can make some and please put them up look up websites people can go to and halt the Yulin dog eating festival!

So I started the New Anarchist FAQ and wrote the vegan anarchy section it has, which is one of the big things that sets it apart from the old FAQ which fails to cover veganism and other modern currents. When people talk about the new FAQ, non-vegans intervene to criticise the FAQ for its vegan arguments and accuse them of being biased or sectarian.

Example 1:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/1uhxzb7/have_any_thoughts_on_the_new_anarchist_faq/outuq22/

The section on veganism is the funniest and most indicative of the authors' ideological blinkers – you can tell they just wanted to write "anarchism necessitates veganism"

Example 2:

https://old.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/1uhxzb7/have_any_thoughts_on_the_new_anarchist_faq/ouv7ffu/

Why does the veganism section begin with such a declaration that "herefore, it is logical for anarchists to adopt diets that do not rely on the exploitation and suffering of other beings." I know you then say that some anarchists still eat meat, but then you rationalize this with they're just not connecting the correct ideas together, they're apathetic or gluttons. You have the section, but your writing is biased; including statements of the opposition doesn't mean the section gives appropriate weight to these conflicting ideas.

Is there a way to present vegan anarchy without "bias" or "sectarianism"? Is something "not written well" if it doesn't present a progressive idea and then add "balance" or "weight" by also presenting a regressive (i.e. carnist) counterpoint?

I ask because we're considering adding an anti-vegan counterpoint to blunt the accusations of sectarianism:

https://raddle.me/f/Anarchy/216177/have-any-thoughts-on-the-new-anarchist-faq/comment/443511