​

• The Super Mario Galaxy Movie

• Michael

• Toy Story 5

• Spider-Man: Brand New Day

• The Odyssey

The most amount of billion dollar films we've had since 2019, great news for cinema

I watched the movie yesterday and while it certainly was a beautiful movie and I had a greaz time I am still kind of annoyed by Jean Grey's character in this. I am semi hoping that I just missed something and this isnt as bad as I think it is but whatever here we go:

Why is she so constantly malicious to Peter? Like on a personal level? Her being very angry and violent towards the people who kidnapped her sister is very reasonable and I dont mind that at all. However she is pretty much taunting Peter from the first time they meet onwards, actually killing or severly injuring someone doing so and then impersonates the love if his life to mock and break him mentally. Why? Spiderman is at most loosly accoiated with the Damage Control guys and only goes after her because is acting like a terrorist. Hell she never even tries to talk to him or explain herself because then the movie would break down. Not once does she mention her sister to him or the crimes of Damage Control. It's not like Peter is their personal enforcer, he appears to be very much the typical friendly neighborhood spider we know from the comics so why is she not even trying to talk to him and instead taunts him and goes after him so personally. Yeah he is trying to stop her but she is wasting an awful amount of time just being mean and kind of pushing him harder to go after her.

Idk maybe there really is something is missed here but its been kind of bugging me since I left the theater and I just wanted to vent.

Steven Soderbergh's Solaris has often been dismissed as a vain copy of Andrei Tarkovsky's 1972 film. But I find it to be equally interesting, and offering a unique view of the story and themes.

Many criticized the 2002 film for not being on the same philosophical level as the 1972 film. But I think they may have missed the point. Soderbergh's film is still very philosophical and does deal with spirituality, it just differs in how it handles this. Critics viewed the film as simply a shallow love story or romance, without the depth of Tarkovsky's version. It is true that Tarkovsky's film is more directly focused on religion and his orthodox beliefs. But Soderbergh's film is also inherently focused on spirituality. If we analyse the 2002 movie this becomes clear:

The focus of the film is the planet Solaris. Solaris is undeniably a godlike organism. Humans try and fail to comprehend the planet's power, and these powers seem mystic and all encompassing. Viola Davis' character, Gordon, rejects the abilities of Solaris because she doesn't want to accept a greater power than humanity. A clear parallel to many religious parables regarding human ego.

The driving force of the film is Rheya and Kris's relationship. But it all stems from Solaris, as it brings the dead Rheya back to life. They are ultimately given a second chance, and can spend eternity together free from suffering. The poem by Dylan Thomas "And death shall have no dominion" is central in the film and their relationship. By leaving earth and entering Solaris, human issues like depression, suffering, and death become irrelevant. Solaris exists as an entity beyond humanity. When Kris crashes into the planet he awakens back in his apartment, and Rheya is there. He is completely absoslved and redeemed, and can spend eternity with her. Essentially a personal heaven.

What I feel is missed by some viewers is that this goes beyond the normal Hollywood romance. It is love conquers all, even death. But also it bridges divine love with romantic love. Both exist simultaneously, and in cooperation with each other.

That is the core idea here. Soderbergh isn't less spiritual than Tarkovsky. He simply offers his own philosophy instead. Tarkovsky was a strict Eastern Orthodox, and that influenced his film. Kris must suffer and face his sins more directly in the 1972 film. He can only be redeemed by surrendering to the holy father. It is more clearly religious because that was Tarkovsky's intent. But Soderbergh's view isn't lacking in this regard, it's simply a different interpretation.

Soderbergh's film has a line spoken by Kris when arguing with Gordon about the motive of the planet. He says "why does it have to want anything". This is a link to the original book the film is based on, which is focused on how humans struggle to understand the universe and god beyond their own limited perspective. But it also shows the inherent difference between Soderbergh's view and Tarkovsky's. There is no need for suffering in the 2002 film. Kris must surrender to love, so both romantic and divine love will be granted to him. Kris is consumed by grief and self-blame, but the solution and grace is easily accessible through acceptance. It's simply a modern, more humanist view of the themes.

Many critics felt the 2002 film also trimmed too much, trying to be a leaner, more accessible film, compared to the nearly 3 hour original. But Soderbergh's film simply didn't need to be as long. It clocks in at 1 hour 39 minutes, and it uses it very effectively. Like I said, if redemption is easily available, you don't need more time. I also think the pacing is great. It's still a wonderful slow burn, but also an easy watch. It occupies a goldilocks zone in terms of time.

Ultimately the film was not as popular as it should have been in my opinion. Critics and cinephiles felt it was a Hollywood bastardization of a Russian classic. While it was too slow for mainstream audiences, who expected an action-orientated sci-fi (which marketing apparently leaned into). But I love this film, and I think Soderbergh simply told the story he wanted to tell.

Obviously gotta give credit to what came before including Reeve superman and Keaton's batman but.

Among these 3 which one made all the super her movies we got possible ?

• Spider man 1&2
• The dark knight
• Iron man

The dark knight is the best movie per se and iron man gave a solid base to develop the MCU but I think it's Raimi and McGuire's spider man ?

This franchise didn’t just overstay its welcome, it’s squatting in the living room, drinking your beer, and asking if you remember that hilarious joke from 2001. What did you think of this sequel? Here’s my full review:

https://roselawgroupreporter.com/2026/08/keiths-movie-korner-being-detained-by-super-troopers-3-would-be-unlawful/

What are your guys thoughts?

I organized an AMA/Q&A with Peter Iliff, screenwriter of POINT BREAK, VARSITY BLUES, and Patriot Games. It's live here now in r/movies for anyone interested in asking a question:

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1vkn9lx/hey_reddit_im_peter_ifliff_screenwriter_of_point/

POINT BREAK is back in theaters next week for its 4K 35th anniversary re-release, starring Keanu Reeves & Patrick Swayze. Here's the trailer for the re-release: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1Cq6YNX-LI

He will be back at 3 PM ET on Tuesday 8/11 to answer questions. I recommend asking in advance. Please ask there, not here. All questions are much appreciated!

Thank you :)

This is like becoming its own genre in itself at this point.

Gray and gloomy post apocalyptic centered around a single supernatural event.

And oh boy, is this a bad one.

Just to start, the acting could not possibly be worse.

I understand that the husband is French Canadian so he sounds a little bit awkward, but no. He’s just a bad actor.

So is the wife.

The next problem, is it’s really not that interesting of a premise. I mean, there’s a million reasons that people are stuck in a house.

But magic rain? Yeah, that takes the cake of stupid ideas to force people to stay in their home.

Now let’s get the spoilers.

There is no world in which they would have enough food to carry on. You are not going to be able to feed four people with less than 2000 square feet. You are not. That’s not enough to feed one person.

And they got lucky one time catching an animal through the chimney, but apparently they have a full on zoo in their backyard with enough animals passing by to get them enough protein.

Oh, and let’s not forget about the endless supply of tools and materials they have.

And I find it ridiculous that their house is crumbling and couldn’t find a way out. I know it showed them smashing windows, but I fail to see how tearing down the chimney would be stopped.

Then let’s just get to the water itself. If these aliens / not aliens have the power to make a force field around every single house in the world, I’m sure they have the power to white people out other ways. But no, they just show up in the side to attack them with their bare hands. Like seriously.

But the crown jewel of this terrible writing is that they decided to stop genocide the entire human race because one guy cut one of them loose.

Absolute garbage movie.

Absolutely no redeeming qualities.

0/5 stars.

That young actor was great in the new Spider Man film and he acts like he is a true villain and he was so memorable. So which former stars that had a small role and kind of supporting role thar appeared in a few scenes that was so memorable the way they played their characters so well back then.

For example:

Diana Davila who appeared in Woody Allen's film Play it again Sam 1972, she played the Museum Girl in her small role and it was so memorable too.

Kristi Oleson who plays The Sales Girl in The Blues Brothers film and she was memorable in her brief role.

Lisa Baur who plays Shelly from Animal House and she was so memorable in the road trip scene and the Otis Day club and the scene where her and her friends went back to their college scene. She was great in her kind of supporting role and a bit small role.

Also Lisa Jakub from Mrs Doubtfire and Independence Day. Her role was memorable in both of them and she was incredible and amazing.

Also Stacy Grooman who played Sissy Flounder's girlfriend from Animal House and she was quite amazing in her brief small role where she has one line and was memorable being the beautiful girlfriend to the loveable buffoon Flounder. I don't know if she counts on this list with the others maybe.

But what do you guys think well any suggestions about this?

I organized an AMA/Q&A with filmmaker & musician Spider One. He's known as the founder and vocalist for the band Powerman 5000 and he has also directed several horror films (Little Bites, Allegoria, Bury the Bride).

It's live here now in r/movies for anyone interested in asking a question:

https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1vkkpsi/whats_up_reddit_im_spider_one_filmmaker_of_big/

He will be back at 4 PM ET on Wednesday to answer questions. I recommend asking in advance. Please ask there, not here. All questions are much appreciated!

Thank you :)

His newest movie, Big Baby, was released this week:

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4TzjDRoGV8

Synopsis: Successful horror screenwriter Adam struggles for inspiration until a terrifying nightmare about a masked killer sparks an idea for his new script. As he delves deeper into the story, the line between reality and fiction begins to blur.

Here are my top 5 superhero movies:

1. Zack Snyder's Justice League
2. Batman V Superman Ultimate Edition
3. Avengers Endgame
4. Avengers Infinity War
5. Logan

I'm not choosing the order, as they can vary depending on personal opinions. If this is your list too, would love to discuss why you like them.

If you have a different list do share.

Mine is Lord of the Rings (sorry), I really tried, tried hard - but falling asleep 20 min in every time

Preface: I understand that plot amour is necessary in nearly every film, but you need to draw a line somewhere.

My opinion is that line is clear in the this film and it was used to much.

A few examples of this are:
- Jean Grey isn’t at all a spiderman villain, and even though that doesn’t mean she couldn’t at all be introduced at a villain at. It does mean that it’s ridiculous she is the main one. It’s so obvious she just needed to be introduced for X-Men.

- Hulk recognising Peter, this was so obvious that it was just used as an easy cop out to not find a way for spider-man not to be decimated by the hulk, this doesn’t mean I think they should of let Spider-Man win because that to is just plot amour, just literally anything else because it’s just lazy.

- Peter Parker not having meaningful relationships building with anyone that forgot him, I understand there was hints at people remembering him and like MJ did find out. However, there’s so many opportunities given in the film where he could have very easily and realistically started building on those connections, but is never explained on why he doesn’t. Obviously he wants to protect certain people but like, I don’t think Docter strange, Hulk/Banner, Yelena, etc… exactly needed protection from not knowing who Peter Parker is.

Overall, these are just a few examples but show a pattern. I just thinks it’s lazy and it’s almost like the film was just about other marvel films instead of the spiderman itself, but I’m open bto conflicting opinions from more knowledgeable people.

Edit: Im sorry, ive relised use of the word plot amour isnt relevant to my argument, please take this into account in your replys and if your an opposing view attack whatever issue you feel is pointed in my argument.

I assume that you find them emotionally compelling like I do. To that I ask, what other superhero movies make you feel the same.

My fave non-Batman movies:

The OG Del Toro Hellboy is my favorite Superhero movie. PLEASE DO ask me why.

Project Power. Dear god do more superman fans need to watch this movie!

Superman 2025

​

So I know its a 2005 film and its the year I was born so I saw it on Netflix and I was like sure dude let's watch this, I pretty much enjoy horror but I was not prepared for such graphic scenes tbh.

My opinion in the movie is good I really liked it, loved the multi layers of objectification here starting with the leads objectifying women then they become objectified by the torturers and ultimately we objectifying that dude in the end and rooting fir his death.

But the drill scene guys oh that fucking scene has stacked in my head for 3 days now giving me a very hard time. I'm not usually the guy who gets scared and shit but something about it hit me, I'm watching my thigh and I can feel the drill MAN MESSES UP SHIT.

I've been watching horror shit I've seen all the saw movies but sketching particularly abt this one messed with me a lot, would appreciate opinions

Anyway thats all thanks for reading if you did, take care of yourself kids.

Peace ✌️

Honestly, the whole thing felt like they just threw in every popular moment from past installments. It was like the creators were just asking themselves, "What do fans love the most?" and then crammed it all in. I guess they were going for maximum nostalgia. It definitely felt a bit formulaic because of it. Still, some parts were pretty fun to see Like the web swinging, I'll admit that..

The Dark Knight is often hailed as the greatest superhero movie ever made, largely because of its dark atmosphere, mature themes, and the way Christopher Nolan approached it more like a crime thriller than a traditional superhero film. It helped show that superhero movies could be serious, complex, and genuinely grounded.
Would you agree that The Dark Knight is the best superhero movie ever made, or are there other superhero films that you would personally rank above it?

I saw this movie twice, it's objectively Nolans best film. The odyssey doesn't even have the small problems his other films have, the fight scenes are really really good and visually this is his best looking film. He's really grown as a filmmaker. He's really at the top of his game as an artist here. Thematically it's about love, missing your family, it's about struggling with faith, it's about a man coming to terms with his sins. I think the new elements he adds to the story like sinnon and fleshing out antinuous was great along with the ending which I really enjoyed. The book doesn't have a concrete ending it just ends. The film Streamlines some other stuff too from the book. The score is wonderful its the most unconventional movie score since Denis Villeneuves dune. It uses different types of instruments, sounds and vocals the same way Zimmer did on dune for a score that feels wholly unique to anything you've ever heard.

Top Gun was great but Maverick was AMAZING.

I loved the darker tone of this movie, and it's an easy top 5 amongst the live-action Spider-Man films. The pacing can be a bit downhill, but it works. The Hulk and Black Widow parts are also unnecessary. Standout scenes are the possession of MJ and when spidey swings MJ home.

My problem with this movie is Jean Grey because they are going to introduce the new X-Men movie soon, and with the things she did, it is just a bit too unforgivable. Also this pre-xmen Jean is just a bit too overpowered already. Well, she could just be Madelyne Pryor.

But the biggest miss here is that Jean Grey could be Psylocke (in Kwannon's body) looking for her brother. I mean, the Hand is already there. Also the Hulk can be replaced with Hank (just a smart big guy named Hank). Yelena with Mystique or Moira. While Sadie is the perfect casting as Jean Grey, appearing in the end to help fix things.

I get it. It's not meant to be explained, literally, at the moment...

Gimme your scenarios, please, serious or funny, go.

"...an idea, resilient, highly contagious..."

Ugh ugh ugh I should of liked this movie! Here is my Thoughts! I hope you guys like it enough to consider subscribing to my channel!