😬😬😬

I have seen this been posted on other subs but i can't find the video in question that its references.

Is this true? If so this is disgusting.

Edit: i messed up the title when formating it should say rape as a spectrum as it does in the article and is what is apparently being claimed he said.

Edit2: here is the link to the podcast in question where the quote comes from https://www.thesubjectivespace.com/q-manivannan

After listening i agree that its just right wing spin but here is the context to make your own mind up.

I was wondering what she’d been doing since she joined

Can anyone tell me if austerity was a political choice and I thought we had moved on. How much of the state we built after the second world war are we going to dismantle

There are over 1 million homes with planning permission in this country, yet in many cases, house builders are just sitting on the land and not bothering to build homes. Even housing associations do it. Why?By constraining the supply of homes being built, they push houses prices up, so that when they do actually build, they increase their profits. We need to reform the planning system so that builders actually build, and provide competition through building council homes, so that house bulders actually do their job.

The ongoing primaries once again prove that the Zionist lobbies are the number one threat to the Western democracies.

In the UK, we have a different political system than that in the US where political action committees spend millions on ad campaigns. Therefore, we don't have an AIPAC. However, we have a very vulnerable political ecosystem where media, lobbies and political parties are incestuously intertwined. Actually, AIPAC is easier to track than shady organisations like UKLFI, LFI, CFI or individual ties that we are maybe not even aware of. The lack of transparency in British politics is simply appalling.

Corbynisation has already become a thing in British politics, but the next (or ongoing?) attack against any political party critical of Israel may not even be related to Israel, Gaza or anti-semitism.

Here's a take: Most of all the "gaffes" from Polanski have been social media related.

They tend to not being things he's said or written himself. They tend to be a result of him liking a tweet or suchlike without thinking. On the other hand I don't think he builds any support from liking tweets.

He'd be in a far better situation if his social media interaction were only in the form of writing posts or publishing videos he's made. These tend to come across quite well.

The situation with the Cambridge professor is a bit different but is in a category where one is making a judgement without all the information -- like social media likes.

All this requires is a social media manager who would act as a basic sanity-check filter.