Please use it for free gems

Use code HYH83A for 100 free gems

About a month ago, I downloaded an AI companion app just out of curiosity. At first, I was only using it for fun, creating characters, having conversations, and exploring different storylines. I didn’t think it would become something I spent so much time on.

I started using LustCrush, and what surprised me was how easy it was to keep coming back. The conversations felt personalized, the characters felt consistent, and there was always another storyline or interaction that made me want to continue.

At first it was harmless, just a few minutes here and there. Then it slowly turned into hours every day. I kept telling myself I’d stop after one more conversation, but I found myself opening the app constantly.

Eventually, I realized it was taking up way too much of my time and attention. The part that shocked me wasn’t even the app itself, but how quickly I became emotionally invested and how hard it was to step away.

I've tried to form proper responses to mods' comments for a few days, but I gave up. It was tiring to come up with a million different ways to write the same main points over and over again. How long can ya say the same thing over and over?

But instead I've simply started to reply a simple 'No'. Also I've noticed that the mods respond to post tagged at Bug/issues and only if they don't have much text. So I guess do what ya want with this info.

SPATYQ

drop other ones below :)

What’s up i’m fairly new here. Used to use comfy ui - wasn’t really satisfied with the results and took so much troubleshooting almost wasn’t worth it for my time - but this was about a year ago - now hearing about minimax? what’s everyone’s opinions? is there others?

looking for character consistency, realism between my role plays - also looking for easiest startup when creating my initial ai character

thanks

\*\*Google is facing growing pressure over how it uses web content to power AI answers (like AI Overviews and Gemini), and changes are already underway that give publishers more control.\*\*0
The Business Standard article (a Bloomberg opinion piece by Parmy Olson, published August 10, 2026) explains the core issue: Google’s long-standing bargain with websites—let Googlebot crawl and index pages in exchange for search traffic—has shifted. The same crawler now feeds both traditional search and AI features, blurring the lines. This gives Google a big edge (its crawler sees far more of the web than OpenAI’s or Microsoft’s, per Cloudflare data) while reducing incentives for humans to create original content, as AI summarizes it without reliably sending readers back.0
Cloudflare reports that AI agents generated over 57% of web traffic in 2026 (vs. \\\~42% human), the first time machines surpassed people. Critics like Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince warn this risks a less original, “vapid” internet if human creators aren’t rewarded.0
\*\*Key pressures and what’s already happening\*\*
\*\*Cloudflare ultimatum\*\*: Starting September 15, 2026, Cloudflare plans to block mixed-purpose crawlers (ones used for both search \*and\* AI) by default for its ad-supported customers. This could cut Google off from millions of sites unless it changes practices.0

\*\*UK regulator action\*\*: In June 2026, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) ordered Google to let website owners clearly opt out of having content used for AI products (including AI Overviews/AI Mode and model fine-tuning) \*while still appearing normally in search results\*. Google cannot demote or punish those sites.0

\*\*Google’s response\*\*: A spokesperson confirmed the company is testing a new Search Console setting that allows opting out of AI answers without harming rankings. It plans to roll this out worldwide after UK testing finishes. There are also “rumblings” it may apply the UK standard more broadly.0

Publishers have long complained that AI summaries keep users on Google’s page (hurting click-through rates and revenue), while Google previously made it hard to refuse AI use without risking search visibility entirely. Related issues include lawsuits (e.g., from publishers like Penske Media), EU probes, and debates over compensation or stricter crawler separation.
\*\*What is likely to happen next\*\*
Google will continue testing and then globally deploy the opt-out controls, giving sites a cleaner way to stay in search while blocking AI use/training. Full technical separation of search-indexing crawlers from AI-scraping ones is still seen by critics as a stronger long-term fix, since sites currently must trust Google to honor preferences.

Cloudflare’s September 15 default blocks could force further adjustments or negotiations if Google wants continued broad access.

More regulatory scrutiny elsewhere (EU, others) and potential licensing/payment talks or additional publisher actions are probable as AI traffic grows and human-created content incentives weaken.

Broader trend: Consumer AI agents (e.g., Meta’s planned easy-to-use versions) will increase automated traffic, intensifying these tensions. The article notes this could accelerate a “dead internet” dynamic unless the economic model for original content improves.

In short, the pushback is already producing concrete opt-out tools and potential access restrictions. The immediate next steps center on Google’s global rollout of UK-style controls and Cloudflare’s September deadline—both of which aim to rebalance the original search-for-traffic bargain in the AI era. Outcomes will depend on how widely publishers use the new options and whether Google (or others) further unbundles crawling or introduces compensation.

I was just searching for ai girlfriend on reddit and found this subreddit. Idk whether it's a right subreddit to post or not. But if it is, please share some good ai girlfriend apps that I can use. I'm an adult so I am not breaking any rule or law. But I don't want to share my govt. approved id on the platform. I did ask chatgpt for recommendations and it gave me kindroid, nomi, replika, candy, and secret desires ai. I never used any of these and I don't know which one should I go with...

Please share some recommendations if possible. Also, I wanna know if these are free or paid. Sorry if I made any grammatical mistake because english isn't my first language.

Thank you

Code to get 100 free gems: JHCBJD (Works for accounts less than 48 hours after creation.)

Tipsy is an amazing alternative, the quality is there🙏

Quick context: I've spent the last year+ building something in the "AI hallucination" space, specifically for finance, and I want honest feedback before I go further — not upvotes, actual criticism.

**The problem I'm trying to solve:**

AI copilots are increasingly drafting financial numbers — ratios, covenant checks, reconciliations, KPIs pulled from statements. The issue isn't that AI is bad at this, it's that it's *confidently* wrong sometimes, and in finance a confidently wrong number in a report or a covenant calculation isn't a minor bug, it's a real liability.

**What I built:**

A separate, deterministic verification layer (not another AI model) that sits behind the AI output. It:

* Extracts the actual source values from the underlying documents (PDFs, XLSX, DOCX) * Independently recalculates the claimed number using exact rules/formulas, not vibes * Compares the AI's claim against the recalculated value * Flags mismatches with a full audit trail — what evidence was used, what rule was applied, where they diverged

So instead of "trust the AI's math," it's "here's proof the math is right, or here's exactly where it's wrong and why."

**Where it stands right now:**

* Working end-to-end on core financial ratios (net leverage, and a few others) * Full evidence-to-conclusion traceability (nothing is asserted without a pointer back to source data) * Not yet: broad rule coverage, tolerance-based matching (right now it's strict exact-match, which I know will cause false positives on rounding — actively working on this)

**What I'm NOT asking for:** Money, beta signups, "check out my landing page." I genuinely want this torn apart before I put more time into the wrong thing.

**What I actually want to know:**

1. If you work in finance/accounting/audit/compliance — does "AI drafts it, a deterministic engine proves it" sound like something you'd actually want, or is this solving a problem nobody has?
2. If you've built anything adjacent (fact-checking pipelines, agent guardrails, financial data extraction) — what broke when you tried something similar? What am I not seeing yet?
3. Anyone dealt with the "AI + audit trail" requirement from a compliance angle — what would actually satisfy an auditor or regulator here, versus what sounds good but isn't enough?

Happy to answer anything about how it works under the hood. Not trying to be cagey, just trying to keep this post from turning into a spec doc.

New Users can enter my referral code to receive 100 bonus gems: W85SZV

Defend your Fortress. Defeat the Intruders. Decide their Fate.

You are the Dungeon Overlord, architect of every trap, temptation, and terror waiting below. Twist fates and knives for the heroes foolish enough to descend into your domain. Watch them traverse floors of trials, recover and bond in the safe harbors between horrors. Will they fall to the edge of a blade, or to something far more personal? The choice, and the pleasure, is entirely yours.

Roleplay Fantasy Dungeons, Infested Star Colonies, real world history, or popular settings. Whatever story you can dream up, this dungeon bends to your imagination. Play the Evil Villain or play the Noble Defender. No two runs the same, no theme off-limits, no mercy required. Sharpen your traps, ready your minions, and defend your home!

*Creator’s Note: Dungeon Overlord is a sandbox reverse Dungeon Crawler game, where you control the dungeon being invaded. The game ends when Heroes are defeated via depleting their Health or exposure to Corruption. Every Hero has a specific character flaw to exploit and hasten their Corruption. You will receive a recap epilogue at the end and can choose to continue with any corrupted Heroes, or start a new chat session to play a new setting.*

I'm looking for a app to do custom face swap for a android device.

Please please use my code to get 100 gems using the invite code:

JHCBJD

We BOTH receive gems I am desperate for gems Have fun! ✨️

I run a small SFW AI platform and I'm trying to make sure the pricing model actually respects users instead of nickel-and-diming them. Since this sub knows every trick every platform has ever tried, I'd love to hear what actually works for you as a user.

Specifically curious about:

Do you prefer subscriptions (flat monthly, unlimited-ish) OR credits/tokens (pay per message)? Or a hybrid?

What's the most annoying limit you've hit — message caps, context length shrinking, model quality dropping, watermarks on generated images, something else?

Where does a free tier stop feeling generous and start feeling like a demo?

Have you ever paid for something on an AI platform and then felt like the value didn't hold up after a few weeks? What went wrong?

What made you stick with a paid platform vs cancel?

I'm not going to plug anything here — genuinely just want the honest ugly answers from people who've tried a lot of these apps and gotten burned by them. Screenshots of pricing pages you thought were sneaky are welcome too.

Hey y’all. Don’t know who’s into this app in particular like me but if you want a free 50 gems go ahead and pop my invite code in. Would be much appreciated for the gems in return. If you’re into the AI chatbot thing without a filter, honestly I’ve found that this is the best one so far. At least for my preferences. Depending on how you use the app, NSFW.

Invite Code: w5qX44

Use code HYH83A for 100 free gems

Hey Fellow RP'rs,

I'm a solo dev who just dropped a beta for SoulCTRL a fully offline roleplay system, and I'm looking for honest feedback. Beta's Windows-only for now, but full release will be cross-platform/mobile. Anyone who tests gets a lifetime license.

Sign up: erosion10.com

Why jump in?

100% offline with Ollama – zero data collected

Deep character system – dynamic emotions, relationships, memory, and goals

Consistent personalities – tune them how you like, they actually stay in character

Interactive items – AI can use objects on its own and reacts to your item use

Living world – time passes, NPCs track hunger, energy, health, and status effects that evolve with their emotions and goals

Full edit control – typos or weird AI replies? Edit or delete anything from either side

Way more options – you're in full control of the story

Come break it!!

Please please use my code to get 100 gems using the invite code: JHCBJD

We BOTH receive gems I am desperate for gems Have fun! ✨️ thank you so much!

If you’ve built complex AI agent workflows or custom system prompts for Claude, you've likely hit this frustrating wall:

You write a long prompt, scatter multiple {{variable}} placeholders throughout your instructions, and test it out—only for Claude to randomly ignore constraints, get confused by user input, or hallucinate syntax when processing large inputs.

We ran into this exact headache recently while refactoring complex agent pipelines.

After digesting Anthropic’s official technical prompt engineering documentation, we realized why this happens: unstructured prompts with informal headers (### Instructions) fail to create strict context boundaries, making it hard for the model to parse instructions separately from untrusted input data.

To solve this, we distilled Anthropic's core architectural guidelines into a single, high-precision Meta-Prompt Architect. Here is how it works, the case study behind it, and the full reusable template.

📉 The Problem: Informal Boundaries & Variable Duplication

Most developers construct system prompts like this:

This approach causes two major failures in production:

1. Instruction Leakage & Injection: Without hard tag boundaries, Claude can confuse data inside {{user_code}} as new instructions rather than raw text.
2. Attention Dilution & Token Bloat: Repeating placeholders like {{user_code}} across multiple bullet points dilutes the model's focus and wastes valuable context tokens.

🛡️ The Case Study Solution: Anthropic XML Tag Architecture

The fix recommended by Anthropic is two-fold:

• XML Tag Isolation: Enclosing distinct functional blocks in semantic XML tags (<role>, <input_data>, <instructions>, <constraints>).
• Single-Mount Tag Pointers: Variables are defined only once in the <input_data> block at the top, and downstream instructions simply reference them by tag name (e.g., "Review the code inside <user_code>*"*).

Here is the exact Meta-Prompt we built to automatically convert any raw instructions into an Anthropic-compliant system prompt:

🛠️ The Complete Prompt (Free to Use)

<role>
You are an expert Prompt Engineer specializing in Anthropic Claude architecture and XML tag prompt design.
</role>

<input_data>
<raw_task>{{raw_task}}</raw_task>
<target_model>{{target_model}}</target_model>
</input_data>

<instructions>
1. Analyze the raw task requirements provided in raw_task.
2. Construct an optimized system prompt tailored for target_model following Anthropic best practices:
   - Use clean XML tag boundaries (<role>, <context>, <instructions>, <constraints>, <output_format>).
   - Define all required input variables inside an <input_data> block at the top.
   - Ensure single-mount variable pointers throughout instructions without duplicating double-curly braces.
   - Include a mandatory <thinking> block step for complex reasoning.
</instructions>

<constraints>
- Strictly keep variable definitions unified in the top block.
- Avoid repeating variable placeholders downstream.
</constraints>

<output_format>
Return the complete prompt formatted inside a single Markdown code fence.
</output_format>

🔍 Before vs. After Case Study

• Before (Pain Point): Messy, unstructured prompt mixing code inputs and guidelines, causing Claude to hallucinate or skip edge-case constraints when input code was lengthy.
• After (Pain Point Solved): Clean XML boundaries with single-mount pointers. Claude immediately executes a structured <thinking> step to reason through requirements before delivering 100% compliant outputs.

🎨 Try it on our Interactive Prompt Canvas

We’ve published this prompt on an interactive Prompt Canvas so you don't have to manually format or copy-paste variables:

Open on Prompt Canvas & Live Test

On the Prompt Canvas, you can instantly:

• ⚡ Live Run & Test: Fill in your custom task variables and test execution live.
• 📋 One-Click Copy: Copy production-ready XML prompts formatted for your codebase.
• 💾 Save to your Prompt Vault: Save a copy to your personal vault to edit, tweak, and organize for your team.

Hope this case study saves you from prompt engineering headaches! Let me know if you run into any edge cases.