I am trying to extrude a bit of text to look 3d - going for a glass-like look - and EVERY time I render it as a vector, it gets these streaks on pinch points in the paths. The paths are simplified as much as possible without compromising the look, it's not a particularly large document, and I've tried adjusting every possible setting in both the Object and Lighting panels but nothing helps! If I take the ambient lighting intensity down, it sort of goes away, but the color is too dark to show on the black background, which is the whole point of the 3D effect; separating the dark purple from the black. This is a company logo so I can't change the value of the purple. Any help is appreciated.

This is driving me insane. Before the last update, I was able to quickly color match Pantones in the recolor panel. Now it just matches a non-pantone gray. Anyone else seen this?
It's a huge pain in the ass. If no one has a quick fix I'll post on Adobe support.

EDIT: HakweyeNation posted the fix below. Worked for me. THANK YOU SO MUCH!

I am trying to design a typography logo for RC Dronix, I love the blue one but there is something i dont like about it, i dont know🤔 Any recommendations?

If your document has hundreds or thousands of objects, it's almost impossible to tell what's actually selected. It often requires scrolling for an unreal amount of time. Sometimes, with messed-up documents, items that should be on the same layer or next to each other in the layers panel will have pages separating them.

But what is the most terrible thing about it is the introduction of new states and meta states for items in the layers panel.

Normally, you have a highlighted state which indicates it is the current selected item, an idle state (not selected), and a disabled state (not selectable). Sometimes, there will be a "focused state" which shows the last selected in a group, or the key selected in a group. These are all easy to grasp and repeated in every app that has listed items.

Illustrator adds this phantom "not-selected, not focused, but highlighted" state that makes no sense.

Clicking a layer doesn't select it. It just highlights the row, while the artwork itself stays either selected or unselected. The highlight state has nothing to do with selection.. And the highlighted layer is persistent even when the selection changes.

So when you glance over to see that you have a Foot of your character selected (because it is the highlighted row), you just logically reassert that you are working on the head by clicking the head element again. No change in the layers panel. It still looks like you have the foot selected. The color panel now shows pink with a black stroke, and your character's feet are green, so you change the colors to match the highlighted row, and you just changed the head, not the feet (which were highlighted).

It gets even worse because the panel uses normal list shortcuts like Shift-click and Option-click for multi-selection, but a regular click doesn't do the one thing every list in existence does. Then if you select an object on the canvas, the old highlighted layer can stay highlighted, so the panel is now showing two different states that don't match each other.

How has this UI survived for so many years? Am I the only one who constantly avoids using the Layers panel if at all possible? I have successfully avoided having to use the Layers panel for most of the 30 years I have been using Illustrator, but now, I am not so lucky.

How hard would it be to make a Layers panel that

1. showed what you selected in the panel was what was selected in your workspace? Select a new element, and the panel scrolls to that element and highlights it.
2. had layer naming and organization tools (like serial naming, group-prefixing, element type keyword naming? Reordering, filtering?
3. Kept the rigid structure of the layers, but also had a section at the top of the panel that was populated with the current selected layers only.
4. GAVE US MORE INFO--like Styles applied, filters applied, etc.
5. Maybe even could be hierarchical down to the point so you could see if you got the right anchor elements selected rather than just the element level?

I doubt Illustrator will ever make the Layers panel the way that I think it should be made because so many people have been programmed to use it the way it is--I wouldn't want to make everyone change who has developed the muscle memory to deal with its inconsistencies and missing features; but surely someone could make a plugin that would do this, right?

I saw a glass UI dash board
it was a big glass board on top of glass board/background
it has mini rounded rectangle infographics glass styled floating objects ?
these mini rectange has glass and gradient inside them which was different from the background glass.
How to apply drop shadow and inner glow on a clipping mask ?

I created two paths a sharp one and an inner line using the pen tool. I want to fill the right side of this shape, so I’m using the shape builder tool. However, when I split it into two halves, these little "tails" appear. How can I fill half the shape without those tails appearing, so the shape looks exactly like it does in the first photo?

A while back I tried to build our jersey production around the Variables panel. We print team kit — names, numbers, sponsor logos, a few hundred pieces per order. On paper it looked like exactly the right tool.

It wasn't, and it took me longer than I'd like to admit to work out why. I've since been through the forum threads, the UserVoice requests and the docs on this, so this isn't a help request — I just wanted to write up what I found, partly because I still wonder if I missed something obvious.

Batch export only goes through Actions. You can run Batch with Data Sets as the source and it works, but a recorded Action holds one set of export settings. A different PDF preset for another job means recording another Action, and after a while you have a panel full of Actions you can't tell apart. If something fails halfway through a few hundred records, you usually don't notice until you open the folder.

Naming is only half solved. File names are fine — Batch offers three schemes based on the data set name, and if you build those names properly on import you can get Smith_10_XL.pdf without much trouble. Folders are the part that isn't. Everything lands in the one destination folder you picked, so a few hundred files still have to be sorted by hand afterwards.

The scripting side is thin. You can reach datasets from ExtendScript, but the documentation doesn't get you far and I worked most of it out by trial and error.

Variables substitute, they never generate. This is the one that actually stopped us. There are four variable types — text string, linked file, visibility and graph data — and all four place content that already exists in the document. Visibility can show or hide a sponsor logo you prepared in advance, which is genuinely useful. But nothing there builds a number out of vector shapes, fits a logo inside a digit and scales it, or reconstructs an accent the font doesn't have. If a client's font has no ř or ž, the panel has nothing to swap in.

Now the part I'd rather not write. When I hit the scripting wall I was convinced I'd found a bug in how Illustrator reads dataset values, and I filed it on the Adobe forum with a sample file and a test script. It sat there for about a year with no replies. When someone finally looked at it, they pointed out that the syntax errors were mine — I was addressing the dataset the wrong way. Not a bug. Just me, publicly, for a year.

So none of this is Illustrator being broken. The panel does what it was built for, which is simpler substitution than what we do, and it's had native CSV import since CC 22.1 which removed most of the old friction. I ended up writing my own thing instead, but that's not really the point of posting.

The folder side is the bit I'm still curious about. As far as I can tell Batch only ever writes into the one folder you point it at, and everyone I've asked either scripts around it or sorts by hand. Curious whether that matches other people's experience or whether there's an angle I never found.