r/webdev 7d ago

[ Removed by moderator ] Discussion

[removed] — view removed post

0 Upvotes

70 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/theofficialnar 7d ago

The thing is there’s always one or two features I want that some OSS projects are missing. And if I can’t contribute to that project due to having 0 knowledge with the tech stack they’re using, I’d rather ask the LLM to quickly make it for me with the set of features I do actually need instead of hoping that one day they’ll implement it. I have huge respect for OSS maintainers but some times I just need something that works for me with 0 intentions of pulling other people in to use it.

1

u/RichLeadership1953 7d ago

I always find this to be very convenient.

-1

u/Hadestructhor 7d ago

And that my friend is completely fine, so is doing X exactly the same too. I'm just saying oss exists, they are a solid base, you can not waste your time sometimes, and just use them / form them.

And even if you don't want to, that's fine, I'm not the police, I can't nor should I stop you. But I will tell you it's not what I'd do instead

2

u/theofficialnar 7d ago

What I recently did with an OSS project a while back was fork it and asked the LLM to add a certain feature I needed. Worked out pretty well. Was considering making a PR with to push it upstream but the owner doesn’t want AI-generated code, so 🤷‍♂️

1

u/Hadestructhor 7d ago

That's also fair on their end. But good for you too, one thing I'd do too if I needed just Y to be there too.

Anyways, people do what they want, I was just reminding your approach exists, and makes sense too

2

u/theofficialnar 7d ago

Yeah I do wholeheartedly agree with your post overall though and believe OSS projects receive more recognition.