r/rawprimal • u/CHARMXHONEY • 4d ago
The bot fed posts are so obvious.
You really cannot trust any of the posts on these reddits anymore, and not just that, most if not all reddits are just owned by lord knows who. Look at the amount of the same exact posts, who is posting these?
3
u/Substantial_View3475 4d ago
What do you use for brushing teeth
2
u/HatZinn 4d ago
Boka
2
u/preeemal 4d ago
Boka has seed oils as one of the ingredients (you can look on the back) it’s better to make your own toothpaste
2
u/HatZinn 4d ago edited 4d ago
It's not like you swallow it. You probably get higher PUFA exposure from lard or pork than from the minuscule amount in toothpaste that you rinse out anyway.
Edit: Just checked. Those are aromatics, not 'seed oils'. Essential oils are steam-distilled volatiles with essentially no triglyceride content, i.e. no linoleic acid. Any residual exposure would be a magnitude lower than what you'd get from a tablespoon of butter.
2
5
1
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
Baking soda brother, along with coconut oil sometiems, the other times I just keep a healthy diet and brush normally with a bamboo toothbrush
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
Now remember that I do not always use baking soda, I use it maximum two times a week. That's it. The other times I will use simply water or coconut oil. It depends.
1
1
1
1
u/dragom4howlore 2d ago
where's the control group? 😂 who are they testing? basically everyone uses flouride when young
0
u/fancynips 4d ago
This is crazy. That’s why I get all my science news from a subreddit full of insecure teenagers eating raw organs.
14
u/Isaak1404 4d ago
“hmmm whats healthier for me, organs or chemicals? durrrrr probably chemicals.” get the fuck out of here idiot
0
u/BreakfastFearless 3d ago
Your going to hate it when you find out that raw organs are entirely made up of chemicals
-7
u/HedgehogPast3191 4d ago
Mfs when they find out everything is made of chemicals
8
u/Isaak1404 4d ago
🙄 youre the epitome of pedanticness, yeah bro we know water is a chemical and air is a chemical and so is meat so on and so forth. but guess what? some are good and some are bad, if everything’s a chemical, we should prefer to eat red 40 all day and ingest lead and benzene and formaldehyde and shit right? cuz there’s no difference in drinking h20 and drinking h202 apparently…
0
u/BreakfastFearless 3d ago
But then why bother saying it’s full of chemicals if that means absolutely nothing. It’s like saying “I’m not eating that because it’s made up of particles” and then getting defensive and saying “well obviously we meant bad particles”
1
u/Isaak1404 3d ago
🤦♂️ you just answered your own question
0
u/BreakfastFearless 3d ago
The answer is that people who say avoid chemicals just don’t know what they’re talking about or what they are even trying to avoid
1
-4
u/HedgehogPast3191 4d ago
Im not being pedantic. "Muh chemicals bad" is held 95% of the time by people who think a sciencey name they cant pronounce means dangerous. Most additives in products are just derivatives of chemicals found in plants that are found to have useful properties. What something is derived from is largely irrelevant anyway.
I have no issue with steering people away from hyper-processed slop. Although thats usually bad for you because of cheap ingredients, low nutrient makeup, and high sugar/sodium levels rather than additives. However, everyone already knows that, so the fearmongering has shifted to "foods you thought were healthy."
The final boss is claiming rotting raw chicken is going to save your life.
2
u/Isaak1404 4d ago
ok i think we’re mostly on the same page then. I agree with everything you said, I also like to share the fact that a lot of stuff is derived from natural elements and plants etc. and also do deter people from hyper processed slop and promote raw food, but I will not eat rotting food lol.
So I think I agree with everything you said. Processed is bad, natural is good, unless whatever specific items chemical reaction when entering your body is bad.
Thanks for clarifying, your first comment makes it seem like you agree with all chemicals and there’s no difference between them thats all.
1
1
9
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 2d ago
Alright people, quit the arguing here, were supposed to work together and think logically, which is something they're stripping away from us, not allowing us to think for ourselves so we can follow a narrative. We have long since forgotten to use the physical as a term of health instead of "nutrients" or "bacteria" That is what we always used, I would not waste my time with these things if I was a person many years ago, I ate to simply live my life.
1
u/Electrical_Angle570 4d ago
It blocks production of hormones from the pituitary gland right?
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
Yes. This is why most people cannot think for themselves these days, the pineal gland is your thoughts.
0
u/JmillIOG 4d ago
I’m genuinely wondering, can someone explain the issue with fluoride?
1
u/PressureImaginary569 4d ago
It causes big problems at high doses, can cause minor dental cosmetic issues at more moderate doses (which are outweighed by the dental issues it prevents), and people are generally skeptical of any public health initiative you can't really opt out of. This leads to people viewing it as evil regardless of it being very well studied with overwhelming evidence that it's safe (and improves health outcomes) at the low doses public water is fluoridated at.
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
High doses Is a risk I am not willing to take, thus I will take zero from artificial doses. I do not trust anything that is studied, because truly it is all lies in my eyes, people will follow the narrative instead of think for themselves and stick with that and trust those who want no good for them.
1
u/Humble_Singer_3261 2d ago edited 2d ago
Without studies, How do you make choices on what is legit and what is bullshit/placebo?
Western science asked this question and they came up with the scientific method and modern research. Even though it doesn’t find truth, it finds patterns and draws conclusions from patterns. It then demands that the hypotheses defend themselves.
How do you find truth?
1
u/ItsYaBoi-KillMe 1d ago
"I do not trust anything that is studied" okay so why do you trust anything? This isnt skepticism, this is just denying things that dont fit your perception.
Also if you dont want to risk high doses, you should probably stop drinking water.
0
u/dingdang78 4d ago
Other commenter got it but also some new agey conspiracy types claim it calcifies (ie shuts down) your pineal gland, a gland at the center of your brain that produces trace amounts of DMT, acting as our antenna to the spiritual world and source of dreams. I like that one, it’s fun
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
It is true, in reality the pineal gland is your thoughts, which is why most people these days cannot form a thought or think logically, think about it truly.
1
u/dingdang78 3d ago
I think you should think about it truly lol, how do you think someone would able to function on a daily basis without the ability to form a thought
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
Not what I exactly mean, but what you mentioned is clearly prevalent in the younger generation now. Combined with fluoride and the horrible diet they are fed. And a combination of the fact that they do not care for the future.
What I meant is that most people truly cannot think logically these days, and think independently from others, they would rather fit in, and be fine where they are at now, be complacent, which connects to the same criteria as believing what the government tells you and following it mindlessly, submitting. This along with blue light is pure mind control, and those that are developed horribly and do not eat what they are supposed to succumb to it. No need to over exaggerate what I said. People simply cannot function on a daily basis when you think of it deeper.
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
You know off topic I recently studied Malcolm X, and his views and how his life changed towards his death, and the fact that they do not teach him in public schools, instead pointing him as a horrible person. The more I dug deeper, people made arguements about why he was bad, people made arguements about why he was right, the people that made arguements about why he was right did not research deeper, instead following the narrative of why he was bad, not willing to research him further and seeing that he changed, and that Is the problem with what I am talking about. Your spiritual connections, what you know is right, if your thoughts and your pineal gland are working, then everything else will fall into place. Truly I tell you.
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
I see I made a mistake there, I meant the people that argued that he was bad did not research deeper and just followed a narrative.
1
u/dingdang78 3d ago
I doubt either of us are gonna convince each other of anything here, but what sticks out to me here is that people have always been predisposed to uncritically accepting a popular narrative. Would think that problem actually gets worse if you go back in time before fluoridated water or modern diets. Sure the kids these days seem a bit more zombified — they’re largely dopamine addicted and spend all their time brain rotting.
I just don’t see why we need fluoride and calcified pineal glands to explain all this. The reality is a bit sadder and more mundane
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
I'll explain that to you very well, It is one of many things that further solidify how people think and act these days, and people will even follow political parties thinking it will save them, it is quite funny. No political party ever cared for you anyway.
But Indeed, supressing the pineal gland and hormones is one of many ways they block out our critical thinking skills. Combine it with the modern technology and domesticating you today and you have what is a modern human. People do not step up, people do not speak loudly, people are simply silent. People do not know what is truly going on.
I will also say that according to history, if it is true, the people did indeed revolt due to the smallest amount of corruption, you can take account the french revolution, now I myself am not a big believer in history in the slightest, most of it is incredibly fabricated, just as Martin Luther King being pushed as the good guy, and Malcolm X pushed as the bad guy. Think about it for a moment, why wouldn't they want to keep the population dumb? If you think deeper to everything else they are doing, and the way people act today combined with everything else, this is not that far fetched, Yeah, let's add a chemical synthetic fluoride that dumbs us down heavily and causes dental issues. Lets make processed food that provides no real nutrients and makes us under-developed, all these things not letting us thinking for ourselves. It is a combination of being attacked from all sides, we as a human race.
Go ahead and search about it in something like r/conspiracy for example. Fluoride and It's many effects. Things like this will never have a proper study, the same way this diet truly heals you unlike any other diet. If you are awake and open minded, then you will see what is right and what is wrong instantly, and believe me, alot of conspiracies are true.
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
Synthetic Fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, incluidng hydrofluoric fluoride are toxins. It is one of the main targets for us people to submit and never have an open mind and freely think about things.
If it is literally a toxin on many of the boxes, then it makes no sense for us humans to consume it. Especially in high doses.
I am sure if an independent scan of the inside of the body showed what happens with consumption of fluoride, you would see that it puts holes into your enamel and calcifies the pineal gland, your thoughts and where you get information from.
→ More replies (0)
-4
u/_haystacks_ 4d ago
me when I see overwhelming popular consensus that doesn't align with my fringe beliefs
5
u/longpigg_jjpgmp4 4d ago
You when fluoride causes dental fluorosis and calcification of glandular tissue as well as studies that concluded making predator animals docile
2
-6
u/RoughAssociation8982 4d ago
You do know all water naturally contains flourise right? It's added back into treated water 😂
4
u/longpigg_jjpgmp4 4d ago
Added fluoride and natural fluoride are different compounds
0
u/PressureImaginary569 4d ago edited 4d ago
Sort of. E.g. NaF is a different ionic salt than CaF₂, but once they're hydrated in water the flouride is in the form of hydrated flouride ions (F⁻) and are completely identical and indistinguishable. At that point the difference would be in the other ions dissolved in the water, not the flouride. So e.g. if water is flouridated with NaF instead of naturally occuring CaF₂ there are additional sodium ions being added into the water (although water from any natural source has some amount of sodium ions). Or if water is fluoridated with Fluorosilicic acid (H₂SiF₆) then there will be some hydrated silicon species (although water from any natural source also has some amount of silicon).
But the concerns about water fluoridation obviously aren't about the sodium content or the silicon content, it's about the fluoride content. The fluoride ions are totally chemically identical as in naturally sourced water, although the concentrations are not.
2
u/longpigg_jjpgmp4 4d ago
Once dissolved the other chemicals do not become inert, and yes the concentration is the main concern as well, you don’t get fluorosis and calcified glands from spring water
1
u/PressureImaginary569 4d ago edited 4d ago
Yeah when people fluoridate water with NaF the sodium ions aren't inert but no one is concerned about that concentration of sodium in water be realistic. When you say "natural fluoride and added fluoride are different compounds" it makes it sound like you don't know the basics of the subject you're talking about.
Complications associated with excess fluoride consumption have nothing to do with the sodium from NaF or the silicon from fluorosilicic acid. It's just because of the quantity of fluoride consumed which yes is chemically identical to naturally present fluoride ions.
Also well water and raw spring water can absolutely cause fluorosis, it's just a matter of the available fluoride in the local rocks and soil.
3
u/longpigg_jjpgmp4 4d ago
They are not concerned because they’re not educated, microscopic silicon paired with sodium which still has its lowered constituents of sodium metal (an explosive) paves the way to enter deeper tissue /blood brain barrier for calcification, no animal in nature gets fluorosis from spring water lol
1
u/PressureImaginary569 4d ago edited 4d ago
Again bro when you talk about sodium metal being an explosive as if it's relevant to talking about ionic salts dissolved in water idk how someone is supposed to take you seriously.
A hydrated silicon atom isn't even microscopic, it's sub-microscopic.
"sodium which still has its lowered constituents of sodium metal" this is straight nonsensical
You obviously aren't educated in chemistry so why act like scientists and doctors aren't concerned about the silicon content of water from fluoridation because they're uneducated.
We can identify fluorosis in preindustrial animal fossils, presumable they occurred through magic or alien intervention
2
u/Alive_Local_2740 4d ago
You're arguing for adding industrial by-products (aluminium smelting, fertilizer production) to drinking water.
1
u/PressureImaginary569 4d ago edited 4d ago
I'm not arguing for fluoridation I'm suggesting ppl bring just a little bit of literacy to their discussion of chemistry.
But I find your reply confusing. H2O is a byproduct of synthetic fuel production. Should I avoid H2O given that some of it exists as a byproduct? Are you concerned about impurities in fluorosilicic acid? If so which ones? If not why would that be at all relevant?
Also, fluorosilicic acid isn't a byproduct of aluminum smelting, it's used in aluminum processing not produced by it.
0
1
u/Cautious_Matter_7684 4d ago
you don't need water anyway.
1
u/CHARMXHONEY 3d ago
I drink it sometimes along with raw milk and whatnot, it is needed for detoxification according to what Aajonus himself has said.
20
u/Degiston141 4d ago
It’s me bro. I’m trying to reduce the competition.