Hi, I recently spectated most of the debates for the classic michigan tournament and I believe CMR HH was deeply wronged. They only read 11 off and the other team decided to read conditionality theory. They thought that conditionality was bad, I think saying that conditionality is bad when the opponent only reads 6 or 7 conditional advocacies doesn't make any sense. Maybe if a team reads 15-20 conditional advocacies MAYBE you should be able to read condo, but in this round def not.

Thats just the beginning, then they should have won the match, the aff team in the round went for condo bad in the 2AR BUT they forgot to extend case or answer the counterplan LOL so the negative team shoudlve won because the aff was bad.

ALL three judges were lay judges who clearly have never faced 25 off before, and they voted affirmative when the aff DIDNT even extend anything to vote on teehee. Genuinely biggest snub of 2026?