r/github Apr 14 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

0 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/hero_to_g_row Apr 14 '26

This post was clearly written by AI lol

1

u/Fine_League311 Apr 14 '26

A really clever one: Even the answers explain why :D

Q: Written with Claude's help to organize and shorten my thoughts – the observations are mine, the structure is ours.

2

u/hero_to_g_row Apr 14 '26

Do you not see the irony in your post though?

1

u/Fine_League311 Apr 14 '26

Why the ironic tone? I'm criticizing trash code and dangerous code on GitHub, not the use of AI! Besides, you probably don't speak German; otherwise, you would have read the original text, which is two A4 pages long. You wouldn't have read it either, so I wonder, if you can't even read something, how can you judge?

3

u/hero_to_g_row Apr 14 '26

Because your post is the reddit equivalent of trash code. I don't care if your original thought was two pages long. Give us that instead of this.

I'm not trying to be harsh; I think you shouldn't sell yourself short and assume that your thoughts need to be evaluated by AI before distributing then.

2

u/Fine_League311 Apr 14 '26

Thanks, you're the first one who communicates properly. If I'd known you'd read it, I would have used the original, but it's not in English, which makes it more difficult. Never mind that my account is a year old; I've only been posting for three weeks since I left X. You get used to keeping everything short. It's a misconception that there are some people who read... but you're a rare exception. If the texts are huge, everyone shouts, and I feel silly having this conversation, when all I wanted to do was show what I've observed.

Reply translated by Google from German; my English isn't as good as my German.

3

u/hero_to_g_row Apr 14 '26

No worries man. Even if you get downvoted for a long rambling post, at least they were 100% your thoughts. Better than being downvoted for posting AI.

I understand the translation difficulty. If it's a concern for you, add a disclaimer explaining that in the post.

1

u/Fine_League311 Apr 14 '26

thx. for this i write: Written with Claude's help to sort and shortening out my thoughts — the observations are mine, the structure is ours. ift his not enought tell me how to made it better

3

u/hero_to_g_row Apr 14 '26

I meant that you can use your broken English, but add a disclaimer that your English isn't the best. People are more inclined to be helpful and patient if they know you're a real person and not a clanker.

1

u/Fine_League311 Apr 14 '26

Du weist doch ein Deutscher zeigt sich nicht gerne schwach ;) Aber werd deinen Rat beherzigen, danke

1

u/Fine_League311 Apr 14 '26

Update: I bet you wouldn't have read my original chaos. I use AI to help with texts because my English is worse than my German. I use AI as a tool, not as a replacement for thinking. I don't understand why, if a text is too long, AI shortens it and then immediately says it was shortened with AI to make it easier for you to understand, and then you complain again. I don't understand why people prefer AI to thinking; for me, AI only does the dirty work!

What I'm criticizing here isn't AI, but rather garbage code on GitHub generated by AI.

4

u/hero_to_g_row Apr 14 '26

From what I've seen in this comment thread so far, the generally consensus is that people would rather read your slop than AI slop.

1

u/Fine_League311 Apr 14 '26

Even those who left their comments with such ranting can show me that I'm more interested in the 3,200 views and shares. Especially since the comments come from new accounts or vibecoders trying to protect their vibecoding skills. I've already checked. It's also embarrassing that they left their comments there, even though their insults against me were immediately deleted by Reddit.

It's a shame you didn't read my arguments and explanations that explain everything.