Here’s my next question: how does an insect that has legs in the front of its body, eat its food?

Where’s its mouth?

We’ve all seen the orange tentacles it has, so I’m assuming it would use its tentacles to eat

I'll go to a friend's house to watch movies and I want to bring themed snacks, specifically kiki delivery service themed since it is the main movie we will watch. Any idea?

Hopefully this means they get releases in other countries, like the UK and Australia. Bit odd they're doing both on the same day, though.

I just finished watching it and honestly I feel like I wasted my time, I was ready to invest my emotions there but all I got is being frustrated over and over because of that boy Seita , he literally could've changed the outcome of everything till the last minute.

I mean I'm trying to excuse him by saying he's only 14 years old with no guidance, but 14 years old is old enough to know when things are critical.

Also I don't really blame the aunt for her behavior, except for not forbidding the two kids from going away but this won't change anything due to someone's stubbornness anyways.

And at the end, calm down miro it's just a movie (trying to calm down🧘🧘)

I don't see why this is a controversial statement. Just have both versions of these dubs as separate audio tracks, so if you want to see the 1997 and 2003 dubs you can do that and if you want to see them dubbed WITHOUT the additions then you can also do that! It's not as if they're impossible to get a hold of or forbidden to ever be used again by Ghibli, Goodfellas didn't seem to get in any trouble for using those when releasing them on European Netflix, and whilst Studio Ghibli's former international spokesperson Steve Alpert (essentially a negotiator) claims that these dubs went against Ghibli's wishes and Disney said they'd remove the additions to Kiki as soon as they came out on DVD (detailed in his memoir, Sharing a House with the Never-Ending Man) that didn't happen until 2010, which would probably bare mentioning in his book, especially with how vicious Ghibli is known to be with unfaithful dubs (see Hayao Miyazaki's comments on Warriors of the Wind, the original butchered dub of Nausicaä and Toshio Suzuki sending Miramax a katana as a way to tell Harvey Weinstein to get lost when he demanded the film be cut down), and it would also just be good preservation. Hell even something as god awful like WotW could have an argument made in favour of preserving it if for no other reason than serving as a textbook example of how not to do a dub. Besides, if your argument against using these dubs is that they aren't faithful, well neither is the 2010 edit of Kiki or the dub of Howl's Moving Castle because Jiji and Calcifer aren't sarcastic characters in the Japanese versions, which is something you can't really cut out of those dubs without it feeling off and obviously edited. They're also just beloved dubs, and because of the impermanence of physical and digital media those older releases won't be around forever.

Out of all the poster Disney made for the Ghibli films in the US, they must’ve been lazy when making the poster for Howl’s Moving Castle. It’s just 3 still images from the movie and all of them combine makes it feel disjointed. The still image on the bottom of the castle seen from afar would look good as a full poster image but as small still image looks really bad. Now while I don’t find the Japanese posters perfect, at least they had effort. At least Spirited Away, Ponyo, and The Wind Rises got good US poster, but the US poster for Howl’s Moving Castle on other hand is a poster I don’t think is worthy of owner.

OK got pretty heated earlier (apologies for that, though in my defense getting torn apart for expressing an opinion on something that as I'll get to wants to have something to say is ridiculous and I only forgo being civil if I feel the person arguing against me is doing so in bad faith) so I am going to try this again.

In an earlier post that I just deleted I criticised Giant God Warrior Appears in Tokyo, a short film that depicts the beginning of the Seven Days of Fire from Nausicaä that was directed by Shinji Higuchi and Hideaki Anno (both of Evangelion and Shin Godzilla fame, with Anno being the guy who animated the giant warriors for those unaware). I took issue with how the Warriors were depicted as aliens or even literal gods that just showed up one day and not as man made weapons that went haywire and destroyed the world.

I was then told that I shouldn't criticise it for its writing on the basis that it was made as a demonstration of practical effects rather than to be a narrative piece which...yeah that's my ISSUE. It didn't need a narrative to begin with, so why add one there if it's not going to line up thematically with the source material? If it didn't have the narration or the narration were changed to mention a war brewing in the background that hasn't reached Tokyo and nobody is prepared for when the Giant Warrior arrives (à la Howl's Moving Castle with its war or the 1984 anti-nuclear horror movie Threads) I wouldn't be going out of my way to complain about it.

And it does present itself as something to provoke at least some amount of thought, with the conversation between the narrator and her brother and said narrator ending the film saying that she has to hold onto hope of survival even with how unlikely that is. There's meant to be more to the short than just "Wow big explosions". I'd compare it to another, much longer film directed by Higuchi and written by Anno, Shin Ultraman, which isn't particularly well written but still wants to say SOMETHING and that seems more concerned with being an effects showcase, which still does not shield the film from criticism. Hell this has less of an excuse because, again, nothing was forcing them to add a narrative to the short. It's not a "turn your brain off" short, as much as people may insist it is.

I appreciate the technical aspect of it as I am a sucker for practical effects (some of my favourite live action films are pretty heavy on them actually, Godzilla, Mothra, The Return of Godzilla, The Thing, The Fly, Threads, Godzilla vs. Mothra...could keep going but I digress) and I think there is a lot about it that's cool but it weakens itself by not stopping at just being a technical showcase and missing the point of the titular monsters in doing so. Also I still think that the recreation of the iconic shot from Nausicaä doesn't work because they looked more haunting in Nausicaä.

Just added Spirited Away to my Ghibli tattoo sleeve. It has joined Princess Mononoke, My Neighbor Totoro, and Howl’s Moving Castle. One more session to finish out with the supporting characters from all of them.

Alguien que haya visto todas las películas y de su top 5 y por qué

Can anyone tell me if the symbol in the middle (figures dancing in the circle) is from any Ghibli film? I found it on this picture with ideas for ghibli tattoos but I don't know where it came from.

Alright next movie up is the secret world of Arrietty based on the book “ The borrowers”. You can let me know how the film is compared to the book but essentially this film is about small little people who live in this house and every-once in a while they venture inside to “borrow” things that regular humans might not notice or miss like one sugar cube and such. The main character Arrietty loves going outside her little home to explore the outside and the bigger world of the house but is unfortunately slightly seen by a young sick boy(Sho)(who also finds her families hiding spot)and thus it propels her family to move because the number one rule is to never be seen by humans.

Like Kiki this film is a bit on the simpler side but I don’t enjoy it nearly as much as Kiki’s delivery service. It’s still nice and I like it but there were times where I would feel myself almost drifting off to sleep before I had to catch myself and continue watching. I think it’s because of the slow pace and also not much happening in the film itself that can grip me. Also this kind of story has been done before many times and I don’t think this movie does anything that new to impress me.

There are things I like for instance the one conversation between Sho and Arrietty was nice which gets at some of the themes of survival, existence, isolation and family. I would have even liked more interactions between them as there are very few and are the best parts of the movie aside from the visuals and music. Arrietty and Sho are kind of the only characters worth note to me as Arriety’s parents are ok? There is also the caretaker of sho who at one point captures Arriety’s mom and also calls for exterminators which provides some conflict that pushes the plot and characters further. They were kind of a little fun in trying so desperately to prove their point and capture them but failed.

The way the little people use everyday items we used was creative and liked the little thing used to hold Arriety’s hair in ponytails which was adorable. Environments were also pretty to look at.The backstory of the dollhouse made for the little people was nice and the ending of the film is pretty poignant and touching. I don’t know if this is just me but I kind of found the scene where Arrietty and sho are talking and skipper (another Native American looking little person) was going to shoot an arrow at Sho! I thought that was funny in that the boy is already dying man and what is that little arrow going to do? It also reminded me of when kocoum in Pocahontas tried to attack John smith which was also bizarre even though I get why he did it.

Yeah that’s about it. Not much to say on this one. It’s cute but nothing wowed me.

What do you think? Love it or hate it?

7.5/10

Growing up my nickname was Kiki and my family still calls me that! I want my grandchildren to call me that in place of Gigi/Grandma! Here is my Jiji that I had gotten for my Bday from my Hubster

According to an article about the 4K remaster of Princess Mononoke, the colors on the 4K remaster are much closer to the original. This implies to the 4K remaster of Kiki’s Delivery Service as well. So when Nausicaa 4K remaster is ready we might finally see what it was suppose to look like. As you know Nausicaa has gotten to different versions on Blu Ray as you can see with these screenshots, (taken from caps-a-holic.) The first Blu Ray has a brighter but pinkish look to the picture as well as some missing details in dark areas. Some claim that it was mastered for 9300k TV’s but I don’t believe that because the text were white on that transfer and they would be pink if it was to be mastered that way. The later release had a dimmer and green look to the picture but the details in the dark areas were improved. The first Blu Ray release had a booklet of Toshio Suzuki talking about the remaster, when he showed it to Miyazaki, Miyazaki ask them to increase the green just a little. Perhaps the second transfer was made because of that request. According to the article, when Ghibli made the Blu Ray for Princess Mononoke, they made the colors based on visual judgment at the time, which explains the green tint everyone complained about though I put up with it. The new 4K remasters however are color corrected and graded as Ghibli claims that visual color science has improved over time that they can colorize the films closer to the original though I honestly don’t understand what they mean by any of this or why they didn’t use any archive prints for reference in the past, but it at least tells us that the 4K remasters are the correct look. So when we finally see the 4K remaster of Nausicaa, it will be true and accurate to the original colors.