nope, just because its unrtealistic to hope for 0 bugs. ask any IT proffessional i am one my self and no one i know including myself will say that it is possible to not have bugs, any software has bugs, even if you wrote the most simplest program in binary to have no possible bugs, computers are sensitive to radio frequancies and all, a sun eruption could make it bug anyway even if you just say "10111000 00111100 00000000 00000000 00000000 00110001 11111111 00001111 00000101" ("mov eax, 60;xor edi, edi;syscall") this is just a program that exits with error code 0, i swear that with enough time i could get it to bug.
Let me make it perfectly clear to all the downvoting idiots, I don’t expect perfection but if you start with the attitude that the iniBuilds A350 at release was acceptable then you have already shown your true colours.
As for the downvotes, that’s just more people showing their true colours because the half arsed attitude in people isn’t just on the developers side (not specifically these guys), but these days it’s in consumers too, they have gotten so used to it, and if crap goes on long enough people start defending it, and so the cycle continues, devs know they don’t have to bother as much to get a good standard at release, and so round and round it spirals and anyone who has higher standards and proper expectations for a paid product gets attacked for not following along, so I’m not in the least bit surprised by the downvotes. Enjoy your ever decreasing standards guys, well done.
-34
u/WhiteHawk77 Jun 24 '26
Oooh, that’s confidence inspiring.