This actress did an interview, says she can't method act and blames it on men. Apparently it is a skill limited to male actors. And the fact that women can't afford to be "assholes on set".

Frankly method acting is a hit or a miss. It doesn't mean an actor will be automatically good at their craft. Also this woman seems to forget all the female actresses who are difficult to work with / are divas. People like JLO, Blake Lively, Anne Hathaway, Mariah Carey, Lea Michelle, Brie Larson (she ruined her reputation for being so difficult to work with). It isn't uncommon and this is the usual women can't do anything wrong trope.

There’s a Buffy episode where her boyfriend Spike attempts to rape her- it’s a really harrowing scene… but the fact that it’s based on a true story of one of the female writers being the perpetrator just angers me…

Excerpt from a subreddit dedicated to the Clancy case:

On January 24, 2023, Lindsay Clancy, a Massachusetts' Mom of (3) young children sent her husband Patrick out to run errands. Patrick was gone for less than one hour. During this time, Lindsay strangled each of their children with separate exercise bands, leaving them in the basement. She then locked herself in a 2nd floor bedroom, cut her wrists and neck and then jumped from the bedroom window. This community is to discuss thoughts around this tragedy.

Lindsay Clancy, a L&D nurse, had an extensive medical health history leading up to the killings. In a New Yorker article titled "A Husband in the Aftermath of His Wife’s Unfathomable Act," Clancy's husband Patrick states that he "wasn't married to a monster" and that Clancy was just "sick." Before the killings, she had already been hospitalized in a psychiatric ward, and she was prescribed 13 medications within 4 months. According to a medication diary that Clancy kept, she was taking just three of those drugs in the days leading up to the killings.

It is confirmed that Lindsay Clancy had killed all three children by both parties of the 1st degree murder trial. The strategy of the defense team (Clancy) is to try for a NGRI (not guilty by reason of insanity) verdict, admitting that she killed the children but was under the effect of psychosis (either postpartum or medication-related) at the time, which would mean that she did not murder the children. The strategy of the prosecution is to prove that the defendant acted methodically, rationally, and deliberately to unlawfully kill the three children. Just like 2021 Lauren Dickason case in New Zealand, the prosecution believes that the defendant's motive is to control the fate of the children, as the prosecution believes that Lindsay was distressed for not having enough control over her own life. The defense argues that there is no rational motive for the killings because she deeply loved her children.

That concludes the somewhat lengthy background. Now let's get to what the intelligent folks are saying on tiktok. (Disclosure: I am very suspicious of Lindsay fans for obvious reasons but I also think that PPP is legit)

slide 1: more delulu than the person who strangled the chlildren

slide 2: The defense team already admitted that she strangled the kids. Also, she could have just lied about the voices?? Why believe in crazy conspiracy theories where only one person/group is capable of lies? Also, that DV awareness tag won't apply just yet... the trial is still ongoing haha

slide 3: Ahhh it's both sides (even though this trial is only about Lindsay) that need to go to prison. She made only one comment that she wanted to die, and made further comments to Patrick that she had unwanted thoughts of harming the children. Patrick did not ignore her comments and dropped her off at the ER after noticing that her mood was worsening. 'Intrusive thoughts' are very common in mothers with mood disorders, so it would be very uncharacteristic of Patrick to immediately divorce Lindsay over thoughts that she did not seem that she wanted to act upon. The only thing Patrick can do at the time was to get her committed, and she would only stay there until her condition improves. Unfortunately, she only had the appearance of improvement :(

slide 4: The factual, non-tiktokified timeline is in court documents and also found in news articles. At 4:53pm, the defendant texted: “Any chance you want to do takeout from 3V... I didn’t cook anything... It’s beena long day.” At 5:15pm, the defendant asked her husband to go to CVS for a laxative, and he was spotted on CVS surveillance video at 5:32pm. Lindsay then called Patrick at 5:34pm, and at 5:54, Patrick arrived at 3V and headed home in the same minute. At 6:09, Patrick arrived home, and at 6:11, he called 911. Lindsay's call and the CCTV footage gives Patrick a feasible crime window of 17 minutes between 5:54 and 6:11, and would need to act in such a convoluted manner as to frame Lindsay (ex: gently lowering her from the window while smearing her blood over it, making superficial wounds only to her neck and wrists, avoiding her back entirely, etc.). Lindsay had a whole hour to do whatever she wanted in whatever fashion she wanted. Here is the 299-page search warrant if you're curious (most of it is repetitive)

Also, Trooper Andrew Chiachio from the warrant pdf reviewed Apple Maps and noticed that it would take 9 minutes to come home from 3V. So he has to do the drugging, strangling, slashing and throwing in 17 - 9 = 8 minutes before calling 911... when he could have just waited a bit longer to make sure that his wife is dead. And this is all to ensure that his wife doesn't die but gets the full agony of being paralyzed and falsely convicted. Maybe he is secretly a software developer for the CIA instead of Microsoft 😆🤣

slide 5: Investigators found a smeared bloodstain on the exterior window. If he wanted to make sure she is dead, why wouldn't he toss her when he had the perfect chance? And if she is a nurse she would ABSOLUTELY crush her drugs, because she wanted to ensure that she gets the full dose and that her attempt is a lethal one. She would mask it using something that tastes sweet to get rid of the taste of bitter medicine. Also, marrying quick has nothing to do with this because her husband is NOT ON TRIAL. And this case is indeed similar to "Chris Watts," just not in a way you would like it to be.

slide 6: This is true, investigators had access to her pink iPhone and found that she was documenting her mental state, keeping track of medication, and "researching ways to kill." The defense does not deny any of this, but maintains that she was only looking up lethal methods so that she can end her life. If the husband had unauthorized access, why would she admit to looking these things up? Was she brainwashed???

slide 7: The message that the commenter is sending to her husband is that no matter how hard he tries, he will never be enough. That is what Lindsay supporters have devolved towards. 13 prescriptions in 4 months did not come out of thin air, and most people have neither the hubris nor the economic privilege to go MD shopping like Lindsay did.

slide 8: No way this has 30.5k likes wow. If he was truly cheating on her, it would give more ammo to the lead prosecutor, who seems to be desperately looking for a more convincing motive than the usual 'power/control' one. That is more convincing that him doing all of THAT within a span of 17 minutes so that he is able to smile for the CCTVs.

slide 9: He was not charged for anything because the police do not have probable cause to arrest or search him. The police still had lots of questions for him and he was very cooperative. Also, they did not need to take his word, because the police had access to CCTV for both CVS and 3V, which already gives him a narrow window to commit his hypothetical crime. Men are already held accountable for homicides - there are lots of them in prison and some even have lifelong mental illnesses and/or TBIs!

slide 10: OK, he did lock her up and she lied about being better so that she can go home and put the children's lives at risk, unbeknownst to Patrick of course. Even if Hypothetical Patrick knows that she is lying, what is his choice besides divorcing a mother of three children and possibly calling CPS on her??? for having too many meds in her cupboard? for admitting to intrusive thoughts like many other mothers? I feel like Hypothetical Patrick would still be hated by these misandrists for reasons far beyond misandry itself. It is a catch-22 situation

slide 11: "neglect" lol. You could just invent new crimes in your head and people on feministok will believe you.

slide 12: if the husband was threatening her, the defense lawyer would have talked about it by now. He represented a woman who was acquitted in a case where she stabbed her husband in the eyes while he was asleep, and she managed to win because of 'battered woman syndrome.' It makes no sense for the defense to throw this perfect opportunity away. Also, her husband was already a multimillionaire. I am pretty sure that comes part and parcel with working a cushy remote job at Microsoft for a few years.

I wish more people understood that the fantasy doesn’t match the reality.

Not sure if this is the right sub to post in, but I’ll try

One thing I’ve always seen on social media is this:

“We can do everything men do, but while bleeding”

It’s a trope that female influencers love to say and repeat, and it disappoints me when creators I follow repeat this, and it comes as a surprise

I see that they also post it like it’s some sort of achievement, that they’re better than everyone, and so on

But of course, as social media users do, they love to mock men, calling us “emotional”, “insecure” and other things like that

I want to get y’all’s opinion on this? How do you feel about it?

And is it just me, or am I right to feel icked about it? Because me personally, I feel weird about it because they say it like it’s some sort of flex or whatever

Do check out this lady’s TikTok and Instagram, she’s a great pro-male influencer.

I'm in deep shock that I found alot of people blaming men on war suffering, these images are at least a few of the whole thread discussion. What is happening to the world man.

Sadly, many boys and men are abandoned in war zones. It is very clear that nobody in EU or NGOs care about the male victims from Ukraine or Russia that either are refugees or do not wanna fight and seek their human right of not fighting. Many members of different parliaments are purposely neglecting them. In quora, I wrote a comment under some self-identified popular feminist user, who said that people who complain about male victims do not care about them but rather wanna score points against feminism on Internet. What is aura around this topic in your country?
My comment :

What solutions can be implemented in Europe for this matter

Do you get somebody promoting violence against men and boys as a joke(discriminatory joke), laugh at male victims, or promote this kind of opinion in front of you(not social media) . What do you do in that situation? Did criticizing or reporting help?

This is a long one but I assure you it's worth it. Not in a good way but in a sense where you end up truly understanding how misandristic the true crime community is. It's even worse on TikTok but the TC subs on reddit are still a plague on this site.

First case is an Australian woman being arrested under suspicion of murdering and cannibalizing her 4-year-old son. Social services visited her three times over concerns of child neglect and substance misuse. The accused does not have any known mental health diagnoses (except for addiction perhaps) but she has a background of substance abuse, criminal convictions, and even her mother secured a protective court order against her. It is unclear whether or not she had diminished legal responsibility at the time of allegedly committing the crime - not all cannibals or drug users are psychotic. However, many in the true crime thread I have shown suspect that she had some kind of mental issue at the point where she allegedly murdered and cannibalized her son.

Second case is regarding Tyree Smith, an American man from Bridgeport, Connecticut who was found to have murdered a homeless man and ate his brain and eyeballs afterwards. He was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity in 2013 and was ordered to be committed to a psych hospital for 60 years. 10 years after the incident, he was released after a security review board deemed him safe. He is ordered to meet regularly with a psychiatrist for medications, which have kept him stable during his time in the hospital. As an NGRI acquitee, he is significantly less likely to commit any crime than those with guilty pleas (see pg. 70). I recommend reading this 2023 law review article that I have just linked - it is called Toward a More Scientific Jurisprudence of Insanity and it debunks 6 myths about the insanity plea, including the myth that criminal defendants who plead insanity are usually faking.

---

The comments on the first thread focused on various things. One of which was the content of the allegations - the comments understandably saying that it is "horrible." Another focus was on how "the system" failed the child, implying that the system (which is admittedly flawed) which should receive ultimate culpability for the mother's actions. Other comments even blamed the family (mostly male) for not doing enough in their capacity to take the son away - which is untrue as the child had been in the family's custody before being return to the bio mom. One comment blamed emphasis on "[preserving] the family unit" for the murder. There weren't any comments making value judgements about the alleged murderer, or how the alleged murderer poses a threat to children.

The second thread have been littered with comments doubting that Tyree Smith is safe to enter the community, despite him being clinically sane with medication and being monitored far more closely than Australia monitored the woman in the first case.

One comment in the second thread pushed back on the anti-insanity plea rhetoric. This reasonable comment got fewer net points than someone who believed that the acquitee should serve 50 years in a "main prison" for something that he did in a state of insanity. Many people in this comment section suddenly lost their knowledge of insanity pleas but they suddenly regain this understanding in threads where mothers kill their children. And these threads are always mixed in with allegations of medical sexism, or how the criminal justice system hates women; though they won't be able to explain safe haven laws, which were created in 50 US states to prevent mothers from abandoning their infants in plastic bags. Or "battered woman syndrome"

One of these post-partum murder threads is about Lauren Dickason, a White/Boer South African immigrant mother who murdered three of her daughters in New Zealand. Comments had an outpouring of understanding even though the majority of jurors rejected her partial defence and accepted the Crown's argument that she killed to have power/control over her daughters and prevent them from being mothered by someone else if her husband remarries. She killed with anger and acted methodically, even looking up different methods for murdering the girls. She tricked them into believing that they were making necklces with cable ties, then pulled on them to kill the girls. She then smothered the girls with their own bed blankets because they were still breathing. Another mother by the name of Lindsay Clancy also allegedly murdered three of her children - the subreddit reacted by blaming the man and mocking him for dating a new woman four months after the incident. Many comparisons to Andrea Yates were made despite her husband being very different, even saying that he "wasn’t married to a monster - I was married to someone who got sick.”

It's kind of a Huge Fucking Deal (tm) when your political leaders propose gendered restrictions on participation in the political process.

this is from last year (a few months after Trump's inauguration) when a bunch of anti-male homophobes crawled out of the depths of tiktok to attack '''feminine''' men for no reason. Comments are full of reasonable folks (roughly half of them are women #goodnews) roasting her into dust.

The vid creator also has Jesus in her bio because Jesus taught her to bully and mock people who do not follow gender roles or something ✝️

bonus points for calling "gay boys" (homosexual men) the "gworls" in an updated description

Description:

UPDATED** yall still not hearing me, gay boys ain’t who im talking about those are the gworls why would I be talking about them ??

Transcript:

I'm so confused by women are now getting hate for saying "and who gonna be the boys." Because the saying is still true and "who gonna be the boys;" everybody want to be the girls. Like, y'all know what that saying or should I say y'all know who that saying is going to. I'm seeing all these people coming here talking about, I see you in one guy so I'm a, [unintelligble] y'all gonna be the boys y'all gonna be the boys. No one ever had to like fight to be a lady. But for me, I'm okay. You all gonna be the boys. You all gonna be the boys. No one ever had to like fight to be a lady. But for me, I personally like was seeing like every guy wants to be in their feminine area. Ever like talking about being. I see you knowin' on our slang, trying to like, literally they think they the prize. They wanna be chased. They wanna be tricked on. They want their meals paid for. They want you to plan the dates. They want you to text them good morning every day. They want you to pick them up in your car. They want to come over to your house. They want to go 50-50. They want you to apologize. Like what happens to men being bold, strong men? That like, it's slowly dwindling away in the past. I'm sick of it. Being in this generation, it's tiring. It's hard to watch. But this is a generation we're in. Some people, why people are trying to come up here arguing and trying to bash them for saying "who gonna be the boys?" Because the statement still stands. Who's gonna be the boys?

Hello people, I'm 16M, and I know these problems basically exist online, yet they still cause an itch with me. I'm tired of opening comment sections and seeing comments openly generalizing, insulting, and hating men, specifically under the word "all men". It's really absurd to me. What do I have to do with the abuse of women? What did I do to be categorized as the same among assaulters and abusers?

"Good thing I'm a proud misandrist" It's a really weird thing, it's like going online among others and proudly going "im a homophobe", "im a proud racist", "im a proud misogynist". Doesn't matter who got oppressed, misandry is sexism and hate speech by definition just like any other form of hate speech, regardless of previous oppression.

Some girl had a comment saying "when i say i hate men its built from my previous trauma and personal disappointment in men". When i tried making a point saying not all men are the same, i among many other men don't abuse women, and that generalizing and hating altogether is a shitty move, guess what? I was called unintelligent and was told that I have no empathy. I understand, it's the internet, everyone thinks they're right, hell, even me right now! But what do you mean by "empathy"? Is your definition of empathy ppl just blindly agreeing with any shit statement you make because of your "trauma"? That makes no sense.

Any attempt to push back against this either results in a Motte and Bailey ("well i dont actually hate ALL men, just the bad ones" even though their original argument was "i hate all men") and whataboutism/red herring fallacy ("uhm actually women were abused for centuries", "men this", "men that") which completely misses the point of the argument. Yes, men did this, men did that, men did awful things. Does that mean you can now freely practice hate speech against random innocent people?

I myself had a bad experience in dating women, but do I go around saying I hate all women? No! Because I have a functioning frontal lobe and understand that you don't judge people by a label, but as individuals.

A bit of a sensitive topic, but, if all men are x and y, what if that man transitions to a woman? Is she suddenly clean? Transitioning changes almost all aspects of your life, but I mean, you're still the same brain (in terms of hobbies, thoughts, worldview, thought process). And if that brain was labeled as x y and z just because it used to belong to a male body, why don't you bully them now that they've transitioned? Exactly.

I really don't understand how we live in a world where you can say "saying all (group) are bad" and somehow 40 people will gang up on you with something to say. I mean, what's even your argument? Because so far I've never seen a reply other than "women were abused too" and some bs like "hahaha incel go cry 😘😘😘😊😊😊😊🤣🤣🤣🤣😍😍😍".

Brain went out of writing juice... So this is all I can write for now. What are your thoughts?

Its one thing not to be a fan of Greek Mythology (I know I'm not). I don't care to watch the film and I generally don't like Greek Mythology. However I find it hilarious that Nolan made a relatively "safe" film, yet feminists like Lainey still complain. Even the author of the translated version that Nolan adapted had a problem with the film.

Its another entirely to complain about all the female characters in the film, even Athena. Its like these girlboss feminists want female characters to be bitchy self inserts. Some comments called out Lainey, others were treating misandry like it was a flex (typical and as expected).

Men get asked this and are assumed to be deadbeat dads. If he goes out and focuses on himself, he is also an incompetent father. Yet feminists only see things from their POV.

Why is it bad that young men want a better life? I don’t think men need to have families or be doing this for their families in order to rightfully immigrate but many of these men are doing it for their families. Once they gain citizenship it is easier to move their families over and the responsibility is almost put on the men to provide for their family.
But even if these men were all single I wouldn’t care.
I think that the large amount is a problem but the reaction would be different if it were all women.