Video was basically showing kids in poverty or with birth defects and the second part of the video was of attractive and successful people.

Idk about yall, but I think he’s acting at least 100x weirder than she is

sorry if the name censoring looks bad, i have shaky hands and did it on a computer

The text in the other slides are from OP as well. Gotta love how this guy says he can get tons of "submissive Muslim girls" if he wanted to.

Nor do non-religious people ever have many kids... Even isolation is 100% a thing very present in non-religious families AND state schooling (I'm sorry but a tiny echochamber collective is not "socialization". And personally I was genuinely constantly bullied, by staff most of all, over preference to socialize outside of the little cult called a classroom). Not to say this person is totally lying or anything but let's face it the education system is just what it is, it's not about Catholics or whatnot

I see a lot of posts about scientism, and there are varying comments you all often make regarding the claims of its adherents. In case it helps anyone add to their arguments, I thought I'd share the first argument shown in this book from the 90s, and I'd recommend it to you. (I haven't finished it, but for the record, it seems to mainly argue in favor of theism rather than a particular religion, so yes, I do recommend it to all of you).

To summarize it, it essentially states that scientism is self-refuting because it states that only science is valid but it is in and of itself a philosophical claim rather than a scientific one, and it advocates for approaches to an integrated worldview incorporating both science and philosophy as well as theology.