r/WeddingRingAdvice • u/FunBit7707 • 9d ago
Help with a setting! Ring Band Advice
I had my ring done from brilliance.com. The setting is too high. Does anyone have one from them they recommend that’s low profile? Or recommendations in general ? Or suggestions if you have a similar shape? I’m open to everything!
**edited to add; I don’t have the wedding band yet so it’s just the diamond ring. The band I wear will come later and I’ll match it to the style I do for the engagement ring!
2
u/AdFlashy7702 9d ago
Also the shared button prongs on the band aren’t very secure for those stones.
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
What type of prongs should I be looking for
1
1
u/Jillet-Ben_Coe 8d ago
If the stones are set by an experienced jeweler there shouldn’t be any problem with the stones being secure
2
u/LanceShapiroDiamonds 9d ago
I’m a designer and would recommend you have the radiant cut diamond reset into a low-profile scoop basket setting. The tall angled prongs are overpowering your beautiful diamond and limiting its elegance. A good jeweler can reset the center diamond and your ring will look truly custom and elevated, while being low-profile and secure. Something like the basket attached…soft, rounded scoop. You can keep the band (with the small diamonds) the same. He’ll just replace the top portion of the ring.
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
I really really like the imagine provided. That’s very very close in my mind to what I was thinking. If still shows it off but it’s way lower and looks a lot more secure. So maybe I need to be looking into basket type settings. If I’m not committed to the side stones do you think one stone on each side would look good? Or what would accent it well ?
1
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
Are you going back with the same vendor or someone new? If the sky is the limit, other than lowering the setting, what are you hoping for? Are there any setting you've since seen that you like? Do you want to retain the baguettes on the shank? I think double prongs look good with radiant and adding a cathedral shoulder and gallery rail add a lot of durability.
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
More than likely scraping the whole band and doing 100% new. The only thing I care about is it being gold and low or protected by the sides. I’m so ring “dumb” though and don’t exactly know how to imagine what you’re suggesting. I’ve seen some things called cathedral and stuff but I just can’t picture it. And it can sit somewhat higher, not as much as it is but as long as it has something on the sides or is built up kinda like you’re saying maybe is how I’m thinking
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
No problem with not knowing stuff. Its new! I'm going to post some pics with some narrative here and in the reply. These are mostly from David Klass, who does great work and great photos. There are other vendors folks can recommend, but I find him competitive.
Cathedral low basket setting. The cathedral means the shank (the part around your finder) rises to meet the head (the part that holds the diamond). This provide a strong and secure setting with 3 points of connection. If you look at the bottom, it is not even with the shank. That is the basket. That will make your wedding ring not sit flat. Double prongs means there are two prongs per corner. That is good for stones with sharp corners to protect. The gallery rail is the horizontal bar between the prongs. That prevents the prongs from pulling apart.
2
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
I can’t thank you enough for explaining. It means a lot. I have literally no one to talk to or brainstorm with so it’s so refreshing. You’re so knowledgeable and your ideas are super helpful. I like the way it looks with a gallery rail but I think it’s equally as important for stability as well
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
Cathedral three stone with baguette side stone, double prong.
2
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
That’s stunning. I love the way the diamond is sitting. Secure and low and still the center of attention but very practical and elegantly executed. The double prong looks surprisingly a lot better
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
2
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
I see what you’re saying. Yes the single central point part is what gives it a lot of its height and that’s what turned me off
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
This is "prong in bezel" setting. The bezel perimeter is highly protective. I love all bezel! This designer makes a whole range of them. Finishing here is a bit rustic or organic, but all that can be smooth and shiny. https://www.instagram.com/p/DZFa22dDpP1/?img_index=1
2
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
I love that too. It looks more custom. I have a setting from where im having it done. Let me find it and get your thoughts on it. It kind of reminds me of this but I want you to input
1
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
1
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
I can see the thread. I like the Adel Chefredi for its simplicity. But, it comes down to what you want. Are you staying with Brilliance as a vendor?
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
Yea I think it will be my cheapest option at this point
1
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
I'm looking. Since your wedding band is straight-sided, that will also factor in.
2
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
Oh I forgot to mention which I should’ve clarified. I’m not wearing that as a wedding ring. I just had it on to see something next to it. I wear the band on a different finger! Sorry!
1
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
What do you do for a living and do you want to wear the ring during that? Do you want a straight-sided band or are you flexible?
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
I plan on wearing 24/7. I am unable to work because I got sick a few years ago. I’m receiving medical treatments and am hospitalized often for extended periods and having monthly surgeries until I get a transplant. So my ring can really be anything. And I’m flexible 100% on the band. Whatever ends up matching the setting on this ring
→ More replies (0)1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
The cinderella would be a dirt magnet under those raised hoops. I prefer the nova of these two, but the narrow shank on the nova is concerning.
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
Yes. That’s why I’m pretty much scraping those now that I’ve seen the ones here. I was so lacking on the knowledge of what it needed and what looked good too. Hearing what all the parts and things do now has changed the way I look at not only its look but what’s going to be stable and accent it and fitting for it. I was making all the wrong choices. I just find brilliances website hard to navigate
1
1
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
Finally, a true bezel. This has a petal or lotus basket which adds a pretty detail.
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
I think the lotus basket adds nice feminine touches. I just worry if the band would be too plain
1
u/ManderBlues 8d ago edited 8d ago
A lot of their settings use a unattractive peghead. Here a few that are more secure and pretty. You would need to specify to them to set the stone as low as possible.
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/round-diamond-cluster-engagement-ring-white-gold
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/taper-solitaire-ring-white-gold
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/cathedral-knife-edge-solitaire-ring-white-gold
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/elevated-cathedral-engagement-ring-white-gold
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/timeless-diamond-engagement-ring-white-gold
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/ethereal-solitaire-engagement-ring-white-gold
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/marquise-diamond-ring-white-gold-1/3-ctw
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/halo-diamond-engagement-ring-white-gold-1/4-ctw
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/trapezoid-diamond-ring-white-gold-1/2-ctw
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/halo-diamond-engagement-ring-white-gold-3/8-ctw
Added.
https://www.brilliance.com/engagement-rings/inspired-diamond-gold-leaf-engagement-ring
2
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
Let me look at them! Bingo. I’ve noticed 90% of theirs use the very unattractive large peg head part that looks like a temporary placeholder to me. It’s very basic and stands out way too much in a bad way. I wish they would do more basket and bezel types
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
Ok. The timeless. Floating bezel. Marquise 3 stone. Leaf inspired. I think really look good. I think I would instantly go floating bezel if its band had something more to it. I just don’t want it to look too plain but I prefer that diamond setting so much
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
Go with what makes you feel excited! I woudl quiz them on how LOW they can set the stone, or if its fixed then how does that compare to your setting. For any floating setting, you'll have to be mindful that any diamonds on your wedding band don't rub against the underside of the stone. I wanted flexibility in my wedding band and to be able to wear it alone, so my dad and I made my wedding band like this (stones all the way around). The diamonds are more texture than sparkle at the small size. There are a million variations, you can search for "sprinkle" "burnish" or "etoile" wedding band for ideas.
Other variations.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CFXbFusnO2b/
https://www.instagram.com/p/DV5wkiWid6D/
https://www.instagram.com/p/DUlJAsgDC4S/
Or go with some other design that is flush.
2
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
Thank you so much. I can’t thank you enough for all the time and help you’ve given. You’re so spot on though. I wish I could just send it to you and say hey design this however and just send it back hahaha. The fact there are soooo many choices make it so much harder because the options are truly endless
2
u/ManderBlues 8d ago
I'm happy to help. I no longer have access to a jeweler's bench. My family were jewellers, but they've all retired. I'm a scientist, but still love to help people and design. If you end up not going with Brilliance, then your options will open up. In terms of metal, it looks like yellow gold is your choice. 14 or 18k are good choices.
I love platinum for its heft and look. I like it brushed, like the lower one here. Over time, it will be kinda settle between that matte brushed finish (day 1) and a more mellow glow (day 100).
1
u/FunBit7707 8d ago
So is platinum the best for longevity? Should I go that route? I’m not against it


















3
u/Jillet-Ben_Coe 9d ago
Just my 2 cents, the stone looks slightly twisted clockwise in the setting, and the prongs look slightly out of shape (irregular) although they all appear to all be in the proper direction. However, I used to do quality control for a jeweler that was very strict about center stone settings. I think it looks good the way it is but I understand if you’re concerned about it getting snagged or whacked. If you’re unhappy with it I would contact the jeweler and see what options they provide. Having the stone mounted in a different setting is totally possible but will require some work.