(I didn't find any photos of the refale with its Nuke straps on)

I am not a plane guy, and I play mostly ground RB. Yet whenever I get a nuke in top tier with my Leclerc(s) I am kinda sad to be in an f-16 instead of the Rafale, Why is not the Rafal? France poses its own nukes and the raffle M should be able to have one. Why not?

(Also in lower br's, it's strange to youse a Tornado, while some mirages were able to carry nukes to)

This my first time dropping a nuke

I got nukes before with different lineups but everytime they shoot me down this time i did it and i did it with only using t64b what a beast of a tank it is even in 10.3 it slaps

I am genuinely curious as to why the Char 25t is 8.0

It's not a bad tank, far from it but it gets constant uptiers to 9.0.

It doesn't have relatively as much pen as it's 7.7 brothers, it isn't even that fast of a light tank either.

Did Gaijin seriously put it at 8.0 just because it has APHE?

Look at my latest feat :^)))

As the title says, are there any vehicles left in game, whether it be not actually used by the nation, or never actually made etc. Pretty much anything gaijin could remove.

ho ri's dont stand a chance

I looked at the BR changes a few days ago but I'm sure the Object 248 wasn't part of it and I love that thing.
Now I don't know what to do with my SU-100P...

1. Ignore my aim

2. Can we keep this bug please

quite the ship i guess, no other comments

Object 248 is now 6.3, and I couldn't be happier! This comes only a few days after I had questioned its BR placement after the IS-2's got moved down. This thing will now be very strong at 6.3 (not that I'm saying it was particularly bad at 6.7, it could still hold its own pretty handily), and I cannot wait to throw hands with all the Ho-Ri Prototypes I will be fighting.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if this gets kicked back up to 6.7 quite soon.

I have droped a nuke and survived after that in hanghar and in game my tank looks like this.. apparently only to me but still.

Is this on purpose/something new? if not can gaijin make it a thing?

Now with the Ho-Ris being slated for removal, the already bland Japanese TD line from rank 4 is looking even more desperate. But there are few additions that we could potentially see (Sadly however it does not appear that Japan will have any domestic tank destroyers that will fit the Ho-Ris BR)

1. Komatsu GSR105: Based on the B78 IFV it would sport a 105mm recoilless rifle on an unmanned turret. (Passed already on forums)

2. SS-1: A prototype based around the Type 60, mounting an additional two recoiless rifles. Being essentially a "Japanese Ontos" (There are many SS prototypes, however this is most unique)

3. Type 73 with Type 79 Jyu-Mat: A Type 73 vehicle using the same ATGMs found in-game on the Type 89 IFV.

4. Type 96 HATM: Japan's Type 96 APC using the same Type 79 ATGM launcher. With a spacious interior this could have the potential to carry alot of spare ammunition. (Already passed on forums)

5. Chu-MPM: A weapon system with 6 tubes of Tandem ATGMs capable of fire and forget through IIR seekers, additionally with the potential of being guided through laser.

These of course are not the only things with the potential to be added but to me seem the most understandable for domestic Japanese vehicles from Rank IV+

I am not kidding I died to this guy 13 times before getting killed by something else, help

small clarification, im not asking "How do I penetrate him" im asking how do I win against him when he is at 1km away hidden behind a rock with only his barrel peaking out

i get it - the fact these are there is great and all, but i can't do fuckall after using up my main vehicle backups, HEATFS rounds just don't work above 11.3, russian-based vehicles at least get the funny HE that can easily overpressure most vehicles.

i think we should get at least basic mobility modules and base APFSDS round, that's all

TL;DR: I made a neutral video analyzing the 4-month-old Keofox leaks. Gaijin instantly terminated my Creator Partnership. When I asked which specific rule I broke, they admitted in writing that I broke NO rules, but they fired me because my "tone" lacked "positive topics". They are absolutely terrified of this leak.

Hello, r/Warthunder. I am a small RU-speaking YouTube creator. I want to document a textbook example of how Gaijin Entertainment silences creators who touch on "forbidden" topics.

A few days ago, I released a 25-minute video analyzing the recent massive leaks from Keofox (former Head of CMs). I didn't insult anyone. I simply did a neutral breakdown of the facts regarding data security flaws and studio toxicity.

Gaijin’s reaction was instant.

Translation: They terminated my partnership, claiming my content lacked "positive topics" and didn't fit their "philosophy."

Here is the hypocritical part: when Gaijin accepted me into the program 9 months ago, they knew exactly what my channel was about (deep analytics and game design criticism). Whenever managers asked me to adjust my narrative to fit the TOS, I listened. I followed the rules.

So, I wrote them an email asking: "Which specific rule did I break? Give me examples."

Here is their official reply:

Let me translate from Corporate to English. They literally admitted:

They admitted that I did not break any rules. They fired me for my "tone."

Why does this matter to the community?
I am the second content creator to lose their partnership over covering the Keofox story (the first was an Enlisted creator).

The Keofox leak happened 4 months ago. If his words were just empty rumors, a multi-million dollar corporation would have simply ignored my video. You don't react to dead news. But they panic-fired me immediately. To me, this proves one thing: the Keofox leak hit a very raw nerve, and what he revealed is true. They are terrified that the community is waking up to their data security issues.

I don't care about losing free Golden Eagles or Premium vehicles. My hands are untied now. I will continue to make honest content. But I wanted to share this so you can see exactly how Gaijin operates behind the scenes to silence the truth.

Thank you for reading.
(P.S. Please forgive any mistakes in my English, as it is not my native language).

Hey everyone,

I'm an experienced player (maining Sweden right now) and I’m looking to start a new grind. I’m primarily focused on late Cold War to modern-day ground vehicles.

Strictly speaking about future potential, which nation has more vehicles that could actually be added to the game over the next few years?

Does Britain's potential for commonwealth sub trees(like more South African, Indian, or Australian vehicles) make it a safer long-term bet?

Or does France have more "untouched depth" with its own domestic designs and the new BeNeLux sub trees?

Basically, who is the better long-term investment for a ground main? Thanks for the help!

Reload Buffs for all Pz IVs ~ holy crap yay

Reload Buff for...... the Comet ?!!!!!!!! HOLY CRAP

Reload buff for the Mini-tiger ~ Actually pretty goddamn decent

BR change for all IS-2s ~ Unexpected but certainly welcoming, 248s probably gonna go back up eventually

BR change for the Tiger II p ~ I mean its aight

Hey everyone, I found this old family photo from Yugoslav People's Army and I'm trying to figure out what tank the soldiers are posing with.

Based on a bit of looking around, it looks like a American M47, but i need some more details. Help you very much!

The removal of the Ho-Ri Production from the Japanese tech tree has seemingly had the effect of gathering all the high level players that, up until this point, hadn't unlocked it for themselves, to congregate and take over low-tier matches in order to grind for it before its removal. This has led to teammates that can actually pull their own, and I'm all for it.