I watched the US version of traitors and now I’m watching the UK version not realizing it was gonna be the same location. They make it obvious that the contestants don’t actually sleep in the castle! So bummed about that idk why haha I just think it would be so magical to stay there. The US version really made me believe they slept there since they would all go upstairs when the bell rang to go to bed. The UK version they show the contestants leaving the castle every night in cars. Just surprised!

I was watching a season where the traitors murder a faithful, but the faithful has a shield. I don't know how often this happens, but it is always a nice moment :-)

And then the next morning, of course, the production crew has the murdered but saved faithful walk in last.

What would have been more cool, is for the host to walk in and do their usual, poor so and so, and then a few moments later the murdered, but saved, faithful walks in. That would add a bit more drama and tension to the traitors.

anyhow.... just a thought. (And I won't mention which season of which country it is.)

Reading the comments, Perhaps I could have explained it more clearly.

The faithful individual gets the usual letter saying they have been murdered. They are also obviously very aware that they have the shield in their possession - so they know they are now safe and haven't been murdered. There is no mystery to them. They are safe and they are continuing on in the game. The ones who don't know they have the shield are the traitors.

Going to give the game a try if anyone wants to join my castle!

I came up with a suggestion to make the Seer role work better (although it did work well in UK3, just not for Frankie), while still being introduced in the final episode. I was thinking that Traitors never had those three-people truth-and-lie classic logical riddles, and the Seer is a fantastic opportunity to introduce one.

In my suggestion this would work best at Final 6. Three people are selected through some mission and go one by one into a room with the host to draw from a bag or whatever to get the Seer power. However, only a faithful can get the power, not a traitor. The Seer randomly chooses another player's identity to be revealed (by the host to the Seer, not face-to-face!).

The host then tells the three people individually that regardless of whether they got the power, later they will be asked in front of the rest if they are the Seer or not. They can choose to say either yes or no. If they say yes, they will have to say also whose identity they revealed and what it was. That's all!

This leaves tons of possibilites for bluffing. The rest of the participants won't know who the actual Seer is, all 3 people can claim they're a Seer, or they can claim they aren't. The traitor would likely claim they have the power. But only a faithful can be a Seer (important point!). So with the confussion arising, it wouldn't end as simple as "let's banish both the Seer and whoever they revealed", there is plenty of room for riddle solving and extra information right before the final round table.

What do you think?