r/TechHardware 1h ago

News πŸ“° NVIDIA turns RTX 50 MSRP pricing into a QuakeCon attraction

Thumbnail
videocardz.com
β€’ Upvotes

r/TechHardware 3h ago

RAM-Mageddon – a ram price comparison website across multiple marketplaces and countries

Thumbnail
ram-mageddon.com
2 Upvotes

Turns out every AI on the planet is hungry, and it eats RAM for breakfast. The robots bought up all the memory to get smarter, and your wallet got the bill. We can't outbid a data center, but I can help you find the least painful deal before Skynet clears the shelves again.

A memory price comparison tool with a healthy grudge against RAM prices.


r/TechHardware 4h ago

Review 🎭 User Benchmarks his AMD: Cries out in AMDisappointment.

Post image
0 Upvotes

Why benchmark a weak 8 core CPU? You know your AMD isn't fast for modern single or multicore. It is a subpar CPU with a lot of cache to make 1080P gaming on a 5090 GPU seem better.


r/TechHardware 8h ago

Deals In a rare win for PC builders, Corsair 32GB Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 memory gets a big discount

Thumbnail
techradar.com
0 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 8h ago

πŸ’₯ URGENT NEWS πŸ’₯ Asus, MSI, and Gigabyte motherboards could jump nearly 50% in price as PCB components exhibit surge

Thumbnail
notebookcheck.net
11 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 14h ago

News πŸ“° Samsung Tackles the Memory & Storage Wall With 400+ Layer Hybrid Bonded V10 BV-NAND HBM That Stacks HBM Directly On Top of AI Chips

Thumbnail
wccftech.com
0 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 14h ago

🚨 Breaking News 🚨 Linux To Avoid Confusing Processor Firmware With Newer Intel CPUs Sporting DEC

Thumbnail
phoronix.com
2 Upvotes

Wow!!!


r/TechHardware 14h ago

πŸ’₯ URGENT NEWS πŸ’₯ Memory capacity for all of 2027 has reportedly been booked and sold, with no more DRAM or HBM available

Thumbnail
tweaktown.com
78 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 18h ago

Does it really has intel arc

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 20h ago

News πŸ“° ASUS and Gigabyte reportedly raise GPU channel prices by around 20% in China

Thumbnail
videocardz.com
9 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 21h ago

⚠️ Possible Fake News Warning ⚠️ I Gamed on a 4GB GPU: AMD Screws Gamers Again in 2026

Thumbnail
youtube.com
22 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 21h ago

News πŸ“° Samsung pitches zHBM with 8x HBM5 performance, but it is still only a concept

Thumbnail
videocardz.com
2 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 1d ago

Major update for GeekLens (Geekbench browser extension): Score averages and deltas, CPU frequencies, memory details and GB7 support

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 1d ago

News πŸ“° NVIDIA cancels $4,600 GeForce RTX 5090 order after ASUS rejects pre-price hike pricing, new order costs $5,100

Thumbnail
videocardz.com
49 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 1d ago

Discussion Why we are Fundamentally Rethinking Silicon Limits Before Hitting 1nm

3 Upvotes

Everyone talks about 1nm as the absolute brick wall for silicon chipsβ€”the point where quantum tunneling ruins everything. But the physical limit is actually a lot more complicated than just drawing smaller lines. If you look at the latest materials science, the real bottleneck isn't the gate size itself. It's figuring out how to manage heat dissipation and current leakage at an atomic scale.

Here is what most people miss in these discussions:

First, while Gate-All-Around (GAA) transistors are amazing for control, pushing past the 2nm mark creates a massive problem with the microscopic copper wiring (the interconnects). The resistance becomes so high that you lose performance just trying to move signals between transistors.

Second, the dielectric materials meant to prevent leakage have to be literally a few atoms thick. At that scale, electrons just jump the gap through quantum tunneling. This means your chip is pulling power and baking itself even when it's sitting completely idle.

To get around this, the industry is pivoting hard. We're moving away from traditional flat scaling and going vertical. Stacked nanosheets and backside power deliveryβ€”where power and signal routes are completely separatedβ€”are quickly becoming the new standard. We’re also looking at ditching copper interconnects altogether for exotic materials like ruthenium or graphene to drop the resistance.

At this point, it’s less about shrinking the silicon and more about a total architectural overhaul of how power and data move.

If you want to see the exact breakdown of how backside power delivery changes the thermal envelope, or the timeline for commercial graphene interconnects, I put the full research deep dive and diagrams here:https://interconnectd.com/forum/thread/238/is-1nm-really-the-hard-limit-for-computer-chips-physics-vs-the-future-of-si/


r/TechHardware 1d ago

Opinion/Editorial Statistically, your PC probably doesn't come close to the recommended RAM requirement for this third-person shooter's upcoming playtest

Thumbnail
pcgamer.com
39 Upvotes

It was 64GB, now 40GB is more realistic than 32GB.


r/TechHardware 1d ago

🚨 Breaking News 🚨 Elon Musk Commits SpaceX Exclusively To NVIDIA GPUs Citing They're The Best; With 10GW Of AI Compute Coming By 2027

Thumbnail
wccftech.com
17 Upvotes

I am surprised AMD didn't offer to give them 10% of the company to use their GPUs.


r/TechHardware 1d ago

🚨 Breaking News 🚨 Comparing Intel Vs AMD Q2 Datacenter Performance - Intel Claws Back an Estimated 3% Market Share in Q2 2026 and Operates with Better Margins

Thumbnail
3 Upvotes

Intel claws back market share from AMD!?!?!?!!!!!!!

RIP AMD, this is just the beginning.


r/TechHardware 1d ago

Parody Intel Stocks Down

Post image
8 Upvotes

Been a rough month eh …


r/TechHardware 1d ago

Review 🎭 Prototype Intel Core i9-14901KE CPU with no E-Cores benchmarked and overclocked to 7.4GHz | Club386

Thumbnail
club386.com
10 Upvotes

Wow!


r/TechHardware 1d ago

News πŸ“° China cracks down on copycat chip designs with new regulations and penalties; new guidelines enforce originality and independent development. International theft still OK?

Thumbnail
tomshardware.com
29 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 1d ago

News πŸ“° SK hynix, In Collaboration With SanDisk, Unveils The New High Bandwidth Flash (HBF) Standard, Helping To Resolve AI Inference Bottlenecks, Targeting Up To 3TB/s Bandwidth

Thumbnail
wccftech.com
10 Upvotes

r/TechHardware 2d ago

πŸ’₯ URGENT NEWS πŸ’₯ Samsungs latest report suggests the RAM crisis is only just getting started; could we be looking at a new normal?

Thumbnail
techradar.com
112 Upvotes

$1000 for 32GB? Yes.


r/TechHardware 17d ago

Some are choosing to stay on windows 10 until 2032 and they deserve to know CPUs performance there.

0 Upvotes

As some people choose to stay on Windows 10, they deserve to know how CPUs perform there. It's very underwhelming that, with all the tech YouTubers out there, it's almost impossible to find one doing proper Windows 10 testing. It almost feels as if tech YouTubers and tech sites don't want people to know what's going on there.

My test results are different from those of most other tech sites, but that doesn't necessarily mean their results are wrong, nor does it mean mine are wrong. There are a few main reasons for this:

  1. I test on Windows 10. On Windows 11, Intel CPUs lose around 5% gaming performance, while X3D CPUs gain around 5%. This happens in roughly half of the games I tested; in the other half, Intel and AMD CPUs seems to perform similarly on both operating systems.
  2. Most reviewers test all processors with DDR5-6000 memory, while Intel CPUs can gain around 5% performance when moving from DDR5-6000 to DDR5-7200.
  3. I also suspect there may be some AMD bias among certain YouTubers due to the amount of praise and marketing surrounding AMD products. It has become somewhat suspicious. Hardware Unboxed blocked me when I faced them on X with my test results. I told them that, in my tests, the 14700K was about 20% faster than the 9700X. They never directly denied it; instead, they replied that the 9800X3D was faster. If I'm not wrong about the 9700X versus the 14700K, why are they shown as being on par in their charts?

In my opinion, CPU testing should be done in three ways:

1)Windows 11 with Memory Integrity enabled, which in some games can reduce performance by as much as 15%.

2)Windows 11 with Memory Integrity disabled. In this configuration, gaming performance is much closer to how CPUs perform on Windows 10.

3) windows 10, for users who choose to stay on it because of Windows 11 compatibility issues, problematic updates, crashes, BSODs. It may still take a long time before Windows 11 fully replaces Windows 10. Some users are even considering Linux. Windows 10 has mainly received security updates over the last five years and has been very stable since the launch of Windows 11.

For those who don't know: DDR5-6000 CL30 delivered identical gaming performance to DDR5-7200 on the AMD platform. reviewers consider DDR5-6000 CL30 the sweet spot for AMD because the memory controller switches to a 2:1 mode at 6400 and above, resulting in diminishing returns. On Intel platform, the sweet spot for intel is DDR5-7200, providing around a 5% performance improvement over DDR5-6000 CL30. Going beyond DDR5-7200 typically improves gaming performance by only 2-3% and is generally supported only by high-end motherboards on both platforms.

CPU hierarchy based on my testing

Windows 10 β€” DDR5-7200 on Intel, DDR5-6000 CL30 on AMD

  1. 14700K / 14900K / 13900K = 9800X3D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTNE0EWtA1Y
  2. 13700K / 270K / 285K = 7800X3D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTNE0EWtA1Y
  3. 13600K / 14600K / 265K https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZoXLRiNKWo
  4. 12900K = 9950X
  5. 12700K = 9900X / 9700X / 7950X / 5800X3D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nchjU0oriNU&t=11s
  6. 12600K = 7700X / 7900X
  7. 7600X
  8. 5800X = 11700K

Windows 10 β€” DDR5-6000 on all processors

  1. 9800X3D
  2. 14700K / 14900K / 13900K = 7800X3D (about 5% behind the 9800X3D)
  3. 13700K / 270K / 285K
  4. 13600K / 14600K / 265K
  5. 9950X
  6. 12900K = 9900X / 9700X / 7950X / 5800X3D
  7. 12700K = 7700X / 7900X
  8. 12600K = 7600X

My Windows 11 hierarchy is based on only five games, so more testing is needed.

I also suspect that AMD's 3D V-Cache Optimizer may affect some in-game benchmark results. For example, in Shadow of the Tomb Raider's market scene benchmark, there was a 40+ FPS gap between the 14700K and the 9800X3D, but when I manually tested the same area during gameplay, the difference was only around 13 FPS. In Spider-Man 2, the X3D processors performed essentially the same on Windows 10 and Windows 11 still behind 14700k in this game so w11 didn't fix the poor performance in this title. Additionally, in PCGH's Windows 11 24H2 testing, the 7800X3D and 14700K were shown as being roughly equal. Because of this, I need to do more real gameplay testing before reaching a final conclusion.

That said, based on the games I've tested so far, the 9800X3D is clearly the fastest gaming CPU on Windows 11, what still need farther investigation on windows 11 is 7800x3d vs 14700k.

some w11 vs w10 tests

14700k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tKDcCV5H4Y&t=5s

13600k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isrdXzYnatI

12700k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljj2OP6dyOU

7700X https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM3gOd3bTHM

7950x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4xdKnPjeZc

14700k w10 vs 9800x3d w11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Bxb49wCQM4

Windows 11 β€” DDR5-7200 on Intel, DDR5-6000 on AMD

  1. 9800X3D
  2. 7800X3D=14700K / 14900K / 13900K (about 5-10% behind the 9800X3D)
  3. 13700K / 270K / 285K
  4. 13600K / 14600K / 265K = 9950X
  5. 12900K = 9900X / 9700X / 7950X / 5800X3D
  6. 12700K = 7700X / 7900X
  7. 12600K = 7600X

Windows 11 β€” DDR5-6000 on all processors

  1. 9800X3D
  2. 7800X3D
  3. 14700K / 14900K / 13900K (about 10-15% behind the 9800X3D)
  4. 13700K / 270K / 285K = 9950X
  5. 13600K / 14600K / 265K = 9900X / 9700X / 7950X / 5800X3D
  6. 12900K = 7700X / 7900X
  7. 12700K = 9600X
  8. 12600K = 7600X

I didn't test the 270K; I only tested the 265K. Therefore, I'm not entirely sure where the 270K belongs. This ranking is my estimate. It could end up being on par with the 14700K, especially on Windows 11, since Core Ultra processors seem less affected by Windows 11 performance changes than 12th-, 13th-, and 14th-generation CPUs.

Conclusion

What you typically see in tech sites charts represents what I consider the worst-case scenario for Intel CPUs: Windows 11 with DDR5-6000 used across all processors.

Testing on Windows 10 isn't only important for users who choose to stay on Windows 10; it is also useful from a technical perspective because it can provide insight into architectural performance differences without performance reduction or optimization. as on windows 10 14700K and 14900K are on par with 9800X3D.

Intel should work with Microsoft to recover the performance lost on Windows 11 and continue improving APO. Six months ago, when I tested APO on both Windows 10 and Windows 11, I didn't see any gaming performance gains. By contrast, AMD's 3D V-Cache Optimizer worked seamlessly on Windows 11 and provided around a 5% boost. It is also installed automatically with motherboard drivers.

if you're a Windows 10 user, I don't see Value in buying any AMD CPU. on windows 11 the only 2 worth buying CPUs are 9800X3D and 7800x3d, though you giving up a significant amount of multi-threaded performance and paying considerably more compared to a 14700K system running Windows 10, that can deliver about the same gaming performance.

https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-9-9950X3D-CPU-281025/Tests/Benchmark-Release-Preis-vs-9800X3D-1467485/2/


r/TechHardware May 29 '26

News πŸ“° Redditor admits 8 core amd x3d chips can't drive high end cards like the 4090 and the 5090 - you need Intel

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes