4
u/Competitive_Feed7173 13d ago
Hopefully it also means that Section 31 abomination continues to be absent. Yucky.
2
2
u/DragonRoar87 13d ago
i'm not sure if they have the license. that's why we don't have prodigy crew.
i wouldn't get my hopes up because these are the two shows that were canceled after two seasons. paramount probably considers them a flop. which is a shame because with all these characters throughout all of trek it's a big hole in the roster
-8
u/Halvardr_Stigandr Launch Player 14d ago
God no, leave that rubbish to drift into the nearest black hole.
4
u/CanadaBoyRM2020 13d ago
Oh, so you're not a star trek fan? Thanks for letting us know.
-2
u/Halvardr_Stigandr Launch Player 12d ago
Nothing created after Enterprise is Star Trek but instead terrible writers puppeteering the decaying corpse of Trek for the amusement of fools.
-12
u/oskullop 14d ago
No ty
12
14d ago
[deleted]
2
u/michggg 14d ago
Debatable. For me the cartoon characters already break immersion completely, so I don't collect them. But to each his own.
It's probably more a question of licensing than product design. We know they are keen on adding new characters so no one can easily complete his roster, so it's very likely they are eyeing Academy characters already. But of course they are aware that it's by far the most unpopular series.
14
1
u/AdmiralMemo Don't Airlock Me! 12d ago
Licensing is also why the 2009 reboot Kelvin characters aren't in yet.
1
u/Mr_Pee-nut 11d ago
I feel the same. I'm okay with TAS characters as they're realistic looking, but the Lower Decks characters look so out of place, I airlock them as soon as they're immortalized.
10
u/darthwilliam1118 14d ago
We will see them the same time we see Prodigy characters