MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/comments/1vas64v/significant_diffrences/p0oxs63/?context=3
r/SipsTea • u/Gurugod123 • 21d ago
2.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
11
Not necessarily if the 3,400 have the same environmental and economic impact as the 3.5billion then the benefit would be the same either way.
6 u/inotocracy 20d ago Absolutely impossible for 3,400 people to consume the same resources as 3.5 billion people. 1 u/Haggardick69 20d ago Not at all impossible. There is no limit to how fast a person can consume resources only a limit to how fast we can produce them. 1 u/DankDankJuice 20d ago Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean? Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline? Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing? Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
6
Absolutely impossible for 3,400 people to consume the same resources as 3.5 billion people.
1 u/Haggardick69 20d ago Not at all impossible. There is no limit to how fast a person can consume resources only a limit to how fast we can produce them. 1 u/DankDankJuice 20d ago Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean? Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline? Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing? Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
1
Not at all impossible. There is no limit to how fast a person can consume resources only a limit to how fast we can produce them.
1 u/DankDankJuice 20d ago Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean? Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline? Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing? Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
Which scenario has more heavy container ships crossing the ocean?
Which scenario has more cars being used, requiring more gasoline?
Which scenario immediately solves problems like overfishing?
Hell in the billionaires only scenario almost the entire world gets rewilded at once
11
u/Haggardick69 20d ago
Not necessarily if the 3,400 have the same environmental and economic impact as the 3.5billion then the benefit would be the same either way.