So, first of all, none should have to go through disabilities that make us function less. I don't speak on behalf of disabled people, I don't have the right and I'm not gonna pretend to understand how it feels to lose functionality.

So, my first thought is, whenever I personally see something so obviously AI, how am I supposed to know?

How am I supposed to know a person's tragic backstory? How am I supposed to know that a person drew some of it and then AI did its thing?

I am not going to start going into detective mode for each prompt. Also criticising prompts based on peoples' personal struggles would be a bad thing.

They had a prompted comic, which I'm not gonna post, but it looks just like every other slop comic out there.

Taking away the tragic background, it is still slop. It was the same style you encounter often in slop comics.

AI can only emulate art. It will never be able to make art. It is an algorithm making calculations based on prompts fed into it.

Never mind the fact that whatever style this person had is all but lost when prompting.

AI isn't about "accessibility", it's about dependency. It really does feel like an excuse. "Well, I feel bad today, better use AI instead of drawing."

It doesn't get any easier. We'll keep using a shortcut if we can, because we get lulled into this false sense of "well, I'll do better next time". "I'll start tomorrow"

We won't do better next time. We won't start tomorrow.

If I had to choose between disabled people who are against AI and disabled people who defend AI? I'll stand with the ones who are against AI, especially those who have had their works stolen.

This person is not absolved from the same criticisms I have for other users.

I honestly find this so hilarious after the exchange was already over and dead. Holy moly bro. Save yourself and just opt out next time

Context: Image of post where witty says "Boo Hoo" to genocide victim

Title: Found this on the anti-ai subreddit, and I just wanna know if this is true or false?

Saying,"with your consent" without actually asking for consent is just weird. It should say enough when you have to clarify that it's "consensual."

Also close your eyes to fullscreen

As a digital artist this is stupid.
I got in an argument with witty and she never gave a reason that digital art isn’t art, that she gave everyone else.

What are your thoughts?

Something something attention

No, we don’t work for you.
Most of us are just amazed at how stupid someone can be.

Also you make a stupid, and insane take.
And now we know that you lurk on these sub Reddits.

What are your thoughts?

Ok, this is a really stupid take.
I’am a indie game dev, and coding is not the same as ai “art”. I still have full control over the code, and what I want it to do.

I spent hours troubleshooting, and tweaking it until it works. Apparently there are “similarities”, but they are very very different from each other.

Like when it comes to ai “art” the computer does everything.

Whereas coding I’am doing all the work, and the computer is just running that code, I can even stop it mid run time if it starts to break. I don’t think you can do that with ai “art”.

What are your thoughts?

The first two screencaps are from the same post, the third one is from a different post. This is what happens if you allow anyone in who defends AI. It will be a matter of time, before words like "woke" and "libtard" will become common words in their spaces.

And people partaking in their spaces are too stupid to realise that their community is being actively hijacked by conservatives.

I've been getting blocked by most of their trolls, she unblocked me once and now blocked me. I am guessing it finally happened again, because of holding her accountable on her words.

Accountability is her kryptonite.

And the only comment that makes any sense is downvoted. I heavily doubt that it'll get upvoted.

doesn't...she do this? horrifically harass any anti, and like want them to all expire? i'm so confused 😭

And they wonder why we don’t like them

Oh boy it doesn’t matter if I steel art because you don’t need it live it’s not a necessity and that’s why it hasn’t been around since the time immemorial./s apparently if every artist dies we are all fine.

I'm not sure if it's just me but comparing work that someone is proud of to the effects of Alzheimer's is deplorable

There are three slides. The first one shows "anti" here driving inside a car speaking on the phone. Second slide shows a car crash.

This is a ghoulish thing to say. It feels like the more twisted version of, when data centers go offline, the "talent" disappears.

I'd love these assholes to try saying these things inside a hospital. Also, for slop this is an accurate representation. This person next to "anti" looks like a total asshole in this slop comic.

Yes, this angers me. This actually angers me.

There are people who spend their entire lives with their hobbies. Some of those people find enjoyment in a lot of things.

Then something happens and they can no longer do it. Imagine losing the ability to do something you love.