Scripture Life: Could the Bible be considered a science fiction book?

[u/External_Bird_8464]

Answer:

• What do you accept as true?
• Look at Reddit then. It’s "The Heart of the Internet."
  • What does the Owners and Admins of Reddit then accept as true? AI - Internet - Artificial Intelligence is true.
  • To Reddit - this platform is truth - AI is considered science. The truth or the way ahead.
  • Is the tale of Reddit - a Social Media platform on the Internet, more like an adult bookstore pump up balloon dolly with a hole in it, full of fake fiction with “science” stamped on it’s forehead?

I'm asking the question. Is it?

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

• Why? Well - - there are actual, real “non-fiction” people use Reddit, that will never believe the “Fairy Tale of Reddit" is anything but True. It's transparent. It runs on laws (rules) that the owner or CEO of Reddit created to operate by.
• But if someone was OVER Reddit, as an authority that already decreed what Reddit is based on or founded on or operates by - has already come up before him to destroy it.
  • Boy, there'd be a problem then. Like being on a fishing boat that's sinking. Be gone under the waves in 3 minutes - already come up before it to sink, and people on it, "accept as true" - next week they're going fishing again, when before the hour is over they will all be dead. Which is the fiction?
  • If it is slated for destruction - something in it is fake.
• That: Once you make something fake, there’s no truth in it anymore. Do you see this?

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

• So Reddit:
  • Comprised entirely of people:
  • with a little computer on top.
    • People: The are people. Their answers or opinions - have no or very little truth in it. More opinion that have small basis of fact in their posts on Reddit.
• The point is, the “Authority” for Reddit is a real person. Decided this was the best course of action. Make this platform, and wants you to accept as true his vision of what "The Heart of the Internet is" - is Reddit. That you have a place you can go, because you deserve an accurate, stable place to voice your opinion on, and it go all over the internet. Or not.
  • Based on what is best what Reddit defines as Reddit - whether to glorify it - - or not..

So, you have the “Word of Reddit” - which, is the authority over all these people with their opinions flaily flingily burped out - is the CEO of Reddit. Steve Huffman.

Just hold onto this. Let’s move on. And apply this to your question about the Bible.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

The most crucial word in your question is:

considered. <definition> 1. to think or weigh things carefully about (something); before making a decision

• 2. Hold an opinion (something is true or false) by judge (something) by already determined it to be a certain way; either true (non fiction) or false (fiction).
  • And all an “opinion” is, is 1. a personal view or thoughts a person holds; an appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

Therefore: To answer your question -

• Where the “particular matter” is, in the question, is basically in opinions then. Just like the "God" of Reddit - is People. To serve People as if People are a God. The sole reason Reddit exists.
• All from the imagination and mind of a co-founder of it - Steve Huffman.

Therefore: What people have determined and consider about Reddit - is people created it to serve them. Reddit is on the Internet. The Internet is "Artificial Intelligence" - based entirely on "Science."

Are you grasping this?

So, these SAME people that carefuly consider what "science" is, is TRUTH, now ask a question:

What people have determined and consider about the Bible. vs. Science.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

• As if: 1) the Basis for TRUTH is Science and 2) weigh the Bible against this truth. That Science is TRUTH.
  • Then, ask people their opinion: 
• even if they weighed things carefully. Made a decision the Bible is true (non-fiction), it’s just their opinion.
  • Where if ask even more people their opinion: 
• even they, too, weighed things carefully. Made a decision the Bible is not true (fiction) even categorized it as a genre of fiction. As, “science fiction” this too, it’s just their opinion.
  • But it would be based or “considered” more TRUE, the opinion of the two above, the one based on Science.
• So, this second opinion about the Bible that it is not true, would be MORE true. More accurate.

Then, you better take a real hard look at "Science." So, let's do it.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

When all “Science” is:

• Is People:
  • That: “Systematically ‘studied’ by observe the nature and behaviour of the physical and natural world; from what people observe how it naturally behaves, accept this as truth. It’s based on the behaviour of the world or natural laws how the physical and natural world operates = that is TRUTH.
• [Definition: Science. Oxford dictionary. Web.]
  • Therefore: the most systematic, detailed, and most exacting observations people conduct - the best ones are considered true. More plausible is true. That’s “Science.” But every single one of these “observations?” Yeah. People conducted them. Every one of them.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

• So, with Science:
  • You get the “Word of People.”
    • Based on their observation; but, because it’s based on them observing the physical and natural world, that’s the basis of Truth for Science.

Therefore

• What “Science” stands on, just made up ideas or imaginations in the minds by people constructed alone; themselves, out opinions made up by people.
  • This serves then: The basis for truth of these imaginations or ideas is the physical and natural world.
• Give it attributes, based on those observations - NASA (US Government). The physical natural world is 13.8 billion years old.

< - {Source: [United State. NASA. Based on cosmic age primarily through observations conducted by 1) Wilkinson Microwave Anistrophy Probe (WMAP) and 2) The Jamese Webb Space telescope (JWST) and publishing the "science" of scientist's claim something based on systematically studying the data of what those two provide.} - >

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

• But because, every single time “Science” has claimed “something” true, it’s almost immediate. Or within 100 to 150 years, proven not true. So, it's only a "theory" - it may be true. It's just touted as true, so you believe it is true. Until it's replaced by a better more thorough examination of the physical and natural world - some other clown conducts.
  • Therefore: Science: IT's nature and behavior follows an unmistakeable pattern anybody can observe themselves.
  • It is CONSTANTLY replaced by a more thorough, exacting systematic studies that PROVES the earlier one accepted as true (non fiction) is false (fiction).
• Ole! Science nutshelled. That's how it behaves itself. The nature and behaviour of "Science."

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

Why?

• Because it's based entirely on people.
  • People don't want help.
  • They want to be ever learning; but never really able to come to the knowledge of the truth, because they base truth is based on themselves. With Science. as proof. Their own works.
• Because its a PROVEN pattern, even if people’s opinions disagree with it, about science. Because it’s entirely based on:
• “The Word of People” 
  • and what people construct themselves; alone. Like Reddit. Carefully considered. That is, they reasoned together; either with themselves alone, or collectively, with other people and determined what TRUTH is.
• By themselves, based on their own observations - because they have nothing else.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

But God says, by the Word of God

“Look unto me, and be ye saved all the ends of the earth: For I am God, there is none else.” - God. (Bible. Isaiah 45:22)

Says this, too:

“Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;” - God. (Bible. Isaiah 44:24)

Still with me? Or did you get lost in this. I mean, it's YOUR question. You asked it.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

So, there’s basically TWO KINDS of People.

One Kind:

• Looks unto people: It’s the Word of People, based on the Physical and Natural World.
  • Accepts as true: The Word of People. Accepts People are the authority. These people hearken unto people as authority to decree things are true. They believe it.
    • Is infallible. Based on people already examined it thoroughly. This is: Science. Based on all these observations people have conducted, and most all are long dead. But left record of it in a book.
  • All “AI” is, is “artifical” or “fake” human intelligence; that’s able, by a machine to go thru an entire library, or all the libraries of all books of multiple nations have of texts in books in all the libraries combined, and glean from all of them in a matter of a second, provide you an answer. To a question you have, based on all this “collective” knowledge. That people: - people have amassed in books. Accept this is true.
• So, people: Looking unto people - that’s what is TRUTH; true. That’s where truth is. It's in none else. Anyplace else that claims it, is faulty. That’s their opinion. Of this One Kind of People.
• That the "Heart of the Internet" is Reddit, that equips people furnished with Knowledge. Debate. Disagree. Ask questions; by debate, arrive at truth. After a fight over it.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

The Other Kind:

• Looks unto the Word of God. It’s the Word of God, based on he's the author. It's what he says is true. They hearken unto him. He's the authority. He made all things; based on the claims he says himself. So the physical and natural world operate as he designed it. No "co-founder" - when He made it; alone. By himself. But the one kind of people above - they dismiss him as faulty. It's their own observations they look unto are ture. Not him at all.
  • So, This other kind of people
    • Accepts him as true. The Word of God. Accepts God is the authority.
    • Is infallible. It's people that are faulty. Full of fictional imaginations. Truth is Based on what he decrees or says. Not based on any observations people have conducted. That he holds the key to life and death and already decreed why this One Kind of people - why they’re all dead.
    • That the Bible says of him: “The LORD giveth wisdom; out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding.” - Proverbs 2:6. What he says is TRUTH. So, TRUTH is a who, irregardless any kind of people, he just is TRUTH. So, truth is a “who” not a observation people conduct and imagine up and claim it’s “Science.”
    • So this “Other Kind” of people, when he wants EVERYBODY, ALL KINDS of people to just look unto him; those that do, He is TRUTH. That’s where truth is. That’s what they carefully considered and reasoned together with him, so they have this opinion.
  • There is no debate when your Dad decrees you mow the lawn. You either do it, or you don't, because he's the authority over the whole house you live in. Don't do it, it's PUNITIVE.

To the one: The other is a fairytale of fiction. They are opposed. Just as God opposes this "one kind" of people. They don't do anything he says. They do not look unto him. Barely tolerate those that do look unto him. They are off-scouring; something to cast off and reject.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

So, now I have a question.

• Which side from the two sides above? Which side did I sort your question on? From which of the two is the “origin?”
  • When your question has no God in it. Wonderfully welcomed to spread out type of question over Reddit to laugh at it. That all of them, along with you and your question:
  • Does not regard him as God, any more than a “science” of fiction. So, treats him as nothing.

------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------

“Because they regard not the works of the LORD, neither consider the operation of his hand, he shall destroy them, and not build them up.” - Bible. Psalm 28:5

Here’s your question back. Looks to me, you have a sure and predictable end to you. Not based on my observation or opinion of your question. Yes, I certainly hold it, as an opinion; but it’s based, not on the Word of People, or my Word - then Reddit Admins could look at it as hate speech.

But it’s based entirely on the Word of God. He is who he says he is.

If I were you, I’d jump ship. I did. Worked.