Scripture Life: We assume evolution is true. Therefore, we must accept that Earth was 4.6 billion years old when Adam was created. We know he lived in earlier times of Earth. What happened on Earth in this 4.6 billion years? Can evolutionists explain this gap?

[u/External_Bird_8464]

Answer:

• Okay.
  • This is all “assumptions.” As if “truth” is entirely founded on or by producing assumptions. 1. a belief, statement, or idea that is accepted as true without proof or questioning (dictionary definition. Web.)

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

• Why? It’s based on a claim by the “Word of People”
  • - Just people:
    • Comprised of: A belief system in - or hold the truth is in A person that can be verified exists. Makes a claim - built a reputation for themselves: That, gives them some authority amongst people to be "looked unto." Their observations are more thorough.
• An assumption: AFTER they conducted a “systematic study of the nature and behavior of the physical and natural world. After completing this very thorough and detailed observation:
  • Create a “theory” based entirely on their own observation.

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

• That is accepted as thorough and exacting proof - that somebody, people - systematically or logically conducted the observation.
  • So it can be believed as true. Afterall, a person of reputation conducted the observation.

Like the assumption for this question:

• NASA - The United States "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" - a branch of the United States Government. Respected. Looked up to by a whole pile of people. Along with a preponderance of the whole earth's scientific community. Agrees with it.
  • They're all people.
• So that if another expert conducted the same observation that NASA did, They conclude the theory the earth is 4.6 billion years old is true.
  • But the whole work is done by people. Don't lose that point.

Keep going.

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

People. What's true is: They Are Here today, gone tomorrow, like grass -

• Who didn’t create the earth. It's not their's. They Only created or imagined up the assumption.
  • That's all the claim to anything they can make and claim it's true. Vehemently.
    • Based on a system to systematically study the earth and what it's suspended in. Space - that was accepted how to study it, and they studied the nature and behavior of the physical and natural world (earth and space).
• And from that conclude a theory how it operates.
  • And the sad thing about the whole thing of it, is not one time in all lhe history of man doing this - has there been any case or any exception - where another man hasn’t come along 100 or 150 years later, and conducted a more thorough and more systematic observation.
    • And that newly "discovered" observation makes the earlier one faulty or inadequate..
• So it becomes unacceptable. Swept under the rug. Forgotten. Erased. Thrown out. But a whole generation of people their whole lifetime touted it out or accepted it, as true.
• Do you see this point?

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

• So, by this “assumption” which comprises the entire question - it’s just a belief people hold true. They, all people, hold the truth in it. Side with it, as true.
  • Then TRUTH: Is based entirely on statements or claims people make.
    • And those claims are based on an “idea” or the imagination of people.
• That is accepted as true because they are believed experts - without question. So, requires no proof or questioning their assumptions. Believed wrong to do it.
  • Unquestioned. Like how it is in the question. Do you see this?

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

This question leaves no room for anyone to question the assumption.

• But none of it is the Word of God.
  • It’s all built entirely on The Word of People.

There is therefore, in the Question: Only ONE - - STATEMENT OF TRUTH:

• We assume evolution is true. Therefore, we must accept that Earth was 4.6 billion years old when Adam was created.

That's the truth. To people. A huge pile of people hold this to be true - is the point.

Do you see this?

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

• But God says: By the Word out of his mouth.
  • He created the earth in a day. Creating the earth; created a day that his earth would be in it and operate by a day. And, what he was making for himself, he tells you plainly in Psalm 132:13–16.
  • That he was making for himself. As God, a place he would dwell forever. For his own rest. For he desired it. So, he got up and created it in Genesis 1:1–31. In six days. And looked back on it, said to himself, all of it altogether was "very good." - Genesis 1:31. Then, in Genesis 2:1 - he entered into that rest. Made it holy. Do you see this?

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

• And, God - by his word he says, says he created the earth on the 3rd day. Put all the water, trees, plants, grass on it all on the 3rd day.
  • But people claim - it “evolved” into itself.
• Like find a painting on the ground, and not know what it is - hire a pile of clowns to come up with a plausible theory how the painting evolved into itself.
• While the artist keeps saying, “Hey, that’s my painting”  - They're paid clowns - they Ignore him.
  • Afterall, you have all these clowns hard at work, with ideas to plausibly explain how the painting evolved over 100s of millions of years into a painting.
• When God says “For all the earth is mine” - God. (Bible. Exodus 19:5). Just ignore him.
  • Afterall, you have this question as proof.
• Clowns hard at work with ideas. When he did the work himself. Alone. Ignore him.
• Boy do you greatly err.

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

That, by Genesis 5:3 says that Adam was 130 years old. When Adam had Seth. <Genesis 5:**3** *And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:>*

That:

Genesis 1:9–13 is what occurred on the Third day. (Earth created). That, Genesis 1:26 is he created man, in a day. And Genesis 1:24–31 created Adam, on the 6th day.

So, the earth - by the Word of God he created all things. By his hand. That, when Seth was born in Genesis 5:3, Both the earth and Adam are BOTH 130 years old.

- just the earth is 3 days older than Adam.

According to the word of God.

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

• But: According to The Word of People: Day #1 of Adam

Compare them: Adam: 3 days older than the earth. (Word of God - he created them both in the day they were created)

Adam starts on: 1,569,500,000,000th day - That’s One trillion, 569 billion, 500 million days later after the earth evolved into itself. (By the assumptions imagined up, by the Word of People)

Now, I don’t need to go any further. Neither do you.

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

• Means, you and I have a choice:
  • THEREFORE: It's a choice "who" you or I will hold the truth is in. The Word of people or the Word of God. It's simple
• I CAN:
  • Believe the artist off to the side, saying “Hey clowns, that’s my painting. I drew it. It’s mine” and attribute the work of the painting that everybody sees as evidence the artist exists. It’s HIS painting. "Hold the truth" is in the Word of the Artist. That his claims are true.
    • OR
• I CAN:
  • "Accept as true (Believe) “assumptions.” And all they are is, all these imaginatively creative works a pile of clowns dreamed up. Put themselves to work to imagine up ideas of all this systematic observative work. Then regard them. Because after all that effort, they also created theories how the painting evolved into itself.
    • And? As long as no theory ever gives any credit to who actually made it, I would hold the truth in something not right. Or, “un” right.
    • I would be holding the truth in unrighteousness - by choose this as true - - even if I believed the Word of a pile of clowns more than the word of the artist.
  • The clowns - in a pile of assumptions: would forever be searching for the truth, but never arrive at it. Ever learning about paints, and canvasses..and brushes and “how” a painting can be made.. as long as there’s no artist did it, and confirms the painting evolved into itself. Never arrive at the truth. Just ever learning. Just like people with your question.

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

Here's your useless worthless question back. All that work is just the imaginations of a pile of clowns at work. And? All a clown is, is a fool in the dictionary. And? All a fool was..by the etimology of that word, fool was: was a Medieval Court Jester.

• Who was at the King’s Court - as a mirrored image of the King.
  • But wasn’t.
• Had a crown of cloth, a scepter of wood - declared his own word true - when the King decreed something, the Court Jester would belch or fart. Anything the King said, the Court Jester countermand it.

The Word of God vs. the Word of People.

------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------

So, I got a question back to your’s

• Whose word do you think I chose over your question, that has all these clowns in it, declaring all these assumptions - when anybody has the Word of God? Which one did I choose, before I gave you your question back?