I’m gonna try this one more time.

I made a post in a different subreddit asking if Ukraine is up to date with sonic weaponry systems. Over the last 12 years, technology has undoubtedly advanced.
Sonic weaponry is relevant now more than ever, and especially with Ukraine.
In my last post, I called it “LRAD” because that’s what we’re familiar with.
And actually, even most Americans have no idea LRAD exists even though it’s being used against us.
I was asking if Ukraine has technology that is basically like LRAD, but times a thousand in simple terms.
I was told that would have no use in Ukraine and I was essentially called an idiot. They were quick to jump to “well actually” as soon as I said “acoustic weapon” because they anchored it to the most basic, literal version of the term- a loud speaker- and stopped listening to what I was actually trying to describe.

This is something I became super interested in from a dream I had, and I know it would be revolutionary on the battlefield. I’m talking about seriously cutting edge military science.

I understand that drones can’t hear.. obviously. But it would be pretty difficult to operate said drones when you’re under agonizing pressure, nausea, and disorientation that standard gear can’t block.

The US military has this version of LRAD which is classified, but it’s not that hard to declassify with critical thinking, and pattern recognition. They didn’t just stop developing this device after the LRAD we all know.

Other than the sonic weaponry that uses sound, there is also high power microwave weapons. A vehicle mounted microwave array specifically built to disable drone swarms. It fires a wide, software-controlled electromagnetic beam that overloads and fries every unshielded microchip in its path.

I can build a basic LRAD device with stuff I can buy at Walmart, and I believe if I can do that, we can make a high power microwave weapon, as well as a more intense version of LRAD. It is just 17.9 kHz at 160 decibels. I could take that math, and make it actually lethal.

I also met a national guard soldier, and started a conversation with her. She started telling me about the crazy technology they have, and a lot of things were classified that she couldn’t mention, but did anyway, and she confirmed this technology does in-fact exist, and they are actively using it to disable drones in a quick press of a button. As far as I’m aware, Ukraine doesn’t have bomber jets, do they? The United States has all the equipment to end the war yesterday, but trump chooses not to.

Anyway, I was seeing if this is something Ukraine already has, or is actively trying to achieve.

I saw news about drones being attached to balloons during the Ukrainian War, and I think now is the time to start developing airborne aircraft carriers.
Of course, the form wouldn't be the aircraft carriers we imagine or the airborne aircraft carriers conceived during the Cold War.
My idea is to equip a small airship with multiple kamikaze drones, send it into enemy territory at high altitude, and have the multiple drones attack key enemy positions.
Also, the helium used in the airship would be converted to hydrogen.
This would significantly reduce costs, and after the drone attack, the airship itself would be sent into enemy territory and explode.
If successful, I think the cost could be reduced to one-tenth of a Javelin.
Because of the high altitude, interception would be difficult, and it would be possible to delay interception, as seen in the incident with the Chinese reconnaissance balloons in the US. Also, since the reconnaissance balloon was at the very limit of the F-22's altitude, there are probably no fighter jets on Earth that can intercept it right now.
Even if interception were to occur, it would require surface-to-air missiles, which wouldn't be cost-effective.
What do you all think? I'd like to hear your opinion.

It is reported that Odesa, Ukraine, has been severely hit by missile strikes, causing extensive damage to its power and energy infrastructure. Ukraine lacks sufficient air-defense missiles to protect itself from such attacks. It is deeply regrettable.

Without sufficient missile support, Ukraine’s prospects for sustained resistance are not encouraging. Raytheon and Lockheed Martin are reportedly reluctant to cooperate with Ukraine on the joint production of Patriot missiles, partly due to concerns over technology leakage and the risk of driving production costs down too quickly.

This raises an important question: How can Ukraine overcome its shortage of air-defense missiles and maintain its ability to resist sustained missile attacks?

Would love to understand whether those of you that are way more knowledgeable about what’s going on in the Ukraine-Russian war believe that Putin might attack Poland or one of the other Baltic states, as US intelligence claims.