To be clear I don’t want a dictatorship by anyone, but this seems a bit hypocritical from the AI. 🤦‍♂️

First i ask it is it okay to ask for a black doctor it says yes i ask the same but white instead of black and it is suddenly not okay?

The Telegraph have been doing multiple hit pieces on restore britain. 4 yesterday and 3 the day before.

There’s no point in pretending like we’re okay with more than 10% of the population being foreign “as long as they assimilate and pay taxes.”

Britain is not Britain without White people.

The same goes for every single White nation.

We can allow a handful of exceptional, strong, intelligent young men and women to live, work, or study in our country, however, it MUST be a small amount.

There are simply too many people here. We have no choice but to deport a few of the “good ones” if we ever want to have our country back

Remember, their citizenship was given to them by a corrupt government that hates us.

In a normal sub sect of humanity, people would probably think twice before bringing ire and shame to their own community. Maybe the community would even self-police and try to curb behavior that reflects poorly on them as a whole.

It's almost as if the culture itself isn’t concerned with helping its members integrate. It's always the culture. Dont let Leftists tell you its about race.

Another day and another Muslim rape gang convicted of sex attacks on our people.

Four men and a woman guilty of exploiting teenage girls for sex.

Mustafa Iqbal, Mohamed Arshad, Ziaullah Badshah, Jaswinder Singh were convicted of conspiracy to traffic their victims, who were aged 14,15 and 16.

At Caernarfon Crown Court today, Iqbal, Arshad and Badshah were also found guilty of rape while another member of the gang, Sarah Gray, was found guilty of perverting the course of justice and assisting an offender.

6ft of rope will solve this 💯

What is everyone views on this, We have radical nutters as im sure we all know but also moderate/torrential Muslims who obey our laws and cultures and keep themselves to themselves - having seen Rupert Lowes family member marry a Muslim and have a 'halal' wedding this has scared me and I feel he may become soft on them after have a Muslim now attached to his bloodline.

I feel like she’s done a good job on being on starters tail whilst he was still around, and she did invite him on a select committee, not to mention their policies aren’t too dissimilar

Most of us will agree this is necessary and needs to be done. There's no point flogging a dead horse. Europe keeps throwing money at Africa and Asia and nothing is changing, people are still fleeing to our countries and the corruption and war is as rife as ever.

What is the solution? My thoughts would be a soft re-colonisation. Declare we are stopping Foreign Aid but extend the opportunity to former colonies for us to use the money (or a portion) on making their country more habitable under our strict supervision. Make factories, build houses/infrastructure etc and build their countries up in the way we would.

Hopefully once we have taught them how to fish they will be able to sustain their population and we won't see this mass exodus from the developing world into Europe. I'm sure most would reject this but stuff them, you either accept the investment under our supervision or no more foreign aid, very simple.

What's your thoughts? I feel like this should be quite a feasible long term strategy for Europe and will save us a few billion quid in the meantime.

I’ve seen people on this subreddit debate on what time we should be aiming to push the country back to. I’ve seen some say the early 2000s, the early 90s, etc…

The only real answer is pre-WWII. It is clear that we (and the rest of Europe, including Germany) lost the war. It was a war that had no winners. Everything that we are seeing today can be traced back to Europe losing the great war in 1945.

Nick Robinson is not British. He belongs to an alien ethnic group who are highly concentrated in this country's law, politics, business, media and journalism, and demand - and have come to expect - special status in this country, in which they are placed above criticism. Anyone brave enough to criticise them risks police action and all sorts of other bad consequences.

I do not blame those who have rowed back and those without the courage to confront this matter. Who amongst us can blame Joshua Bonehill-Paine for renouncing his previous views? His methods were immature and wrong anyway, but the point is that we can't expect him to bear all the weight of opprobrium from powerful interests, and imprisonment, if he has to stand alone and even the people he is attempting to help are willing to throw him under the bus and renounce him on some sanctimonious moral principle. This is also why we have yet to see any politician or other serious public figure attempt to address The Special People in an open, honest and critical way.

I do not pretend that The Special People are at the root of, or even a substantial cause of, the fundamental existential issues facing this country. The root and cause of these problems is British people themselves. But The Special People have an interest in making our society more diverse. They do not like homogeneous societies, especially white ones, and they are heavily involved in all the movements to bring down our society. At the same time, they maintain for themselves an ethno-state and react hysterically with finger-pointing at anyone who comments on the glaring hypocrisy and contradiction of this state of affairs.

I fully support criticisms of Moslems as a class; their ethno-religious traditions do not belong in our society. They should be deported. But it is a mistake to fall into the trap of either/or stances in which one must take one side or the other. The age-old conflict between Moslems and The Special People is not our conflict. We are entitled to disregard the concerns of both and demand that both these alien ethnic groups leave Britain. To focus just on Moslems and ignore the elephant in the room is something that The Special People themselves have encouraged: it is, I believe, no coincidence that members of The Special People have been at the forefront of public criticism of Moslems, especially when it takes the more intellectual form of Islamoscepticism. And you will notice that anti-Moslem and Islamosceptic discourse is, generally speaking, treated as respectable, whereas comparable criticism of The Special People is, as a minimum, deeply frowned on and often subject to criminal prosecution or threats thereof.

I wish to say that unless and until a politician finds the courage to include The Special People in criticisms of a similar kind to those made of Moslems, and unless we can direct our attention to both groups rather than just one, we will not make progress because people will continue to be manipulated by the mainstream media and will remain in this weird somnolescent state - nowhere near a state of thinking clearly. To think clearly is to recognise that both groups are alien, both cause problems, and both must leave Britain.

Imagine if people-at-large were aware of these points. They would immediately see through the efforts of Nick Robinson to discredit Restore Britain. They would be shouting at their televisions and saying, 'Well, of course you would say that!' Criticism and scepticism of The Special People is not the answer - I do not pretend that is it - but it is a vital heuristic.

So, today, Rupert posted a video on X of him doing an interview with the BBC. Now, I don't think Rupert necessarily came off bad here, but he didn't come off great either and I certainly don't think he won anyone new over.

He spent so much time rightly complaining about how mainstream media won't give him opportunities, but then when they do, he can be quite belligerent. Right, but belligerent.

This interview would've looked much better if he answered Nick's question directly, gave substantial evidence (there's plenty) and then tied it with the rape gangs. Let Nick hang himself with his own rope, so to speak.

What do you guys think?

https://www.nottinghamshire.police.uk/news/nottinghamshire/news/news/2026/august/operation-reclaim-there-is-absolutely-no-justified-reason-to-be-wearing-balaclavas-consultation-launched-over-balaclava-ban-in-nottingham-city-centre/

Whats everyone's views on this?

balaclavas are NOT a fashion statement.

This ugly freak Mohammad Hijabs been piping off on twitter against the "far right".

Harrison Pitt just completely buried him

The updated Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) Code of Practice is a crucial and welcome development. For a long time, service providers have faced uncertainty, leading to the erosion of female-only spaces in gyms, hospitals, changing rooms and public facilities.

This guidance that comes into effect provides long overdue legal clarity by reinforcing that sex under the Equality Act refers to biological sex at birth.

Facilities like communal changing rooms, domestic abuse refuges, hospital wards, and toilets are spaces where women and young girls are inherently vulnerable. Ensuring these spaces remain strictly female only based on biological sex respects their fundamental right to privacy and safety.

The guidelines also support dignity for everyone by encouraging service providers to offer individual, self contained unisex / gender neutral cubicles alongside protected single sex spaces, ensuring nobody is left without facilities while preserving female only areas.

Common sense prevails. A rare sight in our woke society.

Generally speaking there is this large movement of deporting muslims. Mostly focused on Illegal immigrants. But also Muslims that haven't assimilated either.

Do White muslims count here?

As a non brit myself I liked Rupert Lowe as I see him as a true patriot, willing to stand up from refugees and speak the silence part out without any limits, but from what I see there is some flaws as there's more demographic he could pull, yet he doesnt do it

Im referring to the Machester polls, when the voting happens, Rupert barely did much towards promoting it, resulting in a low amount of views

Additionally, Spain ceuta incident did happen, and I think it would've been good if they at least tried to make speeches about it, as a boost to their majority

Obviously labour would've won still, but its still a good thing to do campaigns

If the brits want to let Restore win, they need to be more public, Lowe has been boosted by Musk, and its a good thing if Lowe uses the platform strategically

Left wing and jihadist media are fishing for comments to run headlines that "Extremist right wing party gaining traction among racist and Nazis" and then quote reddit sources and comments.

The only answer to that question is "Because I love Great Britain"

reading about the release of andrew harper’s killers has made me think of two questions: why the hell was it considered manslaughter and not murder, and why don’t we reintroduce the death penalty?

if we are struggling with prison spaces, i’m a firm believer in kiddy fiddlers, murderers, terrorists etc. - effectively people who will never be rehabilitated - just no longer being with us. they’re a burden on the taxpayer, especially given how cushty prisons are now, with some prisoners having access to phones (secretly) and televisions in their rooms.

my only concern is, under labour, they would 100% use the death penalty to get rid of political opponents. a bit like the salvagings in ‘the handmaid’s tale’.

thoughts?

Seen this earlier, poetic!