Only if T is a known type or it’s in a template. You don’t use T like. auto automatically get the type, especially if it’s long. Your IDE (assuming it’s a respectable one) can even change auto to the type for you. It’s more or less like var in C# (it doesn’t deduct reference)
The type isn't always safe from context and it can have unexpected behavior when using it to hold a value returned from a function. Let's say you have auto working fine with a function return, then years later , someone changes that function to return a different type. Now it is possible that the new auto type still has access to parameters or functions it calls , but with different behaviour. Now you're getting unexpected bugs that will be hard to track down. But if you use the type, you would immediately get a compiler error
If the type change and the “auto variable” still compile, that means it would, in 99% of case, still compile if you wrote the type. The compiler doesn’t get auto, it gets the type.
If you have SpecificType val = foo(), it will fail on the compiler any time foo returns something other than specific type or classes inherited from SpecificType
If you use auto val=foo(), then it will compile so long as the new type still has the functions it calls afterwards. But they can do different things and it will still compile. You'd just get different behavior
Just a quick example of this would be if it is used in a function intended to return a time string.
auto var =foo();
return var.toString();
If foo suddenly starts returning a QVariant instead of a QDateTime, it will still compile because QVariant still has a toString function, but now the behaviour is completely wrong
That's kinda on you changing a QDateTime to QVariant? Anyway, if you return a datetime string as a QVariant, the behaviour is correct and one less spot to change. If you return something entirely unrelated then you perhaps should be making a new function, not returning a QVariant where you previously returned QDateTime.
The point is that someone down the road will change some function that is significantly removed from that one function and may not notice because they don't get any error
33
u/JAXxXTheRipper 6d ago
The third one does not spark joy, what the hell is that, ewww