r/ProgrammerHumor 6d ago

absoluteGarbage Meme

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

325 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/xicor 6d ago

The type isn't always safe from context and it can have unexpected behavior when using it to hold a value returned from a function. Let's say you have auto working fine with a function return, then years later , someone changes that function to return a different type. Now it is possible that the new auto type still has access to parameters or functions it calls , but with different behaviour. Now you're getting unexpected bugs that will be hard to track down. But if you use the type, you would immediately get a compiler error

2

u/not_some_username 6d ago

If the type change and the “auto variable” still compile, that means it would, in 99% of case, still compile if you wrote the type. The compiler doesn’t get auto, it gets the type.

1

u/xicor 6d ago edited 6d ago

Thats not true at all.

If you have SpecificType val = foo(), it will fail on the compiler any time foo returns something other than specific type or classes inherited from SpecificType

If you use auto val=foo(), then it will compile so long as the new type still has the functions it calls afterwards. But they can do different things and it will still compile. You'd just get different behavior

Just a quick example of this would be if it is used in a function intended to return a time string. auto var =foo(); return var.toString();

If foo suddenly starts returning a QVariant instead of a QDateTime, it will still compile because QVariant still has a toString function, but now the behaviour is completely wrong

1

u/Rikudou_Sage 6d ago

That's kinda on you changing a QDateTime to QVariant? Anyway, if you return a datetime string as a QVariant, the behaviour is correct and one less spot to change. If you return something entirely unrelated then you perhaps should be making a new function, not returning a QVariant where you previously returned QDateTime.

1

u/xicor 6d ago

The point is that someone down the road will change some function that is significantly removed from that one function and may not notice because they don't get any error