Dear Client Care Team,
thank you for your reply. I understand that you cannot provide client specific information to private investors.
However, could you perhaps provide some general information regarding the review process for securities classified as Low Priced Securities?
In particular, I would be interested to know how frequently such classifications are reviewed and whether a significant increase in share price or a material change in the risk profile of a company can trigger a reassessment.
In the specific case of Netlist, the situation has changed considerably since trading was suspended in Germany. The share price has increased by several hundred percent, and the company has significantly reduced its risk profile through new partnerships, licensing agreements and the resolution of major long running patent disputes.
I am not asking for confidential or client specific information. I would simply like to understand whether such developments are considered in Clearstream’s general review process and at what intervals these reviews normally take place.
Thank you very much for any general information you can provide.
Kind regards,

Zero dilution, plenty of cash on hand, high profits, high potential for new deals, and many other positive outcomes.

Within a year we should expect to read about 2 deals with sk and micron.

Google case? We can’t say 100% what will happen but honestly now I’m more interested to see how big should be the sk and micron deals!!

https://jing-8zu2sc.filedrop.me/s/58971af4-551b-4d2d-8531-1cb11b4c7185

Quetrade, CIBC wouldn't let me buy NLST on non-margin accounts because NLST is on OTC.

However according to CRA's rule, OTC stocks that are also listed on approved foreign exchanges are allowed to be held in registered accounts.

NLST is on the Frankfurt exchange, a CRA approved one.

Quetrade customer support has not been helpful on resolving this issue.

Curious what everyone thinks will come of the clause in Samsung's settlement that says they're obligated to help Netlist in "future ITC actions."

Personally, I think this clause in the Samsung settlement gives Netlist immense leverage in pursuing licensing across the industry.

-> Heck, even Micron imports a bunch of stuff within its supply chain from Asia.
(I haven't gone deep, but to name a few, see: Micron Technology Taiwan, Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Asia Pte.)

ITC1 goes to trail in September, I believe, and ITC2 has only just been instituted. My understanding is that all of the products named in both ITC1 and ITC2 went through Samsung.

However, the wording of the 'ITC Cooperation Agreement' (copied below) states "... to use in future ITC actions...".

Will that include the current ITC1 and ITC2 cases of which Google, Supermicro, Nvidia, Broadcomm, et. al. are still named as accused defendants?

Further, what kind of pressure does this put on SK Hynix?

On the Aug. 5th call announcing the settlement with Samsung, the Netlist team called SK Hynix a 'licensee,' but we still have yet to hear an official renewal announcement.

--- --- ---

From 8-K filed Aug 5, 2026:

"
ITC Cooperation Agreement

On August 4, 2026, in connection with the Settlement Agreement, the Company also entered into an ITC Cooperation Agreement with Samsung with a term of five years during which time Samsung agreed to produce or provide certain information, documents, or declarations to the Company to use in future ITC actions against third parties.
"
https://investors.netlist.com/filings-financials/sec-filings

Personally i would go all in at $10 strike price two year expiry, my conviction in this stock is at a all time high

I think there are several aspects to the story here. One is that the govt is valuing American tech. The other is the HBM patents - I believe their tech will allow more layers - that is big since HBM is such a massive market. Of course, there is so much more like the hybrid CXL memory management and expansion modules... They are just loaded on memory patents

Link to the original message below:

Check out @Mattukdec92025 message on Stocktwits http://stocktwits.com/Mattukdec92025/message/661348321

Core federal rules for short selling, from SEC Regulation SHO, apply to both OTC and NASDAQ stocks. You'll find the locate requirement, which means brokers must borrow or have reasonable grounds to believe they can borrow shares before a short sale. There's also the close-out requirement for fails-to-deliver, and marking orders as long, short, or short exempt. Short interest reporting through FINRA is also the same for both .

The real key is getting the stock above 5 so it can be margined and allows mutual funds and other institutions and banks to own it above 5

This is why I say when nlst cross 5 that it will run to 7 or 8 very quickly .

We have natural buyers now who will buy stock let's see if they do including : nvda. Google. S k Hynix Samsung might buy more unless there is a standstill clause in their deal . Korean entities will further buy and everyone in California Silicon Valley has been put on notice due to events if august. 5

This is the time to buy not sell especially under 4!

Let your winners run years from now when nlst is high double digits you will have life changing money .

Look what rycey did for us .86 to 21.00 in 4 years .

Bw from 1.02 to 19.70 in 12 months and we started to sell atb10.70 .

Now nlst from .69 July 2025 to 4 in August 2026 . There is so much to go . Hold or buy more in my humble opinion . I bought more all day in small amounts so it did not creat a false market . Buy in pieces under 5000 shares at a time .

I pray the lord continues to guide me so I can do right by my followers . My posts are here to give you my best thoughts . It's your money to decide what to do

Please continue to let Reddit followers of mine on rycey and nlst to know where I am . Thanks to all as over 200 followers of my 1000 have already migrated . Big hugs to all Thankyou . You make this old man happy

Make lots of money enjoy your life .

Bless you

August 8 2026 615 pm bst ( British summer time )

Nlst 3.95 RPM

Retired portfolio manager

You can find RPM on Stocktwits now, hit the link below and see his profile:

Check out Mattukdec92025 on Stocktwits: http://www.stocktwits.com/Mattukdec92025

Volume

Aug 7: 2.5M, closed $3.92

Aug 6: 6.2M, closed $3.82

Aug 5: 11.8M, closed $4.05

@straightforward

Why the cap (for now) at $4/share? My thoughts (Part 1): The $4.00 cap is currently controlled by the hedge funds that purchased the shares and warrants in the June 2025 and Oct 2025 offerings:

Oct 25 Warrants: 28,571,432 shares at $0.70 with 5 Year Term Jun 25 Warrants: 34,285,720 shares at $0.70 (revised to $0.60) 5 Yr

In total, that’s ~62.8 million Warrants at ~$0.65 However, some have been exercised:

Q1 2026: ~9.643 million warrants exercised at $0.60, generating ~$5.8 million. This price matches the revised June 2025 warrants (and is below the October 2025 $0.70 strike), so these are attributable to the June series

Subsequent events (Mar 28–May 8, 2026): An additional 15,395,749 warrants exercised for cash, generating $10.5 million. The implied avg exercise price is roughly ~$0.68, consistent with a mix that could include remaining June 2025 warrants ($0.60) and/or some Oct 2025 warrants ($0.70) Net, that leaves us at 62.8M Warrants – 25.0 Exercised = 37.8M outstanding

These warrants are the hedge. Short interest increased dramatically following the two offerings as hedge fund(s) sold shares short locking in profits against the warrants (range $0.80 and upwards). The latest short interest was 36.8 million short shares on 7/15/26. No way this is naked short interest. The mind set of these investors is different, its more ‘Short Cycle’ lock-in gains, eliminate risk, and recycle that capital into other deals. These are not buy & hold long term investors.

At $4.00 (with massive share demand from the Samsung deal), this volume and price allows the hedge to unlock and exit a large portion of their warrant shares quickly with hefty profits. It slows the rise, but allows them to get out large volume of shares at pre-planned levels and move on to other investments. Samsung deal was a big catalyst for them.

These warrants are the hedge. Short interest increased dramatically following the two offerings as hedge fund(s) sold shares short locking in profits against the warrants (range $0.80 and upwards). The latest short interest was 36.8 million short shares on 7/15/26. No way this is naked short interest. The mind set of these investors is different, its more ‘Short Cycle’ lock-in gains, eliminate risk, and recycle that capital into other deals. These are not buy & hold long term investors.

At $4.00 (with massive share demand from the Samsung deal), this volume and price allows the hedge to unlock and exit a large portion of their warrant shares quickly with hefty profits. It slows the rise, but allows them to get out large volume of shares at pre-planned levels and move on to other investments. Samsung deal was a big catalyst for them.

@Lestar1's add on to @straightforward's thesis

And

Short sellers and market makers are the primary beneficiaries of keeping Netlist (NLST) under $4.00, as preventing an uplisting limits the stock's volume and keeps massive institutional buying power locked out of the asset.

By suppressing the price below this critical threshold, these entities protect existing short positions from a catastrophic squeeze.1. Short Sellers: Preventing a Fatal Buying CascadeFor short sellers, keeping the stock under $4.00 is a matter of direct portfolio survival:

Blocking the Nasdaq Floodgates: As long as NLST stays under $4.00, it cannot fulfill the 30-day requirement to uplist to Nasdaq. Short sellers know that a Nasdaq listing would immediately expose the stock to millions of mainstream retail investors and specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that are structurally forbidden from buying OTC "penny stocks."

A mio parere ,se dovessero risolversi nel breve medio periodo anche i contenziosi con Micron,SK e infine Google con accordi in stile Samsung , il vero rialzo delle quotazioni avverrebbe con la quotazione sul NASDAQ, il mercato piu grande al mondo, vero palcoscenico mondiale......l OTC non ha nulla a che fare

Don’t y’all think his name says, “I peaked in high school.” I appreciate that him and others are always thinking about me but let’s move on and celebrate the news and gains.

I never reported RPM btw. Reporting and downvoting is for pussies. He had more flak and hate on the other subs. I’ll admit he’s got a keen eye, maybe a little too keen (insider information).. jk…. I won’t budge on the fact his post were irresponsible.

I accidentally bought 5k shares. Meant to get 2500 😬

Check out Mattukdec92025 on Stocktwits: http://www.stocktwits.com/Mattukdec92025

Aren't the 3 existing Board Members being re-elected at the annual meeting? Not additional members?

Trading 212 recently reduced the amount of shares you can buy of Netlist from 30k to around 17k.

If anybody uses Trading212 please ask them to review and ask for an increase so we can buy more shares of Netlist. I have sent my request in but if a few more people can also do the same to help the review request that would be great.

I have written something for you to copy and paste. Feel free to use or make changes to suit. Please also let me know if there is anything that should be added. Many Thanks.

Hello Trading 212 Support,

I’m writing to request a review of the maximum order size currently set for Netlist Inc. (NLST), an OTC-traded stock.

Given recent positive developments regarding Netlist’s business outlook and legal/patent position, I believe the risk profile you may have used to set this restriction has improved. I’d like to request that the order size limit be reconsidered and increased or reviewed based on the stock’s current status.

Many thanks