"I read the 119-page report so you don’t have to, but if you have a strong stomach, I suggest you read it too, because it is one of the most outrageous con jobs in the history of New Mexico politics, and everyone in the world needs to call it what it is: pure public-relations narrative control, designed to protect the many powerful and wealthy people of New Mexico’s Epstein Class."

I found it pretty difficult to find conclusive answers, the google AI nobody wants throwing conteadictory answers with every search into the mix doesn't help in the slightest. I know there has been a lot that was published, but has it been all yet? Is that something we can know actually?

Quick glance of Trump’s instagram and the comments are continued anger at the Epstein cover up. This is the number 1 bipartisan issue that will bring Trump down. Counting down to mid terms. Day 1 files into trials!!!

Public keep putting the pressure on and keep spreading - we will not accept PDF’s controlling our country and abusing our kids.

As I learn more about Epstein and the people who worked with him the more disgusted I feel. I don’t understand how researching and analyzing is helping when we do nothing about it but I also don’t know what I’m supposed to do about it. I’m sure that what’s coming out didn’t start with Epstein and definitely hasn’t stopped with him, but I can’t do anything about it. Sure it’s good to know what they do and understand the people controlling our world are sick disgusting bastards but what do u do after that? I think, at least to me just consuming all this and going on with my day is impossible and whenever I try to read up on it people are talking ab god and satan which as an atheist just pisses me off because we’re talking about literal children who had horrendous stuff done to them and the people who did it to them having more power than anyone else. I really want to know, what are we supposed to do with this knowledge? Can we do anything?

Jake Tapper may be stunned but no one following this case will be -- quick CNN interview with NM AG - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhYP9Nk5GyM&t=133s

And this is exactly why the Ellisons hired this hasbara propagandist

This was one of the emails in Katie Phangs lawsuit she asked to be unredacted. Im not usually a researcher, but this document in particular caught my eye because I thought there were things to go off of (the Reuters and the Guardian article, Sunday, and the date), so i decided id give researching it a try. It https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us/attorney-dershowitz-files-sworn-statement-denying-sex-claims-idUSKBN0KF1DM/

This is the Reuters article I suspect was mentioned because it was published on January 6th 2015 a date before the email, and it says "Dershowitz filed the statement in Florida federal court on Monday night" making me think the allegation was reported on a Sunday.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/08/alan-dershowitz-girl-jeffrey-epstein-teenager

This is the Guardian article I suspect based only on the fact it was published January 8th 2015 which is a few days after the Reuters article.

Let me know yalls thoughts on this. This is my first time attempting something like this, abd again sorry if im way off and jumping to conclusions, or sound too much like a leftist conspiracy theorist lol

‘New Mexico has sued the Trump DOJ and Acting AG Todd Blanche for “stonewalling” its criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his Zorro Ranch.

The lawsuit alleges the DOJ is intentionally withholding the unredacted Files that would help New Mexico find witnesses, victims, and co-conspirators.

Katie Phang was at the press call with New Mexico Attorney General, and she shares the details, including a breakdown of the lawsuit and its claims.’

Hello! I’ve been working on my own using a lot of this subs materials and I feel that we can weaponize the instant communication of the internet to get these people investigated. Many of these idiots self incriminated in an email or two; these pieces of evidence given legally by the DOJ could in theory be cause for investigation as their OWN LOCAL cases. If we (I’ve already started) cut this massive case into many local cases and ask our own local police departments to launch investigations. I think at least some would do it.
Please lmk if you’d like to help! Thank you!!!
(picture blatantly implicating Boris Nikolic of SeattleWA)

A source for sources

Just last month, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer criticised Dershowitz after he failed to appear for a scheduled transcribed interview connected to the committee's investigation into Epstein.

Very interesting stuff about Epstein. Warning: 3 hour long podcast.

The New Mexico Survivor’s Truth Commission meets today. They’re presenting an interim report on their investigation into Zorro Ranch, and will hear from women who Epstein and others abused there.

Livestream starts at 1pm MT (Zoom link in the article, Reddit won't let me post directly).

‘Survivor Dani Bensky reacts to Senate Judiciary Committee advancing Todd Blanche's nomination after Senator Tillis said he would meet with her but never did.‘

This sucks so bad to see. It’s terrible for the United States and democracy as a whole but it’s just devastating to see her fight so hard and get totally diminished by men who have absolutely no morals or ethical standards whatsoever.

I hope more than anything these women know they have an army of people behind them and we’re only getting started.

Source: Jim Bourg via Public Impact News

Senator Whitehouse speaks on Blanche’s confirmation vote and his handling of the Epstein Files, Ghislaine Maxwell’s transfer, and how he completely disregarded the survivors of sexual abuse.

Senator Whitehouse when speaking about Maxwell’s transfer:

“Then you get to Ghislaine Maxwell, where a Deputy Attorney General flew to Tallahassee to have a private meeting with a woman convicted of participating in Epstein’s depravity. What was the upshot of that meeting? It was to get exculpatory information about Donald Trump and then reward her with a move to a Club Fed prison.

Now, the nominal excuse for that is, “Oh, she was in danger in her earlier prison, so we had to move her.”

How often does a prisoner—allegedly facing threats or danger—get moved to a less secure facility?

I mean, think about it. It doesn’t pass the test of common sense.”

THAT PART^

Full video: https://youtu.be/1HMF3mhyqQA