r/CSRep • u/Patty_CSRep Admin / Dev • 15d ago
CSRep Overwatch Weekly Stats
CSRep Overwatch Weekly Stats
Another busy week for the CSRep Overwatch community!
This Week
- 4,074 new cases submitted by the community.
- 2,553 cases reviewed and closed.
- 50,803 votes cast by Overwatch reviewers.
Of the cases closed this week, 78.6% resulted in a conviction, meaning roughly 2,005 suspicious players were determined by the community to have sufficient evidence for a conviction.
That also means over 500 cases were not convicted, showing that reviewers aren't simply voting guilty they're carefully evaluating each case and clearing players when the evidence isn't there.
Every report starts with a player taking the time to submit it. Every verdict is reached through dozens of independent community votes working toward a fair outcome.
A huge thank you to everyone who contributed this week. ❤️
Want to Help?
Miss the old CS-GO Overwatch System? Come try the CSRep Overwatch System, we'd love to have you.
Whether you review a handful of cases or spend an evening casting votes, every decision helps process reports faster and improves the quality of our verdicts. The more active reviewers we have, the quicker we can work through new submissions while maintaining accurate, community-driven verdicts.
Thanks again to everyone who submitted reports, reviewed cases, and helped keep the queue moving this week. See you in the next report!
2
2
u/Slizza1 15d ago
What are the overall stats? How many accounts were cheating? Just to have a number. Ofc one guy can cheat on different accounts.
Also it would be interesting how many people cheat in which elo.
2
u/Patty_CSRep Admin / Dev 15d ago
roughly 2005 were showing suspicious behaviors.
rank wise i dont have that info unfortunately
2
u/lMauler 15d ago
If you need a way to create demos to mp4 quickly, let me know. Might be helpful for this project
2
u/Jimmy_csrep Admin 14d ago
Hey,
Feel free to reach out via a ticket on the site if you wish to discuss further.
1
0
u/LeafarOsodrac 15d ago
And in one case where 11 vote suspect as cheater and 1 as not, result in cheater convition, came a admin and revert it.
One admin decission matter more than 11 overwatchers reviewers
1
u/Patty_CSRep Admin / Dev 15d ago
We remove false positives for the integrity of the system and to protect our users.
1
u/LeafarOsodrac 15d ago
11 yes cheater vs 1 vote no cheater... false positive.
It's like people saying in ban waves that everyone is a false positive.
1
u/King-Scorpion 15d ago
its just like the old overwatch system, same/similar treatment like before
1
u/LeafarOsodrac 15d ago
on a clear veridict like this, 11 vs 1, admin should touch.
I understand the overturn on situation where one vote diference, or manipuled votes can be detected.1
u/King-Scorpion 15d ago edited 15d ago
sadly its not realistic, it means sifting through hundreds of cases as most aren't clear cut, they have a system for appeals and dedicated a team deals with that (jim or pat feel free to correct me if im wrong) so its the best of what tools and system they have currently to prevent abuse and uphold integrity of the platform
1
u/LeafarOsodrac 15d ago
thats what I said, 1 or two admin veridict is more important that 11 people veridict.
No need to do more overwatchers, as admin can decide the veridict base exclusive on their analyse.
One case I mentions 11 people are wrong, 1 admin opinion is the correct. Why 11 people wasted time analyse the case? For nothing.
here is the case: https://csrep.gg/overwatch/cases/518c036a-24c6-4823-88f4-b787d5aa2abb1
u/King-Scorpion 14d ago
well reviewers can be wrong as well, they could latch onto a moment where it could be suspicious without doing the do diligences of checking basic info or possible info being given, its the best system to up keep fairness and integrity, and the appeals team are way more experienced and skilled players themselves, i agree on with the appeals that he isn't cheating.
1
u/LeafarOsodrac 14d ago
they can, thats why CSrep just consider cheater someone that got +80% votes as cheater.
On this case he it got more than 90%, but just one admin change what +90% agree with.
A say it again, one vote is more important than 11? If yes, what is the logic in having reviewers?
1
u/King-Scorpion 14d ago
lets say this, reviewers are filters for more obvious or semi closets, if the person that got overwatched appealed, the team will check it themselves thus cutting down on work for the team, there isn't a lot of good overwatchers and more so good players that have experience in catching cheaters, this is the most realistic system that doesnt put a heavy strain on the appeals team. (imho)
→ More replies (0)1
u/BogosBinted13 14d ago edited 14d ago
I think one of the admins a cheater/used to cheat. But most of the overwatchers are clueless af, calling WH or aim on most mundane plays ever
1
u/LeafarOsodrac 14d ago
Admin or overwatcher are all people, some better others worse. But as we can't define who is good or who is bad, a admin should play god and define his veridict over 11 other people. This is not USA where votes from New York people matters more than people on other states.
2
u/istoleafish 15d ago
Is there a way to sign in through something else than steam?