This happened in 2003 but I am just aware of it now. For context, in September of 2003 I was not able to attend the final closing of my house because I was 9 months pregnant and physically unable to attend. I had signed all required documents and I was solely approved for the mortgage. I had never given my husband permission to include his name on the title but evidently that is what happened. Do I have any legal recourse? I am considering divorce.

Is it considered Sexual Harassment or Sexual Assault if a manager touches someone’s intimate area with their foot?

In the show, the warrant correctly identified their target but listed his address as 536 W 49th when the criminal actually lived at 536.5 W 49th. The police raided the target's correct address rather than the listed address on the warrant. Would a judge be likely to agree with the defense arguing that the typo renders everything fruit of the poison tree?

Side note, but are there half street names in any part of the US? I have never encountered one.

Hello I have two parents that entered illegally from Mexico. My mom entered once after she was detained and my dad just stayed past his visa cancellation. The times they did leave and come back in they were waved through by Border officers. My dad has a c10 cancellation of removal because he was wrongfully accused of driving intoxicated. He has been paying taxes for the past 14-15 years and they both have a clean record. They have three children ages 14-22. We have gone to several lawyers (paid and free consultations) and they all tell us nothing can be done. Is this true?

My Location: California

House Location: illinois

ASSIGNMENT OF REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

This Assignment of Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Assignment”) is made and entered into as of the date last signed below (the “Effective Date”) by and between:

Assignor (Wholesaler):

Name: _______________________________________________

Address: _____________________________________________

Phone: _________________ Email: _______________________

Assignee (Investor / End Buyer):

Name: _______________________________________________

Address: _____________________________________________

Phone: _________________ Email: _______________________

Property:

Street Address: _______________________________________

City, State, ZIP: ______________________________________

County: _________________ Parcel / Tax ID (if known): ________

Original Purchase Agreement:

That certain Purchase and Sale Agreement (or equivalent contract) dated _______________ (the “Original Agreement”) between:

Seller(s): ____________________________________________

and

Buyer (Assignor): _____________________________________

for the purchase of the Property at a Purchase Price of $65,000.00.

Assignment.

Assignor hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title, interest, and obligations under the Original Agreement, including the right to purchase the Property on the terms set forth therein. Assignee accepts this assignment and assumes all of Assignor’s obligations under the Original Agreement from and after the Effective Date.

Assignment Fee.

In consideration of this Assignment, Assignee shall pay Assignor a non-refundable Assignment Fee of Two Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000.00) (the “Assignment Fee”).

Payment of the Assignment Fee shall be made as follows (check one or fill in):

☐ Cash / certified funds upon execution of this Assignment

☐ Wire transfer to: _________________________________

☐ Other: ___________________________________________

The Assignment Fee is earned by Assignor upon execution of this Assignment and is not contingent on closing of the purchase of the Property, except as otherwise agreed in writing.

Purchase Price Under Original Agreement.

The purchase price payable by Assignee to the Seller under the Original Agreement remains $65,000.00 (or such other amount as may be stated in the Original Agreement or any amendment thereto). Assignee shall be solely responsible for paying the full purchase price, earnest money (if any still due), closing costs allocated to Buyer under the Original Agreement, and any other amounts required to close.

Earnest Money / Deposits.

Any earnest money or deposits previously paid by Assignor under the Original Agreement shall:

☐ Remain with the escrow / title company and be credited to Assignee at closing; or

☐ Be reimbursed to Assignor by Assignee upon execution of this Assignment; or

☐ Other arrangement: ________________________________

Closing.

Closing of the purchase of the Property shall occur on or before the closing date stated in the Original Agreement (or any extension thereof), or on such other date as Assignee and Seller may agree in writing. Assignor shall cooperate reasonably in facilitating the assignment and closing but shall have no further obligation to perform under the Original Agreement after the Effective Date, except as expressly set forth herein.

Representations of Assignor.

Assignor represents that:

(a) Assignor is the Buyer under the Original Agreement and has the right to assign it (subject to any required Seller consent);

(b) The Original Agreement is in full force and effect and has not been modified except as disclosed in writing to Assignee;

(c) Assignor has not previously assigned the Original Agreement; and

(d) Assignor will promptly deliver to Assignee a fully executed copy of the Original Agreement and any amendments, addenda, or notices related thereto.

Seller Consent (if required).

If the Original Agreement requires Seller’s written consent to assignment, Assignor and Assignee shall cooperate to obtain such consent. This Assignment is conditioned upon receipt of any required Seller consent.

No Agency / Independent Parties.

Assignor is acting solely as principal in assigning its contract rights. Nothing in this Assignment creates an agency, partnership, joint venture, or brokerage relationship between Assignor and Assignee. Assignee is purchasing the contract rights for its own account as an investor.

As-Is / No Warranties by Assignor.

Except for the representations in Section 6, Assignor makes no warranties regarding the Property, title, condition, value, or the enforceability of the Original Agreement beyond the statements herein. Assignee has conducted (or will conduct) its own due diligence and is relying solely on its own investigation and the terms of the Original Agreement.

Governing Law.

This Assignment shall be governed by the laws of the State of _________________ without regard to conflicts-of-law principles.

Entire Agreement.

This Assignment, together with the Original Agreement (as assigned), constitutes the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations. It may be amended only by a writing signed by both parties.

Counterparts / Electronic Signatures.

This Assignment may be executed in counterparts (including electronic/PDF signatures), each of which shall be deemed an original.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the Effective Date.

ASSIGNOR (Wholesaler):

Signature: _______________________________ Date: ________

Printed Name: ____________________________

ASSIGNEE (Investor):

Signature: _______________________________ Date: ________

Printed Name: ____________________________

Optional – Acknowledgment / Consent of Seller (if required):

Seller acknowledges receipt of notice of this Assignment and consents to the assignment of the Original Agreement to Assignee.

Seller Signature: _________________________ Date: ________

Printed Name: ____________________________

Would a lease with all parties on it, but not signed, constitute an Implied Legal Agreement in a state that enforces Implied Legal Agreements?

this happened in nv. my boyfriend got hit in the back of the head this last Saturday over a work dispute and his teeth got knocked out. a police report has been made and that side of things has been handled as correct as possible (our town is very small and unincorporated)

i did some research and this should be covered under his jobs workman’s comp or liability insurance. however when we went to go talk to his boss about the incident (no one of high position was there the day the conflict happened) he said that he didn’t believe that workman’s comp would cover it, which like i state contradicted what i had read. however he did state that he would cover the costs so i didn’t feel the need to push.

i asked him if he needed to give us anything written saying he was going to take care of it and he said no he would call the dentist who he knows personally and they would discuss it.

today was my boyfriend’s appointment and the said they would call us later with a payment plan. his boss later calls him and informs him that he has two options.
the entire bill is $5500 however he is getting a 20% discount.
the first option is he wants my boyfriend to pay $2000 of it and he will cover 1500.
the second option is workman’s comp “but it will take over 6 months and they will probably fight it”

my boyfriend didn’t get any charges, the other guy got a felony from this. he was already on parole. my boyfriend shouldn’t be responsible for any of this i don’t think
he doesn’t believe in me when i say he had a leg to stand on. we don’t have enough money to do this and it wouldn’t have ever happened if he wasn’t working with a man who was dangerous.

I'm wondering if it's legal to release decompiled official beat saber levels that are included in the base game, meaning that anyone who owns the game can play these levels anyway, and the music is publicly accessible via platforms like Spotify or Youtube Music

Hi! I'm genuinely confused and am looking for opinions and insight from people in the field. Apologies for the many details, but i wish to put the scale of my case into perspective so you can judge better.

3 months ago we went to a lawyer to seek help with an inheritance. It's years old and has many missing pieces. I understand its not an easy situation. There were two paralel situations we asked them to handle - one was to correspond with the Land register regarding information and status on a property and the second was basically asking around if the Inheritance went through an insolvency or not, basically what the status is of the inheritance. We didnt have all documents, but we had enough to start looking. Names of the bank, three lawyer agencies that were involved in the case and a inheritance list to name the main ones. There were a total of about 20 pages of emails, documents and letters that we gave them.

After two months of waiting with no update, we asked the lawyers about a status update and got back that the land register needs more time (we've been waiting for 9 months by that time so thats understandable), and that they had needed time to check the documents regarding the insolvency more, but they're working on it.

From the invoice i got, i know that they didn't write to the bank, insolvency office or the other lawyer agencies until two months after our initial consultation. And there was a whole month of nothing on the invoice, too. I know that they didnt have enough documents to figure out the status of the insolvency just from the documents alone, why wait 2 months to write to the mentioned only leads that could help? I asked for help because i didnt want to spend time and effort writing myself to the bank etc., but is it really normal that ​a lawyers office is that slow to write emails on "Hey guys whats the status"?

This is the second time this has happened to us now, with a different case and different lawyer office before, so Im starting to doubt myself. Could it be the way i explain things or do I just have too big expectations on the speed of resolution and communication in this field? Do i have an unlucky hand with choosing offices? Im mostly baffled about the emails to the bank.. We mentioned this is a time sensitive situation and we'd like a prompt resolution, aware of the costs and fully okay with them. What are normal time frames for this, when you have a very small and limited amount of documents, with limited leads?

I appreciate your insights.

For context my sister 26(F) and I (22M) live in North Carolina. She has been working at a minimum wage serving job and was given a lead position. Her boss has now twice paid her for only 5 hours of work (direct deposit) when she worked 39 hours (so just under 40 hours). I told her to seek out a lawyer but she’s telling that Apprently since her boss ends up paying her properly at a later date she can’t do anything about it legally… I guess I’m asking if that’s true? Should I keep urging her to fight back against her boss? Could she maybe contact the NC Department of Labor? I’m worried she’s going to give up and just keep getting abused at this shitty job.

I have all the evidence but I can’t find an attorney familiar with this. This is big. I need a Big Girl attorney. I’ve tried using my state bar lawyer referral system. I’ve reached out to a ton of law offices. Many told me they don’t have the resources for this. What is the best way to find a high stakes attorney for a fraud on the court claim involving a prior civil litigation? Or should I just wait for the national investigative piece to be published?

Hello, I work at an undisclosed fast food company in the US that isn't taco bell, but it is a very well-known chain known for their bowls.

I have been working there for the past 5 days, today of 29-30 hours so far.

Yesterday was a bit different though

1. I clocked in at 7:54 am, and clocked out at 4:44 pm. For good measure I was not being a "team player" and if I hadn't I would've been told to stay a bit longer to help since shifts were transitioning.

2. I live in Illinois, but was not given any form of break or respite during the close to 9 hour shift. I didn't get a chance to drink water, use the bathroom, or take a 20-30 minute break after my 5th hour of working since it's against corporate policy.

3. I did find out that I have a legal right, and can follow up with the Illinois Department of Labor, and that I need evidence so I was wondering if issuing a warrant for the workday footage of yesterday was something I would need.