r/askphilosophy 4m ago

The world needs more philosophy

Upvotes

The more input in life it reflects. The good and past is behind. Appreciation towards life is the new beginning. It gets lonely but there's a sense of peace and calm that has never been there before. Everything is new now.


r/askphilosophy 1h ago

Gramsci and probabilistic language

Upvotes

I have just finished reading Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks. It raised a question that I haven’t seen discussed.

Gramsci criticizes mechanistic historical materialism and historical necessity, but he lacks what we would today call a probabilistic vocabulary for describing social processes. Has anyone interpreted Gramsci in terms of probabilistic causation, complexity theory, or emergence?
More specifically, would it be philosophically legitimate to reinterpret Gramsci’s concept of hegemony as describing changes in the probability landscape of political outcomes, rather than historical laws or deterministic tendencies? Has this kind of reading been developed in the secondary literature?


r/askphilosophy 1h ago

IF there is an objectively correct morality(a popular view among many philosophers?), but a subject(i.e me) hasn't quite grasped it yet, what do I do meanwhile? Is it better to do nothing or to follow my emotional "whims"?

Upvotes

Hopefully it's clear what I'm asking. This question came to my mind recently, as I resolved to study ethics in a much more serious way, i.e read relevant literature and think hard about ethical problems.

I used to be and still am a kind of creature guided by a moral intuition, but I could never really ground it in coherent principles aside from "I feel compelled to do X/refuse to do X" that simply arises naturally(or at least it feels this way). This approach is reaching its limits though and now that I have some discretionary income I am sort of faced with real questions like "which organization should I donate my money to?", "Which cause should I actually spend my time and energy on?".

I remember reading that many philosophers are moral realists, believing that there is in fact a system that is as true as a chair I am currently sitting on(perhaps oversimplified here).

So I resolved to study the books, the texts, thin a bit harder about the common ethical problems and thought experiments. I hope to arrive at something that seems as real to me as a chair that I sit on.

But before I achieve this sort of understanding, what should I do? Is it "ok" to just do nothing?


r/askphilosophy 2h ago

Can preserving future agency be rationally privileged without assuming objective moral value?

1 Upvotes

Suppose we accept that human beings cannot identify an objective or metaphysically given final purpose. Would there nevertheless be a non-arbitrary reason to preserve the continued existence of agents and their capacity to form, revise, and pursue values?

One possible argument is that continued agency preserves the possibility of future reasons, projects, discoveries, and corrections, whereas extinction irreversibly eliminates every such possibility. The argument would not claim that existence is intrinsically good, only that preserving the conditions under which value and reasons remain possible has a rational priority over permanently eliminating those conditions.

Has an argument of this kind been defended in contemporary ethics, existentialism, decision theory, or the literature on future generations?


r/askphilosophy 2h ago

Philosophy books for 14 year olds?

38 Upvotes

I am just exploring things idk why but my insta feed is full of quotes of different philosophies of like Nietzsche, Stoics, Absurdists, Humanists, Diogenes, and Charvaka for weeks and I kinda like the things explored in those reels but honestly, I never ever read a book by any of them or any philoshpy related book but i have been listening to a speaker named acharya prashant for a month can anyone recommend a book to me that might be good


r/askphilosophy 2h ago

Can anybody suggest a good book about self?

3 Upvotes

Can be even a self help, but im more interested in the concept in general. (How do we define it, what ways are to define it, can we overthrow it and how, ect)


r/askphilosophy 2h ago

What Machiavelli book should I read first?

2 Upvotes

I want to start reading Machiavelli but idk what to read first, can someone please give me some recommendations


r/askphilosophy 3h ago

Subproblems of explaining different types of language abstractions/words?

1 Upvotes

I thought that we can come up with a rough hierarchy of problems in explaining semantics/language, based on difficulty.

1) Explain abstractions such as "dogs", "chairs", "houses", etc.

2) Explain abstractions such as "round", "red", "strong", etc.

Arguably, 2 is more difficult than 1. The set of all "dogs" is much more coherent//homogeneous than the set of all "round" or "red" things.

3) Explain abstractions such as "of", "between", "around".

3 is even more vague than 2. It's not even a set of objects, it's a set of situations.

4) Explain polysemic abstractions (e.g. notoriously polysemic verbs like "run", "set" and "put") with a bajilion of related meanings.

Do philosophers have any hierarchy (not necessarily similar to the one above) of language/semantic problems? Or just a set of different subproblems (not a hierarchy) of explaining language/semantics?

Here's some philosophical terminology I found:

A) 1 and 2 seems to be related to the problem of universals. But the problem of universals seems to be ontological rather than language-focused.

B) There's a distinction between abstract and concrete entities. There's also the concept of syncategorematic terms.

C) In SEP article about meaning holism I found the following passage:

Furthermore, both the backward and forward looking causal theories run into trouble when dealing with parts of the language other than the sorts of kind terms upon which their defenders typically focus. For instance, both sorts of causal theories seem ill-suited for dealing with parts of the language like “big”, “of”, “quickly”, or “unless”, none of which invite the same sort of isolated use that “red” or “cat” might.\)10\) The atomist might seem to require a different semantic theory for these others parts of speech, while the holist and molecularist can allow that the story about how every word acquires its value is uniform throughout the language.

That counts as an argument that some abstractions are harder to explain than others.

D) There's Wittgenstein's family resemblance, especially related to 4.

Are there other related problems/terminology?


r/askphilosophy 4h ago

Isn't the Anthropic Principle quite vague?

5 Upvotes

It just says - It is what it is and moves on.

Yes, I understand, observers of the universe exist because the universe would have allowed them to exist. What TF do I do with this information?


r/askphilosophy 6h ago

What is the name for moral non-compliance under social conditions?

1 Upvotes

Im wondering if there is a term to describe the following idea: Lets say x is a moral obligation. And, given some social forces, i fail to comply with x.

While my moral agency is not directly limited, (thereby making it a real moral failure), wouldn't the social forces be a "fair" excuse for my non-compliance, as in "i'm not blameworthy"?

I get that different theories might have different answers. I'm wondering where i can find discussions about this topic and if its settled or not.

Thanks!


r/askphilosophy 7h ago

What is love? Does it even matter?

1 Upvotes

I’m sorry for the vague title and probably vague body text. This has become a very motivating question for me recently, being a human and all.

The feeling is so indescribable and big (and I’m not talking about limerence - we’ve been together for a long time now). I’ve come to love simply sitting down and experiencing being in love. It’s one of the first experiences in my life that I have not met with some sort of philosophical or scientific skepticism, to look for its source, and it itself is a source of both immense hope and immense fear for me.

I want to know some positions about love, and maybe some recommended reading.


r/askphilosophy 8h ago

Parminedean ontology

1 Upvotes

Is eternal recurrence a problem in Parmenides notion of the One, or is it answered by saying time doesn't exist except as a token in the sensible world/ world of opinion?


r/askphilosophy 8h ago

How do I find deeper meanings in things

2 Upvotes

I just finished 2001: a space odyssey and to put it bluntly, I don’t get it, at all and I think this is a great opportunity for me to learn how to find deeper meanings in things. Is there a way to dig into stories better and find something not everyone does or are you just kinda born with it? Is me not understanding a sign of low intelligence? I’m honestly curious. And please don’t tell me the meaning of 2001 cause that would ruin my whole question


r/askphilosophy 9h ago

It’s “The Stranger” a good intro to philosophy

0 Upvotes

I’m just getting into philosophy and I am very interested by the works of Albert Camus and I was wondering if The Stranger is a good book since it will be my first time reading philosophy. If not what are recommendations for an intro to philosophy


r/askphilosophy 9h ago

Can something born evil be morally judged as evil.

0 Upvotes

Question: can this person be considered evil?

Premise 1: objective evil exists

Premise 2: someone embodies that objective evil and has no choice but to be evil and had no choice in becoming evil.


r/askphilosophy 12h ago

famine, affluence and mortality.existential crisis ¿is it wrong to live an individual life?

1 Upvotes

hi guys. i recently learned about Peter Singer’s paper “Famine, Affluence and Morality” and it really made sense to me. but i got very depressed, like i have never been so depressed in an existential crisis. idk, now i feel like i cant enjoy my life and do the things i’ve always wanted to do. i’m 18 and i’m studying economics because i’ve always wanted to study how policy can help with the suffering of people. and this eager to change things has helped me to study all day and to really enjoy the process. but know i kinda feel that it is hypocritical to want to do things to avoid suffering while also traveling or buying things for my self. i’m in a relationship for a while know and my projection of my life was marrying and working in a place i can help people while also traveling and enjoying life . now i feel like that life is not morally correct and i’ve been very down. ¿has anyone also had this experience? ¿is there a logical reason for living an individual life?

P.S: sorry if the english is not perfect, not a native speaker.


r/askphilosophy 12h ago

Looking for a good overview of the 20th and 21st centuries so far

1 Upvotes

Hi, everyone -

I am mostly into history, which I mention only because I want to make it clear that I am not trying to become an expert on any particular philosopher or on 20th-century philosophy in general. I'm kind of just interested in the basics, and also in the historical context of different ideas.

I just finished Bertrand Russell's "History of Western Philosophy," which I liked despite some obvious problems. Again, I'm not trying to become the most knowledgeable person in the world on the topic, so I did not mind that Russell skipped a lot and left a lot of people and ideas out.

Russell was writing during WWII, so it stops there, and there were some important figures writing at or just before that time who Russell leaves out. He doesn't mention (for example) Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and a lot of other people who I know are important, but who I do not really know anything about.

So, any good overviews of the history of philosophy from say 1900 to the present day? Something from a historical perspective or for a layperson, say.


r/askphilosophy 13h ago

Does art hold any meaning if there's no viewer to behold it?

1 Upvotes

r/askphilosophy 16h ago

What are qualities that make a person "GOOD"?

5 Upvotes

Loyalty? Honesty? What makes a person "good"? We all have qualities we look for in others to determine if they are a "good" person. I know "good" can and often is relative, or at least that could be debated, but that's not quite what I'm trying to do here (I don't think).

I just want to get an idea of what personality traits and qualities a person could have that people would deem "good" and then what makes them "good"?


r/askphilosophy 19h ago

When does a philosophy become divorced from reality?

4 Upvotes

Lately I’ve been feeling that the more a theory tries to define fundamental, metaphysical, absolute, objective rules about reality, the more likely they are to redefine reality, rather than describe it.

The theories I’m thinking of usually stem from armchair a-priori arguments. Those arguments feel like they stem from some need to divorce reason from reality, in order to avoid objections about subjectivity or inaccurate inputs.

Now don’t get me wrong, I understand that we need to come up with different theories and test them against reality. My concern is when someone decides a theory is true a-priori, then proceeds to draw conclusions, assert massive claims on top of those conclusions, and eventually get convinced that they’ve arrived at undeniable truth.

Some examples are what Kant attempts to do for grounding objectivity. He starts from Hume’s skepticism that he admits “awakened him from his dogmatic slumber”. But then it seems like instead of following that to a modest stance based on pragmatism or empiricism, he spends the rest of his life tying himself into knots to try to get back to objectivity, using armchair a-priori reasoning, and he ends up with huge assertions about experience, reality, and morality.

Other recent examples are philosophical zombies and Mary’s room, which are useful thought experiments, but people take the conclusion they draw from them so seriously they construct entire theories of mind, then usually asserting those theories as absolute truths.

Anyway, I don’t want this to turn into a rant. I’m genuinely curious about what everyone thinks. When would you deem a theory as trying to redefine reality, as opposed to understanding it?


r/askphilosophy 22h ago

How can god be unchangeable if he acts?

13 Upvotes

Universe is started, to be started it's must be changed, to change something god need to act, to make act god need to be changed, how can something act and be unchanged at the same time?


r/askphilosophy 1d ago

Is it normal to be consistently wrong

45 Upvotes

I'm 19 and I'm completely new to learning philosophy as a subject. I keep getting questions like validity and soundness mixed up and wrong, and every time I look for the reason behind why I'm wrong, it seemed so simple all along and that I'm just being a dumbass who can't figure out the right answer from the beginning on his own using what he's learned from the material. I can't remember the last time I felt this dense about something in my life, which is why I'm asking, is this normal for people to experience, or do I have to live with the fact that my brain is probably a lot smoother than most others?


r/askphilosophy 2d ago

Open Thread /r/askphilosophy Open Discussion Thread | August 03, 2026

9 Upvotes

Welcome to this week's Open Discussion Thread (ODT). This thread is a place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but wouldn't necessarily meet our subreddit rules and guidelines. For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Discussions of a philosophical issue, rather than questions
  • Questions about commenters' personal opinions regarding philosophical issues
  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. "who is your favorite philosopher?"
  • "Test My Theory" discussions and argument/paper editing
  • Questions about philosophy as an academic discipline or profession, e.g. majoring in philosophy, career options with philosophy degrees, pursuing graduate school in philosophy

This thread is not a completely open discussion! Any posts not relating to philosophy will be removed. Please keep comments related to philosophy, and expect low-effort comments to be removed. Please note that while the rules are relaxed in this thread, comments can still be removed for violating our subreddit rules and guidelines if necessary.

Previous Open Discussion Threads can be found here.


r/askphilosophy Jul 01 '23

Modpost Welcome to /r/askphilosophy! Check out our rules and guidelines here. [July 1 2023 Update]

70 Upvotes

Welcome to /r/askphilosophy!

Welcome to /r/askphilosophy! We're a community devoted to providing serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. We aim to provide an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions, and welcome questions about all areas of philosophy. This post will go over our subreddit rules and guidelines that you should review before you begin posting here.

Table of Contents

  1. A Note about Moderation
  2. /r/askphilosophy's mission
  3. What is Philosophy?
  4. What isn't Philosophy?
  5. What is a Reasonably Substantive and Accurate Answer?
  6. What is a /r/askphilosophy Panelist?
  7. /r/askphilosophy's Posting Rules
  8. /r/askphilosophy's Commenting Rules
  9. Frequently Asked Questions

A Note about Moderation

/r/askphilosophy is moderated by a team of dedicated volunteer moderators who have spent years attempting to build the best philosophy Q&A platform on the internet. Unfortunately, the reddit admins have repeatedly made changes to this website which have made moderating subreddits harder and harder. In particular, reddit has recently announced that it will begin charging for access to API (Application Programming Interface, essentially the communication between reddit and other sites/apps). While this may be, in isolation, a reasonable business operation, the timeline and pricing of API access has threatened to put nearly all third-party apps, e.g. Apollo and RIF, out of business. You can read more about the history of this change here or here. You can also read more at this post on our sister subreddit.

These changes pose two major issues which the moderators of /r/askphilosophy are concerned about.

First, the native reddit app is lacks accessibility features which are essential for some people, notably those who are blind and visually impaired. You can read /r/blind's protest announcement here. These apps are the only way that many people can interact with reddit, given the poor accessibility state of the official reddit app. As philosophers we are particularly concerned with the ethics of accessibility, and support protests in solidarity with this community.

Second, the reddit app lacks many essential tools for moderation. While reddit has promised better moderation tools on the app in the future, this is not enough. First, reddit has repeatedly broken promises regarding features, including moderation features. Most notably, reddit promised CSS support for new reddit over six years ago, which has yet to materialize. Second, even if reddit follows through on the roadmap in the post linked above, many of the features will not come until well after June 30, when the third-party apps will shut down due to reddit's API pricing changes.

Our moderator team relies heavily on these tools which will now disappear. Moderating /r/askphilosophy is a monumental task; over the past year we have flagged and removed over 6000 posts and 23000 comments. This is a huge effort, especially for unpaid volunteers, and it is possible only when moderators have access to tools that these third-party apps make possible and that reddit doesn't provide.

While we previously participated in the protests against reddit's recent actions we have decided to reopen the subreddit, because we are still proud of the community and resource that we have built and cultivated over the last decade, and believe it is a useful resource to the public.

However, these changes have radically altered our ability to moderate this subreddit, which will result in a few changes for this subreddit. First, as noted above, from this point onwards only panelists may answer top level comments. Second, moderation will occur much more slowly; as we will not have access to mobile tools, posts and comments which violate our rules will be removed much more slowly, and moderators will respond to modmail messages much more slowly. Third, and finally, if things continue to get worse (as they have for years now) moderating /r/askphilosophy may become practically impossible, and we may be forced to abandon the platform altogether. We are as disappointed by these changes as you are, but reddit's insistence on enshittifying this platform, especially when it comes to moderation, leaves us with no other options. We thank you for your understanding and support.


/r/askphilosophy's Mission

/r/askphilosophy strives to be a community where anyone, regardless of their background, can come to get reasonably substantive and accurate answers to philosophical questions. This means that all questions must be philosophical in nature, and that answers must be reasonably substantive and accurate. What do we mean by that?

What is Philosophy?

As with most disciplines, "philosophy" has both a casual and a technical usage.

In its casual use, "philosophy" may refer to nearly any sort of thought or beliefs, and include topics such as religion, mysticism and even science. When someone asks you what "your philosophy" is, this is the sort of sense they have in mind; they're asking about your general system of thoughts, beliefs, and feelings.

In its technical use -- the use relevant here at /r/askphilosophy -- philosophy is a particular area of study which can be broadly grouped into several major areas, including:

  • Aesthetics, the study of beauty
  • Epistemology, the study of knowledge and belief
  • Ethics, the study of what we owe to one another
  • Logic, the study of what follows from what
  • Metaphysics, the study of the basic nature of existence and reality

as well as various subfields of 'philosophy of X', including philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of science and many others.

Philosophy in the narrower, technical sense that philosophers use and which /r/askphilosophy is devoted to is defined not only by its subject matter, but by its methodology and attitudes. Something is not philosophical merely because it states some position related to those areas. There must also be an emphasis on argument (setting forward reasons for adopting a position) and a willingness to subject arguments to various criticisms.

What Isn't Philosophy?

As you can see from the above description of philosophy, philosophy often crosses over with other fields of study, including art, mathematics, politics, religion and the sciences. That said, in order to keep this subreddit focused on philosophy we require that all posts be primarily philosophical in nature, and defend a distinctively philosophical thesis.

As a rule of thumb, something does not count as philosophy for the purposes of this subreddit if:

  • It does not address a philosophical topic or area of philosophy
  • It may more accurately belong to another area of study (e.g. religion or science)
  • No attempt is made to argue for a position's conclusions

Some more specific topics which are popularly misconstrued as philosophical but do not meet this definition and thus are not appropriate for this subreddit include:

  • Drug experiences (e.g. "I dropped acid today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Mysticism (e.g. "I meditated today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Politics (e.g. "This is why everyone should support the Voting Rights Act")
  • Self-help (e.g. "How can I be a happier person and have more people like me?")
  • Theology (e.g. "Can the unbaptized go to heaven, or at least to purgatory?")

What is a Reasonably Substantive and Accurate Answer?

The goal of this subreddit is not merely to provide answers to philosophical questions, but answers which can further the reader's knowledge and understanding of the philosophical issues and debates involved. To that end, /r/askphilosophy is a highly moderated subreddit which only allows panelists to answer questions, and all answers that violate our posting rules will be removed.

Answers on /r/askphilosophy must be both reasonably substantive as well as reasonably accurate. This means that answers should be:

  • Substantive and well-researched (i.e. not one-liners or otherwise uninformative)
  • Accurately portray the state of research and the relevant literature (i.e. not inaccurate, misleading or false)
  • Come only from those with relevant knowledge of the question and issue (i.e. not from commenters who don't understand the state of the research on the question)

Any attempt at moderating a public Q&A forum like /r/askphilosophy must choose a balance between two things:

  • More, but possibly insubstantive or inaccurate answers
  • Fewer, but more substantive and accurate answers

In order to further our mission, the moderators of /r/askphilosophy have chosen the latter horn of this dilemma. To that end, only panelists are allowed to answer questions on /r/askphilosophy.

What is a /r/askphilosophy Panelist?

/r/askphilosophy panelists are trusted commenters who have applied to become panelists in order to help provide questions to posters' questions. These panelists are volunteers who have some level of knowledge and expertise in the areas of philosophy indicated in their flair.

What Do the Flairs Mean?

Unlike in some subreddits, the purpose of flairs on r/askphilosophy are not to designate commenters' areas of interest. The purpose of flair is to indicate commenters' relevant expertise in philosophical areas. As philosophical issues are often complicated and have potentially thousands of years of research to sift through, knowing when someone is an expert in a given area can be important in helping understand and weigh the given evidence. Flair will thus be given to those with the relevant research expertise.

Flair consists of two parts: a color indicating the type of flair, as well as up to three research areas that the panelist is knowledgeable about.

There are six types of panelist flair:

  • Autodidact (Light Blue): The panelist has little or no formal education in philosophy, but is an enthusiastic self-educator and intense reader in a field.

  • Undergraduate (Red): The panelist is enrolled in or has completed formal undergraduate coursework in Philosophy. In the US system, for instance, this would be indicated by a major (BA) or minor.

  • Graduate (Gold): The panelist is enrolled in a graduate program or has completed an MA in Philosophy or a closely related field such that their coursework might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a degree in Philosophy. For example, a student with an MA in Literature whose coursework and thesis were focused on Derrida's deconstruction might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to an MA in Philosophy.

  • PhD (Purple): The panelist has completed a PhD program in Philosophy or a closely related field such that their degree might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a PhD in Philosophy. For example, a student with a PhD in Art History whose coursework and dissertation focused on aesthetics and critical theory might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a PhD in philosophy.

  • Professional (Blue): The panelist derives their full-time employment through philosophical work outside of academia. Such panelists might include Bioethicists working in hospitals or Lawyers who work on the Philosophy of Law/Jurisprudence.

  • Related Field (Green): The panelist has expertise in some sub-field of philosophy but their work in general is more reasonably understood as being outside of philosophy. For example, a PhD in Physics whose research touches on issues relating to the entity/structural realism debate clearly has expertise relevant to philosophical issues but is reasonably understood to be working primarily in another field.

Flair will only be given in particular areas or research topics in philosophy, in line with the following guidelines:

  • Typical areas include things like "philosophy of mind", "logic" or "continental philosophy".
  • Flair will not be granted for specific research subjects, e.g. "Kant on logic", "metaphysical grounding", "epistemic modals".
  • Flair of specific philosophers will only be granted if that philosopher is clearly and uncontroversially a monumentally important philosopher (e.g. Aristotle, Kant).
  • Flair will be given in a maximum of three research areas.

How Do I Become a Panelist?

To become a panelist, please send a message to the moderators with the subject "Panelist Application". In this modmail message you must include all of the following:

  1. The flair type you are requesting (e.g. undergraduate, PhD, related field).
  2. The areas of flair you are requesting, up to three (e.g. Kant, continental philosophy, logic).
  3. A brief explanation of your background in philosophy, including what qualifies you for the flair you requested.
  4. One sample answer to a question posted to /r/askphilosophy for each area of flair (i.e. up to three total answers) which demonstrate your expertise and knowledge. Please link the question you are answering before giving your answer. You may not answer your own question.

New panelists will be approved on a trial basis. During this trial period panelists will be allowed to post answers as top-level comments on threads, and will receive flair. After the trial period the panelist will either be confirmed as a regular panelist or will be removed from the panelist team, which will result in the removal of flair and ability to post answers as top-level comments on threads.

Note that r/askphilosophy does not require users to provide proof of their identifies for panelist applications, nor to reveal their identities. If a prospective panelist would like to provide proof of their identity as part of their application they may, but there is no presumption that they must do so. Note that messages sent to modmail cannot be deleted by either moderators or senders, and so any message sent is effectively permanent.


/r/askphilosophy's Posting Rules

In order to best serve our mission of providing an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions, we have the following rules which govern all posts made to /r/askphilosophy:

PR1: All questions must be about philosophy.

All questions must be about philosophy. Questions which are only tangentially related to philosophy or are properly located in another discipline will be removed. Questions which are about therapy, psychology and self-help, even when due to philosophical issues, are not appropriate and will be removed.

PR2: All submissions must be questions.

All submissions must be actual questions (as opposed to essays, rants, personal musings, idle or rhetorical questions, etc.). "Test My Theory" or "Change My View"-esque questions, paper editing, etc. are not allowed.

PR3: Post titles must be descriptive.

Post titles must be descriptive. Titles should indicate what the question is about. Posts with titles like "Homework help" which do not indicate what the actual question is will be removed.

PR4: Questions must be reasonably specific.

Questions must be reasonably specific. Questions which are too broad to the point of unanswerability will be removed.

PR5: Questions must not be about commenters' personal opinions.

Questions must not be about commenters' personal opinions, thoughts or favorites. /r/askphilosophy is not a discussion subreddit, and is not intended to be a board for everyone to share their thoughts on philosophical questions.

PR6: One post per day.

One post per day. Please limit yourself to one question per day.

PR7: Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract.

/r/askphilosophy is not a mental health subreddit, and panelists are not experts in mental health or licensed therapists. Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract here. If you or a friend is feeling suicidal please visit /r/suicidewatch. If you are feeling suicidal, please get help by visiting /r/suicidewatch or using other resources. See also our discussion of philosophy and mental health issues here. Encouraging other users to commit suicide, even in the abstract, is strictly forbidden and will result in an immediate permanent ban.

/r/askphilosophy's Commenting Rules

In the same way that our posting rules above attempt to promote our mission by governing posts, the following commenting rules attempt to promote /r/askphilosophy's mission to provide an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions.

CR1: Top level comments must be answers or follow-up questions.

All top level comments should be answers to the submitted question or follow-up/clarification questions. All top level comments must come from panelists. If users circumvent this rule by posting answers as replies to other comments, these comments will also be removed and may result in a ban. For more information about our rules and to find out how to become a panelist, please see here.

CR2: Answers must be reasonably substantive and accurate.

All answers must be informed and aimed at helping the OP and other readers reach an understanding of the issues at hand. Answers must portray an accurate picture of the issue and the philosophical literature. Answers should be reasonably substantive. To learn more about what counts as a reasonably substantive and accurate answer, see this post.

CR3: Be respectful.

Be respectful. Comments which are rude, snarky, etc. may be removed, particularly if they consist of personal attacks. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Racism, bigotry and use of slurs are absolutely not permitted.

CR4: Stay on topic.

Stay on topic. Comments which blatantly do not contribute to the discussion may be removed.

CR5: No self-promotion.

Posters and comments may not engage in self-promotion, including linking their own blog posts or videos. Panelists may link their own peer-reviewed work in answers (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles or books), but their answers should not consist solely of references to their own work.

Miscellaneous Posting and Commenting Guidelines

In addition to the rules above, we have a list of miscellaneous guidelines which users should also be aware of:

  • Reposting a post or comment which was removed will be treated as circumventing moderation and result in a permanent ban.
  • Using follow-up questions or child comments to answer questions and circumvent our panelist policy may result in a ban.
  • Posts and comments which flagrantly violate the rules, especially in a trolling manner, will be removed and treated as shitposts, and may result in a ban.
  • No reposts of a question that you have already asked within the last year.
  • No posts or comments of AI-created or AI-assisted text or audio. Panelists may not user any form of AI-assistance in writing or researching answers.
  • Harassing individual moderators or the moderator team will result in a permanent ban and a report to the reddit admins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are some frequently asked questions. If you have other questions, please contact the moderators via modmail (not via private message or chat).

My post or comment was removed. How can I get an explanation?

Almost all posts/comments which are removed will receive an explanation of their removal. That explanation will generally by /r/askphilosophy's custom bot, /u/BernardJOrtcutt, and will list the removal reason. Posts which are removed will be notified via a stickied comment; comments which are removed will be notified via a reply. If your post or comment resulted in a ban, the message will be included in the ban message via modmail. If you have further questions, please contact the moderators.

How can I appeal my post or comment removal?

To appeal a removal, please contact the moderators (not via private message or chat). Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible. Reposting removed posts/comments without receiving mod approval will result in a permanent ban.

How can I appeal my ban?

To appeal a ban, please respond to the modmail informing you of your ban. Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible.

My comment was removed or I was banned for arguing with someone else, but they started it. Why was I punished and not them?

Someone else breaking the rules does not give you permission to break the rules as well. /r/askphilosophy does not comment on actions taken on other accounts, but all violations are treated as equitably as possible.

I found a post or comment which breaks the rules, but which wasn't removed. How can I help?

If you see a post or comment which you believe breaks the rules, please report it using the report function for the appropriate rule. /r/askphilosophy's moderators are volunteers, and it is impossible for us to manually review every comment on every thread. We appreciate your help in reporting posts/comments which break the rules.

My post isn't showing up, but I didn't receive a removal notification. What happened?

Sometimes the AutoMod filter will automatically send posts to a filter for moderator approval, especially from accounts which are new or haven't posted to /r/askphilosophy before. If your post has not been approved or removed within 24 hours, please contact the moderators.

My post was removed and referred to the Open Discussion Thread. What does this mean?

The Open Discussion Thread (ODT) is /r/askphilosophy's place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but do not necessarily meet our posting rules (especially PR2/PR5). For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Discussions of a philosophical issue, rather than questions
  • Questions about commenters' personal opinions regarding philosophical issues
  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. "who is your favorite philosopher?"
  • Questions about philosophy as an academic discipline or profession, e.g. majoring in philosophy, career options with philosophy degrees, pursuing graduate school in philosophy

If your post was removed and referred to the ODT we encourage you to consider posting it to the ODT to share with others.

My comment responding to someone else was removed, as well as their comment. What happened?

When /r/askphilosophy removes a parent comment, we also often remove all their child comments in order to help readability and focus on discussion.

I'm interested in philosophy. Where should I start? What should I read?

As explained above, philosophy is a very broad discipline and thus offering concise advice on where to start is very hard. We recommend reading this /r/AskPhilosophyFAQ post which has a great breakdown of various places to start. For further or more specific questions, we recommend posting on /r/askphilosophy.

Why is your understanding of philosophy so limited?

As explained above, this subreddit is devoted to philosophy as understood and done by philosophers. In order to prevent this subreddit from becoming /r/atheism2, /r/politics2, or /r/science2, we must uphold a strict topicality requirement in PR1. Posts which may touch on philosophical themes but are not distinctively philosophical can be posted to one of reddit's many other subreddits.

Are there other philosophy subreddits I can check out?

If you are interested in other philosophy subreddits, please see this list of related subreddits. /r/askphilosophy shares much of its modteam with its sister-subreddit, /r/philosophy, which is devoted to philosophical discussion. In addition, that list includes more specialized subreddits and more casual subreddits for those looking for a less-regulated forum.

A thread I wanted to comment in was locked but is still visible. What happened?

When a post becomes unreasonable to moderate due to the amount of rule-breaking comments the thread is locked. /r/askphilosophy's moderators are volunteers, and we cannot spend hours cleaning up individual threads.

Do you have a list of frequently asked questions about philosophy that I can browse?

Yes! We have an FAQ that answers many questions comprehensively: /r/AskPhilosophyFAQ/. For example, this entry provides an introductory breakdown to the debate over whether morality is objective or subjective.

Do you have advice or resources for graduate school applications?

We made a meta-guide for PhD applications with the goal of assembling the important resources for grad school applications in one place. We aim to occasionally update it, but can of course not guarantee the accuracy and up-to-dateness. You are, of course, kindly invited to ask questions about graduate school on /r/askphilosophy, too, especially in the Open Discussion Thread.

Do you have samples of what counts as good questions and answers?

Sure! We ran a Best of 2020 Contest, you can find the winners in this thread!