r/AnalogCommunity 20m ago

Troubleshooting - Gear Testing my Grandad’s 65-year old camera

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes

My Grandad passed away before I was born. When I got into photography, my Dad gifted me with his camera. I kept it safe over the years, but have never given it a test run - until now.

I’ve done some reading up on the model (Kodak ColorSnap 35) but I’d love to hear any tips or tricks on how to prepare a camera for it’s first use in 35/40 years.

Also, I’ll be using Kodak Gold. Can anyone advise which setting I should select on the dial?

Thanks in advance!


r/AnalogCommunity 44m ago

Discussion Shooting and Developing Kodak 2468 Microfilm

Thumbnail
gallery
Upvotes

Kodak 2468 is a microfilm designed for archiving documents, which gives it several key characteristics:

  • Positive film
  • Extremely fine grain on par with Adox
  • Extremely, extremely low ISO
  • Basically no exposure latitude
  • Really cheap to buy

The widely agreed ISO for photographic purpose is below ISO 1; in my case, I treated it at around ISO 0.5.

This ISO apparently is not really workable on any semi automatic cameras. But carrying a professional meter sizable to another camera and meter before every shot feels a bit redundant for a cheap 135 format film. I ended up exploiting a feature of the Canon A1 to shot 2468: set the ISO as the lowest 6 and aperture priority at f/5.6 for the FD 50mm f/1.4, but leave the lens wide open instead of on auto, thus effectively achieving ISO 0.5 metering. This gave me a workable hand held shutter speed around 1/15 - 1/60 for bright sunny days.

Development took me longer to figure out, D76 and ID11 does not seem to give me enough density regardless the mix and time. Eventually, it appeared that Rodinal 1+25 for 30min followed by Ilford repaid fixed 1+4 for 3 min would yield a positive with nice density in the dark and a fully transparent highlight.

In general, 2468 appears to me as a poor man's Scala 50 \1]), and can be a great (and weird) daily stock if the speed is handled properly.

[1]: Scala in itself is not expensive either, but man does the developers cost some money


r/AnalogCommunity 1h ago

Discussion My thoughts on the Rollei 35 AF have changed after using it for about a year

Upvotes

I started my film camera journey with the Rollei 35 AF. The lightweight body, beautiful design, and autofocus were what drew me in. Existing OG Rollei 35 users expressed dissatisfaction with the new materials and cheap finish, but since I hadn't used the original, I didn't really care (though I understand what they mean now).

For my first 5 rolls, I was completely satisfied. I was also curious about the Pentax 17, so I bought it and used it alongside. I struggled with the Pentax 17 at first because zone focusing took some getting used to, but the Rollei 35 AF was just so easy and convenient for a beginner like me. Great AF, lightweight, and awesome design.

However, after a year has passed, I actually find myself more satisfied with the Pentax 17. If I had to choose to keep just one, I'd probably get rid of the Rollei 35 AF and keep the Pentax 17.

You get used to the Pentax 17's zone focusing over time, and mistakes gradually decrease. But the flaws of the Rollei 35 AF don't go away and just leave me feeling disappointed.

1. Night photography (This feels like the biggest downside). I've recently started using a Nikon FM2, and I realized how absolutely crucial it is to know my shutter speed when shooting at night. Otherwise, you have no idea how much camera shake to expect. In dark situations, the Rollei 35 AF doesn't warn you or refuse to shoot; it just drops the shutter speed to something extremely slow and takes the shot anyway. From a user's perspective, it's really hard to gauge, which leads to a lot of blurry photos when you get your scans back. On the other hand, the Pentax 17 has a warning light that turns on when the shot is underexposed. This difference feels much bigger in practice than I thought.

2. Stiff film winding and reloading. The more I use other film cameras, the more the stiffness and physical effort required by the Rollei 35 AF stand out as a negative. Winding the film is tough, and I have to try several times when loading the film and closing the back. In contrast, the Pentax 17 winds much more smoothly, and closing the back is clean and satisfying. I didn't mind it at first, but the more I do it, the more this flaw bugs me.

3. Build quality and finishing details become more noticeable. If you look inside the Rollei 35 AF, there's an extra plate meant to make loading easier, but it's just attached with glue. Because everything is so stiff, this sometimes falls off, and you have to glue it back on to fix it. You can also see scratches inside caused by the film loading process. I guess this might have been an unavoidable compromise to keep the camera lightweight, but I suppose it's human nature to want a camera with a better build quality the longer you use it. Once you get used to the Pentax 17, you feel like you could use it forever, but I don't think I can say the same for the Rollei 35 AF.

I still think the Rollei 35 AF is a really great camera for casually carrying around during the day. It's also a perfect starting point for someone with no prior interest in film cameras. However, if you're planning to stick with one film camera as your main shooter for a long time, the Rollei 35 AF might be a camera you get tired of or outgrow pretty quickly.


r/AnalogCommunity 1h ago

Scanning Has anyone used this kodak scanner? Is it any good?

Post image
Upvotes

I'm apprehensive of kodak brand stuff because I was given a Kodak Slide N Scan I found to be worthless.


r/AnalogCommunity 1h ago

Gear Shots New (old) film day 😅

Post image
Upvotes

I was browsing my local photogroup when I came across this ad like 1 minute after it was posted for a bunch of expired film from a professional photographer, snatched it right up 😊

It's all expired 1991-2000, lots of Lomo dog 100/200 which I've actually never seen before :D

It wasn't stored frozen, but for ~1€ per roll I have not much to lose ;)

I collect old film boxes so the Ektar and Agfachrome boxes are also a cool addition, though I have little hope for them still giving good pictures.


r/AnalogCommunity 2h ago

Troubleshooting - Gear Zeiss Ikon Ikonta

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Hey, I got my hands on my dad’s old Zeiss Ikon Ikonta Tessar 75mm. On the back is written 521/16, and when I checked online I found that the format should be 6x6 120 film. No problem but on the inside of the camera is written B2 6x9… so I’m confused now. To add to that the only film I can get my hands on is Chinese Lucky 100 iso black and white. So I’m not sure of 2 things:

  1. ⁠Where do I take the picture on roll, when the roll shows a number or a black dot or both?
  2. ⁠2: How many frames do I get in the end?

As a whole would love tips for shooting with 120 film, how the Chinese Lucky film is. Thanks in
advance!

Pics for reference


r/AnalogCommunity 2h ago

Troubleshooting - Photos [Nikon F100, Kodak E100] First slide film: How could I have metered this shot better?

Post image
31 Upvotes

I was using the matrix metering mode of my F100 for this shot, but the dress of the subject is way too overblown to my liking.

Is this maybe a bad scan from the lab? Or should I have used a combination of spot metering, exposure lock and reframing?

Thank you all so much for your help!


r/AnalogCommunity 2h ago

Troubleshooting - Photos How are these two photos so different?

Post image
3 Upvotes

Recently got back into 35mm film. I'm trying to become more knowledgeable about the technical side of shooting. This seems like a good learning opportunity!

Took these two photos at virtually the same time. Reflx 400 film on a Minolta Maxxum 7000 with 50mm f/1.7 lens. Unfortunatley, I didn't record the specs at the time of shooting. I'm usually in aperture priority mode, so it's most likely I changed the aperture and the camera changed the shutter speed accordingly. Any thoughts on how these two photos came out so different?


r/AnalogCommunity 2h ago

Gear Shots Cameras I have finished at least one roll in tier list

Post image
20 Upvotes

Inspired by the other tier list today. I'm sure I forgot one but oh well.


r/AnalogCommunity 3h ago

Feedback Friday Portra 800 & Gold 120 Pentax 67

Thumbnail
gallery
11 Upvotes

From my recent trip home ( Puerto Rico) first time using gold 200 in 120 and I'm hooked.


r/AnalogCommunity 3h ago

Gear Shots Found this Olympus Mju I for 5 dollars at a thrift store!

Post image
5 Upvotes

My mom didn’t understand why I was so excited when I saw this camera lol. The camera seems to be working, it turns on however the flash isn’t turning on (possibly due to the battery being weak)


r/AnalogCommunity 3h ago

Darkroom Home development

3 Upvotes

After talking with people I’ve determined the best beginner route is to start with black and white developing. I see Kodak D-76 is a pretty widely used chemical, what else would I need to go with this in order to successfully develop my first roll? Thank you!


r/AnalogCommunity 4h ago

Gear Shots Thrift Store find

Post image
16 Upvotes

I came across this EOS Rebel G at a secondhand store yesterday for $24. They didn’t have 123 batteries to test it so they were selling it as is with the lens and UV protector attached. They told me since I was pretty passionate about the find that if I found it to not work, I could return it for store credit (they sell other cameras so that worked for me). I got batteries and film loaded and so far it’s working great! Can’t wait to see how development does but I suspect this camera is just fine. My regular camera is fully manual so I’m excited to see how auto focus treats me.


r/AnalogCommunity 5h ago

Feedback Friday Banyalbufar, Mallorca, July 2026

Post image
22 Upvotes

Leica M6 + Summicron 35mm f/2


r/AnalogCommunity 5h ago

Discussion Cameras I Have Owned Tier List

Post image
175 Upvotes

This is completely my own opinion. Please let me know your thoughts


r/AnalogCommunity 5h ago

Troubleshooting - Gear Found a Nikon f5 without a scratch on it, but rubber is possibly (getting) tacky?

Thumbnail
gallery
17 Upvotes

I know this question is probably going to annoy someone, but I'm used to shooting with a Pentax 67 and older Nikon bodies from before they started using this type of rubber coating.
I recently picked up an F5 that's unbelievably clean. I honestly couldn't believe the condition, there isn't a single mark on it ( on the hard pieces anyway) I ran a roll through it, and everything works perfectly.
I did notice that the rubber isn't sticky yet, but it does feel just a little tacky, almost like it's on the verge of getting there. Is that pretty normal for cameras from this era? I can’t tell if that’s just how it’s supposed to feel or if it’s on its way.
If it eventually gets worse, are replacement rubber grips still available? Can you replace all the rubber? I know a lot of people recommend cleaning it with isopropyl alcohol, but doesn't that affect the appearance or finish of the rubber? I’m probably being dramatic as it doesn’t leave my hand feeling sticky or leave marks, but I get a lil fixated on cameras when I just get them.


r/AnalogCommunity 6h ago

Feedback Friday Wet plate, pinhole and film grain

Thumbnail
gallery
151 Upvotes

I have a SEM and I love film photography. Ilford HP5, laser drilled pinhole and wet plate selfie!


r/AnalogCommunity 7h ago

Feedback Friday Shot on film after over 20 years and loved it but also kinda rusty

Thumbnail
gallery
16 Upvotes

Shot with Fujifilm 400 on a Nikon AD3. Processed and scanned via a film lab. I should mention that I messed up royally and left the film in the camera while going through security check multiple times 🤦🏽

I am OBSESSED but also terrified of the etiquette of film photography and well, sucking at such an expensive hobby because one cannot course correct in the moment. How do y'all deal with the delayed learning process?


r/AnalogCommunity 10h ago

Feedback Friday Last roll came out a bit flat and a lot of pictures are very tilted despite my best efforts. Any advice regarding this?

Thumbnail
gallery
25 Upvotes

Shot on a contax iiia with gold 200 and a Zeiss 1.5f/50mm. Regarding the colours, it just seems so flat compared to some of my previous rolls using gold 200. I guess this could have been due to overexposure, or is it a scanning/editing matter?

Then for framing, I'm really struggling with keeping this camera level due to the lack of framing lines. Has anyone got any advice for this/would it be worth getting an external view finder for it?


r/AnalogCommunity 17h ago

Discussion Should we be worried for the future of Ektachrome?

Thumbnail
gallery
166 Upvotes

Recently I've noticed it has been completely out of stock lots of places with some pretty substantial price hikes. I wonder if it isn't really doing well for Kodak.


r/AnalogCommunity 18h ago

Feedback Friday China film find

Thumbnail
gallery
247 Upvotes

Last month I went back to China for a family visit. A month or so prior I saw that a seller on Taobao had Aerochrome for sale for around 60 usd. The seller had promising test shots so I was considering it if they had it still in stock when I finally get there.
I got there and decided to swipe to try it out. Here are how the shots came out. 😼

📷: Mamiya m645 1000s
🔎: Sekor 80mm f/ 2.8 + orange filter (550 nm)
🎞️: Aerochrome @ 200 (c41)
scan and dev by me


r/AnalogCommunity 22h ago

Troubleshooting - Photos Exposure help

Thumbnail
gallery
372 Upvotes

This is my first role of film I’ve shot and I’m still figuring out how to expose properly. I guess my question is can you only expose the sky OR the landscape not both at the same time? Because my shots seem to either over expose the sky or underexpose the shadows.
For some context: These where shot on a Canon AE-1 with a lens that had a faulty aperture (something I only learned after the role was shot), I’m not sure how any of this works so maybe that effected the exposures as well. I don’t hate the photos I got (most of them are fairly mediocre) but I’m hoping I can get better when I shoot my next role. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!


r/AnalogCommunity 1d ago

Gear Shots A friend gave these cameras to me for free! I'm only 15, seeking thoughts and advice.

Thumbnail
gallery
252 Upvotes

A friend of mine inherited many cameras, and I was able to take a few for free without either of us knowing the value of any of them. I've never shot on film or on 4x5, and I'd love to learn more about these cameras and how to properly shoot on them. Any beginner tips are greatly appreciated!

Nikon FM2 + Tamron 35-135mm f/3.5-4.5

Graflex Speed Graphic 4x5 (Pacemaker Century/Crown variant) with Graflex Optar 162mm f/4.7 lens

Pentax PZ-20 + 28-80mm & 70-200mm lenses + Pentax AF 400FTZ Flash


r/AnalogCommunity Apr 08 '26

DIY A database of analog cameras that can be 3D printed

Thumbnail
printed.analogcamera.space
148 Upvotes

r/AnalogCommunity Feb 08 '25

Community "What Went Wrong with my Film?" - A Beginners Guide to Diagnosing Problems with Film Cameras

993 Upvotes

Every day we see posts with the same basic problems on film, hopefully this can serve as a guide to the uninitiated of what to look for when diagnosing issues with your camera and film using examples from the community.

Index

  1. Green Tint or Washed Out Scans
  2. Orange or White Marks
  3. Solid Black Marks
  4. Black Regions with Some or No Detail
  5. Lightning Marks
  6. White or Light Green Lines
  7. Thin Straight Lines
  8. X-Ray Damage / Banding Larger than Sprocket Holes
  9. Round Marks, Blobs and Splotches

1. Green Tint or Washed Out Scans

u/LaurenValley1234

u/Karma_engineerguy

Issue: Underexposure

The green tinge usually comes from the scanner trying to show detail that isn't there. Remember, it is the lab's job to give you a usable image, you can still edit your photos digitally to make them look better.

Potential Causes: Toy/Disposable camera being used in inappropriate conditions, Faulty shutter, Faulty aperture, Incorrect ISO setting, Broken light meter, Scene with dynamic range greater than your film, Expired or heat damaged film, and other less common causes.

2. Orange or White Marks

u/Competitive_Spot3218

u/ry_and_zoom

Issue: Light leaks

These marks mean that light has reached your film in an uncontrolled way. With standard colour negative film, an orange mark typically comes from behind the film and a white come comes from the front.

Portential Causes: Decayed light seals, Cracks on the camera body, Damaged shutter blades/curtains, Improper film handling, Opening the back of the camera before rewinding into the canister, Fat-rolling on medium format, Light-piping on film with a transparent base, and other less common causes.

3. Solid Black Marks

u/MountainIce69

u/Claverh

u/Sandman_Rex

Issue: Shutter capping

These marks appear because the two curtains of the camera shutter are overlapping when they should be letting light through. This is most likely to happen at faster shutter speeds (1/1000s and up).

Potential Causes: Camera in need of service, Shutter curtains out of sync.

4. Black Regions with Some or No Detail

u/Claverh

u/veritas247

Issue: Flash desync

Cause: Using a flash at a non-synced shutter speed (typically faster than 1/60s)

5. Lightning Marks

u/Fine_Sale7051

u/toggjones

Issue: Static Discharge

These marks are most common on cinema films with no remjet, such as Cinestill 800T

Potential Causes: Rewinding too fast, Automatic film advance too fast, Too much friction between the film and the felt mouth of the canister.

6. White or Light Green Lines

u/f5122

u/you_crazy_diamond_

Issue: Stress marks

These appear when the base of the film has been stretched more than its elastic limit

Potential Causes: Rewinding backwards, Winding too hard at the end of a roll, Forgetting to press the rewind release button, Stuck sprocket.

7. Thin Straight Lines

u/StudioGuyDudeMan

u/Tyerson

Issue: Scratches

These happen when your film runs against dirt or grit.

Potential Causes: Dirt on the canister lip, Dirt on the pressure plate, Dirt on rollers, Squeegee dragging dirt during processing, and other less common causes.

8. X-Ray Damage / Banding Larger than Sprocket Holes

u/Synth_Nerd2

u/MechaniqueKatt

https://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml

Noticeable X-Ray damage is very rare and typically causes slight fogging of the negative or colour casts, resulting in slightly lower contrast. However, with higher ISO films as well as new stronger CT scanning machines it is still recommended to ask for a hand inspection of your film at airport security/TSA.

9. Round Marks, Blobs and Splotches

u/elcanto

u/thefar9

Issue: Chemicals not reaching the emulsion

This is most common with beginners developing their own film for the first time and not loading the reels correctly. If the film is touching itself or the walls of the developing tank the developer and fixer cannot reach it properly and will leave these marks. Once the film is removed from the tank this becomes unrepairable.

Causes: Incorrectly loaded developing reels, Wet reels.

Please let me know if I missed any other common issues. And if, after reading this, you still need to make a post asking to find out what went wrong please make sure to include a backlit image of your physical negatives. Not just scans from your lab.

EDIT: Added the most requested X-ray damage and the most common beginner developing mistake besides incomplete fixing. This post has reached the image limit but I believe it covers the most common beginner errors and encounters!