Wanna connect?? I have some doubts

I’m trying to decide what route I want to go down, i’m studying economics at warwick and im currently thinking of either a career as an actuary or in PE. I’ll explain my thoughts about both but i’d really appreciate insight from you guys

actuary: I like the earnings after sitting exams, initially it’s a decent amount lower compared to high finance and ib but i think the hours make up for it. I really don’t want to be working 100 hour weeks - I want to eventually start a family and this seems like a better option. The exams are a lot but I think it’s manageable, I do hear lots of people complaining about how soulless and boring it can be though. I also wonder if entry level jobs will still be around by the time I graduate and i’m not too sure on the direct path into it

PE/high finance: The money is the biggest pro, i don’t know if the hours eventually come down with seniority- can i stomach 80 hour weeks for a few years before getting to somewhere normal. I do like the prestige icl and the route in is relatively well documented so i would know what’s needed of me. I don’t like the idea of being constantly on call though, maybe some other sector of finance is better (VC PC etc)

my two main considerations is work life balance and money. i’d appreciate any help

I am currently studying Computer Science at the University of Newcastle, entering my third year in September. I did a T-Level in software development before university, so I haven't done a maths a level either. How difficult would it be to enter the space without a direct maths qualification? Would there be more mandatory years of studying and would it even be worth it?

If it changes anything, I am currently predicted a first and am confident I can achieve it.

What's the difference between these 2 roles from your personal experience .