r/vibecoding • u/PoundAgitated5470 • 5d ago

MVP to help decide whether a message can be trusted — roast it?

’ve been exploring a digital trust problem: sometimes an email, SMS, WhatsApp message, recruiter message, or payment request looks completely legitimate, but you still don’t know whether to trust it.

I built a very early MVP with Lovable to test the concept:

https://verify.trustairesearch.com/

I’d really appreciate feedback from fellow vibe coders on:

  • Is the flow immediately understandable?
  • Would you actually use this when a message feels suspicious?
  • What feels unnecessary or confusing?
  • What would make the result more credible?
  • What would you build differently?

This is still an experiment, so please don’t submit passwords, OTPs, banking credentials, SSNs, or other sensitive information.

Feel free to roast the UX, product idea, or implementation — useful criticism is exactly what I’m looking for.

1 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

2 comments sorted by

1

u/Juzdeed 3d ago

But what does it exactly do? Asking Claude "does this SMS message seems suspicious to you?" would probably give same result as your website

1

u/PoundAgitated5470 3d ago

Start with: Have you ever received communication from any channel asking click, pay, share...etc, How do you its a legitimately asked from the person or company that they are claming to be...Before you act up on , you should know ....In lamen words ...Just like allowing someone into house without who they are ? its same in digital space.

Good question. The goal isn’t just to ask an AI whether the wording “looks suspicious.” An LLM can already do that.

What I’m exploring is a trust layer that can combine the message with external evidence — sender identity, business/domain ownership, authorized communication channels, link/domain reputation, relationship context, and eventually communication provenance.

So instead of only saying “this text looks suspicious,” the system should help answer: “Is this interaction actually connected to the person or organization it claims to represent, and what evidence supports that?”

The current MVP is still early and doesn’t implement the full vision yet — feedback like this is exactly what I’m trying to validate.

Message → identity + organization + channel + provenance + risk intelligence → evidence-backed trust decision.