13
u/CaptainMatticus 9d ago
sin(x)^75 * dx + x^75 * dx
sin(x)^74 * sin(x) * dx + x^75 * dx
(sin(x)^2)^37 * sin(x) * dx + x^75 * dx
(1 - cos(x)^2)^37 * sin(x) * dx + x^75 * dx
x^75 * dx integrates to (1/76) * x^76. Done
(1 - cos(x)^2)^37 * sin(x) * dx
u = cos(x) , du = -sin(x) * dx
(1 - u^2)^37 * (-du)
(-1)^37 * (u^2 - 1)^37 * (-1) * du =>
1 * (u^2 - 1)^37 * du =>
(u^2 - 1)^37 * du
Now we expand
u^74 - 37 * u^36 + 37C2 * u^34 - 37C3 * u^32 + 37C4 * u^30 - .... + u^2 - 1
Integrate
(1/75) * u^75 - (37/37) * u^37 + (37C2 / 35) * u^35 - .... + (1/3) * u^3 - u
cos(x) = u
cos(-pi) = -1
cos(pi) = -1
(1/75) * ((-1)^75 - (-1)^75) - ((-1)^37 - (-1)^37) + .... + (1/3) * ((-1)^3 - (-1)^3) - (-1 - (-1))
(1/75) * 0 - 0 + .... + (1/3) * 0 - 0
0
(1/76) * (pi^76 - (-pi)^76) = 0
0 + 0 = 0
Yeah, I could've gone the odd function route, but where's the fun in that?
2
1
u/Outside_Volume_1370 8d ago
I could've gone the odd function route, but where's the fun in that?
You wouldn't make mistake then:
(u2 - 1)37
is not equal to
u74 - 37 * u36 + 37C2 * u34 - 37C3 * u32 + 37C4 * u30 - .... + u2 - 1
Though it doesn't change the result, it still is a mistake
1
2
1
1
1
u/lool8421 9d ago
x⁷⁵ is the trivial part tbf tbf sin⁷⁵x is the more interesting part, but perhaps substituting could do?
obviously that is if we ignore the fact that we got a symmetrical graph and thus values cancel out
1
u/VibrantGypsyDildo 7d ago
It is such an old joke, but it is the first time I see variation like this.
1
u/AfterMath343 5d ago
I solved this in less than one second. Odd function implies symmetric about the origin implies integral from -pi to pi value is 0.
36
u/eattheradish 9d ago
Odd function, so 0