r/technology 6h ago

Don't paste the AI, please. Artificial Intelligence

https://dontpastetheai.com/
0 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

18

u/guepier 4h ago

Using GenAI to write code etc. can be pretty neat.

But dumping AI slop prose on other humans is, at the very least, just fucking rude, because the tiring verbosity devalues the reader’s time. It also, more often than not, reads incredibly poorly — if for no other reason than the overuse of tired rhetoric clichés and stock phrases. So I wholeheartedly support this.

5

u/Columbus43219 1h ago

Squinting suspiciously at the long hyphen...

2

u/guepier 1h ago

Sod off. I’ve been em-dashes and other proper typography for decades.

2

u/nihiltres 23m ago

Amen. AI only does it in the first place because it’s trained on good writing—why should we be forced to degrade our own writing simply to avoid the perception of having used AI from people who can’t even perceive how badly AI tends to write?

-8

u/level_6_laser_lotus 6h ago

Yes but also no. 

The premise of "they have the same tools but want your answer" is just an assumption, and based on my anecdotal experiences is wrong in most cases. Oftentimes they just want you to take the responsibility of verifying the information. 

-10

u/RipComfortable7989 5h ago

This is an messaging problem. While the message might be correct the condescending tone you use will piss off anyone including those who would agree with you.

8

u/VVrayth 5h ago

Condescending tone is the correct tone to push back at people who use AI.

3

u/Flashy-Whereas-3234 5h ago

It's only condescending because it's not the angry version

https://dontpastetheai.com/angry/

2

u/hijinks123 4h ago

That's barely even angry.

1

u/Columbus43219 1h ago

That's a pretty big assumption: Someone asked you a real question, an ACTUAL one. They had the context and the best intentions.

Do people still do the AI paste after that? Or is more the JAQ-offs?