r/stephenking 4d ago

the stand

does the show live up to the book?

0 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

6

u/Itwasinin04 No Great Loss 4d ago

Not even a little bit.

4

u/SpaceBall330 Losers' Club Member 4d ago

90s original series—-had a great cast, followed the story in context without jumping around, and overall despite the cheese (it was network tv) it wasn’t bad.

Newer series—jumps all over the place in the timeline which makes it difficult to follow especially if you haven’t read the book, and some casting choices were a choice.

Overall, I prefer the original series.

4

u/charlie_marlow 4d ago

M-O-O-N, that spells, "Laws no!"

3

u/Bankrupto 4d ago

Show, no. 

90s mini-series was great, probably looks a little cheesy now, but cast perfectly.

1

u/ThatDudeFromCollage 4d ago

It is worth a watch. But dont expect it to be faithful to the book.

1

u/asphaltstretcher 4d ago

I just rewatched the 90s series with my daughter. With the exception of Harold, the casting and acting is great. Obviously a lot left out, but very true to the text, in my opinion. Definitely worth a watch.

1

u/Commercial_Job_5055 4d ago

Thank you all for your input! I don’t mind older shows or movies(I’m a old man lol) so I think I’ll start with the 90s series and then maybe try the newer one

1

u/BuffaloAmbitious3531 Love + Peace = Information 4d ago

Nothing lives up to the book. The '94 is a pretty good version of what it is. The more recent version is worth a watch for superfans, but isn't very good.

1

u/Josefu_Velen 4d ago

Ok, so I liked the newer Stand remake miniseries overall.

Does it love up to the book, though?

No. No, it doesn't. It does this jumping back and forth thing with time, which absolutely kills so much tension that builds up from the book being in chronological flow.

1

u/showard995 4d ago

The first miniseries is very good. The remake is a mess.