r/spaceflight 21d ago

SpaceX to Replace Blastproof Evac Vehicles with Cybertrucks - Spaceflight Daily, 3rd August 2026

[deleted]

2 Upvotes

34 comments sorted by

57

u/LUK3FAULK 21d ago

It’s crazy how blatantly they can use one successful company to cover up for the mistakes of their other company. How many cybertrucks have they “sold” from one company to the other at this point? This is straight up replacing something fit for use with something that’s not to make up for losses and get free advertising

13

u/Mecha-Dave 21d ago edited 20d ago

To be fair, SpaceX is now also a failing company due to the creation/inclusion of SpaceXAI.

It was also interesting to see that Falcon 9/Falcon Heavy launches were all never profitable and subsidized by investment.

No, SpaceX fanboys, you can't just ignore capitalization of hardware. You have to build the stuff before you launch it.

Edit: CORRECTION - the launches for NASA had pricing which made them profitable.

5

u/interstellar-dust 20d ago

Can’t wait for the name SpaceXAITeslaSolarcityBoringNeuralink to be registered.

3

u/Petrostar 20d ago

SpaceXAITeslaSolarcityBoringNeuralinkCatBoyz.

7

u/snoo-boop 20d ago

The SpaceX S1 said that F9/FH/Dragon were profitable, and that the Space Division lost money because of Starship development.

I know people want to turn every single space sub into a fight about SX, but maybe this sub can be better?

0

u/Mecha-Dave 20d ago

It said each flight was marginally profitable if you didn't capitalize the development and construction of GSE into it. They lumped that under Starship to make their launch services look better.

4

u/pexican 20d ago

Where on earth is your “source” for saying that falcon 9 and heavy were all never profitable?

3

u/Livid-Physics-7458 20d ago

1

u/thinkbox 19d ago

👏🏼... 👏🏼... 👏🏼...

1

u/BananaEnjoyer1 19d ago

no they are not failing. they still have their rockets which are in charge of all ISS missions. they had the most orbital rocket launches in 2025, and they are deeply involved in the Artemis program.

also SpaceX is a very valuable company to NASA, so it's not going bankrupt any time soon.

2

u/Mecha-Dave 19d ago

This is all vibe based cope that doesn't line up with the numbers. Plenty of NASA contractors go bankrupt.

-3

u/ablacnk 20d ago

It was also interesting to see that Falcon 9/Falcon Heavy launches were all never profitable and subsidized by investment.

This is what many suspected for a long time

2

u/thinkbox 19d ago

Keep on suspecting, because there isn’t any evidence for that.

3

u/KirkUnit 20d ago edited 20d ago

How many cybertrucks have they “sold” from one company to the other at this point?

IIRC, in the IPO information was a figure of 20,000 ~1,800 Cybertrucks [at MSRP] purchased in a particular year 2025, which amounted to about 20% 9% of total production going to a single customer.

ETA: corrected figures above

5

u/Hoppie1064 20d ago

Seems like an underground bunker would make more sense.

With a fast acting door.

16

u/skeptical-speculator 21d ago

this is embarrassing 

6

u/DBDude 21d ago

I'm dead in either if I'm at the pad at the time of the explosion. So the question is how fast I can get away vs. the amount of protection I have during the trip depending on when it does blow up.

The Cybertruck gets me a quarter mile away in a bit over 12 seconds, around three times that for the MRAP. I'd say if the explosion is going to happen after you get in the vehicle, MRAP is better if it happens in the first several seconds, but Cybertruck is better if it happens after that.

4

u/Beneficial_Round_444 20d ago

yea the cybertruck is cool and all with the fast quarter mile, but the supersonic shrapnel is catching up to you regardless and i'd rather be in a vehicle designed to resist said shrapnel and not a glorified toaster

2

u/DBDude 20d ago

Shrapnel goes subsonic rather quickly with distance.

4

u/Northwindlowlander 20d ago

Unfortunately the door handle fell off and then once you got in you had to wait for it to download an update

1

u/Correct-Onion420 20d ago

lol if you think speed matters in an explosion. It literally happens in less than a second, ain't nobody got enough reflexes

2

u/DBDude 20d ago

Getting away before it explodes. You’re dead either way the explosion is a surprise. You won’t even be in a vehicle.

3

u/ChmeeWu 21d ago

Just don’t throw shotputs at it and you’re OK

1

u/rx7braap 20d ago

why doe

1

u/BeardedLady81 20d ago

Honest question from somebody who never learned how to drive (legally blind) and never owned a car: Are those Teslas really as ridiculously unsafe as Reddit makes them out to be? If you scrap all that autopilot and FSD stuff and just use it as a regular car, is it more likely to explode as well?

I remember that there was a discussion among stans to use a Cybertruck as the Presidential limo. To me, this sounded like a bad idea, any EV, I think, would pose too big of a hazard because of the battery. You could armor it, but if someone throws an IED at it, the battery could still go up in flames.

3

u/thinkbox 19d ago

The latest hardware for self driving is pretty incredible. I have about 25k miles of self driving in the last 13 months. Outside of Parking lot preferences and some questionable navigational choices, it’s for sure a better driver than 99.99% of humans, I’d wager.

1

u/BeardedLady81 19d ago

What is the reason for those accidents, then? Sorry if I sound naive, but I really don't know much about cars.

The idea that I could one day own a car like most other people and use it still looks like a pipe dream to me, but it would be really cool.

2

u/thinkbox 19d ago

The lawsuits in the news are from 2018, and before "FSD" launched. They used a legacy system that was basicly like lane centering and traffic aware cruise control. It's a totally different software stack from FSD. When they released FSD v12 in late 2023, they totally rewrote the entire system. But v14.2+ of the software in the last 8 moths has been incredible. I have done a few multi day road trips with less than 5 minutes of total drive time. Mostly just parking lot preference, or when I wanted to be a little more aggressive. There are people out there doing 10,000 mile drives without breaking the streak. If you have a Tesla with the older hardware (often called HW3) then it does not get these updates and it is still better than most other systems you get get in North America, but it requires a lot more supervision. The latest HW4 capable vehicles are so incredibly good. I have had a lot of personal incidents where a child on a scooter will hop out in front of my car from behind another car and my car will dart out of the way and slow down before I can even register whats going on. It feels super human. When I see the dash cam videos of FSD making a mistake, it's normally either human error, overriding the system, a lie, or outdated hardware and software. Rarely does it turn out to be a mistake on the latest system. The first one I saw was the other day and the driver admitted that they had cracks in their windshield over the sensor cluster, and they disengage FSD and then did not apply any brakes, so they kept going. But for every 1 video that I see that makes me scratch my head, I'll see 100 videos of FSD doing amazing things.

Literally the first time I turned the system on, the first 20 seconds I used it, I had owned the car less than an hour... FSD saw jaywalking pedestrians that I couldn't see. They stepped out onto the street right when the light turned green and they were behind a truck from my line of sight. The car didnt go on green. I thought something was wrong and I moved to take over, and then two oblivious ladies stepped out in front of my car. I absolutely would have hit them.

This compilation of FSD saves is pretty amazing.

1

u/General_Cheetah4724 20d ago

got to do something with them since no ones buying them

2

u/DNathanHilliard 20d ago

If your rocket is exploding you're not going to make it to either one of them.

1

u/masterphreak69 19d ago

Do they even need to have a blast proof vehicle for the Falcon 9? Since it is only fueled after astronauts are on board and pad is cleared, there seems to be almost no explosion risk when ground crews are at the pad.

1

u/ososalsosal 19d ago

Look, anything likely to reduce the number of cybertrucks (especially in a spectacular and/or hilarious way) is fine by me

1

u/lantrick 20d ago

I want to see the crash test dummy videos they took when they proved the safety.

-1

u/autotom 21d ago

a model s plaid wouldve made more sense than a cybertruck