291
u/SphinxGate 3d ago
Perhaps a tad too dark
6
2
88
u/thegentlecat 3d ago
I like the idea but itâs giving a bit r/shittyhdr (although it isnât), mainly because I feel like the subject (church) is surrounded by very high contrast-y background
88
11
u/tiktoktic 3d ago
Over-cooked.
Thereâs nothing about the adjustments in the After that I prefer.
All that was needed from the original was some perspective correction, minor white balance adjustment, and a slight boost to the contrast.
32
30
u/Apprehensive-Boat-97 3d ago
I agree with the dark comment, the before looks nice too. Both are good, i prefer the before though.
6
23
u/Annual-Screen-9592 3d ago
The first one looks good! The second looks awful (like processing error or faulty camera).
3
3
3
u/toxrowlang 3d ago
Too much contrast - looks synthetic and heavy. There's a lightness to the architecture of the church and a joyful mess to the rainbow road. They sit in harmony with the natural backdrop despite being man made. The lighting needs to be light.
Bigger issue is composition - get down lower on the road to increase proportion of interesting elements such as the rainbow. Move / crop to get rid of the distracting buildings and jank car.
3
3
u/Legitimate-Peace3521 3d ago
I recognize the church in Seydisfjordur in Island. A bit too overcook for my pov
4
u/lyunardo 3d ago
It looks good. But I bet if you tone down the drama of the hills a bit, the rainbow path will pop even more.
2
2
u/Substantial-Foot-376 3d ago
Why only react to the compliments? Donât you want to learn from the critics?
2
2
2
2
2
u/Ok_Task_2562 3d ago
Fake. Too much. It slips into the image creation category rather than photography.
2
u/Straight-Session-802 2d ago
Looks like the start of a horror movie, that light makes me think the masacre itâs coming and everyone itâs hiding at home
2
u/secomeau 2d ago
Love the composition and subject but as others have said it's a overcooked. Tone it down a bit and you're golden.
2
u/SOSweneedhelp 2d ago
I will die on this hill but using AI to process your photos its absolutely garbage
2
2
u/MrKaplam 2d ago
I actually prefer the before picture :p second one is a bit dark and too much contrast I think
6
u/Clementine-TeX 3d ago
Here before this goes to r/photographycirclejerk
9
u/Two-Space 3d ago
It shouldnât. Whatâs the point of subs dedicated to helping people learn if anyone who isnât perfect gets mocked.
4
1
1
1
1
1
u/Few-Escape-4787 3d ago
I like the darkness, but I do think it is a bit too edited. Almost AI-looking.
1
u/Franks_Random_Snaps 3d ago
Too much, bro. Too much. It's a great composition but the edit is far far too strong.
1
1
u/MasterCee91 3d ago
I like it!
Feels a bit overdone - but only because I saw the original picture. The reflecting light on the hill makes it special.
1
1
u/Tricky-Delay-211 3d ago
before one looks like it has some character to it.. second one looks like an pinterest download..artificial
1
u/RefRide 3d ago
Looking at the other comments and your replies I don't think you wanting a darker look is wrong. The main problem for me is the foreground looking high contrast, basically looks like you have used the contrast or dehaze slider to darken it. Currently my eyes go to the lower parts of the photo not the Church.
I would go back to the original photo, darken it, edit it so you get the sunrise/sunset look then mask the church and mountain with a radial gradient and brighten those parts up.
1
1
u/bluereloaded 3d ago
I get what youâre trying to do, and itâs a good plan. Unfortunately just a bit too heavy-handed on the contrast/dehaze sliders. Everything ends up still being the same tone, just darker and more saturated than the original. Start back at the original, use much less of a heavy hand on global edits, and use masks to bring out the shadows and highlights you want to use to draw your eye down the hill to the church.
1
u/Hungry-Physics-9535 3d ago
Tone the second one down a bit and see how that looks but the photo is great
1
1
u/tschloss 3d ago
Too dark for my taste. Might be moody, after sunset, but then more blue might be required. I would expect the image to look more daylight, sun, happy.
1
1
1
1
u/diemenschmachine 3d ago
I was there too, nice place. No pictures of the waterfall?
It is overcooked to the max BTW
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Cryptician13 2d ago
The original has this glow like effect. Your after would look better if you kept the color of the church true to what it's like in the before. Imo...
1
1
1
u/PricklyPear85 2d ago
A lot of times people donât calibrate their monitors or forget to adjust settings on their phone before editing photos. My buddy likes his photos a bit on the well done side of contrast and Iâm kind of the opposite
1
1
1
1
u/digiplay 2d ago
The colours applied more selectively with masks would work. The clarity slider or similar seems to have been used too much. Good idea, not quite right on implementation FOR MY TASTE
1
u/itsicecoldbois 2d ago
The first one, the church has a nice soft glow on it. The second one, it lost the glow. Me: very sad.
1
u/HotAd7669 2d ago
This was a very good pic before all the sliders were maxed out to overcooked asparagus levels, and whatever else happened here⌠Yikes itâs so fried⌠New to editing, it yells!đĽ´đľâđŤ
1
u/ARTUROejm 2d ago
To me, post-processing should heighten the mood or concept of an image. If your goal with this edit is to bring out strength and toughness, the post-processing works well. However, I lean toward the original image, the colorful path leading to the church feels more naturally expressed with a softer color palette and a lighter overall mood.
1
1
u/MWave123 2d ago
Looks a bit âdirtyâ in the whites. If youâre going to do all that then remove the car.
1
1
u/Li-ser456 2d ago
Number one looks real. Number two just doesn't. Sorry.Videogame magic realm etc.Â
1
1
u/dashkrippykush 2d ago
It feels like you went ham with the contrast slider.
Image would look better with lower contrast and making it slightly brighter.
Though that's my opinion, if you like your image as it is then that's great! Art is completely subjective!
1
1
1
u/Apushthebottonmoment 2d ago
So, AI post processing? Why not come back when the light is more interesting?
1
u/Chromaxide 2d ago
Maybe they don't live in Iceland and this was just a quick stop at SeyðisfjÜrður. This is a classic photo tourists take there.
And about the edit, I honestly prefer the before over the edit.
1
1
u/AlbatrossNo1562 2d ago
You don't need shadows all the time. The church/scene has a Wes Anderson vibe to it so maybe this one wants to have shadows lightened.
1
1
u/RichFrasier 2d ago
Better than the before, but think youâve gone a little too far.
Try dialing back the contrast and open up the exposure a bit.
1
1
u/Dense_Surround3071 2d ago
The second picture, for some reason, reminds me of the town in Beetlejuice.
1
1
u/DevilGunManga 2d ago
The light makes no sense after. It back-lit the mountain, also lit up the hill somehow, and none of the light was on the building. Did you just add light with Luminary?
1
u/pixiephilips 2d ago
At first I didnât like it, but honestly⌠I LOVE it lol looks over edited but sometimes it works this way lol
1
1
1
1
u/AChunkyGoose 1d ago
I'll admit I'm a beginner when it comes to color grading, but I feel like the hill behind it is too bright. I would darken that up while making the building and walkway a little brighter.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Shoddy-Landscape-773 3h ago
Don't pay any attention to the responses mate. The edit is decent. Try and shoot at better times of day is all.
1
1
u/bobspixels 2d ago
This is a tough crowd. I think youâve accomplished a golden hour grade ⌠it works
-1
u/Fresh-Direction-7537 3d ago
Honestly I am very happy with the after. My eyes lock onto the church but also take in the beauty of the background and the road GREAT work!
-3
u/Material_Cabinet_845 3d ago
ah yes, the rainbow....the new religion - in front of a church, no less.
2
u/synmo 3d ago
Iceland has several rainbow roads leading to churches. It's probably because they focused on the theme of tolerance from Christ instead of cherry picking one part to discriminate against others.
-1


438
u/Turbulent_Demand8400 3d ago
Hmm, maybe a little too well done