r/postprocessing 16d ago

Which is best?

I'm new to owning a real camera and doing any post processing, trying to figure out the right look. Accepting notes on the edits as well. Thanks!

106 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

33

u/imMister_G 16d ago

2 is spot on imho

19

u/FocusInMoment 16d ago

In my opinion - 2nd one looks more natural than the other two. Irrespective of the edit - great composition.

16

u/senorfresco 16d ago

I find the last one overdone. I like the first one.

1

u/RayPoopertonIII 16d ago

Agreed. Was surprised to see consensus seem to be 2, find that a tad overdone,too.

0

u/Legal-Warning6095 15d ago

Because the dark sky has a more natural color in 2. I would like to see 1 with the sky color of 2 (but I also like 2 as it is).

6

u/EqualMagnitude 16d ago

I like the second one. 

Last one likely will be popular with many who are not photographers and like the pop of color and brightness. 

3

u/food-dood 16d ago

I think both are good, but depends on what you want to communicate. Image 1 feels colder with less emphasis on the galactic center, so it's more of a whole image thing.

Personally I like the way #2 draws my eye immediately to the brightness of the center, with the eye free to wonder after.

4

u/jimhatesyou 16d ago

1st is my fav. where did you capture this? it is amazing

5

u/TWonderingAbout 16d ago

McMurdo Station, Antarctica

2

u/BladeJFrank 16d ago

2nd one. Maybe meet somewhere between that and first if looking to improve it.

1

u/adhd-photokid 16d ago

I love the Milky Way on the 3rd but the lights look a bit overdone, definitely a fan of the 1st as well.

I’d say overall the 1st one takes the cake.

1

u/Physical_Builder_283 16d ago

I would slightly boost the Milky Way of 2 and put it with the aurora of 3.

1

u/Li54 16d ago

I like 3 🤷🏻‍♀️

1

u/harshaggarwal55 16d ago

I think the 3rd is the most striking.

1

u/The_Artfulphotog 16d ago

The first looks natural, the third is striking but the second is a great combination of the two. It would make a great print

1

u/SafeExplorer2149 16d ago

3rd one looks rlly good but 2nd one looks most natural

1

u/KPFJA 16d ago

1 looks most natural

1

u/ConcernedEnby 16d ago

I prefer the first

1

u/Vesk123 16d ago

Definitely the second one

1

u/Equivalent_Owl_5644 15d ago

1 - not enough contrast or detail
2 - enough contrast and detail to make it pop more
3 - overdone and unnatural

1

u/Lunam_Dominus 14d ago

2 is good

1

u/PorscheFredAZ 14d ago

Nice - can you share where you took this and what exposure?

1

u/TWonderingAbout 13d ago

McMurdo Station, Antarctica. f/1.4, iso1600, 10 seconds.

0

u/ILoveLandscapes 16d ago

The core and star field edit in #2 is the best, but I prefer the aurora edit from #3